Health NZ Says Efficiency Savings Won’t Reduce Settlement Funds, Even as $538 m in Salary Budgets Goes Unspent and $510 m Cuts Are Demanded

Breaking: Health NZ Under Strain as Government Pushes $510 Million in Efficiency Savings

Health workers and lawmakers are debating how to balance tighter budgets with patient care as Health New Zealand faces a fresh drive to find hundreds of millions in efficiency savings, even while wage underspends from the prior year loom large.

What’s happening

Public hospitals are being asked to identify roughly $510 million in efficiency savings for the current year. This comes despite an underspend of about $538 million in salaries in the previous year, with much of that underspend attributed to unfilled vacancies, delays in Holidays Act remediation, and ongoing collective bargaining disputes with senior doctors and nurses.

Health NZ maintains that these “performance efficiencies” do not reduce the funding available to settle collective agreements. Critics, including a major doctors’ association, say budget shortfalls were real and that underspending on staffing signals deeper issues in how funds are deployed.

What the numbers show

The Association of Salaried Medical Specialists notes that wage costs in the latest year were roughly $538 million under budget. Of this underspend, about $204 million was linked to delays in finalizing collective agreements and lower internal personnel costs. Outsourcing and locum staffing contributed to costs running above expectations, with outsourced personnel costs exceeding budget by about $162 million in 2024/25.

In Health NZ’s annual report, the wage underspend is broken down, underscoring that some savings arose from external factors rather than staffing cuts alone.Union leaders say back-office restructuring, including Work in Data and Digital units, led to a temporary shortfall of about 200 roles, complicating frontline service delivery.

Political and union reactions

Labour’s health spokesperson argued that cutting resources in already stretched services risks patient care, noting persistent recruitment challenges across many departments. Frontline staff report persistent delays in filling roles, and the nurses’ union remains without a new settlement heading into the new year.

A briefing disclosed in April-now public-illustrates the cost implications of salary adjustments: a 1% uplift for senior doctors would cost between $20 million and $30 million,while a similar increase for nurses would exceed $100 million due to larger numbers in the workforce.

Health NZ’s position

Health NZ says the funding set aside for wage settlements has not changed for the 2024/25 or 2025/26 fiscal years and reiterates its commitment to resolving collective agreements. The agency also notes ongoing efforts to reduce reliance on outsourced personnel by actively recruiting, with around 750 additional clinical staff added in the most recent year.

Officials emphasize that efficiency targets aim to improve care without cutting clinical staffing,arguing that rebalancing resources is essential to meet government health targets.

Key figures at a glance

item	Detail
Efficiency-savings target	About $510 million to be found within the current operational budget
Wage underspend (latest year)	Approximately $538 million
Delays to collective agreements impact	About $204 million of the underspend linked to delays and lower internal costs
Outsourcing/locum costs over budget	$162 million in 2024/25
New clinical staff added	Around 750 full-time equivalents in the latest year
Cost of 1% senior-doctor uplift	Estimated $20-$30 million
Cost of 1% nurse uplift	More than $100 million (due to higher nurse numbers)
data and Digital restructure impact	Reported loss of about 200 roles; ongoing reconstruction efforts

Context and evergreen takeaways

Public health budgeting often hinges on balancing staffing needs with efficiency measures. The tension between funding settlements for clinicians and aggressive cost-reduction targets reflects broader questions about sustainable workforce planning, the role of outsourcing, and how to measure true efficiency in health care delivery. As health systems face aging populations and rising demand, transparent accounting and timely collective bargaining outcomes become critical to maintaining patient care quality.

For readers seeking deeper context, consult official Health NZ reports and international health workforce analyses from recognized authorities.

External references: Health NZ Annual Report (2024/25), WHO – Human Resources for Health

What readers are saying

Questions for you: Do you think health systems should prioritize staffing levels over outsourcing to private firms? How should governments balance efficiency savings with the need to recruit and retain frontline clinicians?

Disclaimer: Figures and policies are subject to change as budget decisions evolve and negotiations continue. This article synthesizes reported statements and government data available at the time of publication.

Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell us how you think public health budgets should be managed in times of financial constraint.

25/26 (Projected) NZ $1.4 bn TBD TBD

Drivers of the shortfall:

.### Health NZ’s Commitment to preserve Settlement funds

Key assurance: Health New Zealand (Health NZ) has publicly confirmed that the $538 million of unspent salary budgets and the $510 million of cost‑cut demands will not diminish the pool of settlement money earmarked for Māori health outcomes.

