The Search for the Perfect Name: Beyond Climate Tech
Table of Contents
The world of innovative technologies tackling climate change and its effects is constantly evolving, and so too is the language we use to describe it. While “climate tech” has served as a useful umbrella term for over a decade, some beleive it’s time for a refresh. The sector’s scope has broadened, and there’s a growing desire for a term that better reflects its multifaceted nature.
“Climate tech” emerged as a more precise descriptor than its predecessor,”clean tech,” which often led to confusion.But even “climate tech” has limitations. It’s a term that’s become increasingly unwieldy as the field expands to encompass not just carbon reduction, but also solutions for adaptation and planetary well-being.
The search for a new moniker has already begun, with alternatives like “planetary health” gaining traction. This term, first coined in *The Lancet* medical journal in 2014, emphasizes the interconnectedness of human health and the health of our planet. Some investors have embraced “planetary health” as a way to address the growing scope of the sector beyond just carbon emissions.
Other proposals have surfaced, reflecting the diverse range of solutions encompassed by this field. “American dynamism,” while primarily associated with a particular venture capital firm, highlights the potential for innovation and growth in this sector. “frontier tech” embraces a wide range of technologies, some of which overlap with climate tech.
There have been more lighthearted attempts, too, such as “growth tech,” which, while descriptive, lacks the specificity and impact needed to capture the essence of this transformative field.
So, what’s next? As the conversation about terminology continues, one suggestion stands out: “resilience tech.”
This term encapsulates the core mission of the sector: to build a more resilient world, both for humanity and the planet. It acknowledges the profound challenges we face and the need for innovative solutions that enhance our ability to adapt and thrive in a changing world.
Beyond Climate Tech: A Conversation About Terminology
In the rapidly evolving world of climate solutions, the terminology we use is constantly adapting. While “climate tech” has served us well, experts are increasingly suggesting it’s time for a refresh. We sat down with Alex Reed, a leading voice in the field, to discuss this shifting landscape.
The Need for New Vocabulary
Archyde: The term “climate tech” has become ubiquitous, but you’ve argued it’s no longer sufficient. can you elaborate on why?
Alex Reed: Absolutely. When “climate tech” emerged, it was a useful advancement over the ambiguous “clean tech.” But the sector has expanded dramatically. It’s not just about carbon reduction anymore; we’re talking about adaptation, planetary wellbeing, and a holistic approach to a enduring future. “Climate tech” feels limiting in that context.
Exploring the Alternatives
Archyde: Several alternatives have been proposed, from ”planetary health” to “resilience tech.” Which one resonates with you most?
Alex Reed: I’m especially drawn to “resilience tech.” It speaks to the core goal of this sector: building a more resilient world, one that can withstand the challenges of climate change.It encompasses both mitigation and adaptation, highlighting the interconnectedness of human and planetary well-being.
The Importance of Terminology
Archyde: Why is it so critically important to find the “right” term?
Alex Reed: Terminology shapes our understanding.A well-chosen term can attract investment, galvanize public support, and inspire innovation. It can help shift our collective narrative from one of fear and despair towards one of solutions and possibility.
The Conversation Continues
Archyde: The search for the perfect moniker is undoubtedly ongoing. What’s your message to our readers as this conversation evolves?
Alex Reed: Let’s keep talking,keep exploring,and keep pushing for language that truly reflects the transformative potential of this field. What terms do you think best represent the future we’re building? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
