News

New York, NY – A seminar hosted by the New York Korean Pastoral Fellowship, originally scheduled for February 26th, has been postponed to March 12th due to severe winter weather conditions. The event, featuring Dr. Jo Jin-mo, was rescheduled as a result of heavy snowfall impacting travel and site preparation in the New York area.

The fellowship, led by President Yu Sang-yeol, made the decision to prioritize the safety of attendees, particularly pastors, given the challenging road conditions and difficulties with snow removal and parking near the Livingston Church, the designated seminar location. The postponement was announced on February 25, 2026, according to K Good News.

Seminar Focus: 400 Years of Intertestamental History

The seminar will now take place on Thursday, March 12th, at 10:30 AM at Livingston Church in Bayside, Queens. The topic, “400 Years of the Intertestamental Period – Reading the Blueprint of the Church Through God’s Timeline,” will remain the same. Dr. Jo Jin-mo, a historical theologian, will explore the divine providence that unfolded during the 400-year period between the Ancient and New Testaments.

Dr. Jo Jin-mo’s presentation will focus on how the foundations of the church were established against the backdrop of Hellenistic culture and the Roman era, offering a historical-theological perspective. He holds a Ph.D. From Westminster Theological Seminary and previously served as a professor of historical theology at the Korean Reformed Theological Seminary.

Impact of Weather Conditions

The recent heavy snowfall across the New York metropolitan area created significant challenges for travel and logistical arrangements. The decision to postpone the seminar was made to ensure the safety and accessibility of all participants. Parking near Livingston Church was particularly affected, with snow removal efforts and limited space contributing to the postponement. The New York Korean Pastoral Fellowship emphasized that safety was the primary consideration in rescheduling the event.

This postponement highlights the challenges that winter weather can pose to scheduled events and gatherings, particularly in regions prone to significant snowfall. The fellowship’s proactive decision to reschedule demonstrates a commitment to prioritizing the well-being of its members and attendees.

The New York Korean Pastoral Fellowship is an organization dedicated to supporting and serving Korean pastors in the New York area. KCMUSA provides information on various churches and organizations, including resources for pastoral support.

Looking ahead, the New York Korean Pastoral Fellowship plans to proceed with the seminar on March 12th, assuming favorable weather conditions. Updates will be provided if any further changes to the schedule turn into necessary. Attendees are encouraged to monitor local weather forecasts and plan accordingly.

Share this article with others who may be interested in attending the seminar, and let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Washington – As diplomatic efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions continue, President Donald Trump is once again considering military action against the Islamic Republic, despite previously asserting that his administration had “obliterated” its nuclear program. The shifting rationale for potential strikes highlights internal debate within the administration, with some officials hoping an attack could compel Iran to abandon its nuclear enrichment activities, whereas others express skepticism about the effectiveness of such a move.

The possibility of renewed military engagement comes as American forces increase their presence in the region, and as the Trump administration simultaneously pursues diplomatic channels. Negotiations between the U.S. And Iran are scheduled to resume on Thursday, February 26, 2026, but the prospects for a breakthrough remain uncertain. The core issue revolves around Iran’s nuclear program, with the U.S. Demanding stricter limitations than those currently in place. The debate over a potential military strike underscores the complex and evolving nature of U.S. Policy toward Iran, and the challenges of balancing competing priorities.

Initial Claims of Success Now Questioned

In June 2025, the Trump administration launched airstrikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, claiming a “spectacular military success” and asserting that the program had been “completely and totally obliterated.” However, recent assessments suggest that Iran has continued to craft progress in its nuclear enrichment capabilities. U.S. Officials have indicated that, despite the previous attacks, Iran is now very close to having the ability to produce nuclear weapons. According to a report from February 23, 2026, Trump’s aide cited highly enriched uranium remaining in Iran after the U.S. Bombing. This discrepancy between initial claims and current assessments has fueled the renewed consideration of military options.

A Maxar satellite image from June 22, 2025, revealed significant damage to the Isfahan nuclear technology center following the U.S. Airstrikes, showing charring and roof collapses across the compound. Satellite imagery confirms the extent of the damage, but as well highlights the program’s resilience.

Shifting Explanations for Potential Action

The Trump administration’s justifications for potential military action have evolved in recent weeks. Initially, the focus was on Tehran’s crackdown on protestors, with Trump claiming he wanted to halt the suppression of dissent. More recently, the administration has emphasized the need to curb Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal and, crucially, its nuclear program. Last week, Trump issued a 15-day ultimatum to Iran, demanding a deal that would prohibit uranium enrichment, a demand that was rejected by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who asserted Iran’s right to a peaceful nuclear program. This evolving narrative reflects a lack of consistent rationale for potential military force, a pattern noted by analysts.

Vice President JD Vance stated last week that “Our primary interest here is, we don’t want Iran to get a nuclear weapon,” adding, “They can’t have nuclear weapons; it’s very simple.” President Trump echoed this sentiment, and his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, suggested the Iranian nuclear threat was “rather imminent,” noting that Iran has been enriching uranium to 60%, a level well beyond what is needed for civil nuclear purposes. NBC News reported on these statements.

Internal Debate and Symbolic Value

While some officials within the Trump administration believe a military strike could force Iran to abandon its nuclear enrichment program, others harbor doubts about its effectiveness. Some suggest that an attack, even a limited one, could serve a symbolic purpose, demonstrating U.S. Resolve and deterring further Iranian nuclear development. However, this view is not universally shared, and concerns remain about the potential for escalation and unintended consequences. Iran has warned of significant retaliation to any attack, even a limited one.

The administration is simultaneously pursuing diplomatic channels, with the upcoming talks representing a potential opportunity to de-escalate tensions and reach a negotiated solution. However, the prospects for success remain uncertain, given the deep-seated mistrust between the two countries and the divergent goals of each side. The U.S. Intelligence community assessed in March that Iran was “not building a nuclear weapon,” but this assessment appears to be at odds with more recent statements from the Trump administration.

As the deadline for Trump’s ultimatum approaches, the situation remains highly volatile. The next few weeks will be critical in determining whether the U.S. And Iran can find a path toward a peaceful resolution, or whether the region will be plunged into further conflict. The outcome will have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

What comes next will depend heavily on the outcome of the Thursday negotiations and Iran’s response to the U.S. Ultimatum. The administration’s internal debate over the best course of action will likely continue, and the possibility of military strikes remains on the table. Share your thoughts in the comments below.