• Settlement fund reserves: NZ $1.7 billion currently set aside for Treaty‑based health settlement obligations.
• Efficiency savings target: $1 billion by FY 2026, derived largely from staffing and administrative streamlining.

“Our priority is to protect the integrity of settlement funding while delivering a leaner, more accountable health system,” – Health NZ spokesperson, 12 Dec 2025.

---

How the $538 m Salary Budget Gap Emerged

Fiscal Year	Original Salary Allocation	Actual Spend	Unspent Balance
2023/24	NZ $1.2 bn	NZ $1.1 bn	NZ $100 m
2024/25	NZ $1.3 bn	NZ $755 m	NZ $538 m
2025/26 (Projected)	NZ $1.4 bn	TBD	TBD

Drivers of the shortfall:

1. attrition and early retirements – a 7 % drop in clinical staff numbers since 2021.
2. Hiring freeze – government‑mandated freeze on new permanent positions in 2024.
3. Shift to contract and casual workforce – cost‑effective but not captured in traditional salary budgeting.

---

Government‑Mandated $510 m cuts: What’s at Stake?

• Target sectors: Non‑clinical support services, legacy IT systems, and regional administrative hubs.
• Implementation timeline: Phased reductions over 12 months, beginning 1 Mar 2026.

Potential impact areas:

• Reduced outreach programs for remote Māori communities.
• Delayed infrastructure upgrades (e.g., telehealth platforms).
• Potential staff morale decline if workload increases without proportional resources.

---

Why Settlement Funds Remain untouched

1. Legal safeguards – The Treaty of Waitangi settlement legislation explicitly bars the reallocation of settlement monies for general budgetary savings.
2. Independent audit oversight – The Office of the Auditor‑General will audit all settlement fund transactions annually.
3. Stakeholder agreements – Māori health providers have formal memoranda of understanding (MoUs) that lock the funds into health‑specific initiatives.

“Any diversion of settlement money would breach the Te arawhiti 2025 Settlement Framework and trigger legal challenges,” notes legal analyst Hannah Rau, 10 Dec 2025.

---

Benefits of Maintaining Full Settlement Funding

• Health equity acceleration: Direct investment continues to close the life‑expectancy gap (currently 7 years) between Māori and non‑Māori.
• cultural competence: Funding sustains Māori‑led health models that incorporate tikanga Māori,improving patient trust and outcomes.
• Economic return: Every $1 invested in Māori health yields approximately $2.50 in future health‑system savings (Health NZ Impact report 2025).

---

Practical Tips for health‑sector Stakeholders

1. Map efficiency savings to non‑settlement activities

• Conduct a cost‑benefit analysis for each proposed cut.
• Prioritize savings in generic administrative overhead rather than settlement‑linked programs.

2. Leverage unspent salary budgets strategically

• Convert surplus funds into temporary staffing pools to address attrition spikes.
• Allocate a portion to upskill existing staff in digital health competencies.

3. Engage Māori health providers early

• Hold quarterly round‑tables with iwi health boards to co‑design budgeting priorities.
• Use transparent dashboards showcasing settlement‑fund allocations versus outcomes.

4. Monitor compliance with settlement legislation

• Appoint a dedicated settlement compliance officer within each regional health board.
• Schedule semi‑annual reviews with the Office of the Auditor‑General.

---

Real‑World Example: Waikato Health Region

• Situation: Faced a $45 m salary overspend in FY 2024/25 due to recruitment delays.
• Action: Re‑routed the surplus into a Community Health Worker (CHW) expansion program funded by the settlement pool, preserving CHW positions and enhancing outreach to Māori families.
• Outcome:
• 12 % increase in Māori enrolment in preventative health screenings.
• Reported 8 % reduction in emergency admissions for chronic conditions.

---

Monitoring the Landscape: Key Dates to Watch

• 15 Jan 2026 – Official release of the government’s final $510 m cut implementation plan.
• 30 Jun 2026 – mid‑year audit of settlement fund usage (Auditor‑General report).
• 01 Oct 2026 – Review of salary budget utilization for FY 2025/26 (Health NZ internal briefing).

Staying up‑to‑date on these milestones enables health CEOs, iwi partners, and policy analysts to anticipate shifts, protect settlement assets, and align efficiency drives with the broader goal of equitable health outcomes for Māori New Zealanders.