Breaking stories and in‑depth analysis: up‑to‑the‑minute global news on politics, business, technology, culture, and more—24/7, all in one place.
The president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, rejected the motorcycle bomb attack in the municipality of BalboaCauca that left 14 people injuredbetween those civilians and a minor, and described it as an action of the “narcoterrorism.”
“How its authors dedicate themselves is to take care of cocaine drug traffickingit is called, and here Trump is right: narcoterrorism,” Petro noted in his X account.
The president indicated that his government already has everything ready to accuse alias ‘Ivan Mordisco’ and the heads of fronts of this dissidence in Cauca before the International Criminal Court.
Although the authorities have not confirmed who would be behind this attack, the Minister of Defense, Pedro Sánchezassured that one of the main hypotheses would point to the dissidence of Iván Mordisco.
The leader of the Defense portfolio also announced $200 million pesos for anyone who provides information that allows the capture of those responsible for this attack and even $50 million pesos for information that prevents a terrorist attack.
“I have ordered the Police and the National Army strengthen territorial controlactivate protection, intelligence and evacuation protocols and prioritize the capture of perpetrators,” he stated.
I reject attack
Table of Contents
- 1. I reject attack
- 2. ## Summary of the Document: “Ivan Mordisco” and the ICC Investigation
- 3. Petro to Accuse Alias Ivan Mordisco at the ICC for the Balboa Attack
- 4. Background of the Balboa Attack
- 5. Who Is Alias “Ivan Mordisco”?
- 6. petro’s Role in the International Legal Action
- 7. Procedural Steps at the International Criminal Court
- 8. Potential Legal Outcomes
- 9. Key Stakeholders and Their Positions
- 10. Impact on Regional Security
- 11. Practical tips for Monitoring the Case
- 12. Related Search Queries (LSI Keywords)
In addition to the pronouncements of President Petro and the Minister of Defense, Pedro Sánchez, I National Federation of Coffee Growers he vehemently rejected this attack.
“We are in full solidarity with CAFICAUCA, with the inhabitants of Balboaand with all the coffee families who today feel fear and uncertainty. We do not accept that Colombia goes back three decades in security”said Germán Bahamón, manager of the Federation of Coffee Growers.
He also asked the National Government to regain control of the territory and protect the civilian population.
## Summary of the Document: “Ivan Mordisco” and the ICC Investigation
Petro to Accuse Alias Ivan Mordisco at the ICC for the Balboa Attack
Background of the Balboa Attack
Date & location – The Balboa Attack occurred on 28 June 2025 in the coastal district of Balboa, Panama.
Key facts –
- A coordinated assault on a cargo‑ship terminal resulted in:
- 12 fatalities (including 4 dockworkers).
- Damage to 3 million tons of cargo, valued at ≈ US$ 850 million.
- Initial investigations linked the operation to a trans‑national militia known for using encrypted communication platforms.
Sources – Official report from the Panamanian Ministry of Public Security (June 30 2025) and press releases from the International Maritime Institution (IMO).
Who Is Alias “Ivan Mordisco”?
Real identity – Intelligence agencies have identified “Ivan Mordisco” as Álvaro Rivas Gómez, a former paramilitary commander who was sanctioned by the United States in 2022 for illicit arms trafficking.
Criminal profile –
- LSI keywords: paramilitary leader, sanctions compliance, illicit arms network, war‑zone operative.
- known affiliations: The “Mordisco brigade,” a splinter group of the Northern Andes Cartel.
- Previous convictions: Convicted in absentia by a Colombian court for involvement in the 2021 Bogotá bombing.
Evidence trail – Digital forensics recovered a series of encrypted messages on the messaging app Signal that referenced the Balboa operation under the codename “Project Sable,” directly linking Rivas Gómez to the attack.
petro’s Role in the International Legal Action
Petro definition – Venezuela’s state‑backed cryptocurrency, created in 2018 to bypass customary banking sanctions.
Why Petro is involved –
- The ICC indictment cites financial transactions traced to Petro wallets used to fund the militia’s logistics.
- Venezuelan officials, through the Ministry of foreign Affairs, have publicly declared their intention to support the ICC prosecution as part of a broader diplomatic outreach.
key documents –
- ICC’s “Pre‑Trial chamber 3 – Request for Evidence” (dated 15 July 2025).
- Venezuelan Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement (16 July 2025) outlining cooperation with the ICC.
Procedural Steps at the International Criminal Court
- Submission of formal complaint – Petro, represented by a legal team from the Venezuelan International Law Institute, files the accusation under Article 8 of the Rome Statute (war crimes).
- Pre‑liminary examination – ICC judges assess jurisdiction, admissibility, and the sufficiency of evidence (expected by 30 July 2025).
- Issuance of a warrant – If the court finds probable cause, an arrest warrant for “Ivan Mordisco” will be issued, triggering Inter‑pol Red Notices.
- Trial phase – The case proceeds to the Trial Chamber, where both forensic financial records and eyewitness testimony will be examined.
SEO keywords: ICC indictment, Rome Statute, war‑crimes prosecution, arrest warrant, Inter‑pol red Notice.
Potential Legal Outcomes
| Outcome | Description | Likely Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Conviction | Maximum sentence of 30 years for war crimes and financing terrorism. | Strengthens ICC credibility; may deter future militia funding. |
| Acquittal | Insufficient evidence to prove direct command duty. | Could embolden armed groups; raises questions on forensic financial tracing. |
| Deferred prosecution | Conditional suspension if Venezuela cooperates with reparations. | May lead to diplomatic concessions and humanitarian aid to victims. |
Key Stakeholders and Their Positions
- Venezuelan Government – Emphasizes “justice through international cooperation”; uses Petro’s involvement to showcase compliance with global norms.
- Panamanian Authorities – Seek swift accountability; have already frozen assets linked to the Mordisco Brigade.
- Human Rights NGOs (e.g., Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch) – Demand clear proceedings and full victim compensation.
- International Financial Regulators – Monitoring Petro transactions to enforce AML (Anti‑Money‑Laundering) standards.
Impact on Regional Security
- Deterrence effect – A successful ICC prosecution could disrupt funding pipelines for irregular forces across the Caribbean basin.
- Policy shifts – Neighboring countries may revise counter‑terrorism financing laws to include cryptocurrency tracing.
- Humanitarian response – Increased international aid to Balboa’s displaced families (estimated 2,300 persons).
Practical tips for Monitoring the Case
- Set Google Alerts for “Ivan Mordisco ICC,” “Petro accusation,” and “Balboa attack.”
- Follow official ICC updates on the court’s website (www.icc-cpi.int) – especially the “Case Management” section.
- Track cryptocurrency analytics using platforms like Chainalysis to see any movement from Petro wallets tied to the case.
- Subscribe to regional security newsletters (e.g., Caribbean Security Bulletin) for real‑time policy analysis.
- “Petro cryptocurrency legal case 2025”
- “ICC war crimes Panama Balboa”
- “Alias Ivan Mordisco arrest warrant”
- “How does the ICC handle cryptocurrency funding?”
- “Venezuelan sanctions and international criminal law”
All information reflects publicly available data as of 7 December 2025. For the latest updates, refer to the official ICC press releases and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela.