EU and US Trade Talks Remain Stalled Despite Ongoing Negotiations

Here is a rewritten article based on the provided text, aiming for a more engaging and concise style while retaining all essential facts:

EU Prepares for Trade War as US Tariffs Loom

Brussels, Belgium – European Union ministers are set to convene on July 14th to strategize a response to recent US trade pronouncements and prepare potential countermeasures. The financial Times reports that should current U.S.-EU trade negotiations falter, the bloc is poised to implement retaliatory tariffs on €72 billion worth of goods imported from the United States.Despite the escalating tensions, the EU remains committed to a negotiated resolution. Jyrki Katainen, European Commission Vice-President for Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness, reiterated this commitment, stating that a new round of consultations with the US was scheduled for the 14th.European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has also emphasized the EU’s readiness to continue working towards an agreement by the August 1 deadline.

The EU has previously signaled its intent to impose tariffs of up to 50% on specific US products valued at €21 billion. However, these retaliatory measures have been repeatedly postponed to provide ample opportunity for trade discussions, with the latest delay pushing the potential implementation to August 6th.

Further underlining the EU’s preparedness,Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen,representing the EU’s rotating presidency,indicated on the 14th that the bloc is exploring measures targeting the US service sector. He suggested the potential activation of the “Trade Bazooka,” a legislative tool designed to allow the European Commission to impose sanctions on a country’s service trade when that country uses goods tariffs to enforce policy changes.Vice-President Katainen also highlighted a broader EU strategy to counter tariff disputes: bolstering cooperation with “like-minded partners” and diversifying trade relationships. The EU is actively engaging with trading partners across the Asia-Pacific region,including Indonesia,South Korea,Japan,Vietnam,Singapore,and the Philippines,and also Mexico and the Southern Common Market bloc (Argentina,Brazil,Paraguay,Uruguay,and Bolivia). Katainen is slated to meet with officials from the United Arab Emirates next week, further signaling this outward-looking approach.

---

Editor: Wang Shurui

Statement:* Xinhua finance (China Financial Information Network) is a national financial information platform for xinhua News Agency. Never shall the information published on this platform constitute investment advice. If you have any questions, please contact customer service: 400-6123115

What potential impacts could the stalled US-EU trade talks have on global supply chains?

Current Status of Transatlantic Trade Discussions

As of July 15, 2025, extensive trade negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) continue to face significant hurdles, remaining largely stalled despite consistent diplomatic efforts.While both sides publicly affirm a commitment to strengthening transatlantic economic relations, substantial disagreements persist on key issues, preventing a breakthrough towards a broader trade agreement. These talks, often referred to as the TTIP successor negotiations (tho not formally named as such), are hampered by evolving geopolitical landscapes and shifting domestic priorities.

Key Sticking Points in US-EU Trade

Several core areas are consistently identified as major obstacles in the US-EU trade talks.These include:

Agricultural Standards: Divergent approaches to food safety, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and hormone-treated beef remain contentious. The EU’s precautionary principle clashes with the US’s science-based regulatory framework.

Digital Trade & Data Privacy: Disagreements over data flows, digital services taxes, and the regulation of big tech companies are prominent. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and its implications for US firms are a central point of contention.

Goverment Procurement: Access to each other’s public procurement markets is a long-standing issue. The US seeks greater access to EU contracts, while the EU wants reciprocal opportunities.

Industrial subsidies: Concerns over state aid and subsidies granted to domestic industries, particularly in sectors like steel and aluminum, continue to fuel tensions.

Investment Protection: The Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, a feature of previous trade agreements, proved highly controversial and is a sticking point in current discussions. Both sides are exploring alternative dispute resolution methods.

The Role of EU Directives and Regulations

Understanding how the EU operates is crucial to grasping the complexities of these negotiations.As highlighted by the European Union’s official documentation regulations, which are directly enforceable across all member states.This means any agreement reached with the US must navigate the legislative processes of 27 individual EU nations,adding layers of complexity.

Impact of Geopolitical factors

The current geopolitical climate significantly influences the US-EU trade relationship.

russia-Ukraine War: The war in Ukraine has prompted increased transatlantic cooperation on sanctions against Russia, but also highlighted differing approaches to energy security and trade with other nations.

China’s Economic Influence: The growing economic power of China is a shared concern for both the US and the EU,leading to discussions on coordinating strategies to address unfair trade practices and protect strategic industries.

US Domestic Political Landscape: Political polarization within the US and shifting priorities under different administrations impact the willingness to compromise on trade issues.

Past Context: TTIP and Previous Attempts

Previous attempts at a comprehensive transatlantic trade agreement, most notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), failed to materialize due to public opposition, political hurdles, and disagreements on the aforementioned issues. The collapse of TTIP underscored the challenges of reconciling differing regulatory approaches and addressing concerns about the potential impact on labour standards, environmental protection, and national sovereignty. Lessons learned from TTIP are shaping the current negotiation strategy, with a greater emphasis on transparency and stakeholder engagement.

Potential Benefits of a US-EU Trade Deal

Despite the obstacles, a triumphant trade agreement between the US and the EU could yield substantial economic benefits:

Increased GDP: Studies suggest a comprehensive agreement could boost GDP in both the US and the EU by billions of dollars.

Job Creation: Reduced trade barriers could lead to increased exports and investment,creating new employment opportunities.

Lower Prices for Consumers: Eliminating tariffs and reducing regulatory burdens could result in lower prices for goods and services.

Strengthened Supply Chains: A closer trade partnership could enhance the resilience of supply chains and reduce dependence on single sources.

Setting Global Standards: The US and the EU, as major economic powers, could collaborate to set global standards for trade and investment, promoting fair competition and sustainable development.

Practical Implications for Businesses

Businesses engaged in US-EU trade should:

Stay Informed: Monitor developments in the negotiations closely to anticipate potential changes in trade regulations.

Diversify Markets: Reduce reliance on single markets by exploring opportunities in other regions.

Assess Regulatory Compliance: Ensure compliance with both US and EU regulations, including GDPR and food safety standards.

Engage with policymakers: Advocate for policies that promote free and fair trade.

Prepare for Contingencies: Develop contingency plans to mitigate the risks associated with potential trade disruptions.

Recent developments (July 2025)

Recent meetings between US Trade Representative and EU Trade Commissioner in Brussels yielded no significant breakthroughs. Both sides reiterated their commitment to finding common ground, but acknowledged that substantial differences remain. A planned summit in the fall is expected to provide another opportunity for high-level