Exploiting Loopholes: How Payviders Drive Hidden Medicare Advantage Costs Amid Medical Loss Ratio Loopholes

Health insurers are facing scrutiny over potential price inflation and regulatory loopholes. Discover how 'payviders' might potentially be impacting healthcare costs and what steps are being taken to address these concerns.">

Insurers Accused of Inflating Healthcare Costs Through Provider Networks

October 6, 2025

A growing trend of health insurers acquiring or integrating with healthcare providers is drawing criticism amid accusations of inflated pricing and circumvention of federal regulations. These so-called “payviders” – entities that simultaneously operate as insurers and care providers – are under increased scrutiny for potentially manipulating the system to their financial advantage.

The Rise of ‘Payviders’ and the Medical Loss Ratio

Companies like UnitedHealth Group, Elevance Health, and CVS Health have been expanding their reach into the healthcare delivery space, creating vertically integrated systems. This integration allows them to potentially exploit a loophole related to the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR), a key metric established by the Affordable Care Act.

The MLR measures the percentage of premium revenue that insurers must spend on actual medical care and quality improvements, as opposed to administrative costs and profits. The ACA mandates an MLR of at least 80% in most markets. Insurers failing to meet this threshold are required to issue rebates to consumers.As 2012, approximately $13 billion has been returned to consumers through these rebates, indicating the incentive for insurers to minimize payouts.

How Integration Can Mask True costs

By owning provider networks, these payviders can strategically funnel business to their affiliated practices, which may then charge higher prices for services. This inflated spending effectively increases the reported MLR, making it appear as though the insurer is meeting its obligations, even if the true cost of care hasn’t actually decreased. This practice reduces the amount of rebates the insurers have to pay.

Did You Know? A 2023 analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that Medicare Advantage plans, frequently enough operated by payviders, had higher rates of denied claims compared to traditional Medicare.

Medicare Advantage and Non-Claims Payments

The strategies employed by payviders have also fueled a surge in “non-claims payments” within Medicare Advantage, a privately run alternative to traditional Medicare.such as, Oregon officials recently reported that a substantial increase in these payments was linked to UnitedHealthcare shifting costs through its Optum subsidiary.

The concern extends beyond Medicare Advantage. UnitedHealth, Elevance, and Aetna all operate across various markets, raising the possibility of similar practices affecting commercial insurance plans.

Calls for Increased Oversight

Lawmakers are responding to these concerns. In late 2023,Senators Elizabeth Warren and Mike Braun formally requested that the Department of health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigate the impact of vertical integration on healthcare costs and MLR compliance. Similar requests concerning Medicare Advantage have been made by other members of Congress.

Policy experts emphasize the urgency of reassessing regulatory tools like the MLR and enhancing state-level scrutiny of vertical integration arrangements.

Company	key Strategy	Potential Impact
UnitedHealth Group	Vertical integration through optum	Increased non-claims payments; potential MLR manipulation
Elevance Health	Provider network acquisition	Inflated service pricing; reduced rebate obligations
CVS Health	Integrated pharmacy and care delivery	Potential for steering patients to higher-cost services

Pro Tip: Consumers should carefully review their Description of Benefits (EOB) statements to understand the actual cost of their care and identify any potential discrepancies.

Addressing these issues is crucial for upholding the goals of cost containment and ensuring that healthcare funding is dedicated to delivering genuine patient care.

What impact do you think increased oversight will have on healthcare costs? Are current regulations sufficient to prevent these practices?

Understanding Healthcare Vertical integration

Healthcare vertical integration, where a single company controls multiple stages of the healthcare supply chain, has been a persistent trend for decades. While proponents argue it can improve coordination and efficiency, critics raise concerns about anti-competitive practices and increased costs. The increasing concentration of power within a few large companies warrants continuous monitoring and evaluation.

The core of the MLR rule is to balance insurer profit with patient care. When insurers also own provider groups, this balance can become distorted, shifting the focus from care to financial manipulation.

Frequently asked Questions

• What is the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)? The MLR is the percentage of premium revenue health insurers must spend on medical care and quality improvements.
• How do ‘payviders’ potentially exploit the MLR? Payviders can inflate prices within their provider networks to artificially increase their reported MLR.
• What are non-claims payments in Medicare Advantage? These are payments made to Medicare Advantage plans beyond traditional claims for services, and they are often subject to less scrutiny.
• What is being done to address these concerns? Lawmakers are requesting investigations and policy experts are calling for increased oversight of vertical integration.
• Is this issue limited to Medicare Advantage? No, concerns about payvider practices extend to commercial insurance markets as well.
• What can consumers do to protect themselves? Carefully review your Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements and understand the costs of your care.
• What is vertical integration in healthcare? Vertical integration occurs when a single company owns multiple parts of the healthcare system, like insurers and hospitals.

