News

For the first time in over fifty years, there are no binding limits on the expansion of nuclear arsenals among the world’s largest nuclear powers. The New START treaty, which imposed restrictions on U.S. And Russian nuclear forces, expired on February 5, 2026, marking the end of the last remaining formal constraints on their nuclear capabilities.

The New START treaty had set limits on the number of strategic nuclear warheads that both the United States and Russia could deploy to 1,550 each. It also regulated the types of missiles and bombers that could be equipped with these warheads, mandated on-site inspections, facilitated data exchanges, prohibited interference with satellite monitoring and established a joint commission for dispute resolution. However, it did not place any caps on the number of nuclear weapons that either side could retain in reserve.

As China rapidly enhances its nuclear arsenal amid rising tensions, the potential for an unpredictable three-way arms race among the United States, China, and Russia looms larger. With advanced technologies, including precision conventional weapons and artificial intelligence, complicating the nuclear balance, the risk of nuclear conflict appears to be escalating, potentially higher than it has been in decades.

The Importance of Nuclear Agreements

Nuclear agreements like New START offer significant advantages, even if the specific numbers of warheads and delivery systems might not seem crucial on the surface. They enhance:

• Predictability: They alleviate pressures to expand nuclear arsenals stemming from worst-case assessments of adversaries’ capabilities.
• Transparency: Mechanisms such as data exchanges and inspections allow each nation to better understand the nuclear capabilities of others.
• Reduced First-Strike Incentives: By limiting certain types of dangerous weapons, these agreements lower the likelihood of preemptive strikes.
• Improved Relations: Agreements signal a willingness to limit forces, which can reduce hostility and the potential for crises.

The expiration of the New START treaty significantly disrupts decades of nuclear stability that followed the Cold War era. In the wake of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, President John F. Kennedy recognized the dangers of relying solely on nuclear deterrence without any agreed-upon restraints. This realization led to the negotiation of the Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963 and the establishment of a direct communication line between the U.S. And the Soviet Union.

Future Implications and Challenges

In the context of increasing nuclear threats, the desire for a new arms control agreement remains critical. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty obligates nuclear-armed states to negotiate toward disarmament, and as nations face mounting pressure to develop their own nuclear capabilities, the need for the established nuclear powers to accept constraints has never been more pressing.

Critics of arms control often cite past violations by Russia, with allegations from the Trump administration regarding illicit nuclear tests by both Russia and China. However, despite these concerns, significant elements of previous agreements have contributed to a safer global environment, as noted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who pointed out that more than 80% of the world’s nuclear weapons have been dismantled since the height of the Cold War.

The United States is currently developing new arms, including a nuclear-armed cruise missile capable of being launched from submarines. However, there is growing pressure within Washington to increase nuclear capabilities rather than pursue disarmament in order to deter Russia, China, and North Korea.

What Comes Next?

President Trump has not responded to President Putin’s proposal to maintain limits outlined in the New START treaty while exploring new options. Instead, Trump has expressed interest in negotiating a “better” deal that would not only address U.S. And Russian forces but also account for China’s expanding nuclear arsenal and Russia’s large stockpile of nonstrategic nuclear weapons.

As of now, no follow-on negotiations are underway, and the U.S. Administration has not proposed discussions surrounding specific weapon systems that concern both Russia and China. This lack of dialogue, alongside the U.S.’s existing nuclear stockpile and modernization efforts, raises concerns about the potential for a renewed arms race. If the U.S. Opts to expand its nuclear forces, it is likely that Russia will respond similarly, possibly prompting an even larger buildup by China.

Despite the mutual interests of the United States, Russia, and China in avoiding an uncontained nuclear arms race, the path toward new agreements among these nations will be challenging. Each country must navigate internal and external pressures to ensure their national interests align with a collective agreement aimed at nuclear restraint.

As the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, the implications of the New START treaty’s expiration will likely be felt across international relations and global security frameworks. The coming months will be critical in determining whether the major nuclear powers can stabilize their arsenals and engage in meaningful dialogue to prevent a dangerous escalation.

We invite readers to share their thoughts on the future of nuclear arms control and its implications for global security.