News

Florida, a state renowned for its unique wildlife and often-unconventional news stories, is once again capturing the internet’s attention. A recent surge in viral videos and memes, particularly those shared through accounts like “Only in Florida,” highlights ongoing encounters between residents and the state’s growing iguana population. The question on many minds – and increasingly, the subject of humorous online debates – is whose spot is it, really?

The phenomenon isn’t novel. Iguanas, not native to Florida, have been establishing themselves in the state for decades, particularly in South Florida. However, recent cold snaps have brought the issue into sharper focus, with images of “frozen iguanas” becoming a recurring meme, as reported by the News-Press [https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxNOGRrTUNfX0ZtVEFFaF9xNkRKZ1hVdUlOc3RGZUdXM0lua0VhWmxuZ3ZVemRZM2pNaEt2R2JLX2FPZ2xzVW9oSDFmeHlUZW00bWVCMGcwM0MxZmotV29lOWoySUlQRUdEUzdYbldkakZDRVVTYnZRdExwRDNXRTdkTVVlelM4Y2twRW1scklwdUEwVjRLS0F6Y1lNSThzdkstTVJ6Tkt2dmNDZjFTeFZBdEgxRUJRLTViUmc?oc=5]. But beyond the novelty, these encounters are raising questions about property damage, ecological impact, and the challenges of coexisting with an invasive species.

The “Cuban Tarzan” and the Biggest Iguana

One individual gaining notoriety for his iguana-wrangling skills is Andrew Morales, who refers to himself as the “Cuban Tarzan.” According to Facebook posts, Morales claims to have caught the largest iguana ever recorded in Florida [https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi3wFBVV95cUxONFlvUWYwU3VHSkZRS3RqWWxyWjlkVktGUk5hWVhTa3RZZkk0SXdvVzZqN1p3MFduNDU4Si1CeE9BTzdhME1UVll6dHdFeS1UWks4MWlTM1czQmZYVXBPYTdHQzljdF9FbU53RU9BcTl1NVZyVEdONnpDTmpvX1dxdS03Zkl2a3dfZmVmVWtxWjhjd20yRXhmanZJcXlUaXZhNzFGbFA1U2YzYmt3U3pYRVZOREdiY1JiZjJBb2xpZU14dmpLS2N5Nko4d1hpMVpJYTl5djYtaHJPblVrSDA4?oc=5]. Even as the claim hasn’t been officially verified by state wildlife officials, it has fueled further interest in the ongoing human-iguana interactions.

The increasing frequency of these encounters is prompting a wave of user-generated content, with many Floridians sharing their own iguana stories, and videos. The hashtag #OnlyinFlorida has develop into a popular way to categorize and share these experiences, turning everyday occurrences into viral sensations. Accounts like “Only in Florida” actively repost these submissions, fostering a community around the state’s unique and often-quirky wildlife.

The Florida Man Meme and the State’s Image

The fascination with unusual Florida news isn’t entirely new. The “Florida Man” meme, a long-running internet phenomenon, has cemented the state’s reputation for bizarre and often humorous headlines. As detailed by Netflix [https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiggFBVV95cUxOTkZfYi1VWkJoZFFuZHJNNTJ1all6T1RfWURqOEZIVWtNZi0zdFBENkZNNm9BRG5xLUJRQ3dSU2JWMVVYcXFyMUFNVXc4VDQyblpNcmNoNFc3RE5HRkc3UDBhMlNJNjJKczNLQzBIQ1c4emNBcGZhb0NjNEltdHViRzhR?oc=5], the meme typically involves a news headline starting with “Florida Man…” followed by an outlandish act. The iguana encounters, while not always fitting the “Florida Man” mold, contribute to the state’s overall image as a place where the unexpected is commonplace.

The University of South Florida (USF) even leveraged the recent excitement surrounding a significant sports upset by creating memes and videos, demonstrating the power of internet culture in capturing and sharing moments [https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiqwFBVV95cUxQS2hWMDVqYm9VWmpOOHlkUjN2bno4dHMyaVU5Y1psa2pUdnlBQjAzdEk4US1qdUxCMFlBMmVXRzc4VWN6SU5CemxCbm0wenBvZzl1NlpWVXI0azExS2xQRXZXRWh0MUVXWkVDSVE1OV9NNkszbWlZTkRkZm8wUF9mY0R6c3dsWnVqUFByLWJvQTdaakpGTzJaQ1dvU3FmWmxzamp6WmdYZVpscHc?oc=5]. This highlights how quickly events in Florida can translate into shareable content, further amplifying the state’s online presence.

Florida Weather and Iguana Behavior

The behavior of iguanas is also heavily influenced by Florida’s climate. As the Daytona Beach News-Journal reported, even December can bring surprisingly cold temperatures to the Sunshine State [https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi0wFBVV95cUxPQUtJakxrb3NjczlNaHcxaktIenRMdno3eFV0eC1DaE43d1FGUHdKN0kwdlR3TnIwbU5qZjVSRkhEbnJpdWF3eWdBSWo0QzVhTC1iRnNpTHdOMjdscU5kbTRlc3g0UTNfVVQybklfaGNsc29kQkFkdnF4eHlHZUJ6QjRuNHhtdUktTG1VVFB1QXNoYWZoREtta1BtOWVBTll2UUU1REhxVEpTenVzZ2tGM3FQUmgzdU4tT2NjX0FGbDZGTkhTcjhpZHdSQ2s1eXhiSGM0?oc=5]. These cold spells can cause iguanas to become lethargic and even fall from trees, leading to the aforementioned “frozen iguana” phenomenon. However, they are not necessarily dead, and often revive once temperatures rise.

