HIV Risk Perception Among LGBTQ+ Communities

Bridging the PrEP Gap: Sexual and Gender Minorities at Heightened HIV Risk, Underutilizing Prevention

A recent study highlights a critical disconnect for many sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in North Carolina: engaging in behaviors that increase HIV risk without the protective shield of PrEP, and often without realizing their own heightened vulnerability. The findings underscore an urgent need for more targeted and affirming HIV prevention strategies within healthcare settings.

The research, published in the South Medical Journal, reveals a concerning trend. While a important portion of participants reported behaviors that elevate their risk of HIV acquisition, only a fraction of these individuals were actually prescribed Pre-Exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the highly effective medication used to prevent HIV transmission. This “PrEP gap” is particularly pronounced across various SGM groups, indicating a widespread underutilization of a vital HIV prevention tool.Key findings paint a stark picture:

Low PrEP Adoption Despite Risk: A substantial percentage of individuals engaging in HIV risk-increasing behaviors were not prescribed PrEP. Compounding this issue, a majority of those engaging in these behaviors did not perceive themselves to be at high risk for HIV.
disparities Across Gender Identities:
Cisgender Women: While less likely to engage in risk-increasing behaviors, only a small minority believed they were at increased risk if they did.
Nonbinary Individuals: Reported risk-increasing behaviors at a higher rate, yet a significant majority did not perceive themselves to be at increased risk.
Cisgender Men: Showed higher rates of endorsing risk behaviors and a greater acknowledgment of perceived risk compared to cisgender women and nonbinary participants.
Transgender Women: A notable percentage engaged in risk-increasing behaviors, but very few perceived themselves to be at increased risk.
Awareness vs. Access: The study found that while overall awareness of PrEP was high (78.5%), only 15.1% of participants had ever been prescribed it. Cisgender men led in both awareness and prescription rates. Worryingly,no nonbinary participants reported being prescribed PrEP.
Provider Influence and Barriers: A physician’s suggestion to use PrEP held significant importance for nearly half of the participants. Though, substantial barriers to PrEP access and uptake were identified, including financial cost (56.6%), the need for frequent follow-up appointments (27.1%), concerns about adverse effects (47.4%), and potential medication interactions (36.2%).
Stigma and Mistrust: The stigma surrounding PrEP emerged as a concern for some, with worries about disclosing its use to physicians and loved ones.Furthermore, instances of mistreatment by medical providers were cited as a reason to avoid care by 10% of participants, highlighting the critical need for affirming healthcare environments.

Limitations and Future Directions:

The researchers acknowledged several limitations, including a small sample size that may affect generalizability. The broad categorization of diverse gender identities under “nonbinary” could also influence findings.Additionally, the study’s reliance on PrEP stigma scales previously validated only for cisgender men who have sex with men, and the potential for self-selection bias towards PrEP-aware individuals, are important considerations. The demographic makeup of the participants, with a higher proportion of White, educated individuals living in urban areas, also warrants careful attention when interpreting the results for broader populations.

The study’s conclusion is clear: a diverse range of sexual and gender minorities are at elevated risk of HIV without the consistent use of PrEP. The authors emphasize the crucial need for healthcare providers to proactively inquire about behaviors that increase HIV acquisition risk with all patients. Critically, healthcare settings must transform into safer and more affirming spaces for SGM individuals.Concurrently, intensified efforts are required to promote prep to a wider spectrum of SGM communities, including bisexual women and nonbinary individuals, ensuring that this life-saving prevention is accessible and understood by all who can benefit.

---

References:

1. Cunningham HE,Davis DA,Burns CM,et al. Preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition: perceptions among sexual and gender minority individuals in North Carolina. South Med J*. 2025; 118 (7): 357-364.Doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852
2. U.S. statistics.HIV.gov. Updated February 21, 2025. Accessed July 22, 2025. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics

How does stigma surrounding both HIV adn LGBTQ+ identity impact access to HIV testing and treatment within these communities?

