News

Philadelphia – Randy Orton enters this Saturday’s WWE Elimination Chamber with a complex narrative: qualified for a high-stakes match, yet carrying a weight of recent setbacks. While his inclusion alongside Cody Rhodes and LA Knight initially sparked excitement among fans hoping to see “The Viper” reclaim a prominent position, a closer appear reveals a challenging year for the veteran performer as he prepares for one of WWE’s most physically demanding contests.

The Elimination Chamber match is known for its brutal nature, testing not only physical endurance but also mental fortitude. For Orton, the timing couldn’t be more precarious. Since returning to full-time competition in early 2025, his premium live event record has been notably sparse, raising questions about his current standing within the company and his ability to recapture past glory. The stakes are particularly high as WWE builds toward WrestleMania 42.

A Year of Limited Premium Live Event Success

Orton’s recent performance at premium live events paints a stark picture. He has secured only one victory at this level in the past year – a hard-fought win against Joe Hendry at WrestleMania last year, according to available records. This single highlight across an entire year of major events underscores the uphill battle he faces as he steps into the unforgiving structure of the Elimination Chamber. The match itself is designed to push competitors to their absolute limits, and Orton’s recent form suggests he may be entering with less momentum than his opponents.

The significance of this record extends beyond mere statistics. Orton has built his legendary career on a reputation for dominance in high-profile matches, characterized by impeccable timing and the ability to seize opportunities. This current stretch of inconsistent results feels like more than just a temporary slump. it raises concerns about his position within WWE’s long-term plans.

Past Challenges Loom Large

Adding to the pressure is the memory of last year’s WrestleMania plans, which were disrupted when Orton’s scheduled opponent suffered a serious injury just before their match. This forced WWE to scramble for a replacement, ultimately leading to Orton being sidelined from a major storyline. The experience highlighted the unpredictable nature of professional wrestling and the reality that even established stars are not immune to unforeseen circumstances.

The Elimination Chamber presents a unique opportunity for Orton to reset the narrative. A strong performance – demonstrating the precision and presence that once defined his career – could remind both fans and WWE decision-makers of his capabilities. Such a showing would also provide creative teams with a solid foundation for building a compelling storyline leading into WrestleMania 42.

Although, the Chamber is a notoriously unpredictable environment. The structure itself demands both physical resilience and strategic thinking. Orton will need to navigate a field of formidable opponents, each vying for a chance to earn a championship opportunity.

What’s Next for “The Viper”?

As Orton prepares for Saturday’s match, the question remains: can he overcome recent challenges and reassert himself as a major force in WWE? The Elimination Chamber will undoubtedly be a pivotal moment in his career, potentially shaping his trajectory for the months to approach. The outcome will not only determine his path toward WrestleMania but also offer a clear indication of WWE’s plans for one of its most iconic performers.

Share your thoughts on Randy Orton’s chances in the Elimination Chamber in the comments below, and be sure to share this article with fellow wrestling fans!

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder, Klaus Schwab, are facing mounting accusations of manipulating data in its Global Competitiveness Report to undermine the perceived success of Brexit. Allegations surfaced in Swiss media and have gained traction internationally, prompting an internal investigation and raising questions about the organization’s impartiality. The controversy centers around claims that Schwab directed staff to lower the UK’s economic productivity ranking in the 2017-18 report, fearing positive results would bolster the pro-Brexit movement.

The accusations come at a time of increased scrutiny of the WEF and its influence on global policy. Critics argue that the alleged manipulation demonstrates a clear ideological bias against Brexit and raises concerns about the integrity of the WEF’s research. The timing of the alleged intervention coincided with ongoing debates in the UK regarding a potential second referendum and then-Prime Minister Theresa May’s address on Britain’s post-Brexit future at the 2017 Davos Summit. The core of the dispute revolves around the discrepancy between an initial draft of the report, which reportedly showed the UK rising to fourth place and the final published version, which placed the UK in eighth.

Leaked Draft and Alleged Instructions

According to reports in the Swiss newspaper SonntagsZeitung, Schwab allegedly stated that Brexit “will by definition weaken the UK’s markets component” and instructed staff that the UK “must not see any improvement.” He reportedly warned that better results could be “exploited by the Brexit camp.” This alleged directive directly contradicts the WEF’s public statements at the time, which indicated the Brexit vote was not factored into the rankings but acknowledged its potential future impact. An internal investigation, triggered by whistleblower claims, reportedly corroborated allegations that Schwab directed staff to manipulate data. The investigation likewise included accusations of financial misconduct, inappropriate behavior towards junior staff, and interference with research findings, according to local media reports.

