The Last Mile Problem: Will Rural New Zealand Be Left Offline as Copper Networks Fade?
For nearly 100,000 New Zealanders, the future of staying connected isn’t about faster speeds or cutting-edge technology – it’s about having a connection at all. As Chorus seeks to decommission its aging copper network, mirroring a trend seen globally, a growing number of rural communities face the prospect of digital isolation. The Commerce Commission’s recent draft recommendation to deregulate rural copper, now subject to a final decision by Minister Paul Goldsmith, has ignited a debate that goes to the heart of equitable access in the digital age.
A Lifeline Severed: The Realities for Rural Residents
The concerns aren’t hypothetical. Residents like Robyn, near Lake Rotoiti, illustrate the stark reality. With no cell service and a landline already removed, her household relies entirely on an overloaded copper connection for internet and, critically, emergency communication. “If you moved here and tried to get a connection you won’t be able to,” she explains, highlighting the difficulty of establishing new services in these areas. The potential loss of this connection isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s a safety risk, particularly for those with health concerns or living alone.
This isn’t an isolated case. A Taupo resident, who wished to remain anonymous, echoed these fears, stating that providers prioritize densely populated areas where returns are higher, leaving rural needs unmet. This disparity underscores a fundamental challenge: the “last mile problem” – the disproportionately high cost of extending infrastructure to sparsely populated regions.
Beyond Copper: Exploring Alternative Connectivity Options
Chorus argues that alternatives exist. Their General Manager, Anna Mitchell, points to satellite options like Starlink, alongside fixed wireless, as viable replacements for 97% of those still on copper. However, the reality is more nuanced. While Starlink offers a promising solution, its reliability, particularly during severe weather events like Cyclone Gabrielle – where copper failures were eight times higher than fibre – remains a concern. The cost, ranging from $79 to $159 per month, also presents a barrier for many.
The Technology Users Association New Zealand (TUANZ) emphasizes the broader implications. “It’s Telehealth, it’s health and safety, being able to call for ambulances,” says Craig Young. “It is about mental health…there’s all sorts of impacts if you can’t make those connections.” He highlights the lack of universal service obligations in New Zealand, unlike Australia, meaning there’s no legal requirement to provide connectivity to every location.
The Fibre Gap and the Need for Investment
The core of the issue isn’t simply the phasing out of copper, but the lack of adequate fibre infrastructure in rural areas. Federated Farmers’ Mark Hooper advocates for increased government investment in rural broadband, arguing it’s as crucial as roads and bridges. Chorus itself has submitted a bid to the infrastructure priorities pipeline to extend fibre further, acknowledging the need.
However, extending fibre isn’t a quick fix. It requires significant capital expenditure and careful planning. The Commerce Commission acknowledges the concerns raised by rural consumers, stating they deserve the same consideration given to urban areas during the previous copper withdrawal process. They recognize that technological advancements offer alternatives, but also that these alternatives aren’t always a perfect fit.
The Future of Rural Connectivity: A Multi-Pronged Approach
The future of rural connectivity likely won’t rely on a single solution. A combination of technologies will be necessary, including continued fibre expansion where feasible, improved satellite services (with increasing competition expected from new providers in the coming years), and potentially innovative fixed wireless solutions. However, relying solely on market forces isn’t enough.
The key takeaway is this: rural connectivity isn’t just a technological issue; it’s a social and economic one. Without reliable access to the internet, rural communities risk being left behind, hindering economic development, limiting access to essential services, and jeopardizing public safety. A proactive, coordinated approach involving government, telecommunications providers, and local communities is essential to ensure that no one is digitally disconnected. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) highlights the global importance of bridging the digital divide, and New Zealand must prioritize this within its own borders.
What steps do you think are most crucial to ensure equitable access to connectivity for all New Zealanders? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
