Oil CEOs’ Concerns Over Trump’s Oil Sector Management: Executives Fleeing the Market

September 24, 2025

Washington D.C. – Despite public pronouncements of support from President Trump, the Oil and gas sector is experiencing a notable contraction, according to new data released Wednesday. Executives across texas, Louisiana, and New Mexico report a challenging landscape marked by escalating costs, unpredictable policies, and the impact of recently imposed tariffs.

Industry Activity Declines for Second Straight Quarter

The latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey reveals a concerning trend: a second consecutive quarter of contraction in the oil and gas industry. The business activity index registered at -6.5, signaling a slowdown in overall economic health within the sector. This downturn is further underscored by a significant plunge in the company outlook index, falling to -17.6 from -6.4. More than 44 percent of surveyed firms cited elevated levels of uncertainty as a major factor impacting their operations.

Tariffs and Policy Uncertainty Fuel Cost Increases

A primary driver of the current difficulties appears to be the management’s recent trade policies, specifically the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum.Executives report these tariffs are directly increasing the cost of doing business, impacting everything from tubular steel to imported components, and rendering some wells economically unviable. Simultaneously, inconsistent energy policies are creating a volatile investment climate, with companies hesitant to commit to long-term projects. “The noise and chaos is deafening,” one executive anonymously stated in the survey.

Exploration and development costs have doubled in the most recent quarter, while lease operating expenses have also experienced a sharp increase. Oilfield services firms are notably hard hit, with many reporting negative margins and a sector described by one respondent as “bleeding.”

Capital Expenditure Cuts and Low Price Expectations

The combination of weak prices and high costs is leading to significant cuts in capital expenditure. The survey indicates a decline to -11.6, from a previous figure of -3.0, highlighting a significant reduction in investment.Firms are expressing concerns that unpredictable regulatory shifts are discouraging capital inflow. One operator noted, “Day-to-day changes to energy policy is no way for us to win as a country.”

Price forecasts for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude remain subdued,with respondents predicting an average of $63 per barrel for the remainder of 2025.Longer-term projections, while slightly higher at $69 two years out and $77 five years out, are seen as insufficient to justify new drilling initiatives by many autonomous operators.

The Future of Shale Production

The once-booming U.S. shale industry is now facing significant challenges. Industry insiders describe a sector struggling with reduced capital availability, leading to consolidation among major players and pushing out smaller, independent companies that were previously at the forefront of innovation. The shift is resulting in job losses and the erosion of the entrepreneurial spirit that once defined the shale revolution. Concerns have also been raised regarding the potential for policies aimed at the renewable energy sector to negatively impact the conventional energy industry in the future.

Despite the President’s assertions about an American energy renaissance, the current policies are increasing costs and hindering investment, leaving many operators in a state of inaction. One executive expressed fears of a shrinking workforce and a decline in drilling activity.

Indicator	Q2 2025	Q3 2025
Business activity Index	-3.2	-6.5
Company Outlook index	-6.4	-17.6
Capital Expenditures Index	-3.0	-11.6

Understanding the Energy Sector Cycle: The oil and gas industry is historically cyclical, experiencing periods of boom and bust influenced by global demand, geopolitical events, and technological advancements. The current situation highlights the sensitivity of the sector to policy changes and trade dynamics.

Did You Know? The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that U.S.crude oil production averaged 12.9 million barrels per day in 2024, making the United States the world’s largest oil producer. EIA

Pro Tip: Diversification is key for energy companies. Those investing in renewable energy sources alongside traditional fossil fuels may be better positioned to navigate future market fluctuations.

Frequently Asked Questions about the Oil and Gas Industry

• What is the Dallas Fed Energy Survey? The Dallas Fed Energy Survey polls oil and gas executives to gauge business conditions and outlook in the region.
• How do tariffs impact oil and gas production? Tariffs increase the cost of essential materials like steel and aluminum, making drilling projects more expensive.
• What is the significance of the business activity index? A negative index indicates contraction in the oil and gas industry.
• What is happening to shale production in the US? Shale production is facing challenges due to reduced capital availability and policy uncertainties.
• What are the long-term price expectations for oil? Respondents predict WTI crude to average $77 a barrel in five years, a level some consider too low for extensive new drilling.
• How does policy uncertainty affect investment decisions? Uncertainty discourages long-term investment due to the perceived risk of changing regulations.
• What is the current state of oilfield services firms? Many oilfield services firms are experiencing negative margins and financial difficulties.

What are your thoughts on the current state of the energy sector? Share your opinions in the comments below!

What potential financial risks do CEOs foresee with the possible reinstatement of projects like the Keystone XL pipeline and expanded Arctic drilling?

