Escaping the Thucydides Trap: US-China Relations Under Xi Jinping

Chenggang Xu dissects how China’s totalitarian institutions defied decades of Western assumptions by surviving market reforms and reasserting under President Xi Jinping.

The Bottom Line

  • Structural Resilience: Contrary to Western modernization theory, which posited that economic growth would naturally foster political liberalization similar to South Korea or Taiwan, China’s state-centric apparatus has systematically reasserted institutional control over private enterprise.

Dismantling the Convergence Hypothesis

For decades, orthodox economic theory maintained a singular trajectory for developing nations. The underlying premise was straightforward: as capital accumulation expanded and a middle class emerged, authoritarian states would inevitably liberalize. This model drew heavy precedent from the post-war transformations of South Korea and Taiwan, where robust private sectors ultimately catalyzed democratic transitions.

Yet, the structural reality of the world’s second-largest economy deviated sharply from this blueprint. Rather than withering away under the weight of market-based reforms, totalitarian controls adapted, integrating state capitalism with advanced digital surveillance and party dominance.

Here is the math.

The Thucydides Trap and Global Market Mechanics

Over the past decade, the discourse surrounding US-China relations has frequently anchored on the Thucydides Trap—a theoretical framework popularized to describe the structural friction that occurs when a rising power challenges an established hegemon. President Xi Jinping has repeatedly leveraged this paradigm to frame bilateral competition, cementing a narrative of systemic rivalry.

Comparative Institutional Paradigms in Modern Economic Development
Metric / Dimension East Asian Model (Historical Precedent) Chinese Institutional Model
Primary Political Trajectory Gradual democratization alongside market growth Reassertion of totalitarian and party-state controls
Private Sector Autonomy High institutional independence Subordinate to state directives and party committees
Foreign Investor Risk Premium Historically compressible via governance reforms Structurally elevated due to regulatory unpredictability

Re-Pricing Risk in an Era of State Primacy

The Strategic Outlook

The persistence of centralized institutional control in China marks a definitive end to the linear modernization narrative.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

US-China Relations: Xi Jinping Mentions 'Thucydides Trap', Explained! | WION
Photo of author

Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

Editor-in-Chief Prize-winning journalist with over 20 years of international news experience. Alexandra leads the editorial team, ensuring every story meets the highest standards of accuracy and journalistic integrity.

Medical Groups Slam Trump’s ‘Dangerous’ Childhood Vaccine Executive Order

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.