The Secretary-General of Hezbollah, His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, affirmed that Lebanon was subjected by the air, land and sea to the Zionist enemy, and the culmination of this aggression was in 1982 when he wanted to enter Lebanon into the Israeli era.
Sayyed Nasrallah made it clear in the “Al-Arba’een Dialogue” on “Al-Mayadeen” channel this evening, Monday, that there was nothing to deter the Zionist enemy from invading Lebanon, and before the invasion, there was nothing to deter it from the repeated aggression against Lebanon, pointing out that the beginnings of deterrence began in 1984. 1985, when the Zionist enemy was forced to withdraw from large areas of Lebanon, as a result of a large number of qualitative and major operations carried out by various factions of the Lebanese resistance.
He said: This was the first deterrence, and it was the achievement of all the resistance movements that carried out martyrdom operations, in which the Lebanese and the Palestinians participated in that stage.
He added that the second phase of deterrence began after 1985, when the “Israeli” enemy was trying to advance into towns and villages and was exposed to a very violent confrontation… Here the scene changed… For example, the Midoun experience where there was very violent fighting…”
Nasrallah continued: The third stage of deterrence developed from 1992 to July 1993, when we reached high deterrence and some violations occurred, and in the 1996 aggression the deterrence of 1993 was proven and was a prelude to the liberation of 2000.
Therefore, from 2006 to today, no Israeli raid occurred except for one on an ambiguous border point between Lebanon and Syria, and two raids on floats, and we responded to them all.
His Eminence said: “As a result of the July 2006 war, the enemy realized that the confrontation with the resistance is dangerous, and its capabilities have gone beyond the settlements on the borders, but extend to the north and center.”
Regarding the saying, “Israel is weaker than the spider’s web,” Nasrallah said: “In Bint Jbeil’s speech, we are facing a historic and unexpected victory in the Arab world.
He considered that an essential part of the battle today is to secure an alternative to Russian gas and oil for Europe, and US President Joe Biden came to the region for gas and oil, and the addition that Saudi Arabia and the UAE can provide cannot fill the need, so they asked the “Israelis” to expedite the export from Karish. .
On the Karish equation and after Karish, Nasrallah explained: “I said in the speech that the issue is greater than Karish versus Qana… If the enemy froze the extraction from Karish, Lebanon would have achieved a moral victory, but without a practical achievement,” noting that there is an estimate that says Biden Today, he does not want another war in the region.
Nasrallah considered that “there is an opportunity for the American, European, and Israeli need to extract oil and gas, and an opportunity that they do not want another war here. Lebanon should take advantage of the golden opportunity, so I said that the issue is all the oil and gas fields looted from the occupied Palestinian coasts in exchange for Lebanon’s rights to demarcate borders and extract.” “.
Nasrallah pointed out that the enemy had ended the exploration, drilling and exploration, and the ship was for extraction, and they prevented all companies from taking any step with Lebanon before demarcating the maritime borders, and this was pressure on the Lebanese state to accept the “Hof Line” or the line that the “Israeli” wanted.
Nasrallah also stressed that “all the fields are in the threat’s circle and the coordinates are available to us.. the fields that are extracted and sold, and those in which exploration and drilling continues, and are also frozen.
He pointed out that the Lebanese state is talking about the demarcation of the Lebanese land border with occupied Palestine and about Lebanon’s right to extract oil and gas, and what it requested from the American mediator, through which it made a major concession, and this is known in the country.
He added: “In practice, official Lebanon has made an offer that the enemy should not reject… What is required is not only to obtain the borders requested by the Lebanese state, but also to lift the veto, ban and threat to companies (French Total, Italian and Russian companies).
Nasrallah indicated that in light of the “Israeli” answer, the situation will be decided, and Lebanon is the victim, and if they try to deceive and procrastinate, we will consider that America and “Israel” are deceiving Lebanon, and we are a country that does not accept deception.”
Sayyed Nasrallah warned that the time is not open, but only until September.. If September comes and the enemy begins to extract and Lebanon does not take its right, then we are going to the problem.
And when his interlocutor, Ghassan Ben Jeddou, asked him what would happen? Sayyed Nasrallah replied: “Tomorrow you will see.”
His Eminence pointed out that the Lebanese state, according to all the evidence since 1948 until today, is unable to take the appropriate decision to protect Lebanon and its wealth, and said: “Our goal is for Lebanon to extract oil and gas because it is the only way for Lebanon to survive… This is the last line.”
He explained that when he directed the last threat to the Zionist enemy, he confirmed that Hezbollah did not coordinate with the Syrian brothers or the Iranians. .
In response to a question about the request of the head of the “Free Patriotic Movement”, Gibran Bassil, for Iranian assistance in the electricity file, Nasrallah replied: “I am ready to bring free Iranian fuel to the electricity plants in Lebanon when the Lebanese government announces that it is ready to receive ships coming from Iran.” .
In response to a question about the possibility of Hezbollah pushing Iranian companies to explore and extract, Sayyed Nasrallah explained that the problem lies with the Lebanese government.. He said: “There are enough problems in the country without us opening a new problem.. Iran, we Hezbollah are ready to bring in Iranian fuel.”
In response to another question, Sayyed Nasrallah revealed for the first time that “our marches have always entered the Galilee and occupied Palestine and have gone back and forth dozens of times over the past years without the ability to bring them down… There are those in the Zionist entity who miscalculate that Hezbollah will not take such a step.” I say that we are taking a step of this kind, and we want shooting there, and we want it from the “Israeli”… We pushed the “Israeli” to shoot.”
And when Ibn Gedo asked him: Do you mean he fell into the trap? His Eminence replied: “Naturally, he fell into the trap.”
