North Dakota Tribes Eye Supreme Court Challenge to Voting Rights Ruling

North Dakota Tribes Eye Supreme Court Over Voting Rights Dispute

The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa and Spirit Lake Tribes are exploring legal avenues after a recent appellate court ruling on legislative maps that they argue dilute the native vote.

WASHINGTON – A important voting rights dispute originating in North dakota may soon reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa and spirit Lake Tribes, alongside several Native American citizens within the state, have been engaged in a prolonged legal battle concerning legislative maps enacted in 2021.

Tribal representatives assert that these maps unfairly dilute the voting power of Native Americans. This week, the Campaign Legal Center announced that counsel for the tribes has submitted a motion to stay a court’s decision and is preparing to petition the Supreme Court for a review of the case.

The matter recently went before the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate panel concluded that private citizens are barred from challenging the law, stating that only the U.S. department of Justice possesses this authority. The court also declined to reconsider its ruling this week.

In a statement shared on social media, Turtle Mountain Tribal Chairman Jamie azure expressed deep concern over the decision. He cautioned that the ruling establishes a dangerous precedent and sends a discouraging message to Native voters.

“It sends a troubling message to Native voters: that when the state enacts unfair or unlawful maps, we are no longer entitled to seek justice through the courts,”urized, in part.

Azure affirmed the tribe’s commitment to exhausting all legal options to safeguard Native voting rights. It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear the case.

Your News Leader has also reached out to a representative for the Spirit lake Tribe seeking comment and will provide updates as information becomes available.

Understanding Voting Rights on Native American Reservations

Voting rights for Native Americans have been a critical issue for decades,with various legal challenges aimed at ensuring equitable representation.Key legislation like the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been instrumental in protecting these rights, though its application and enforcement, particularly in relation to redistricting, continue to be subjects of legal scrutiny.

The process of drawing legislative district maps, known as redistricting, occurs every ten years following the U.S. Census. The goal is to create districts of roughly equal population. Though, concerns frequently enough arise when these maps are perceived to dilute the voting strength of specific communities, including Native American populations, by concentrating or dispersing voters across multiple districts.

Frequently Asked Questions

• What is the core issue in the North Dakota voting rights dispute?

  The dispute centers on legislative maps adopted in 2021, which the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa and Spirit Lake Tribes claim dilute the Native American vote.

• What was the ruling from the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals?

  The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that private citizens cannot challenge the law in question; only the U.S. department of justice can do so.

• What are the tribes seeking now?

  The tribes are preparing to seek a U.S. Supreme court review of the appellate court’s decision.

• What is redistricting?

  Redistricting is the process of redrawing legislative district boundaries every ten years based on census data to ensure districts have roughly equal populations.

What are your thoughts on this developing story? Share your comments below and help us spread the word by sharing this article with your network.

Copyright 2025 KFYR.All rights reserved.

What specific arguments are Native American tribes using to challenge North Dakota’s voter ID laws, beyond the issue of tribal ID acceptance?

the Core of the Dispute: Voter ID Laws and Tribal IDs

North Dakota’s Native American tribes are actively considering a challenge to a recent federal ruling upholding the state’s voter ID laws.The central issue revolves around the acceptance – or lack thereof – of tribal identification cards as valid forms of identification for voting. This isn’t a new battle; it’s a continuation of a decades-long struggle for voting rights access for Indigenous populations. The crux of the argument centers on whether denying tribal IDs constitutes a discriminatory practice, effectively suppressing the vote of Native Americans who often lack the standard forms of photo identification required by the state.

Key Legislation: North Dakota Century Code Chapter 11.6, specifically Section 11.6-02-01, outlines the state’s voter identification requirements.

Tribal Sovereignty: The tribes argue that the state’s refusal to recognize tribal IDs undermines tribal sovereignty and the federal government’s trust obligation to Native American tribes.

Disparate Impact: Data consistently shows a disproportionate impact of strict voter ID laws on Native American voters, who often face greater barriers to obtaining acceptable identification.

Understanding the Recent Ruling & Its Implications

The recent ruling, handed down by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, largely affirmed the state’s position. The court found that North Dakota’s voter ID law does not violate the Voting Rights Act. Though, tribal leaders and voting rights advocates strongly disagree, citing evidence of voter suppression and systemic barriers.

The ruling hinged on the court’s interpretation of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and whether the state was obligated to accept tribal IDs. The court determined that HAVA doesn’t explicitly require states to accept tribal IDs. This interpretation is now being fiercely contested.

The Impact on Specific Tribes

Several tribes in North Dakota are particularly affected by this ruling:

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe: Historically, Standing Rock has faced notable challenges wiht voter access due to remote locations and limited transportation.

Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians: A large percentage of the Turtle mountain population relies on tribal IDs as their primary form of identification.

Spirit Lake Tribe: Similar to other tribes, Spirit Lake members often encounter difficulties obtaining state-issued IDs due to distance and financial constraints.

Potential Supreme Court Arguments: A Path Forward

Tribal leaders are now exploring a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. The arguments they are likely to present include:

1. Discriminatory Intent/Effect: Demonstrating that the law, while seemingly neutral, has a discriminatory effect on Native American voters, violating the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.
2. Federal Trust Responsibility: Asserting that the state’s actions violate the federal government’s trust responsibility to Native American tribes, a principle rooted in treaties and ancient agreements.
3. Unique Circumstances of Tribal IDs: Highlighting the unique status of tribal IDs as legitimate forms of identification issued by sovereign tribal governments.
4. Voting Rights Act Violations: re-arguing that the state’s law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits voting practices that discriminate on the basis of race.

Historical Context: Voting Rights Struggles in North Dakota

The current dispute is not isolated. North Dakota has a long history of contentious battles over voting rights for Native Americans.

19th Century Disenfranchisement: For decades, Native Americans were explicitly denied the right to vote based on their tribal affiliation.

1924 Indian Citizenship Act: While granting citizenship, the Act didn’t guarantee voting rights, leaving states to determine eligibility.

Address Confidentiality Programs: Concerns about voter intimidation and safety have led to the implementation of address confidentiality programs for Native American voters in remote areas.

2018 Supreme Court Case ( North Dakota v.Brakebill): A previous challenge to the voter ID law reached the Supreme Court, but the court declined to hear the case, leaving the Eighth Circuit ruling in place.

Resources for Voters & Advocates

Several organizations are working to protect voting rights in North Dakota and nationwide:

Native American Rights Fund (NARF): Provides legal assistance to Native American tribes and individuals. (https://www.narf.org/)

**American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)