Federal Court Blocks California Law Requiring ICE Agents to Show ID During Raids

Federal immigration agents in California can now conduct raids without displaying their identification, after a federal appeals court blocked a state law requiring them to do so. The decision is a setback for Governor Gavin Newsom, who championed the measure known as the No Vigilantes Act.

Court Blocks California Law Requiring ICE Agent ID

On October 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered a temporary and indefinite suspension of the No Vigilantes Act, specifically Section 10. This provision had mandated that non-uniformed federal immigration agents carry visible identification while performing duties. The court ruled that California lacked the authority to regulate the functions of federal agents without explicit authorization from Congress.

Federal appeals court blocks California law requiring ICE agents to wear visible badges

“Como concluimos anteriormente, la Ley No Vigilantes intenta regular directamente a Estados Unidos en el desempeño de sus funciones gubernamentales”, escribió el juez Mark J. Bennett en nombre del tribunal.

The case reached a federal court in Los Angeles in early 2026.

Legal Dispute Over State and Federal Authority

Before the Ninth Circuit’s intervention, U.S. District Judge Christina A. Snyder had made a split decision. She blocked California’s law banning the use of masks by law enforcement, arguing it created an unjust exception for state officers, but allowed the ICE identification requirement to proceed. The Ninth Circuit disagreed with her ruling on the identification mandate.

Federal Court Blocks California Law Requiring ICE Agents to Show ID During Raids
Photo: lanacion.com.ar

The legal conflict arose amid a surge in immigration enforcement operations in Minneapolis, which included a deadly ICE agent shooting that resulted in the deaths of civilians Renee Good and Alex Pretti. At that time, more than a dozen states were pushing for similar legislation to restrict federal officers’ actions.

Context of Enforcement and Public Opinion

The court’s decision came at a time of significant changes within the ICE agency, which was discreetly dismissing many of the 12,000 new recruits it had hired the previous year. While public outrage over mass deportations had subsided since the winter, immigration remained a prominent issue for the November 3 elections.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll from September showed that more than 40% of Americans disapproved of the president’s handling of immigration. The poll also noted that the percentage of people concerned about unauthorized immigration was nearly identical to those worried about the uncontrolled spread of measles, with both issues ranking below other national concerns like the cost of living and the war with Iran.

Photo of author

Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Omar El Sayed is Archyde’s World Editor, focused on international affairs, diplomacy, conflict, and cross-border political developments. He brings a global newsroom perspective to complex events and helps readers understand how regional stories connect to wider geopolitical shifts.

Shek O Tai Ping Ching Chiu Draws Crowds to Hong Kong

Gordon Ramsay’s $20 Million Hypercar Collection: Ferrari and More