Home » Health » Daily step count linked to lower cardiovascular risk in older adults

Daily step count linked to lower cardiovascular risk in older adults

Risks begin to drop well below the 10,000 step threshold.

To remember

  • The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events drops as the number of daily steps increases in an older adult population.
  • Taking 6,000 to 9,000 steps per day is associated with a 50% lower risk, compared to 2,000 steps.

Why is this important?

  • Many adults do not practice sufficient physical activity according to the recommendations of health authorities.
  • This study suggests that even modest increases in step count might lead to a substantial benefit.

Methodology

  • A meta-analysis of 8 studies measured step counts and CVD events in adults (n=20,152).
  • Endpoint: CVD events (fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure).
  • Funding: United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Principle results

  • Average age: 63.2 years.
  • The mean follow-up time was 6.2 years.
  • Median number of steps taken per day:
    • Persons aged 60 or over: 4,323 (interquartile range [IIQ] : 2 760–6 924).
    • People aged under 60: 6,911 (IIQ: 4,783–9,794).
  • CVD risks (risk ratio [RR]) among participants aged 60 or older, relative to the lowest quartile of steps:
    • Quartile 2: 0.80 (confidence interval [IC] at 95%: 0.69–0.93).
    • Quartile 3: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52–0.74).
    • Quartile 4: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41–0.63).
  • Among participants younger than 60, the risks in quartiles 2 through 4 were nonsignificantly lower than those in the bottom quartile.
    • Quartile 2: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.46–1.35).
    • Quartile 3: 0.90 (95% CI: 0.64–1.25).
    • Quartile 4: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.61–1.48).
  • No relationship was found between step rate and outcome.

Limits

  • No causal link has been established.
  • Potential residual confounders.
  • No analysis of individual patient data.
  • Most participants were of non-Hispanic white ethnicity, which limits the generalizability of the results.
  • Follow-up may not have been long enough to document associations in younger people.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.