Music Streaming Fraud: Indie Artists Caught in AI-Generated Royalty Skimming
A Shadowy Battle Is Raging Within The Music Industry As Streaming Platforms Grapple With Widespread Manipulation. Innocent Independent Artists Are Increasingly Becoming Collateral Damage In This Fight Against Music Streaming Fraud. This Growing Threat Involves Fraudsters Exploiting Streaming Services Such As Spotify And Apple Music, Using Ai-Generated Tracks To Illegitimately Collect Royalties.
These Ai-Generated Songs Are Inexpensive and Rapid To Produce, Making Them An Attractive Tool For Fraudsters. According To Deezer, As Of April 2025, Over 20,000 Ai-Created Tracks Were Being Uploaded Daily, Representing 18% Of All New Music-Nearly Double The Number from january. These Malicious Actors Frequently enough Employ Bots, Ai, Or even Human Click Farms To Repeatedly Play These Fake Songs, Generating Revenue Illegally. Others Exploit Upload Services To Place Fake Songs On Legitimate Artists’ Pages, Siphoning Off Royalties That Way.
The Streaming Giants’ Response
Spotify Reports Fining The Most Egregious Offenders And Investing “significant Engineering Resources And Research Into Detecting, Mitigating, And Removing Artificial Streaming Activity.” Similarly, Apple Music Claims That “Less Than 1% Of All Streams Are Manipulated” On Its Platform.While This May seem encouraging, The Scale Of The Streaming Business, Valued At $20.4 Billion Globally by The ifpi, Means That Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars Are Likely Being Skimmed Off Annually By These Criminals.
One Major Issue Is That While It Has Become Easier For Musicians To Upload Songs Than To Manufacture Physical Copies, The Same Is True For Fraudsters. This Has Led To The Music Industry Declaring War On Streaming manipulation,But Automated Detection Systems,Often Overly Sensitive,Are Causing Artists To Have Their Music Taken Offline Even When They’ve Done Nothing Wrong.

Inside The Fight Against Fake Streams
Darren Owen, Chief Operating Officer Of Music Distribution Company Fuga, noted That music Streaming Fraud “Started To Blow Up Across The Industry” Around 2021, And Dealing With It Now Constitutes About Half Of His Workload.
Fuga Utilizes Ai And Machine Learning To Assign A “Severity Score” To Streaming Patterns, Identifying “Non-human Listening Patterns” To Detect Fraud. According To Owen, Coordinated Criminal Elements Are Frequently enough Involved As Well, With Countries Including India, Vietnam, Thailand, And Parts Of Eastern Europe Serving As Hotbeds Of Click-Farm Activity.
In Addition To Services Like Pimpyourfollower.De, Which Was Shut Down After A Court Order, Major Record Labels Are Also Being Embroiled In These Allegations. Drake Accused Global Music Group (Umg) Of Conspiring To Inflate Streams Of Kendrick Lamar’s Diss Track “Not Like Us,” An Allegation That Umg Denies.
The Impact On Independent Artists
Several Artists Have Shared Experiences Of Being Wrongfully Accused Of Music Streaming Fraud When unexpected Stream Spikes Triggered Automated Systems.Darren Hemmings, Managing Director Of Motive Unknown, A Music Marketing Company, Noted that One Of His Tracks Was Flagged For Manipulation After Its Streams Increased Significantly. Although He Had Not Manipulated The Streams, He Could Not Determine Why The Song Became Popular.
Similarly, Northern Irish Rock Band Final Thirteen Had Their Music Removed From Streaming Services After A Significant Spike In Streams, suspected To Be From Radio Play. Their Distributor, However, Automatically Assumed Manipulation. “It’s Really hard For Any Artist To Prove That They Didn’t [Manipulate Streams], But It’s Even Harder For Spotify To Prove That They Did,” Said Doobes, The Band’s Drummer.

Adam J Morgan, An Indie Artist Performing As Naked & baked, Experienced A Similar Issue When A Track Gained Over 10,000 Streams In A Week, Possibly Due To Use On Tiktok, But Was Removed By His Distributor, Routenote. Morgan Stated he Hadn’t Engaged In Any unethical Activities And Was Not Given An explanation.
These Takedowns Can Be Disruptive, Leading to Marketing Setbacks And Financial Loss. matthew Whiteside Of The Night With… Had Three Albums Removed Due To Suspicious Streaming Activity. He Discovered That tnw music Tracks Were Being Added To Manipulated Playlists. The Distributor Offered Resubmission At $40 Per Album, But Without Guarantee Of Non-Removal.
Did you Know? According To A Study Published In “Music Business Journal” In May 2024, Approximately 10% Of All Music Streams Globally Are Estimated To Be Fraudulent.
Whiteside Emphasizes That “Streaming In General Is Geared Against The Smaller And The Niche.” he Notes That Earning Even 1,000 Streams A Month Would Be A Success, Making Paying To Resubmit Albums Financially Unfeasible. He Further Suggests Smaller Artists are disproportionately affected.
Potential Solutions And Industry Responses
Deezer States It Was The First Streaming Service To Implement Fraud Detection Systems.Thibault Roucou, Deezer’s Royalties and Reporting Director, Said That The company Relies On Multiple Indicators To Detect Fraudulent Users, While Thoroughly Investigating Each Case Before Requesting A Takedown.
Other Platforms’ Systems for Taking Down Tracks Often Assume Guilt, With Complex Appeals Processes That Discourage Smaller Artists. Pop Singer Levina, Who Represented Germany At Eurovision In 2017, Had Her Music Removed Because she Shared A Name With Another Artist. She Lamented The Difficulty Of Appealing These Decisions Through streaming Services.

