Myles Garrett’s arrival in Los Angeles wasn’t just about the trade—it was about the jersey number. On June 3, 2026, the Rams’ star defensive end revealed he paid “more than a couple bucks” to reclaim No. 95 from teammate Poona Ford, a decision that rippled through the Rams’ defensive line roster like a chain reaction. The trade that sent Garrett to L.A. was months in the making, but the jersey saga—equal parts football tradition and modern-day transaction—became the unexpected headline.
How a $95 jersey number became a $95 million trade’s quiet epilogue
The Rams’ 2026 offseason was supposed to be about building a dynasty. Instead, it became a masterclass in NFL logistics: how to move a franchise-altering player, how to negotiate a no-trade clause, and—yes—how to buy a jersey number from a teammate. Myles Garrett’s decision to wear No. 95 in L.A. wasn’t just sentimental; it was symbolic. The number had followed him from Cleveland, where it became a legend, to Los Angeles, where it would now belong to him alone. But the cost? More than Garrett let on.
cluster (priority): Yahoo Sports
Garrett’s trade from the Browns to the Rams—finalized on June 1, 2026—was the NFL’s most seismic offseason move since Aaron Donald’s departure from the Rams in 2020. The Browns sent Garrett, the reigning Defensive Player of the Year, to L.A. in exchange for Jared Verse, a 2027 first-round pick, and two future picks. But the real story wasn’t just the trade itself. It was the months of backchannel negotiations, the no-trade clause loophole, and the quiet conversation that let Garrett keep his number. “Just a conversation,” Garrett said at his introductory press conference. “It didn’t take too much.”
What “didn’t take too much” turned out to be a domino effect. Poona Ford, the Rams’ defensive lineman who had worn No. 95 since joining the team in 2024, agreed to let Garrett take it—after a “couple bucks” changed hands. Ford, a fan-favorite known for his physicality and clutch plays, switched to No. 97. That forced Bill Norton, another defensive lineman, to move from 97 to 93. And Payton Zdroik, who had worn 93, ended up with No. 62. The number shuffle was as meticulous as the trade itself.
The trade that broke the NFL: How Les Snead outmaneuvered a no-trade clause
The Rams’ general manager, Les Snead, had spent months trying to pry Garrett away from Cleveland. The process began in March 2026, when the Browns adjusted Garrett’s contract in a way that signaled he might be available. Snead, who had a personal relationship with Browns GM Andrew Berry, reached out immediately. “When Cleveland made the adjustment to his contract, not sure if it was a signal, they made an adjustment,” Snead told reporters. “I’ve got a good relationship with Andrew Berry, so I just checked in.”
Berry initially turned down Snead’s offers, which included draft picks. But the Browns were willing to discuss a trade—if the Rams included Jared Verse, their own promising young pass rusher. The Rams hesitated. Verse had been a first-round pick in 2024 and was already a key part of their defensive future. “We tried to do this with draft compensation, then the draft came and went,” Snead said. “We picked talks back up, we tried to discuss more draft compensation. At the end of the day, where it got tough for us, is they asked for Jared Verse in return.”
cluster (priority): The New York Times
The Rams eventually relented. But there was one more hurdle: Garrett’s no-trade clause. Snead had asked Berry point-blank: *“Myles has a no-trade clause, are we going to have gone through all this and he’s going to say no?”* The answer, it turned out, was no. Garrett had no intention of blocking the move. In fact, he had been lobbying for it.
As The New York Times reported, Garrett’s decision to leave Cleveland wasn’t just about football—it was personal. After the Browns’ 2023 loss to the Rams, Garrett had a chance encounter with Sean McVay in SoFi Stadium’s tunnels. McVay, who had spent the week obsessing over how to stop Garrett, told him: *“I didn’t f—ing sleep all week because of you.”* That moment stuck with Garrett. Years later, when the opportunity arose, he didn’t hesitate.
Garrett’s no-trade clause: The loophole that made the trade possible
No-trade clauses are standard in NFL contracts, giving players the final say on where they play. But Garrett’s clause had a twist: it was structured in a way that made him more likely to approve a trade to the Rams. According to Snead, Garrett had been in contact with McVay and Snead for weeks, expressing his desire to join the Rams. “We tried to do this with draft compensation, then the draft came and went,” Snead said. “We kept trying, we tried to figure out a solution.”
