News

2023-07-04 23:59:00

A young merchant was the victim this Tuesday followingnoon of a robbery by a criminal, but following the fact decided to run him and hold him until police officers arrived half an hour later.

The surprising thing regarding the case, which occurred on the corner of Montevideo and Buenos Aires, is that the young rrecognized the criminal, because the day before he stole a bag for 10 thousand pesos in the same business.

“Today he took a similar amount, and we managed to prevent the same thing from happening. 24 hours ago he did the same thing, and it’s actually the third time. The whole neighborhood already knows him, and he continues to do the same thing,” said the young merchant to Mobile telenoche (Three).

Asked regarding the moment of arrest, he explained: “I kept him from being hit by some neighbors, because if he didn’t run away and tomorrow he’ll rob us once more. I hope it’s useful for something, but I have my doubts that it won’t happen once more.” .

Another neighbor later commented: “I don’t know if it’s a liberated area, or why it happens that we get robbed every day. We’re really tired of having to put up with these robberies. I feel squeezed, outraged, I can’t stand that these things happen in a so beautiful city In this corner they broke the window three times and stole electronic things. A disaster”.

1688525047
#merchant #starred #civil #arrest #robbed #times #subject

2023-07-05 01:55:00

We haven’t seen this kind of federal investment in the economy since the days of FDR

I recently traveled from Baltimore, where my mother grew up, to Portland, Maine, where my father grew up. It’s easy for many people to see the differences between one of the blackest cities in America and one of the whitest states in the country.

What always strikes me is what unites the two places: the pain they felt as a result of the decline of American industry in the 50 years of my life.

My father’s family used to operate woolen mills in New England. Those factories no longer exist, as do 63,000 other factories across America that have closed since the adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) three decades ago.

As a result, millions of American families of all colors have been locked in a downward spiral of economic mobility for too long, driven by the greed of multinational corporations and facilitated for decades by government policies like NAFTA.

Partly because of the pandemic and partly because of the tight cushion that remains before our climate is beyond repair, we are at a time when we can turn the tide. Over the past three years, we have committed as a nation to unprecedented private and public investment in clean energy and infrastructure in a way that promises to reverse the destructive trajectory of dreams.

We are at a time when we can finally move from an economy defined by consumption to one defined by workers who make and use things they can be proud of once more, from electric school buses to solar panels.

You would think that this opportunity would be welcomed by all. But self-interested corporations like Big Oil and Big Gas are hoarding billions in historic profits, and the politicians they back are doing all they can to backtrack on commitments made since 2021. They even stifled the recent debate over a US default on its loans to advance their opposition.

It’s a strange political game. A CBS News poll released in April found that more than half of Americans want the climate crisis solved now, and more than two-thirds want it solved within a few years.

This includes 44% of Republicans. Given that every Republican in Congress voted once morest the clean energy package last year, this large plurality is significant. It’s also a sign that many GOP leaders in Washington are increasingly out of step with their own constituents and districts.

When the Climate Power group looked at the nearly 200 clean energy projects launched since Congress and the president approved the federal spending package last summer, nearly six in 10 of them are in districts. represented by Republicans who voted once morest the package. These projects mean at least 77,000 new jobs for electricians, mechanics, technicians, support staff and others.

Not since the days of FDR have we seen this kind of national investment. At the time, building American industry was essential to winning a war once morest genocide across Europe. Today, our investment in diverting our economy from destruction and into good jobs in a cleaner economy that sustains our planet is a fight to protect all humanity.

1688523423
#Good #jobs #cleaner #economy

2023-07-04 20:13:55

It was complicated, but now the traffic light parties are in a hurry: The Building Energy Act (GEG) – colloquially known as the Heating Act – should be decided this Friday. Today, the traffic light factions specified the planned funding for the gradual switch to more climate-friendly heating systems. What subsidies can citizens expect when exchanging their old heating system for a new one?

Up to 30,000 euros eligible investment costs

The traffic light fractions imagine it like this: if the owner of a single-family home installs climate-friendly heating, up to 30,000 euros of the total bill can be subsidised. And at most 70 percent. This means that the state pays a maximum of 21,000 euros for a heating conversion. This emerges from the draft for a motion for a resolution on the GEG, which is available to the ARD capital studio. For heating systems that can be operated with hydrogen in the future, only the additional costs for the “H2 readiness” of the system are eligible.

According to the application, the maximum eligible costs for apartment buildings should be EUR 30,000 for the first residential unit, EUR 10,000 each for the second to sixth residential units, and EUR 3,000 each for the seventh residential unit. The background is that multi-family houses usually have central heating – so no individual systems are necessary for each apartment.

In the case of homeowners’ associations, the regulation should be applied accordingly, in the case of non-residential buildings, similar limits should apply depending on the number of square meters. Capping the subsidy is also intended to prevent possible price usury for new heating systems. If the state were to pay a percentage of the total bill without a limit, heating contractors would possibly charge higher bills.

Landlords and non-profit organizations receive basic funding

SPD parliamentary group deputy Achim Post said: “Especially citizens with small and medium-sized incomes, we give a lot of support when replacing the heating system – with a subsidy of up to 70 percent.” Landlords, non-profit organizations and municipalities would also be supported with basic funding.

“Combustion heaters for gas and oil are still not being subsidised,” said Greens Vice-Chairman Andreas Audretsch. “It’s regarding social promotion of the switch to climate-friendly heating systems.” The application is to be decided by the Bundestag on Friday with the Building Energy Act.

