Legal Case: Theft with Violence, Destruction, and Controversy – Analysis and Updates

2023-06-29 13:00:00

He is prosecuted for theft with violence of a mobile phone, blows and destruction of the fence, in this case the front door, in which he had kicked before snatching a mobile phone from the hands of his ex, d ‘where this robbery prevention.

“I just took the mobile phone out of his hands. I had good reasons. On the other hand, I didn’t hit him”.

The victim’s lawyer indicates that the conflict still exists: “The reasons for this conflict is that the gentleman accuses my client of being part of a sect and of dragging their children into it. However, there is nothing that justifies such accusations on his part. My client is not part of a cult and it has been proven.

He came to her house at 11:00 p.m., supposedly to fill out those tax papers. He threw a big tantrum, left before coming back and kicking the door. He snatched the phone from her hands to read her messages. He grabbed my client by the neck and arms.”

The King’s Prosecutor confirms that the lady was indeed seized: “He grabbed her in the neck and the mobile phone was torn off. We would give the good Lord without confession to the defendant, if I dare say. There were no traces of blows noted but the victim was very shocked. The gentleman has no history. I require 7 months with a possibly probationary reprieve”.

The defense admits that the time chosen by the defendant, 11 p.m., was inappropriate: “He found it difficult to accept their separation. They are still not divorced since the judgment has not been served. The situation is still peaceful and everyone has the double of the other’s key. We seek acquittal for the beatings. For the rest, a simple suspension or a total reprieve. He learned the lesson.” Judgment on September 11.

1688083026
#Mouscronnois #knocks #exs #door #p.m #fill #tax #return..