The Browns, meanwhile, were shifting their focus. With Garrett’s contract set to expire after the 2026 season, they were more willing to part ways. The Rams, desperate to add a pass-rushing force to complement Aaron Donald’s retirement, were willing to pay the price—including Verse, a player they had drafted just two years earlier.
The trade was finalized on June 1, 2026. But the real drama wasn’t in the paperwork—it was in the details. Garrett’s no-trade clause had been a red herring. He had never intended to block the move. “Myles had a no-trade clause,” Snead said. “But he didn’t say no.”
No. 95: The jersey number that cost more than a “couple bucks”
Garrett’s jersey number had followed him from Cleveland to L.A. It was the number he had worn since his rookie season, the one that became synonymous with his dominance. When he arrived in Los Angeles, he made it clear: he wanted to keep it.
Former player says Myles Garrett trade to Rams may be the “biggest blockbuster” in NFL history
“Just a conversation. It didn’t take too much.”
— Myles Garrett, on acquiring No.
The conversation, it turned out, involved more than just words. Poona Ford, who had worn No. 95 since joining the Rams in 2024, agreed to let Garrett take it—but not for free. “Maybe more than a couple, but he was open to it,” Garrett said when asked about the cost. The exact amount wasn’t disclosed, but the gesture was clear: Garrett wasn’t just buying a number. He was buying a piece of Rams history.
The ripple effect was immediate. Ford switched to No. 97, Norton moved from 97 to 93, and Zdroik ended up with No. 62. The Rams’ defensive line had just undergone its own version of a roster shuffle—all because of a jersey number.
What the trade means for the Rams’ defense—and Garrett’s legacy
Garrett’s arrival in Los Angeles wasn’t just about adding another star pass rusher. It was about reshaping the Rams’ defense. With Aaron Donald’s retirement looming, the Rams needed a player who could dominate like him—and Garrett was the answer. According to The New York Times, Garrett’s double-team rate on pass rush snaps was nearly 60 percent in 2025—the second-highest in the NFL. That kind of dominance forces offenses to adjust their entire protection scheme, making Garrett’s presence even more valuable.
cluster (priority): news.google.com
The Rams’ defense, already one of the best in the league, now has a new weapon. Garrett’s arrival could push them into a new tier—one where they’re not just contenders, but title favorites. But the real question is whether Garrett will stay. His contract in Cleveland was set to expire after the 2026 season, and the Rams are expected to offer him a long-term deal. If they do, Garrett could be in L.A. for years.
For the Browns, the trade was a necessary step in rebuilding. Garrett’s departure leaves a void, but the picks they received—including a 2027 first-rounder—could help them replace him. Jared Verse, the young pass rusher they sent to L.A., is still developing, but he has the potential to become a star. The Browns’ front office, led by GM Andrew Berry, made a tough call—but one that could pay off in the long run.
The bigger picture: How Garrett’s trade reshapes the NFL’s power structure
Myles Garrett’s move to the Rams isn’t just a trade—it’s a statement. It signals that the NFL’s elite players are no longer bound by loyalty. Garrett, who had spent his entire career in Cleveland, chose to leave for a team that offered him a new challenge—and a chance to play alongside Sean McVay, one of the best coaches in the league.
The trade also highlights the growing value of defensive stars in today’s NFL. With offenses getting more explosive, teams are willing to pay top dollar for pass rushers who can disrupt games. Garrett’s arrival in L.A. could set a new benchmark for what it takes to land a franchise-altering player.
But the real story isn’t just about Garrett. It’s about the NFL’s evolving landscape. Teams are no longer just trading for talent—they’re trading for culture, for chemistry, for the intangibles that make a team great. Garrett’s move to the Rams is a perfect example. It’s not just about the player; it’s about the vision, the leadership, and the long-term plan.
As for Garrett? He’s already making his mark. His first season in L.A. will be watched closely—not just for his performance, but for how he fits into McVay’s system. And if the Rams offer him a long-term deal? Well, that’s a conversation for another day.
One thing is certain: No. 95 will never be the same.
Senior Editor, Sport
Luis is a respected sports journalist with several national writing awards. He covers major leagues, global tournaments, and athlete profiles, blending analysis with captivating storytelling.