What is an application for permanent termination of a hearing in a criminal case? The court has the discretion to order a permanent termination if exceptional circumstances arise. The defense must prove that the prosecution abused the process and that remedial measures cannot provide a fair trial. The court considers factors such as delay in prosecution and unfair evidence collection. The defense bears the burden of proof to show that the defendant cannot receive a fair trial. In a rare case in 2010, the court ordered the permanent termination of the hearing on the grounds that the investigators of the ICAC secretly recorded a conversation between the defendant and the lawyer representing him, violating the “legal professional privilege,” and preventing a fair trial. Reports violating regulations can be prosecuted, and there may be an appeal mechanism to rectify errors made by judges in relevant disputes. It is possible to sue others for infringement without trademark or copyright registration. The real court trial is rigorous and occasionally dramatic.
What is an application to permanently discontinue a hearing? What justification is needed?
Answer: In criminal cases, the court strictly abides by the principle of neutrality. Both the prosecution and the defense have the right to request that the case be advanced to trial, submitted to a judge or jury for trial and decision. However, the court has residual discretion to order a permanent termination of the hearing. Nevertheless, the court will only order a permanent discontinuation of the hearing in very exceptional circumstances.
The defense needs to prove that the prosecution abused the process (abuse of process), and even if the court takes remedial measures, the defendant still cannot get a fair trial. Common grounds for application include delay in prosecution, unfair evidence collection, and media reports before the trial, making it impossible for the jury to reach a fair verdict.
What factors will the court consider?
A: The court considers whether it is impossible for the defendant to receive a fair trial when deciding whether to grant a permanent termination of the hearing. For this reason, the defense has the burden of proof to prove that the defendant is unlikely to receive a fair trial. ” is low.
If the defense cited delay in prosecution as an example, the court would consider whether the defendant’s ability to properly prepare his defense would have been seriously impaired by the delay in prosecution without reasonable excuse.
Has there been any successful application for permanent termination of hearing in criminal cases in recent years?
A: In 2010, there was a rare case of “HKSAR v WONG HUNG KI (黄洪基)” that successfully applied for permanent termination of hearing【Related Judgment Links]the court ordered the permanent termination of the hearing on the grounds that the investigators of the ICAC secretly recorded the conversation between the defendant and the lawyer representing him. The court ruled that this behavior violated the “legal professional privilege” and prevented the defendant from receiving a fair trial. Although the prosecution applied to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal, it was rejected. The defendants in the case were released without trial.
More legal Q&A tips:
Media pre-trial reports can be used as grounds for permanent termination of hearing Lawyer: There are no “successful” cases yet, but media reports that violate regulations can be prosecuted
“No need to answer” proposed to amend the law to establish an appeal mechanism because the two judges made mistakes to see the relevant disputes clearly
Lawyer: You can still sue others for infringement without trademark or copyright registration[Video]
Lawyers in the infringement case against Mei Qiming’s film “Anita Mui” explain the “goodwill” dispute in the answer
Poisonous tongue ｜Real court trial is rigorous and occasionally dramatic
In conclusion, the decision to permanently discontinue a hearing in a criminal case is not taken lightly and is only granted in exceptional circumstances. The defense’s burden of proof to provide evidence of an abuse of process is high, and the court considers multiple factors when making a decision. As seen in the rare case of “HKSAR v WONG HUNG KI,” successful applications for permanent termination of hearing do happen, but they are not common. It’s essential to have a strong legal strategy and evidence in place before making such a significant application. If you have any legal concerns or questions, please refer to the various legal Q&A tips provided in this article, and always consult with a qualified lawyer for specific advice tailored to your case.