El Salvador’s Unlimited Re-election Push: Constitutional Reform Passes Congress

El Salvador Faces Growing Repression Concerns Amidst Opposition Detentions

SAN SALVADOR – International human rights organizations are sounding the alarm over an escalating crackdown on critical voices in El Salvador, with President Nayib Bukele at the helm. The recent detentions of prominent lawyers and activists Ruth López and Enrique Anaya are being cited as stark examples of this intensifying repression.

Juanita Goebertus, Director for the Americas at Human Rights Watch, issued a dire warning, drawing parallels between El Salvador’s current trajectory and that of Venezuela. “They are touring the same path as Venezuela,” Goebertus stated prior to a key project approval. “It begins with a leader who uses her popularity to concentrate power, and ends in dictatorship.”

evergreen Insight: The concerns raised by Human Rights Watch highlight a recurring pattern in political transitions where popular leaders,fueled by public support,gradually consolidate power,perhaps at the expense of democratic institutions and the rule of law. This process often involves the erosion of checks and balances, the silencing of dissent, and an increase in executive authority, which can ultimately lead to authoritarianism. The vigilance of civil society and international observers remains crucial in identifying and addressing these trends early on.

What are the potential long-term consequences of eliminating term limits for all elected officials in El Salvador?

The Historic Vote & Immediate Impact

On july 30, 2025, El Salvador’s Congress approved a controversial constitutional reform allowing President Nayib Bukele to seek re-election indefinitely. This decision dramatically alters the political landscape of the nation, circumventing the existing one-term limit stipulated in the constitution. The vote, backed by Bukele’s Nuevas Ideas party and its allies, passed with a supermajority – exceeding the 67 votes required for constitutional changes. This move has sparked international debate regarding democratic norms and the concentration of power. The reform effectively removes term limits for all elected officials, not just the presidency, impacting future elections for mayors, legislators, and judges.

Key Provisions of the Constitutional Reform

The approved changes encompass several key areas:

Elimination of term limits: The most notable change is the removal of restrictions on consecutive presidential terms. This opens the door for Bukele to perhaps remain in office beyond 2024, when his current term ends.

Reduced Election Cycle: The reform shortens the election cycle, potentially streamlining the electoral process but also raising concerns about rushed campaigns and limited voter deliberation.

Changes to Judicial Appointments: Modifications to the process of appointing judges have been included, further consolidating executive influence over the judiciary. Critics argue this undermines the separation of powers.

Creation of New Autonomous Bodies: The reform establishes new autonomous bodies, the specifics of which are still being detailed, but which are expected to operate under significant presidential oversight.

Bukele’s Justification & Public Support

President Bukele has consistently argued that the reform is necessary for continued progress in tackling El Salvador’s longstanding issues, particularly gang violence and economic instability. He frames the change as a means to ensure policy continuity and prevent reversals of the gains made during his administration.

Public opinion polls, while often subject to debate regarding methodology, have consistently shown strong support for Bukele, largely attributed to his “mano dura” (iron fist) approach to gang suppression. This strategy, while controversial due to human rights concerns, has demonstrably reduced homicide rates. The widespread public approval has been a key factor in the Congress’s willingness to approve the reforms.Recent surveys indicate over 70% approval rating for bukele, fueling his confidence in pursuing these changes.

International Reactions & Concerns

The international community has largely expressed concern over the constitutional changes.

United States: The U.S. State Department released a statement expressing “deep concern” about the erosion of democratic institutions in El Salvador.

European Union: The EU has echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional limits on power.

Human Rights Organizations: groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have condemned the move, citing concerns about authoritarian tendencies and the potential for abuse of power. They point to the increasing centralization of power under Bukele and the weakening of checks and balances.

OAS (Institution of American States): The OAS has called for a review of the reforms, emphasizing the need for adherence to democratic principles.

The Context: Gang Violence & economic Challenges

Understanding the context is crucial. El Salvador has historically been plagued by extreme gang violence, with groups like MS-13 and Barrio 18 controlling vast territories and extorting businesses and communities. Bukele’s aggressive crackdown on these gangs, involving mass arrests and the construction of a mega-prison, has considerably reduced violence, but at a considerable cost to civil liberties.

Economically, El Salvador faces significant challenges, including high levels of poverty and unemployment.Bukele’s administration has pursued unconventional economic policies, including the adoption of bitcoin as legal tender, which has been met with mixed results and criticism from international financial institutions like the IMF. These factors contribute to a complex political environment where security concerns often outweigh concerns about democratic norms for a significant portion of the population.

Potential Future Scenarios

Several scenarios could unfold in the coming months and years:

1. Bukele Runs for Re-election: The most likely outcome is that Bukele will seek re-election in 2024, leveraging his high approval ratings and the newly amended constitution.
2. Increased International Pressure: Continued international criticism could lead to sanctions or othre forms of pressure on El Salvador.
3. **