Cuban Demand Removal of Television Program

Cuban Presenter’s Plea for Resources Sparks Public Outcry against Propaganda Programme

The official presenter Michel E. Torres Corona’s recent lament about a supposed lack of resources for his program “Con Filo” has ignited a firestorm on Cuban social media, revealing a widespread public sentiment: many Cubans no longer want this particular show on national television.

Torres Corona, a figure openly aligned with the government’s discourse, took to Facebook to voice his concerns, stating that his program is being produced “increasingly with fewer resources.” Though, this plea for sympathy was met with overwhelming public backlash. Instead of empathy, internet users flooded the platform with criticism, questioning state funding for a production widely deemed “unnecessary,” “false,” and “disconnected from the people.”

A chorus of online commenters echoed sentiments such as, “They should remove that program and allocate those resources to hospitals, schools, or social dining rooms.” Many directly called for the show’s immediate cancellation.

Adding an ironic twist, some users pointed out that if citizens are expected to “tighten their belts” as per regime slogans, Michel Torres could also practice “creative resistance.”

The criticism primarily targeted the perceived impunity and privilege enjoyed by the presenters of “Con Filo.” Users contend that these individuals receive state backing,have access to international travel,and are provided a platform to disseminate possibly misleading details from a position of authority.

“He complains about a lack of resources, but for them, nothing is missing. The problem is that they have no audience,” one commenter bluntly stated.

Others were even more direct, with comments such as “That program doesn’t work, nobody watches it, they should take it out now,” “It’s a mockery of the people who follow it while they close down truly useful spaces,” or “With that money being spent, it would be better to buy food for an elderly asylum.”

This collective outrage translates into a clear rejection of what many see as a propaganda apparatus incapable of offering tangible solutions to the nation’s pressing problems.

the critique also highlighted the inherent contradiction of a program that actively attacks independent media and government critics now positioning itself as a victim of the economic crisis.

“Michel Torres wants to portray himself as destitute, but his program is financed by those who ask us for resistance. Now he’s practicing it too,” an internet user sarcastically remarked.

Torres’s statement appears to have been the final straw for many Cubans who, facing widespread blackouts, scarcity, and censorship, are making a clear demand: less political propaganda on television and more concrete solutions to the country’s territorial problems.

For a significant segment of the Cuban population, the first step towards achieving this may well begin with the removal of programs like “Con Filo” from the airwaves.

What are the potential implications of the Cuban goverment’s response to demands for removal of the television program for international perceptions of freedom of speech in Cuba?

The Controversy Surrounding “Patria y Vida”

In a notable growth impacting media freedom and international relations, Cuba has recently seen widespread demands for the removal of a television program. The focal point of this controversy is the song and subsequent music video, “Patria y Vida” (Homeland and Life), and its appearances on state-run television channels. This isn’t simply a matter of artistic preference; it touches upon deeply rooted political tensions, freedom of expression, and the Cuban government’s control over media. The situation highlights the ongoing struggle between pro-government and opposition forces within Cuba, and the role of media in shaping public opinion. Key terms related to this event include Cuban protests, freedom of speech Cuba, state media Cuba, and “Patria y Vida” controversy.

Origins of “Patria y Vida” and its Message

Originally a response to the long-standing pro-government slogan “Patria o Muerte” (Homeland or Death), “Patria y Vida” was created by a group of Cuban artists and musicians, many residing outside of Cuba. The song directly challenges the established narrative, advocating for a Cuba where life and well-being are prioritized over ideological commitment.

Key Artists Involved: Yotuel Romero, Descemer Bueno, Maykel Osorbo, El Funky, and Gente de Zona (though the latter has distanced himself from the movement).

Lyrical Themes: The lyrics address issues of political repression, economic hardship, and the desire for democratic change.

Initial Impact: Upon release in February 2021, the song quickly became an anthem for the Cuban opposition, resonating with citizens frustrated by the contry’s economic and political situation.It rapidly gained traction on social media, circumventing state-controlled media outlets.

Why the Demand for Removal?

The demands for the program’s removal stem from several factors. Pro-government supporters view the song as a subversive attempt to destabilize the Cuban revolution and undermine national unity. They argue that its message is inherently anti-Cuban and funded by external forces seeking to overthrow the government.

Government Response: Initially, state media largely ignored the song. However, as its popularity grew, government officials began to denounce it as a US-backed propaganda effort.

Counter-Protests: Pro-government rallies were organized to counter the song’s message, with participants expressing their support for the revolution and condemning the artists involved.

State Television Airing: The unexpected airing of segments featuring the song on state television, seemingly as a critique, sparked outrage among supporters of the song and fueled demands for its complete removal. This perceived attempt to co-opt and discredit the movement backfired, further amplifying its message.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The situation raises complex legal and ethical questions regarding freedom of expression and the role of state media. While the Cuban constitution guarantees freedom of speech, this right is often restricted in practice, especially when it comes to criticism of the government.

International Law: International human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, protect the right to freedom of expression.

State Media Obligation: The ethical responsibility of state media to provide balanced and unbiased coverage is also at issue. Critics argue that Cuban state media consistently promotes a pro-government narrative and suppresses dissenting voices.

Censorship Concerns: The demand for removal is seen by many as a form of censorship, aimed at silencing opposition voices and controlling the flow of information. Related search terms include censorship in Cuba and human rights Cuba.

The Role of Social Media and Digital Activism

Social media platforms have played a crucial role in amplifying the message of “Patria y Vida” and mobilizing support for the movement. Despite government efforts to restrict internet access and control online content, Cubans have found ways to circumvent these restrictions and connect with the outside world.

VPN Usage: The use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) allows Cubans to access blocked websites and social media platforms.

Autonomous Journalism: independent Cuban journalists and bloggers have used social media to report on the protests and share information about the situation on the ground.

Global Solidarity: Social media has also facilitated international solidarity with the Cuban opposition, raising awareness about the situation and mobilizing support for democratic change.

recent Developments & Current Status (August 2, 2025)

As of August 2, 2025, the situation remains volatile. While the song itself hasn’t been officially banned, its presence on state television remains a contentious issue. Reports indicate continued pressure from pro-government groups for its complete removal. Independent observers note a tightening of restrictions on internet access and increased surveillance of activists. The Cuban government has not issued a formal statement addressing the ongoing demands,