(Ling Media/Comprehensive Report) In order to counter the “anti-crime clause” adopted by the Democratic Progressive Party for the election of the chairman and deputy speaker, the Kuomintang claimed that as long as it is “guilty in the first instance”, it will refuse to nominate, which is stricter than the Democratic Progressive Party. In this regard, the DPP listed 8 “ex-criminal teams” on the Facebook fan group yesterday (8th). , There are so many that they can form a “team of ex-convicts”. Which one is guilty in the first instance and is expelled? In this regard, Lin Jiaxing, vice-chairman of the Cultural Communication Association, criticized the DPP for making a list, trying to confuse the opposition party, and called on voters Zhou to teach the arrogant and abusive DPP a lesson.
On the 7th, the Central Committee of the Democratic Progressive Party adopted the “anti-crime clause” for the election of the chairman and deputy speaker. The parliamentary party groups and party members are not allowed to decide to support those who have been convicted of “black, gold, guns, and drugs”. Acting party chairman Chen Qimai also called on the KMT to respond. However, the chairman of the Kuomintang, Zhu Lilun, retorted that every item listed in the “anti-crime clause” of the Kuomintang is stricter than that of the DPP; Lin Jiaxing, the vice chairman of the Cultural Affairs Committee, also said that when the DPP is still “determining the sentence” When it came to exclusion, the KMT insisted on a high standard, and “guilty at first instance” was excluded.
The Democratic Progressive Party said, “Since the Kuomintang wants to use its own regulations to slap its face, then we will seriously count the cases for the Kuomintang, and the number of cases within the party is too numerous to record”:
※Nantou County Magistrate Lin Mingzhen, the second-instance verdict for “election bribery” was confirmed
※Xu Yaochang, the magistrate of Miaoli County, was sentenced to 9 years and deprived of public rights for 6 years for the crime of “seeking profit” in the first instance
※Legislator Fu Kunyu, sentenced to 2 years and 10 months in the third trial of the “stock speculation case”
※Chairman Qiu Yisheng of Taoyuan City Council was sentenced to 9 years in prison and 4 years of deprivation of public rights in the second instance of “corruption”
※Xu Xiurui, chairman of the Hsinchu City Council, was sentenced to 6 months in prison for violating the “Waste Cleaning Law” and committing compulsory crimes in 2005. He was sentenced to 1 year in prison and probation 3 years
※Chairman Zhong Dongjin of the Miaoli County Council was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months for “attempted murder”
※New Taipei City councilor Zhou Shengkao was sentenced to 10 years in prison in the first instance of the “Big Dome Fraud Case”
※Xiao Jingtian, a member of the Central Standing Committee of the Kuomintang, was imprisoned for “killing a policeman”
The Democratic Progressive Party called out, asking the Kuomintang to tell the whole people, which one of the above-mentioned people has been expelled? Why are there rules but no courage to implement them? There are even people who return to the party after being sentenced through the “Same Boat Project”. The KMT basically says one thing and does another. When the DPP discussed anti-criminal provisions such as the “Draft Amendment to Article 26 of the Law on the Election and Recall of Public Officials”, the Kuomintang group immediately retreated, saying that it was “unfair to rehabilitated persons.”
The DPP bluntly said that it would not be nominated if it is guilty, and that it is unfair to the rehabilitated. The KMT is requested to respond positively to the anti-crime law as soon as possible. “May I ask if the Kuomintang still supports these candidates who support black money and have criminal records in this speaker election?”
In this regard, Lin Jiaxing, deputy chairman of the Kuomintang Cultural Communication Association, responded that the Kuomintang’s “nomination criteria” have stricter anti-criminal clauses than the DPP. Those who did not participate in the election for public office, those who were acquitted in the second trial, those who were acquitted in the third trial, those who had served their sentences, and those who were not nominated by the Kuomintang, all complied with the party constitution and the national public office election regulations, otherwise they would be elected How to allow these people to run?
Lin Jiaxing also asked friends from the green camp to strengthen their legal and literary literacy. In addition to not causing unconstitutional controversy and depriving the people of suffrage, they should not just make a list, try to confuse the opposition party, but at the same time, they still have a gangster background in their own party. The fact that the Standing Committee is at the core of power, and comrades in the party accuse Tainan of being black in the election of the Speaker of the House of Representatives is silent.
His criticism of the DPP’s double-standard attitude only proves once again that after the defeat of the Nine-in-One Party, it still has no intention of introspection. The Taiwanese society will see it and will continue to use the votes in its hands to teach the arrogant and abusive DPP a lesson.
Original URL of Ling Media:“Guilty at first instance” and not nominated?The green dot named the 8th “Ex-Convicts Team” and the blue batch: fake eyes