Home » world » Daniel Suspension: Ogun APC Rejects NWC Decision

Daniel Suspension: Ogun APC Rejects NWC Decision

by James Carter Senior News Editor

Nigeria’s Political Fracture: Why Local Party Disputes Now Threaten National Stability

A seemingly localized power struggle within the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ogun State is rapidly becoming a bellwether for a much larger, and potentially destabilizing, trend in Nigerian politics: the escalating tension between national party structures and increasingly assertive local chapters. The indefinite suspension of Senator Gbenga Daniel over alleged anti-party activities, and the subsequent defiance of the APC National Working Committee (NWC) in attempting to overturn it, isn’t just about one man’s political future – it’s a symptom of a deeper erosion of centralized control and a growing appetite for autonomy at the grassroots level.

The Battle for Authority: Ward vs. National

The core of the dispute lies in interpreting the APC constitution. Ward 4 in Sabo, Sagamu, insists its suspension of Senator Daniel, a former governor and current Senator representing Ogun East, is valid and protected under the party’s rules. They argue the NWC’s attempt to dismiss the suspension is a blatant overreach, citing Article 21 of the constitution which, according to Ward Secretary Aduroja Oluwole, grants the NWC the power to suspend members but not to invalidate disciplinary actions taken by lower-level executives. This isn’t simply a legalistic argument; it’s a power play, demonstrating a willingness by local chapters to challenge the authority of the national body.

This challenge is particularly significant given the context. Senator Daniel, through his spokesperson Steve Oliyide, vehemently denies the allegations of anti-party behavior, framing the suspension as politically motivated – a move to prevent him from contesting the 2027 senatorial election. Oliyide points to Daniel’s past support for Governor Dapo Abiodun, even while a member of the PDP in 2019, as evidence of his loyalty, further fueling the narrative of a politically-driven vendetta. Adding another layer of complexity, Daniel’s registration in Isote Ward 12 raises questions about the legitimacy of the suspension being carried out by Ward 4.

Beyond Ogun State: A National Trend?

While the Daniel case is specific to Ogun State, the underlying dynamics are playing out across Nigeria. For years, the APC, like many Nigerian political parties, has been characterized by a top-down structure, with decisions largely emanating from Abuja. However, several factors are contributing to a shift in this power dynamic. Increased political awareness among local party members, fueled by social media and greater access to information, is fostering a demand for greater participation in decision-making. Furthermore, the desire to control local resources and patronage networks incentivizes local chapters to assert their independence.

This trend isn’t limited to the APC. Similar tensions are emerging within the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and other political formations. The implications are far-reaching. A fragmented party structure can hinder effective governance, complicate the selection of candidates, and exacerbate internal conflicts, potentially leading to instability, especially as the 2027 elections approach.

The Role of Internal Party Democracy

The current situation underscores a critical need for greater internal party democracy in Nigeria. Strengthening mechanisms for dispute resolution within parties, ensuring transparent candidate selection processes, and empowering local chapters to participate meaningfully in policy formulation are essential steps. Without these reforms, the risk of further fragmentation and escalating conflicts will only increase. A study by the National Democratic Institute highlights the importance of robust internal party structures for fostering good governance and political stability in Nigeria.

The Future of Nigerian Politics: Decentralization or Disintegration?

The clash between the APC NWC and Ward 4 represents more than just a disciplinary dispute; it’s a microcosm of a broader struggle for control within Nigerian politics. The question now is whether this trend towards decentralization will ultimately strengthen the political system by fostering greater accountability and responsiveness, or whether it will lead to further fragmentation and instability. The ability of the APC – and other major parties – to navigate these internal tensions will be crucial in determining the future of Nigerian democracy.

The coming months will be critical. How the APC resolves the Daniel suspension, and how it addresses the broader concerns about the balance of power between the national and local levels, will set a precedent for future disputes. Ignoring the growing demands for greater autonomy at the grassroots level could prove to be a fatal mistake, potentially unraveling the fragile fabric of Nigeria’s political landscape. What are your predictions for the future of party politics in Nigeria? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.