The federal government is thus given guidelines for funding. She is asked to submit the funding concept to the Budget Committee of the Bundestag by September 30th.

What are the core points of the Building Energy Act?

The controversial building energy law stipulates that from January 1, 2024, only heating systems that are operated with at least 65 percent renewable energies should be installed in new buildings. For existing buildings, there should initially be no obligation for a new heating system, but various options.

However, none of them should encroach on private property or include bans, which the FDP pushed through in the last few meters. However, it has long been the case that fossil heating systems that have not been renewed for over 30 years must be replaced. It should stay with this rule.

If the old gas or oil heating system is irreparably broken, then a transition phase begins, at the end of which a new, non-fossil heating system should be installed. At least that’s what the law says. Until then, the classic systems can also be installed and operated temporarily, but following that they must finally be replaced with an energy-efficient heating method. But there should be one exception: If the newly installed heater is operated with gas, but can also be connected to hydrogen lines (“H2 ready”), it can remain in there permanently.

All of this should only apply to the heating exchange in the existing building when there is a municipal heating plan that also shows whether a connection to district heating or a hydrogen network will be possible. These heating plans should be available throughout Germany by mid-2028 at the latest.

FDP warns once morest compulsory heat pumps through the back door

FDP parliamentary group leader Lukas Köhler emphasized that people might decide for themselves as part of municipal heating planning whether they would like to install a gas heating system that can be converted to hydrogen, a wood heating system or a heat pump. He warned once morest far-reaching European requirements. In their application, the traffic light groups call on the federal government to “attempt a harmonization of relevant EU legal acts along the Building Energy Act at European level”.

The background is, among other things, an update of an EU law on specifications for the efficiency of new heating devices, which according to the draft might apply from 2029. Heaters should therefore have an efficiency of at least 115 percent. Critics see it as a heat pump requirement through the back door.

Söder continues once morest the heating law

Bavaria’s Prime Minister and CSU party leader Markus Söder wants to continue to campaign once morest the heating law. “I’ll say it for the Union: We would completely revise this law following the next federal election and also abolish it once more,” said Söder on the ARD talk show “maischberger”. Söder once more criticized the federal government’s schedule: “Pushing it through the Bundestag now, putting pressure on the Bundesrat with an extension of the deadline, I think is fundamentally the wrong way.” That is why the CSU will vote once morest the law.

With information from dpa and reuters

1688522710
#Traffic #light #details #heating #exchange #promoted

2023-07-04 21:22:56

On Tuesday, the Saudi Press Agency quoted a source in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as saying that the ownership of the natural resources in the “divided submerged area”, including the entire Durra field, is joint ownership between the Kingdom and the State of Kuwait only.

The agency added that Saudi Arabia “renews its previous calls for the Iranian side to start negotiations to demarcate the eastern border of the submerged area divided between the Kingdom and Kuwait as one negotiating party once morest the Iranian side, in accordance with the provisions of international law.”

On Monday, Kuwait, in turn, renewed its call on Iran to resume talks on demarcating maritime borders, following Tehran announced its readiness to start exploration in a disputed gas field in the Gulf waters rich in natural resources.

Kuwait insists that it has “exclusive rights” to the offshore field with Saudi Arabia, and the two countries agreed to develop it jointly last year.

The field, known in Iran as “Arsh” and in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia as “Al-Durra”, Tehran says is located within its exclusive economic zone, in a dispute that began several decades ago.

The Kuwaiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that “Kuwait and Saudi Arabia alone have exclusive rights to the natural wealth in the Al-Durra field.”

The statement quoted an official source in the Kuwaiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs as saying, “The State of Kuwait renews its call to the Iranian side to start negotiations on the demarcation of the maritime borders between the Kuwaiti and Saudi sides as one negotiating party in exchange for the Iranian side.”

Last year, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement to develop the field, despite objections from Tehran, which described the deal as “illegal”.

Last week, the executive director of the National Iranian Oil Company, Mohsen Khajesteh Mehr, said, “We are completely ready to start drilling operations in the Arash field,” according to what was reported by Iran’s Fars news agency.

He continued, “We have approved large financial resources to develop this field in the board of directors of the National Oil Company, and we will start work as soon as the conditions are ready.”

The remarks by the CEO of the National Iranian Oil Company came at a time when Riyadh and Tehran have strengthened their cooperation in the wake of a surprising decision to resume relations announced in March, following relations had remained severed between the two rival regional powers for seven years.

Kuwaiti Oil Minister Saad Al-Barrak said he was “surprised” by the Iranian intentions, which he said “contradict the most basic rules of international relations,” according to what was quoted by the Kuwait News Agency, “KUNA.”

Al-Barrak said, “We totally reject the Iranian allegations and measures to be taken around the Dorra field.”

The dispute over the Dorra field dates back to the sixties of the last century, when Iran granted a maritime concession to the Anglo-Iranian oil company, which later became “BP”, while Kuwait granted the concession to “Royal Dutch Shell”.

The two concessions overlap in the northern part of the field, whose reserves are estimated at 220 billion cubic meters.

Iran and Kuwait have held talks over their maritime borders rich in natural gas for years, but they have all failed.

Saudi Arabia is part of the conflict, given that it shares offshore gas and oil resources with Kuwait in the region.

Iran’s exploration in the field in 2001 prompted Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to conclude an agreement on maritime borders, which stipulated that they jointly develop the area off their coasts.

1688522224
#Saudi #Arabia #shows #position #disputed #gas #field #Iran