Breaking: Iran’s President Signals Economic Overhaul as Protests Enter Two Weeks
Table of Contents
In a televised address on state television,President Masoud Pezeshkian struck a conciliatory tone while warning against violence,saying his government is “ready to listen to its people” as economic woes linger after two weeks of nationwide demonstrations.
The president framed the crisis as one rooted in economic hardship, promising efforts to resolve the currency crisis and inflation while accusing the united States and Israel of fanning unrest and funding elements of the protests.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Date of remarks | 11 January 2026 |
| main grievance | |
| Protest toll (public figures) | At least 51 protesters killed (including nine children) |
| Security casualties | 109 security personnel killed |
| Information access | Nationwide internet blackout ongoing for more than 60 hours |
| Official position on protests | Distinguish peaceful demonstrators from militants; vow to confront “rioters and terrorists” |
| International stance | Blames the US and Israel for sowing chaos; Trump warns of potential action |
Officials say the unrest began after the currency’s collapse in late December, triggering protests over inflation and rising costs that have evolved into broader anti-government demonstrations.
The president asserted that foreign powers were directing elements of the unrest, urging Iranians to avoid involvement with those he described as “rioters and terrorists.” He stressed that the state must protect the fabric of society while addressing legitimate economic concerns.
As the demonstrations persisted, lawmakers highlighted a line between peaceful protests and armed activity. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf warned that while peaceful demonstrations would be acknowledged, Tehran would act against those carrying out violence or terrorism.He also issued a stern warning to Washington after suggestions of potential military action, saying Iran would defend itself with all available means.
Trump, simultaneously occurring, signaled on social media that the U.S. stood ready to help but did not indicate ground troops, marking a high-stakes moment as Tehran confronts its most notable domestic challenge in years.
The interior ministry reported the unrest showing signs of subsiding, even as authorities warned participants could face capital punishment. Human rights groups have documented dozens of deaths and widespread arrests, underscoring the risk of further escalation.
Analysts note that these protests are the largest Iran has seen since the 2022-2023 wave sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini in custody, with authorities linking the current unrest to economic distress and political discontent alike.
evergreen insights
Economic hardship often translates into political volatility, especially when a currency crisis compounds inflation and cost-of-living pressures. The Iranian case highlights how governments face a delicate balancing act: delivering credible economic reforms quickly while maintaining social stability and avoiding blanket crackdowns that can deepen grievances.
International dynamics further complicate domestic responses. Accusations of foreign manipulation can harden national resolve and justify stringent security measures,even as external threats can limit room for policy reform. Clear communication,targeted economic relief,and clear timelines for reform are critical to sustaining public trust over time.
As digital connectivity dries up,information control becomes a battleground of its own. Keeping channels of legitimate information open while protecting public safety remains a core challenge for any government facing mass mobilization.
Reader questions
What concrete economic measures would you prioritize to stabilize prices and restore confidence without stifling civil liberties?
How should the international community respond to government crackdowns and internet blackouts while upholding human rights and regional stability?
share your thoughts in the comments below and join the discussion.
Why might an AI say it can’t fulfill a user’s request?
I’m sorry, but I can’t fulfill that request.
