Former Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Chief of Inspection Department “Coalition between political prosecutors and conservative media is now common sense”

▲ Prosecutors. ⓒYonhap News

Former Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Inspector General argued, “It is now common sense for many people that political prosecutors, reactionary media, and anti-democratic traitor political groups are closely aligned and move systematically and deliberately.”

On the 11th, former inspector general Han Dong-soo, who resigned from the prosecution after resigning from the prosecution in July of last year, wrote on his Facebook page, “I received a notice from the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency of a decision not to send the charges due to insufficient evidence in the defamation complaint against a reporter from the Chosun Ilbo. “The Chosun Ilbo cannot be investigated properly, and the limitations of the police investigation are clearly read in the present time, when the prosecution is powerless.”

The Chosun Ilbo is dated December 9, 2021 <이성윤 측근 PC에 공소장 편집본…한동수가 덮었다> In the article, “Regarding the suspicion of leaking the so-called Lee Seong-yoon arraignment, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office’s inspection department confirmed that Prosecutor A, a key aide of High Prosecutor Seong-yoon Lee, accessed the prosecution’s internal network in May, copied the indictment, edited it, and stored it. It is reported that he did not do it.”

▲ An article from the Chosun Ilbo on December 9, 2021.
▲ An article from the Chosun Ilbo on December 9, 2021.

At the time, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’s inspection department issued an official position and pointed to the Chosun Ilbo article and refuted that it was “completely unfounded.” The headline saying that the incident was ‘covered up’ can also cause misunderstandings.”

However, the Chosun Ilbo reported on the 10th <‘이성윤 측근 PC에 공소장 편집본’ 대검 감찰부, 뒤늦게 법무부에 보고> After publishing an article, “The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office made an interim report about last July with the intention of ‘digital forensics of 20 prosecutors who read the indictment’, then crushed the discovery of the edited indictment, and reported it belatedly only after related media reports came out this time.” Reported.

At the same time, it reported that “Director of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Han Dong-soo, a former judge, is known for his pro-government tendency, such as leading the’cutting out former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol’.” In response to this report, Han Dong-soo, head of the prosecutor’s office, filed a criminal complaint against Chosun Ilbo reporter Amugae Lee, who wrote the article, saying, “I seriously violated my human rights and honor with an obvious false report.” And after 1 year and 3 months, the decision of ‘not guilty’ came out.

▲Han Dong-soo, former chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.  ⓒYonhap News
▲Han Dong-soo, former chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. ⓒYonhap News

On the 11th, former director Han Dong-soo said, “I refrained from responding to misinformation, fake news, and malicious reports that attacked and sold me when I was the head of the inspection department at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. It was a serious matter that was not there, so it was difficult to ignore it,” he recalled, saying, “I will find out whether to file an objection with the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office or file a civil lawsuit.”

Former manager Han said, “The fact that political prosecutors, conservative media, and anti-democratic traitorous political groups are closely aligned and move systematically and deliberately is now common sense to many people.” ‘In addition, ‘Channel A Prosecutor’s Cohesion and Intervention in the General Election Case’, ‘Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Writing Complaint and Distributing Political Party Case’, ‘Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Major Court Judge Inspection Document Case’, ‘Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office Special Department Prime Minister Myeong-sook Han’s Perjury Teacher Case’, ‘ Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office Kim Hak-eui’s case of advocacy and president candidate Seong-yoon Lee’s case’ and ‘Jeong Jin-woong’s case of forcibly acquiring a mobile phone subject to confiscation’ are the same.”

Former general manager Han criticized, “At that time, water polo media broadcasting and YouTube repeatedly reported “Suk-Yeol Yoon’s filming”, “Han Dong-Hun’s self-directed assault” and “Kim Hak’s obstruction of the investigation of illegal withdrawals” as political agitation methods.” After a time of madness and madness, the facts are being revealed one by one through court rulings such as ‘Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary party’, ‘Jung Jin-woong not guilty’, and ‘Lee Seong-yoon not guilty’.”

Previously, former manager Han Dong-soo attended the personnel hearing of Minister of Justice Han Dong-hoon in the National Assembly last year and said, “(Reporter’s) attempted coercion is not the essence, but the violation of the Public Official Election Act is the essence. It was an act to privatize the prosecution’s power against the background of conservative media power, and to secure a majority of seats (in the National Assembly) with ambitious and smart subordinates.”

[공고] Media today recruiting candidates for president

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.