On October 2, at the Thai Journalists Association, the 3rd Council, together with the May 35 Heroic Relatives Committee, organized a forum to analyze the political situation after the Constitutional Court’s verdict. to reclaim the privilege of choosing the Prime Minister from the will of the people by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pichai Rattanadilok Na Phuket Lecturer, Faculty of Social Development and Administrative Strategy National Institute of Development Administration Ms. Rosana Tositrakool Former Bangkok Senator Mr. Phiphob Thongchai Advisor to the Board of Directors of the Heroic Relatives May 35 Mr. Adul Khiaoboriboon Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Heroic Relatives May 35 andMr. Metha Maskhao Secretary-General of the Campaign for Democracy Committee (CRC) joined the discussion.
Mr. Adul Chairman of the May 35 Heroic Relatives Committee said that it must be considered General Prayut Has the highest prestige that can cause the Constitutional Court to make judgments against the feelings of many people. Which do not know how the Faculty of Law will continue to study law In the future, how will the country find a solution together?
“In the past, 38 days without Prime Minister Prayut were very different from days with Prime Minister Prayut for 8 years. an obstacle to the development of the country and there is a problem of good governance in the administration of the country and the benefit of the monopoly capital group.” Mr. Adul said
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Phichai Lecturer, Faculty of Social Development and Administrative Strategy The National Institute of Development Administration said that the 3 P.S. representatives represent the authoritarian side that designed the Constitution. 60 This ruling is one clear evidence that This constitution belongs to the NCPO, by the NCPO, for the NCPO, so in the next election there should be a referendum on a new draft constitution.
from the decision of the Constitutional Court Remark No. 1 neglects the intent of the Constitution to be interpreted at all. because if used in consideration, it will not be able to make Gen. Prayut was able to continue, although a minority judge had brought it up. Remarks No. 2, Section 264 did not specify an exception and clearly wrote that the Prime Minister continued. making society hopeless in applying the law in Thailand It was a dark age of law enforcement. Consequently, the interpretation of the Constitutional Court does not lead to any hope of establishing norms in Thai society.
“General Prayut He seemed very happy because the Facebook post just minutes after the court’s verdict seemed to have known the verdict. The image has deteriorated a lot in the past month when compared to General Prawit Wongsuwan, who seems to run the country better. From now on, before the next election General Prayut will be under a lot of pressure because of the loss of legitimacy in the tenure Including the condition that the abolition of the Emergency Decree will make people feel comfortable in exercising their political rights to rally and evict. General Prayut more because Gen. Prayut would not retreat from the will of the desire to stay in power,” Mr Pichai said. Government capitalists are getting richer. As the people continue to be poor It will be another condition that causes the rally from the economic impact as well. In addition, there will be internal conflicts such as within the Pracharat Party. and conflicts within the Democrat Party and the Bhumjaithai Party from the expansion of power in the next election
Miss Rosana Former Bangkok Senator said that the 2007 Constitution was the first time that the Prime Minister may not hold office for more than 8 years, but can use spaces As for the 2017 Constitution, it is written whether they are in contact or not. But the decision since the promulgation of the constitution is that The Thai constitution is like growing bean sprouts. There is no continuity in enforcement as a norm at all. Thai political and administrative traditions have not been instilled in the will for the continuity of democracy. Therefore, the Thai constitution has no chance to become the country’s big tree. Because after the events of May 1992, we do not think there will be another coup in the end.
“As a result, people will continue to be charged higher electricity bills as it facilitates the monopoly of electricity. Instead of having to open to free solar roof and store it in the country’s electricity system, which will revolutionize the country’s power system due to 8 years of Gen. Prayut causing maximum energy monopoly causing people to suffer all over the land It will have to wait after the election that the Conservatives lost in a landslide. and the strong people freed from separation and rule not being dominated by both the blue corner and the red corner.” Ms. Rosana said.
Mr. Phiphob Advisor to the May 35 Heroic Relatives Committee and the secretary of the Children’s Foundation said that the minority judges expressed their views on the intent of the Constitution very clearly. do not want to create a continuous monopoly of power causing the majority of sound judgments to be weak
This has been in effect since Constitution 50, which lifts the presidency of the United States. that adheres to the tradition of holding office for no more than 8 years or 2 terms since the first president Therefore, this matter must be considered as the intention of the people as well.
“General Prayut should not be prime minister for another era for various reasons The most disappointing thing is that the Prayut government does not reform education. no police reform and not to reform the energy monopoly that began in Mr Thaksin’s government. So it’s not helpful at all. To continue in power leads to the failure of society.” Mr. Phiphob said
Mr. Phiphob also said that At present, he has not seen any political parties fighting these matters. in order to amend the law and repeal these matters In addition to the Progressive Party, the Thai people must therefore be more active in formulating public policy and policy formulation of political parties that will be elected soon. that must have a policy on electricity How clear is the oil? What laws are stuck in solving the problem? How do I modify and cancel?
“I want to explain to my friends who came out to chase General Prayut is not just sacking General Prayut. Only the head of this government which has no personal conflict But came out to chase the military government General Prayut It is only one of the representatives of the military government.” Mr. Phiphob said