Share this article with your network, and let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

What are the primary ways payviders exploit loopholes in the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) regulations?

the Rise of Payviders and Medicare Advantage

The healthcare landscape is rapidly evolving, and a key driver of this change is the emergence of “payviders” – organizations that function as both payers (insurance companies) and providers (healthcare delivery systems). This vertical integration is particularly prominent within the Medicare advantage (MA) market, and while it promises streamlined care and cost savings, it’s also creating opportunities to exploit loopholes within the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) regulations, ultimately driving up hidden costs for beneficiaries and taxpayers. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating the complexities of modern healthcare financing.

Understanding the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)

The MLR is a key regulatory metric designed to ensure that health insurance companies spend a sufficient portion of premium dollars on actual medical care, rather then administrative costs and profits. Under the Affordable care Act (ACA), insurers must maintain a minimum MLR – typically 83% for large group plans and 80% for individual and small group plans. However, the way MLR is calculated, and the specific expenses allowed to be deducted, creates vulnerabilities that payviders are increasingly leveraging. medicare Advantage plans operate under similar MLR requirements, but the complexities are amplified by the unique structure of MA.

How Payviders Exploit MLR Loopholes

Payviders, by controlling both the financial and clinical sides of care, have unique avenues for manipulating the MLR calculation. Here’s how:

* Inflated Cost Shifting: Payviders can shift costs between their payer and provider arms. For example,a hospital owned by the same entity as the MA plan can charge higher rates for services rendered to plan members,effectively increasing the “medical” expenses reported to meet MLR requirements. This isn’t necessarily illegal, but it artificially inflates costs.

* risk Adjustment Gaming: Risk adjustment is a system designed to compensate plans for enrolling sicker beneficiaries. Payviders can aggressively code for diagnoses to increase risk scores, attracting higher payments from Medicare. While accurate coding is essential, the incentive to maximize risk scores can lead to upcoding or documenting conditions that aren’t fully substantiated.

* Denial of Care & Utilization Management: Strict utilization management practices – prior authorizations, step therapy, and limitations on covered services – can reduce medical spending, boosting the MLR. However, these practices can also lead to delayed or denied care, negatively impacting patient health. The line between legitimate cost control and inappropriate denial of care is often blurred.

* “Directed growth” & Enrollment Tactics: Payviders often focus enrollment efforts on healthier individuals, minimizing medical expenses and improving their MLR. This practice, known as “directed growth,” can leave sicker beneficiaries concentrated in other plans, exacerbating adverse selection.

* Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Relationships: While not exclusive to payviders, complex relationships with PBMs can obscure true drug costs. Rebates and discounts may not be fully reflected in the MLR calculation, allowing payviders to benefit financially while appearing to meet regulatory requirements.

The Impact on Medicare advantage Beneficiaries

These loopholes translate into tangible consequences for those enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans:

* Higher Out-of-Pocket Costs: While MA plans often advertise low or zero premiums, beneficiaries frequently face substantial out-of-pocket expenses for deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.

* Limited Provider Networks: Payviders often restrict their networks to facilities and physicians within their integrated system, limiting patient choice and potentially reducing access to specialized care.

* Increased Administrative Burden: Navigating prior authorizations and utilization management requirements can be time-consuming and frustrating for beneficiaries.

* potential for Suboptimal Care: The focus on cost control can sometimes lead to delays in care or the use of less expensive, but potentially less effective, treatments.

Real-World examples & Case Studies

Several investigations and reports have highlighted these concerns. For example, a 2022 report by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that some MA plans were improperly denying necessary care to beneficiaries. Moreover, analyses by organizations like the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) have documented the increasing concentration of market share among payviders and the associated rise in denials. These findings underscore the need for greater scrutiny and regulatory oversight.

Regulatory Challenges & potential Solutions

Addressing these loopholes requires a multi-pronged approach:

* Enhanced MLR Scrutiny: CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) needs to refine the MLR calculation to account for the unique characteristics of payvider organizations and prevent cost shifting.

* Increased Transparency: Greater transparency in pricing and utilization management practices is essential. Beneficiaries should have clear facts about their coverage and the reasons for any denials of care.

* Strengthened Auditing & Enforcement: CMS should increase audits of MA plans to identify and penalize those engaging in improper practices.

* Self-reliant Review Processes: Establishing an independent review process for denied claims can provide beneficiaries with a fair and impartial avenue for appeal.

* Addressing Risk Adjustment Accuracy: Improving the accuracy