As the iguana population continues to grow, and as Floridians continue to document their encounters, the debate over whose spot it is – and how to coexist with these increasingly common reptiles – is likely to continue. The ongoing stream of videos and memes shared under the #OnlyinFlorida hashtag ensures that this uniquely Floridian story will remain in the spotlight.

Looking ahead, state wildlife officials will likely continue to monitor the iguana population and explore strategies for managing its impact on the ecosystem. The public’s role in reporting sightings and sharing information will also be crucial in understanding and addressing this ongoing challenge. Share your Florida experiences and tag us – we want to see what makes your corner of the Sunshine State so unique!

A Reddit thread initiated on February 4th, inviting Singaporeans to share the most “out-of-touch” statements they’ve encountered regarding the current job market, has quickly become a focal point for venting frustrations about employment challenges. The discussion, posted on the r/askSingapore forum, aimed to create a space for shared experiences and, as the original poster set it, “at least laugh at them together.”

The original poster (OP) began the conversation by recounting an interaction where someone suggested that the issue wasn’t a lack of jobs, but rather that fresh graduates and Singaporeans were “too picky” and unwilling to accept positions in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). According to the OP, this perspective implies that a willingness to work in SMEs would resolve the broader job crisis.

The post resonated widely, prompting numerous responses from users sharing similar experiences. One Redditor described being questioned about how they managed to live on a monthly income of S$6,000 in Singapore. Another recalled being told by a potential employer that they simply weren’t “hungry enough” to secure a position. A commenter shared an experience with a career advisor who advised them to pursue a degree as a guaranteed path to employment.

Further adding to the sense of disconnect, one user reported being told that the presence of foreign workers wasn’t about displacing local talent, but rather about enhancing employment opportunities for Singaporeans.

Official data from Workforce Singapore indicates a slight decline in unemployment rates in August 2025, reporting a seasonally adjusted overall rate of 1.9%. Employment rates among recent resident graduates also showed improvement, rising to 51.9% as of June 2025, compared to 47.9% for the previous graduating cohort. The data indicates that 87.1% of fresh graduates found employment within six months of completing their studies, a slight decrease from 89.6% the previous year.

Lausanne, Switzerland – Chocolate manufacturer Läderach has won a legal dispute against Swiss public broadcaster SRG SSR, with the Swiss Federal Court ruling that an article published on SRG’s Swissinfo platform violated the company’s personality rights. The case centered on the use of the English term “dropped” in connection with Läderach and its former sponsorship arrangements, a phrasing the court found misleading and damaging to the company’s reputation.

The legal battle stemmed from a Swissinfo article published in April 2021, which reported on the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs (EDA) reducing its list of sponsoring partners from 83 to 36. The EDA had been reviewing its partners based on sustainability and reputational concerns, particularly within the tobacco, arms, and raw materials industries. The court determined that the article’s wording created a false impression that Läderach had been deliberately removed from the EDA’s partner list due to reputational issues.

Specifically, the court took issue with the phrasing used to describe how both the EDA and Swiss International Air Lines had “dropped” Läderach. The article stated that Swiss had not renewed a contract for Läderach chocolates on board its flights. Läderach argued that it had never been actively partnered with the EDA and that the language implied a negative reason for the non-renewal of the airline contract. The Federal Court agreed, stating the wording did not accurately reflect the situation and presented the chocolatier in a negative light.

Swissinfo has been ordered to remove the offending passage and publish a summary of the court’s ruling prominently for 30 days. While Läderach will not receive financial compensation, SRG SSR will be responsible for paying 18,000 Swiss francs in court costs and legal fees, as reported by 20min.ch.

Background to the Dispute

The origin of the dispute lies in a report initially published by the NZZ am Sonntag on April 25, 2021, concerning the EDA’s reduction of its sponsorship partners. The Swissinfo article subsequently referenced this report. The court’s decision highlights the importance of precise language in reporting, particularly when it concerns the reputation of businesses and individuals. The use of “dropped,” according to the court, suggested a deliberate severing of ties based on negative perceptions.

Läderach’s legal team successfully argued that the company had no active collaboration with the EDA, and the phrasing created a misleading narrative. The court emphasized that an average reader could reasonably interpret the article as implying Läderach was removed from the EDA list and that Swiss terminated its contract due to concerns about the company’s values. This interpretation, the court found, was inaccurate.

SRG SSR’s Response and Previous Scrutiny

SRG SSR has accepted the court’s ruling and will comply with the order to remove the passage and publish the summary. The organization had previously argued that it was defending the constitutionally protected freedom of the press, but ultimately accepted the court’s decision. persoenlich.com reports that SRG SSR will implement the ruling within the specified timeframe.

This legal challenge comes after Läderach faced public scrutiny in 2020 when members of the owning family’s involvement in evangelical Christian groups – which hold views opposing same-sex partnerships and abortion rights – became a topic of public discussion. SRF, another SRG SSR platform, aired a documentary titled “The Evangelical World of Läderach – Chastisement in the Name of God” exploring these connections.

Implications for Media Reporting

This ruling sets a precedent for media organizations operating in Switzerland, emphasizing the demand for careful and accurate reporting, particularly when dealing with potentially sensitive issues related to corporate reputation. The case underscores the importance of avoiding language that could be interpreted as defamatory or misleading, even when reporting on broader trends or changes in sponsorship arrangements. The court’s decision in this Tages-Anzeiger report demonstrates a willingness to protect the personality rights of companies against potentially damaging misrepresentations.

Looking ahead, media outlets will likely review their editorial processes to ensure greater precision in their reporting, particularly when using potentially loaded language. The case also highlights the potential for legal challenges when reporting on the connections between a company’s ownership and their personal beliefs, especially when those beliefs are controversial.

What are your thoughts on the balance between freedom of the press and protecting corporate reputation? Share your perspective in the comments below.