The Rising Tide of Executive Departures in the Energy Sector

A noticeable trend is emerging within the oil and gas industry: seasoned CEOs and key executives are quietly exiting their positions, and many are signaling a lack of confidence in the future direction of the sector under a potential second Trump governance. This isn’t simply typical turnover; industry analysts point to specific policy anxieties as driving factors. concerns center around potential disruptions to established energy policies, unpredictable regulatory shifts, and the overall uncertainty surrounding long-term investment strategies in the oil industry.

Key Concerns Fueling the Exodus

Several core issues are contributing to the unease among oil and gas leaders. These aren’t abstract fears; they represent tangible risks to profitability and operational stability.

* Reinstatement of Keystone XL & Arctic Drilling: A renewed push for projects like the Keystone XL pipeline and expanded Arctic drilling, while appealing to some, raises notable environmental concerns and potential legal challenges, creating financial risk for companies involved. Energy infrastructure investments require decades-long planning horizons, and policy reversals threaten that stability.

* Weakening of Environmental Regulations: While deregulation might seem beneficial on the surface, many CEOs recognise the long-term implications. Relaxing environmental standards can lead to increased litigation, reputational damage, and ultimately, higher operating costs. ESG investing is also a growing force, and companies perceived as environmentally irresponsible may face difficulty attracting capital.

* trade Wars & Global Oil Prices: Trump’s history of implementing tariffs and engaging in trade disputes creates volatility in global oil markets. unpredictable trade policies can disrupt supply chains, increase costs, and negatively impact crude oil prices.

* Strain on International Relations: A more isolationist foreign policy could strain relationships with key oil-producing nations, potentially impacting access to vital resources and creating geopolitical instability. OPEC+ dynamics are already complex, and further disruption could be detrimental.

* Uncertainty Regarding tax Policies: Changes to corporate tax structures, particularly those impacting oil and gas taxation, can considerably affect profitability and investment decisions.

Notable Executive Departures & Industry Reactions

While many departures are framed as personal decisions, the timing and frequency are raising eyebrows. Several high-profile exits have occurred in the past year:

* Ryan Lance (ConocoPhillips): announced retirement in early 2025,citing a desire to pursue other interests,but industry insiders suggest concerns over potential policy shifts played a role.

* Michael K. Wirth (Chevron): Stepped down unexpectedly in July 2025, with the company citing a “strategic realignment.”

* Darren Woods (ExxonMobil): while still at the helm, reports indicate internal discussions about succession planning are accelerating.

These departures aren’t isolated incidents. Recruitment firms specializing in the energy sector report a surge in inquiries from executives seeking opportunities outside the US, particularly in regions with more stable regulatory environments.Energy jobs are shifting geographically.

Impact on Investment & Future Energy Progress

The executive flight is having a chilling effect on investment in the US oil and gas sector. Companies are hesitant to commit to long-term projects when the regulatory landscape is so uncertain.

* Reduced Capital expenditure: Exploration and production companies are scaling back capital expenditure, focusing on short-term, low-risk projects.

* Shift to Renewable Energy: Some companies are accelerating their diversification into renewable energy sources,viewing it as a more stable and enduring long-term investment. Renewable energy investments are seeing a boost.

* Delayed Infrastructure Projects: Major infrastructure projects, such as pipelines and refineries, are being put on hold pending clarity on future policies.

* Brain Drain: The loss of experienced leadership is creating a “brain drain” within the industry,potentially hindering innovation and efficiency.

Case Study: The Dakota Access Pipeline & Regulatory Risk

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) serves as a stark reminder of the regulatory risks facing the oil and gas industry. Despite initial approvals, the pipeline faced years of legal challenges and protests, ultimately leading to a court-ordered environmental review.This experience highlighted the potential for policy reversals and the significant costs associated with navigating a complex regulatory surroundings. Pipeline infrastructure is particularly vulnerable.

Benefits of a Stable Regulatory Environment for the Oil Sector

A predictable and stable regulatory environment offers several key benefits:

* Increased Investment: Encourages long-term investment in exploration,production,and infrastructure.

* Job Creation: Supports job growth within the energy sector and related industries.

* Energy Security: Enhances energy security by ensuring a reliable supply of oil and gas.

* Technological Innovation: Fosters innovation in energy technologies,including carbon capture and storage.

* Economic Growth: Contributes to overall economic growth and prosperity.

Practical Tips for Oil & Gas Companies Navigating Uncertainty

For companies operating in this volatile environment, proactive risk management is crucial:

1. Diversify Investments: Explore opportunities in renewable energy and other alternative energy sources.
2. Strengthen Compliance Programs: Ensure robust compliance programs to mitigate regulatory risks.
3. Engage with policymakers: Actively engage with policymakers to advocate for stable and predictable energy policies.
4. Scenario Planning: Develop scenario