Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) has formally pushed back against MSCI’s newly proposed index methodology, which targets non-operating companies and threatens to remove the largest bitcoin treasury company from global equity benchmarks. The ongoing dispute centers on whether digital asset treasuries qualify as operating businesses or passive holding vehicles.
The Bottom Line
- The Regulatory Threat: MSCI’s revised financial-ratio screen could remove Strategy, Metaplanet, and Yellow Cake from the MSCI ACWI IMI as early as November.
- The Financial Exposure: Market analysts estimate that Strategy could face up to $2.8 billion in institutional stock liquidations if the exclusion rules are finalized.
- The Corporate Defense: Strategy argues the criteria are arbitrary, discriminatory, and ignore its enterprise software business and Bitcoin-backed credit operations.
Unpacking the MSCI Two-Step Financial Screen
The index provider launched a public consultation in August 2026 introducing a revised methodology designed to capture firms whose balance sheets reflect non-operating characteristics. According to reporting from TechTimes, the framework uses a sequential two-step test. It first evaluates whether operating assets exceed 50% of a company’s total assets. If they fall below that mark, the issuer must clear five granular financial ratios regarding expense intensity, operating cash flow, capital dependence, fair value fluctuations, and asset concentration.
Here is the math. A company must fail four of the five ratios to face mandatory exclusion. Based on FY2025 filings, Strategy triggers all five screens. Tokyo-listed Metaplanet is projected to encounter the same regulatory hurdle. Metaplanet posted ¥3.331 billion in H1 2026 operating profit (approximately $20.9 million USD), yet logged a ¥182.774 billion net accounting loss due to Bitcoin’s price fluctuations during the period, according to financial disclosures cited by TechTimes.
Corporate Strategy and the Defense of Index Neutrality
Management at Strategy has forcefully rejected the classification. In a statement posted on X, the firm asserted, “Digital assets are assets. Index providers should measure markets, not decide which assets companies are allowed to own.” The company further stated that “MSCI’s proposal puts it out of step with regulators, markets, and its own customers. Bitcoin doesn’t need MSCI. Neither does Strategy.”

This pushback builds on Strategy’s formal objection in December 2025 against an earlier iteration of the rule. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor’s firm contends that it is an operating entity maintaining a global enterprise analytics software division, active treasury operations, and Bitcoin-backed credit instruments. Cryptopolitan reported that similar opposition came from structured-finance company Strive, which sent a letter to MSCI CEO Henry Fernandez arguing that the proposed exclusions violate the long-established principle of index neutrality.
| Company | Ticker / Exchange | Estimated Market Cap / Valuation | Primary Treasury Asset |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy | NASDAQ: MSTR | $23.93 billion (Free float-adjusted) | Bitcoin (660,624 BTC) |
| Metaplanet | Tokyo | $654 million | Bitcoin |
| Yellow Cake PLC | London-listed | $1.81 billion | Uranium |
Treasury Scaling Amid Market Pressures
Even as regulatory headwinds intensify, Strategy has maintained an aggressive capital-raising and coin accumulation model. Between December 1 and 7, the company purchased 10,624 BTC for $962.7 million at an average price of $90,615 per coin, bringing its total holdings to 660,624 BTC acquired for approximately $49.35 billion, as detailed by Cryptopolitan. The corporation’s aggressive equity and debt issuance model mirrors the exact financial structure that MSCI’s screening criteria is engineered to filter out.
Market reaction has mirrored the broader digital asset sentiment. Strategy shares declined 4.3% on Friday as Bitcoin pulled back to $62,600. Institutional investors and index trackers now await the formal conclusion of MSCI’s public consultation, which will determine whether the proposed changes take effect in the upcoming index rebalancing.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Related reading
- Kennedy Center Board Seeks to Name Grounds President Donald J. Trump Plaza
- Ohio State Football Unveils 2026 Home Game Themes and Stadium Upgrades
- MSCI Proposal Could Remove Bitcoin Treasury Firms and Yellow Cake From Global Indexes (archynewsy.com)
- Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy Bitcoin Strategy Updates (newsdirectory3.com)