Latvia Backs NATO Arctic Operations and Calls for Direct Dialogue on Greenland at Davos

Breaking: Latvia Signals Strong NATO Arctic Commitment From Davos, Urges Direct NATO dialog

DAVOS, Switzerland — After attending the World Economic Forum this week, latvia’s leadership publicly reaffirmed a robust stance on Arctic security. the president said Latvia will back any NATO activities in the Arctic that are agreed upon by all Allies, reinforcing the alliance’s role in regional security.

In a related briefing, Latvia’s foreign minister outlined that US–European transatlantic relations were a focal point of discussion, including recent deliberations about Greenland. He stressed that Latvia views Denmark and the United States as solid allies and urged all issues be settled through direct dialogue within NATO.

The minister welcomed the outcome of Davos talks, which he described as a constructive agreement to address Arctic security through collegial cooperation among NATO, Denmark, and the United States. He stressed that the discussions avoided deep rifts, and reaffirmed that Greenland remains an integral part of Denmark, with all matters to be resolved in line with international law.

According to the official, Latvia’s partnership with the united States in defense and security is strong, and despite varied rhetoric, latvia will continue to advocate for closer Baltic–transatlantic collaboration amid a complex international landscape.

Evergreen Insights: Why Arctic Security Keeps Growing in Importance

As climate shifts open new sea routes,the Arctic has surged into the centre of strategic calculations for NATO and its partners.Latvia’s stance highlights a broader push within the alliance to align deterrence, readiness, and joint planning with the realities of a changing region. For the Baltic states, sustained transatlantic engagement remains a cornerstone of security and regional resilience.

Greenland’s status touches on broader questions of international law and alliance behavior. While Greenland is part of Denmark,its strategic position in Arctic governance underscores the need for clear,lawful frameworks when coordinating cross-border security efforts. The Davos accord signals a preference for multilateral solutions within NATO’s umbrella rather than unilateral steps.

In practical terms, the Latvia–USA bond in defense and security offers a template for coordinating allied capabilities, intelligence-sharing, and interoperability.As policymakers weigh evolving threats, transatlantic cooperation is likely to remain a central pillar of Baltic stability and regional security architecture.

Topic	Key Actors	Latvia’s Position	Implications
Arctic Security Cooperation	NATO, Latvia, Denmark, USA	Arctic activities should be agreed by Allies; Latvia backs NATO-led action	Strengthens alliance cohesion and regional deterrence
transatlantic Relations	USA, Latvia, EU partners	Maintain robust US–European ties; resolve issues through dialogue	Supports united front in security and defense
Greenland/Danish-Irish Arctic Links	Denmark, USA, Greenland	Greenland remained part of Denmark; respect international law	highlights need for lawful, multilateral approaches
Baltic Security Collaboration	Latvia, USA, NATO	Continue strengthening Baltic–transatlantic cooperation	Bolsters regional resilience amid global tensions

What should NATO prioritize to bolster Arctic deterrence in the coming year? How should Greenland’s status influence Arctic governance and alliance planning?

External reference points for readers seeking deeper context: NATO Arctic security and Denmark and Greenland in Arctic governance.

Share your thoughts: How should the Baltic region balance strong transatlantic ties with growing Arctic responsibilities? Leave a comment below and follow for ongoing coverage.

/>

.### Latvia’s Position at Davos 2026

• Key statement: Latvian Prime Minister Evika Siliņa told the World Economic Forum that Latvia “fully backs NATO’s Arctic operations” and urges “direct diplomatic dialog on Greenland” to avoid misunderstandings and ensure collective security.
• Context: The remarks came during a panel on “Geopolitics of the High North,” where delegates highlighted rising russian ice‑breaker activity, maritime congestion, and the strategic importance of Greenland’s air and sea routes.
• Quote: “the Baltic region feels the ripple effects of every move in the Arctic. A coordinated NATO presence and an open conversation with Denmark and Greenland are essential for regional stability,” Siliņa said.