Levina, Also Chair Of The Artist Council Within The Featured Artists Coalition, Is Working On “Minimum Standards For What Distributors Should Be Doing.” she Suggests Implementing A Traffic Light Warning System That Allows Artists Time to Defend Themselves Or Rectify Issues.
The Consensus Among Streaming Services And Distributors Is That eliminating Music Streaming Fraud Entirely Is Unrealistic; Containment Is The More Achievable Goal. Owen Notes That The Latest Fraudulent Tactic involves Incrementally Boosting Numerous Tracks To Evade Detection Systems.
The Future of Music Streaming
Hemmings Suggests This Could Lead To A Two-Tier Streaming Economy, Where Indie Artists Abandon Main Platforms For Services Like Bandcamp. He Notes That The Low Earnings On Main Platforms Might lead The Independent Music Community to Seek Other Revenue Streams.
In 2024, Bandcamp reported a 30% increase in artist payouts compared to the previous year, indicating a growing trend towards alternative platforms that prioritize artist compensation.
Where do you see the future of music streaming heading? What measures do you think would most effectively combat music streaming fraud?
Pro Tip: Artists Can Use Tools like Soundcharts to Monitor Their streaming Data And Identify Any Unusual Activity That Could Indicate Music streaming Fraud.
The Economic Impact Of Music Streaming Fraud
Music Streaming Fraud Not Only Harms Individual Artists But Also Distorts The Entire Music Industry Ecosystem. The Artificial Inflation Of Stream Counts Diverts Royalties Away From Legitimate Artists And Publishers, skewing The distribution Of Revenue And Potentially impacting Investment Decisions Made By Record Labels And Streaming Platforms.
Moreover, The Presence Of Fraudulent Streams Can Undermine The Credibility Of Music Charts And Playlists, Making It challenging For listeners To Discover Authentic And Emerging Talent. This Can Lead to A Decreased Value Of Music Streaming Services And A Loss Of Trust Among Both Artists And Consumers.
Combating Fraud: A Multi-Faceted Approach
Addressing Music streaming Fraud Requires A Collaborative Effort From Streaming Platforms, Distributors, Record Labels, And Artists. Streaming Services Need To Continuously Refine their Fraud Detection algorithms, utilizing Machine Learning And Ai To Identify Suspicious Streaming Patterns In Real-Time.
Distributors Should Implement Stricter Verification Processes For Artists And Tracks While Remaining Obvious And Fair In Their Takedown Procedures. Additionally, Record Labels Can Play A Role In Educating Artists About Best Practices For Promoting Their Music Without Resorting To Unethical Tactics That could Flag Their Music As Fraudulent.
Artists Themselves Must Remain Vigilant And Monitor Their Streaming Data Regularly, Reporting Any Unusual Activity To Their Distributors Or Streaming platforms. By Working Together, The Music Industry Can Create A More Equitable And Enduring Streaming Ecosystem For All.
| Stakeholder | Responsibilities | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Streaming Platforms | Fraud Detection & Prevention | Refine Algorithms, Monitor Streaming Patterns |
| Distributors | Verification & Clarity | Implement Stricter Verification, Improve Takedown Procedures |
| Record Labels | Education & Support | Educate Artists On Best Practices |
| Artists | Monitoring & Reporting | Monitor Streaming Data, Report Suspicious Activity |
Frequently Asked Questions About Music Streaming Fraud
-
What Exactly Is Music Streaming Fraud?
Music Streaming Fraud Involves Artificially Inflating The Number Of Streams A Song Receives, Typically Through The Use Of Bots Or Paid Services To Generate Illegitimate Royalties.
-
How Does Ai Contribute To Music Streaming Fraud?
Ai is Used To Generate Cheap,Quick tracks That Are Then Fraudulently Streamed To Collect Royalties.It Also Powers Bots That Simulate Human Listening Behavior.
-
What Are Streaming Services Doing To Combat Music Streaming Fraud?
streaming Services Are Investing In Fraud Detection Technology, Fining Offenders, And Removing Artificial Streaming Activity.
-
What Can Independent Artists Do If They Are Wrongly Accused Of music Streaming Fraud?
Independent Artists should Monitor Their Streaming Data, Report Any Unusual activity, And Be Prepared To Defend Themselves Against False Accusations By Providing Evidence Of Legitimate Promotion.
-
Why Is It Difficult To Appeal Takedowns Related To Music Streaming Fraud?
The Appeals Process Is Often Arduous And Complex, With Systems That Presume Guilt.This Can Discourage Small Artists From Challenging Takedowns.
-
Are There Alternative Platforms To Avoid Music Streaming Fraud?
Some Artists Are Turning To Platforms Like Bandcamp, Which Offer Greater Transparency And Better Compensation, Reducing the Incentive For Fraud.
Share Your Thoughts in The Comments Below! How Do You Think The Music Industry Should Tackle Music Streaming fraud?