Norway Faces International Scrutiny Over Wolf Conservation Policies
After years of criticism from environmental groups, Norway is facing increased international pressure over its wolf management practices. The Bern Convention, a treaties focused on the conservation of European wildlife, has formally challenged Norway’s policies, citing concerns about the critically endangered status of the wolf population.
A History of Conflict
The conflict stems from Norway’s restrictive wolf policy, which has limited the animals’ habitat to a mere 5% of the country. This policy has kept wolf numbers precariously low, raising alarms among conservationists who argue that Norway is failing to meet its obligations under the Bern Convention.
International Concern Mounts
In a formal complaint filed in 2022, animal rights organization Noah highlighted concerns about the restrictive nature of Norway’s wolf policy. Their complaint triggered a series of critical appeals from the Bern Convention agency, urging Norway to reconsider its approach.
The issue escalated further as representatives from multiple countries voiced their concerns about Norway’s wolf management practices during a recent Bern Convention meeting. Nine countries formally moved to open a case against Norway, a move met with unanimous support from the assembled representatives.
Calls for Immediate Action
Siri Martinsen, manager of Noah, expressed dismay at Norway’s intransigence. ” -In Norway, over several years now we have experienced an absurd situation where the government and the Supreme Court have claimed that keeping the wolf critically endangered is ‘in line with the Berne Convention’. There is no doubt that Norway is breaking the convention and must change course.”
Martinsen urged the Norwegian government to immediately overturn a decision by the predatory game commission that allows for the shooting of wolf family groups within designated wolf zones.
She emphasized the urgent need for a shift towards non-lethal measures and coexistence strategies, advocating for policies that prioritize the long-term survival of the wolf population in Norway.
• What are the main concerns of the Bern Convention regarding Norway’s wolf management policies?
## Norway Faces International Pressure Over Wolf Policies
**Host:** Welcome back to the show. Today we’re discussing Norway’s controversial wolf management policies, which are attracting increasing international scrutiny. Joining us is Dr. Alex Reed, a leading expert on wolf conservation. Dr. Alex Reed, thank you for being with us.
**Dr. Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** The Bern Convention, a major international treaty focused on wildlife conservation, has officially challenged Norway’s approach to wolf management. Can you shed some light on the concerns behind this challenge?
**Dr. Alex Reed:** Absolutely. The Bern Convention is deeply worried about the critically endangered status of the wolf population in Norway. [1] The latest count showed only 89-92 wolves remaining, with a significant portion living on the border with Sweden. This precarious situation has triggered alarm bells, as these numbers highlight the fragility of the wolf population and the urgent need for stronger conservation efforts.
**Host:** Norway has faced years of criticism from environmental groups about its wolf policies. What are the main points of contention?
**Dr. Alex Reed** : There are several key issues. Some argue that Norway’s hunting quotas are too high and put further strain on an already vulnerable population. Additionally, there are questions about the effectiveness of Norway’s approach to mitigating human-wolf conflict, which can sometimes lead to the culling of wolves.
**Host:** Given Norway’s unique geographical situation, with wolves traveling across borders, how do international agreements and cooperation play a role in this conservation effort?
**Dr. Alex Reed:** International cooperation is absolutely crucial. Wolves don’t respect borders, and conservation efforts need to be coordinated between Norway and Sweden. The Bern Convention’s involvement underscores the international community’s concern and the need for Norway to align its policies with broader conservation goals.
**Host:** What are the potential consequences for Norway if it fails to address these concerns effectively?
**Dr. Alex Reed:** The Bern Convention can take various steps, including issuing recommendations, conducting on-site inspections, and even potentially imposing sanctions. However, the larger consequence is the potential loss of a vital part of Norway’s natural heritage. Wolves play a critical role in the ecosystem, and their disappearance would have cascading effects on the environment.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Alex Reed, for providing us with valuable insights into this complex issue. It’s clear that the future of wolves in Norway hangs in the balance, and international pressure is mounting for a change in approach.
**[1](https://www.wwf.no/dyr-og-natur/truede-arter/ulv-i-norge/rettssak-for-ulven/save-our-wolves)**
