News

HELSINKI – A debate over the future of Finland’s social security system has intensified following comments by former Helsinki mayor and current Hanken School of Economics labor market professor Juhana Vartiainen, who suggested linking benefits to active participation in the workforce. Vartiainen’s proposals, made during a televised discussion on Tuesday, have drawn sharp criticism from social policy experts, highlighting fundamental disagreements about the role of social support in the country.

Vartiainen argued that Finland’s current system is an outlier among Nordic nations, lacking the necessary incentives for recipients to seek employment. He proposed modeling the Finnish system after Denmark’s, where social security benefits are contingent upon fulfilling certain obligations and engaging in services designed to help individuals re-enter the labor market. “I believe that in Denmark, the poor are not worse off than in Finland,” Vartiainen stated, adding that the Danish system allows for the removal of all financial support if individuals do not actively perform towards improving their situation. He clarified, however, that such a drastic measure is rarely implemented in Denmark, as the threat of losing benefits encourages job seeking.

The discussion, broadcast on Yle’s A-studio program, featured a direct challenge to Vartiainen’s ideas from University of Helsinki social policy professor Heikki Hiilamo. Hiilamo dismissed the notion that a Danish-style system could be successfully implemented in Finland, arguing that it would likely devolve into a punitive measure rather than a supportive one. “In Finland, this easily turns into a punishment,” Hiilamo said. “In Denmark and Sweden, people are encouraged. In Finland, we have nothing to encourage them with.”

Hiilamo further contended that a significant barrier to employment exists in Finland, regardless of benefit conditions. “There aren’t even jobs for educated people,” he stated, questioning the feasibility of expecting all those relying on social assistance to transition into the workforce. He also criticized Prime Minister Petteri Orpo’s government, writing in a Yle column that it had “shot full of holes” in Finland’s basic security net.

Vartiainen Defends Proposal, Cites Systemic Issues

Vartiainen defended his position, describing Finland’s current toimeentulotuki (basic income support) as a “miserable exception” among Nordic countries and an “unfortunate phenomenon” that should be eliminated. He envisions a future where such support is unnecessary, emphasizing the importance of individual responsibility. He acknowledged that Hiilamo’s characterization of his views was “over the top,” but reiterated his belief that the current system is fundamentally flawed.

The core of Vartiainen’s argument centers on the idea that a lack of obligation attached to social security benefits creates a disincentive to work. He believes that by tying support to active job searching, training, or other forms of engagement, individuals will be more motivated to improve their circumstances. This approach, he suggests, would not only reduce the burden on the social security system but also promote greater economic self-sufficiency.

Expert Disagreement Highlights Broader Concerns

The debate between Vartiainen and Hiilamo reflects a broader discussion about the effectiveness and fairness of Finland’s social safety net. Hiilamo, whose research focuses on poverty and family policy, has consistently advocated for strengthening social protections and addressing the root causes of inequality. Heikki Hiilamo has also been involved in investigative journalism and has published extensively on social issues. Vartiainen, a long-time member of the National Coalition Party, has often championed market-based solutions and emphasized the importance of individual responsibility. He previously served as the mayor of Helsinki and currently works as a professor of labor market studies at Hanken School of Economics.

The discussion also touched upon the challenges of implementing such changes in the Finnish context. Hiilamo argued that the lack of available jobs, particularly for those with limited skills or education, would render a more stringent system ineffective and potentially harmful. He suggested that focusing on job creation and skills development would be a more productive approach.

What’s Next for Finland’s Social Security?

The debate sparked by Vartiainen’s comments is likely to continue as Finland grapples with economic challenges and evolving social needs. The current government, led by Prime Minister Petteri Orpo, has already begun implementing reforms to the social security system, and further changes are expected in the coming months. A recent discussion paper from a group of experts, including Vartiainen and Hiilamo, proposed extending unemployment insurance to all salaried employees under equal conditions, suggesting a potential area for compromise. The long-term impact of these changes on poverty, employment, and social equity remains to be seen.

What are your thoughts on linking social security benefits to work requirements? Share your opinions in the comments below.