Understanding Unique Vulnerabilities

LGBTQ+ individuals experience disproportionately higher rates of HIV infection compared to the general population. This isn’t due to inherent biological factors, but rather a complex interplay of social, behavioral, and systemic factors influencing HIV risk perception and access to care. Understanding these nuances is crucial for effective prevention and treatment strategies. Key terms frequently enough searched include LGBTQ HIV rates, HIV prevention for gay men, and HIV risk factors LGBTQ.

The Role of Stigma and Discrimination

Stigma surrounding both HIV and LGBTQ+ identity creates meaningful barriers to testing, treatment, and open communication about sexual health. Internalized stigma can lead to feelings of shame and fear, discouraging individuals from seeking necessary care. External stigma, manifested as discrimination in healthcare settings or social environments, further exacerbates these challenges. This impacts HIV awareness and contributes to delayed diagnosis.

Impact on Testing: Fear of judgment or discrimination can prevent individuals from getting tested for HIV, even when engaging in risky behaviors.

Disclosure Concerns: Stigma can make it tough for people living wiht HIV to disclose their status to partners, hindering prevention efforts.

Mental Health: The constant stress of navigating stigma can negatively impact mental health, increasing vulnerability to risky behaviors.

Behavioral Factors & Risk Assessment

Specific sexual practices common within some LGBTQ+ communities can increase HIV risk. However, it’s vital to avoid generalizations and recognize the diversity of experiences. Accurate risk assessment is paramount.

Sexual Behaviors and Transmission

Certain sexual activities carry a higher risk of HIV transmission. These include:

1. Anal Sex: Receptive anal sex carries the highest risk due to the fragility of the rectal lining.
2. Vaginal Sex: While lower risk than anal sex, vaginal sex can still transmit HIV, especially in the presence of othre sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
3. Sharing Sex Toys: Sharing sex toys without proper cleaning and barrier protection can facilitate HIV transmission.
4. Multiple Partners: Increasing the number of sexual partners increases the likelihood of encountering someone with HIV.

PrEP Awareness and Uptake

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective medication that can prevent HIV infection in individuals at high risk. Though,awareness and uptake of PrEP remain uneven within LGBTQ+ communities. Factors influencing PrEP use include:

Access to Healthcare: Limited access to affordable and culturally competent healthcare can be a significant barrier.

Provider Knowledge: Some healthcare providers may lack sufficient knowledge about PrEP or be uncomfortable prescribing it.

Cost and insurance Coverage: The cost of PrEP and insurance coverage can be prohibitive for some individuals.

Misconceptions about PrEP: False beliefs about PrEP’s effectiveness or side effects can deter individuals from using it.

Intersectionality and Increased Risk

Intersectionality – the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender – plays a crucial role in shaping HIV risk for LGBTQ+ individuals.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities

LGBTQ+ people of color experience significantly higher rates of HIV infection than their white counterparts. This is due to a confluence of factors, including:

Structural racism: Systemic racism contributes to economic disparities, limited access to healthcare, and increased exposure to social determinants of health.

Cultural Stigma: Cultural norms and beliefs can exacerbate stigma surrounding HIV and LGBTQ+ identity.

Language Barriers: Language barriers can hinder access to details and healthcare services.

Transgender Individuals and HIV

Transgender individuals face unique challenges related to HIV risk. These include:

Discrimination in Healthcare: transgender individuals often experience discrimination in healthcare settings, leading to avoidance of care.

Hormone Therapy and HIV: The impact of hormone therapy on HIV progression and treatment is still being studied.

* Lack of Trans-Specific Research: Limited research on HIV prevention and treatment specifically tailored to the needs of transgender individuals.

Window Period & Testing Considerations

Understanding the HIV window period – the time between infection and detectable antibodies – is vital for accurate testing. As of 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) states the HIV window period is 14-21 days. This means a negative test result within this timeframe doesn’t necessarily rule out infection. Fourth-generation HIV tests detect both antibodies and antigens, shortening the window period. Regular HIV testing is crucial, especially for those engaging in higher-risk behaviors. Keywords related to this include