High Court with questions on Silverline. The court also asked how 955 hectares of land could be acquired without conducting a survey. The questions are when considering the petition to cancel the land acquisition.
The petition seeks annulment of the land acquisition at Silver Line. Four plaintiffs who lost their land stated that the government notification was illegal. It is argued that railway projects cannot acquire land without central approval. The petitioners contended that the power to acquire land for rail projects rested solely with the Center. And that the proceedings should be stayed immediately.
.
Related posts:
Miami Beach curfew after weekend of "spring break" shootings
Geneva bans baptism in the waters of the lake
"From death squads" to "cannon fodder", the bloody year of the mercenaries of the Wagner group
"The Truth about the Breakthrough of Ukrainian Troops in Shebekino: Official Information from the Op...
"Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party Candidate Withdraws from Campaign: Political Turmoil in Nakhon Phanom"
The Meteorological Department issued the 9th edition warning of heavy rain. Risk of flash floods - ...
Musk offers $5,000 to Florida student to close his Twitter account
Tragic Dog Poisoning at Shan Ha Village: Urgent Call to Protect Innocent Lives