On March 5, 65, Mr. Somkid Chuakong, Ubon Ratchathani MP, Pheu Thai Party, spoke about preparing to submit a no-confidence debate in the government at the next meeting. After the House of Representatives opened on May 22, it was expected that the Extraordinary Committee would consider the Organic Law on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives and the Organic Law on Political Parties. will be submitted to the National Assembly Consider Agenda 2-3 Available around the end of May to the beginning of June. Then, in June, the Pheu Thai Party will file a no-confidence debate on the government. after child law 2 copies of the agenda 2-3 already
Mr. Somkid said, but now he’s starting to hear the news that General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense will dissolve the parliament before the council meeting on 22 May to escape the no-confidence debate Looks like it’s likely to happen. but considered unreasonable because the council did not have a problem If the dissolution of the House of Representatives is equal to fleeing the laundering, it is not dignified. Currently, the consideration of the two child law bills is pending the consideration of the Extraordinary Council, with only 2 months left. Should wait for the child law to be completed first. If you go to the dissolution of the parliament first The more answer that The government feared a distrustful debate. and was afraid that no one would raise their hands in the washing arena
When asked if the government would dissolve the parliament To compete for an advantage in determining the method of calculating the vote of the list of MPs From the original to use 100 to divide the total score of the list of MPs across the country Set to be an average vote per one party-list MP, changed to use 500 dividing instead to gain an advantage over the Pheu Thai party or not The total score of the MPs on the national list already If going to adjust the thinking method, use 500 to divide instead, equal to contrary to the constitutional intent on 2 cards. the more the law equal to the country without a name can do anything is imaginable but dare to do it or not If true, then Amending the constitution is useless. Confirm the intention of 2 cards. It must be divided by 100 in the calculation of the list of MPs. But no matter what formula is used, think of the list of MPs. Pheu Thai Party is not afraid. ready to fight all rules how to exclude But the people who will answer are the people.
When asked if it is possible to consider the 2nd child bill Edition in the class of committee. Going to adjust the method of calculating the list of MPs to use 500 to divide instead of 100. Mr. Somkid said that he couldn’t do it because according to the constitutional intent on 2 cards, it must be divided by 100. Trying to shake hands to gain an advantage in this matter. But it’s too late because there are clearly defined principles
When asked if he was afraid that there would be a legal miracle to amend the child law, Mr Somkid said he was not afraid because the law did not allow him to do so. Except for people to cause wonder is another story. which is possible Therefore, I would like to keep a close eye on each other. Will it make it harder for the Pheu Thai Party’s land slide opportunity to occur? The people will be the answer to themselves. The more you go to write the law on your own side, the more Will the people be the answer to let the power be inherited or not?