Nasrallah also revealed a third march that the Zionist enemy did not shoot over the Karish field, and stressed that Hezbollah does not need to launch drones to explore Karish, “and we have means that enable us to know everything related to the ship (the platform), its movements, and the naval force.”
His Eminence emphasized, “We have a naval capability (defensive and offensive) that is sufficient to achieve the required deterrence and the desired goals.”
And about the picture shown by Al-Mayadeen channel of the missile wing that targeted the Zionist battleship “Sa’ar” in the July 2006 war.. Sayyed Nasrallah explained, “The youths intended to bring him and put him in the background of the scene.”
He stressed that Hezbollah does not disclose its air capabilities, and said: “After sending Israeli drones to the southern suburbs, we took a decision to confront the marches within a certain level. We considered that operation a dangerous development because it moved from gathering information to bombing. A very difficult security…”
He added: “In the Bekaa, for example, the marches were a ‘going coming’, but today, months pass without marches passing, and in the south, their movement has greatly reduced… This amount of air power was forced to detect it, and the rest we leave it until after… If things go to war, it suffices to say For the Lebanese to have confidence in your Lord and ours, and to be confident that they have in the resistance the human, military and material strength and ability that will make “Israel” subject to Lebanon’s will… Be confident.
His Eminence continued: “If there is a war between Hezbollah and “Israel”, it is not known that the war will remain between these two sides… Will it develop into a war at the level of the region and other powers will enter? This is a very possible possibility… We do not want war, but we do not fear it, and if it does happen, we Its men and heroes.. We will prevent the “Israeli” from taking out the looted oil and gas, unless Lebanon is allowed to extract its oil and gas, even if that leads to war.”
Sayyed Nasrallah responded to those accusing Hezbollah of being patriotic and Lebanese, and said: “What are the criteria for saying who is Lebanese? With the mood, everyone can say what he wants, and therefore there is no room for discussion… If the matter is according to logic, let us know what criteria you have for saying this. The party or this sect or group of people are Lebanese.” Stressing that the Shiites in Lebanon have existed for 1,400 years… Our life in this country is 1,400 years, according to the historical extension.
He added: “What are the criteria adopted in the world on the human level of patriotism? For example, when Greater Lebanon was established, if the criterion was that people are their grandfathers and their great-grandfathers lived in this region, then this criterion applies to us.. Unfortunately, some of those who accuse us of being non-Lebanese know where they came from. Where did their ancestors come from?
And he added: “We defended and offered blood and liberated our country, and had it not been for these martyrs, Israel would have swallowed Lebanon…”.
Concerning the allegations of imported culture, Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that “the owners of this statement are ignorant…either deliberate or ignorant people who do not know history…Lebanon is historically composed of Muslims and Christians, and our culture is an Islamic and Shiite culture for 1,400 years, so our culture is imported? We are the books of our scholars taught.” In all seminaries.. We exported our culture to many places in the world.. Imam Khamenei said that the two most important places in the world had an impact on culture in Iran are Jabal Amel and Ahvas.
He said: “This country is culturally, ideologically and religiously diverse, and this is the advantage of Lebanon, which was the haven for those who are afraid of their faith, thought and traditions… Lebanon brought us together and made us one nation and people, and we built on respect for the traditions, culture and customs of each other, so why is this being denied today?”
He continued, “We do not originally accept that someone puts us in a place and says that he is suspicious of our Lebaneseness and patriotism. We are our authentic culture that we worked to spread in the world.
And what if Hezbollah protested against those who did not object to raising slogans against the party in the patriarchal edifice? His Eminence replied, “This is their business.”
Regarding the objectors in the case of Archbishop Musa al-Hajj, Sayyed Nasrallah said: “I say to the oldest of them to the youngest, this method and path is dangerous and incorrect and does not serve the interest of the country at all.”
He pointed out that they consider that “Iranian diesel violates sovereignty, but 20 “bags” from occupied Palestine do not violate sovereignty?”, stressing that transferring funds from occupied Palestine to Lebanon is against the law.. Pointing out to the Lebanese people that one day when the Israelis built a wall They called it the “good wall” to normalize the situation. The people of the south were very poor, so Imam al-Sayyid Musa al-Sadr issued a decree prohibiting taking medicine or bread from them, even if the person was at risk of death.
He said: “With all due respect to the Patriarchate, the bishops, the sheikhs and the muftis, the issue of “Israel” and the relationship with it and money from within the occupied entity is contrary to the laws and the Lebanese interest.”
Regarding the presidential elections, Sayyed Nasrallah said: “Tonight, I will not talk about names for the presidency. As for Hezbollah, we did not start this discussion. The discussion will be with our allies and friends, and those concerned with a basic debate with the Free Patriotic Movement, the Marada movement, and an internal debate in Hezbollah.”
He pointed out that some will try, in the manner of burning the names of the candidates, to say that some of the names are nominated by Hezbollah, stressing that Hezbollah will not have a candidate for the presidency. When the candidates appear, Hezbollah makes a decision about which candidate to support.
Nasrallah made it clear that the President of the Republic in Lebanon is not a ruler, and after Taif has limited and specific powers, and the executive authority is in the hands of the Council of Ministers as a whole, and after Taif, the influence of the Prime Minister is very large.
He stressed that “there is no such thing as Hezbollah sources…when a decision is taken about the presidency, an official statement is issued, or I speak.”
His Eminence said, “We do not see any point in talking about the specifications (the presidential candidate), this is a waste of time.. There are names on the table.. In Lebanon, there is something on the table that is the ‘natural candidate’, and this does not exist in the whole world.. The importance of the President of the Republic is a guarantee.”
Mr. Hassan NasrallahResistanceKarish field