Broader Accusations and Political Reactions

The allegations extend beyond Brexit, with the whistleblower also accusing Schwab of misusing funds and interfering with research to maintain India’s high ranking in the Global Competitiveness Report, allegedly to secure Prime Minister Modi’s attendance at the annual Davos summit. This broader pattern of alleged manipulation has fueled criticism from various political figures. British politicians, including Priti Patel and Lord Frost, have condemned the alleged manipulation as anti-democratic and ideologically driven. Reform UK leaders Nigel Farage and Richard Tice stated the revelations confirm long-held concerns about the WEF’s globalist agenda.

WEF Response and Ongoing Investigation

The WEF initially stated that the Brexit vote was not factored into the rankings, but acknowledged its potential future impact. However, the organization has faced increasing pressure to address the specific allegations of data manipulation. Schwab has denied wrongdoing and criticized the WEF board for leaking preliminary findings of the investigation. The investigation, led by law firm Homburger, is also reviewing over £800,000 in expenses filed by Schwab and his wife, some of which allegedly lack a clear link to WEF activities, according to the Daily Mail. The final report from Homburger is expected later this year.

The Context of “Davos Man”

This controversy further fuels concerns over the influence of elite groups in global governance, often symbolized by the term “Davos Man”—a descriptor for a class of borderless, unaccountable elites. The accusations against Schwab and the WEF resonate with broader anxieties about the concentration of power and the potential for manipulation of information to serve specific agendas. The European Conservative highlights this growing sentiment, framing the allegations as a challenge to the legitimacy of global institutions.

As the Homburger investigation nears completion, the findings are expected to have significant implications for the WEF’s credibility and its role in shaping global discourse. The allegations have already sparked a wider debate about the transparency and accountability of international organizations and the potential for bias in their research. The outcome of the investigation will likely determine whether the WEF can regain the trust of critics and maintain its position as a leading forum for global leaders.

What comes next will depend on the findings of the Homburger investigation and the WEF’s response. The scrutiny surrounding Klaus Schwab and the organization is unlikely to subside quickly, and the debate over its influence on global affairs will likely continue. Share your thoughts in the comments below.

The new film “Hasta la Montaña” (To the Mountain), directed by Canadian filmmaker Sophie Deraspe, will premiere on February 27th, telling the story of a young Montreal advertising executive who abandons his urban life to pursue a radically different existence as a shepherd in the French Alps. The film, which received the award for Best Canadian Film at the Toronto Film Festival, has already garnered attention following screenings at the Málaga French Film Festival and successful runs in Quebec, France, and Italy.

Deraspe’s film is inspired by “D’où viens-tu, berger?” (Where do you approach from, shepherd?) by Mathyas Lefebure, a non-fiction work detailing Lefebure’s own decision to leave a career in marketing and public relations after an existential crisis, and embrace the life of a shepherd in Provence. The film follows Mathyas as he spends a summer in the mountains with a flock of sheep, joined by Élise, a former civil servant drawn to his pastoral lifestyle.

According to Deraspe, the shift in motivations for choosing a rural life is significant. “Before, you belonged to the rural world because your family had a farm. You came from the land and were going to continue working it,” she stated in an interview with Europa Press. “Today, I think it’s a matter of choice. I can’t speak for Spain, but I’ve seen it a lot in France. Being a shepherd is almost a political choice, an option in favor of a way of life apart from a remarkably materialistic world.”

The film aims to portray both the romanticized and harsh realities of shepherding. Deraspe noted a tendency in cinema to “idealize” rural life, acknowledging that this idealization reflects a genuine quality – the potential for nature to offer a “almost mystical” experience. However, she also emphasized the “rather crude relationship with life and death” inherent in the lifestyle, which she believes may be “shocking or unexpected” for some. “In the film, I’ve tried to show both sides at the same time,” she said.

The production itself experienced an authentic moment of rural life when a lamb was born during filming. Deraspe, who had previously witnessed a calf birth with a shepherdess and described the experience as “very powerful,” had proactively discussed with both the shepherds and actors the possibility of continuing to film should such an event occur. A director’s assistant, disguised as a shepherdess to blend into the background, first noticed the lamb’s arrival. The crew then filmed the birth alongside the actor and sound engineer.

While Lefebure’s book served as a starting point, Deraspe emphasized the significant contributions of the shepherds she worked with, particularly regarding their perspectives on wildlife, such as wolves. “There is a lot of fear, a kind of paranoia that prevents people from living well alongside the wolf,” she explained.

Deraspe observed a common human desire to connect with the natural world, finding it present in both rural and urban populations. “That way of conceiving the world, I identify it in the rural world, I find it in certain people in the urban world, so I don’t end up distinguishing the two things,” she said.

A pre-premiere screening of “Hasta la Montaña” was held on February 16th at the Instituto Francés in Madrid.