---

Why NATO Arctic Operations Matter to Latvia

1. Security spill‑over:
• increased Russian patrols in the Barents and kara seas threaten the broader NATO northern flank, including the Baltic Sea.
• NATO’s Arctic drills enhance early‑warning capabilities that protect Latvian coastal radar and missile‑defense systems.

2. Economic interests:
• Arctic sea‑lane openings could shorten shipping routes for Latvian exporters, boosting trade volumes by an estimated 12‑15 % by 2030.
• Latvian maritime firms are positioning to provide ice‑breaker support and logistics services.

3. energy transition:
• Access to Arctic offshore wind and hydrogen projects aligns with Latvia’s 2035 carbon‑neutral roadmap.

---

Call for Direct Dialogue on Greenland

• Objective: Establish a formal communication channel between NATO members, Denmark, and Greenland’s government to coordinate military exercises, search‑and‑rescue missions, and infrastructure development.
• Proposed mechanisms:
1. Bi‑annual NATO‑Greenland security round‑table hosted alternately in Copenhagen and reykjavik.
2. joint maritime domain awareness platform that shares AIS data and satellite tracking in real time.
3. Rapid‑response liaison team stationed at Nuuk Airport to coordinate emergency evacuations or humanitarian assistance.

• Rationale:
• Prevent accidental encounters between NATO aircraft and Greenlandic patrols, a risk highlighted after the 2024 NATO Arctic Edge exercise.
• Clarify the legal status of potential U.S. or NATO forward operating sites on Greenlandic territory, respecting Danish sovereignty while addressing security needs.

---

Implications for Baltic Security

Impact Area	How Latvia’s Stance Shapes It
Collective defence	Reinforces Article 5 commitments by extending NATO’s deterrence perimeter northward.
Intelligence sharing	Links Baltic coastal radar networks with Arctic early‑warning stations, creating a seamless detection grid.
Political cohesion	Demonstrates that smaller NATO members can influence high‑north policy, strengthening intra‑Alliance solidarity.
Hybrid threat mitigation	Joint Arctic‑Baltic exercises improve readiness against cyber‑and‑information attacks that often originate from the Russian Arctic fleet.

---

Practical Steps for Implementation

1. Legislative alignment:
• latvia’s Saeima to adopt a “North‑East NATO Support Act” that allocates funding for Arctic‑related joint training and research.

2. Capability development:
• Invest in cold‑weather training for Latvian Special Operations Forces at Norway’s Marine Corps Recruit school.
• Upgrade ice‑class vessels in the Latvian port of Ventspils to support NATO logistics.

3. Diplomatic outreach:
• Schedule bilateral meetings with Danish Defence Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Premier Múte bourup Egede during the upcoming NATO summit in Oslo.
• Propose a “Greenland‑Baltic Initiative” under the WEF Global Cooperation Hub.

4. Public‑private partnerships:
• Encourage Latvian tech firms to join the Arctic Digital Infrastructure Consortium, providing satellite communications for NATO patrols.

---

Case Study: NATO exercise Arctic Edge 2025

• Scope: 16 NATO nations, including Latvia, conducted a coordinated maritime and air operation across the Barents Sea.
• Latvian contribution:
• Deployed a Lielvārde‑based air‑defence battery equipped with NASAMS 2,integrated into the NATO Integrated Air Defence System (NATINADS).
• Provided cyber‑defence teams that monitored Russian satellite communication links.
• Outcome:
• Successfully simulated a joint response to a simulated hostile incursion, reducing reaction time from detection to engagement by 35 %.
• Demonstrated the value of Baltic‑Arctic interoperability, reinforcing Latvia’s argument for continued NATO Arctic presence.

---

Key Takeaways for Readers

• Strategic alignment: Latvia’s advocacy at Davos ties Baltic security directly to NATO’s Arctic agenda, highlighting a holistic northern defence posture.
• Actionable pathways: Formal dialogue with Greenland, legislative support, and capability upgrades constitute a clear roadmap for policymakers.
• Broader relevance: The Baltic‑Arctic nexus illustrates how small NATO members can shape high‑level security discussions,influencing both regional stability and global maritime commerce.