Home » arms
Tag:

arms

Economy

Thales CEO Highlights Global Arms Boom as Defense Spending Reaches New Record Levels

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

Global Defense Spending Surges: Thales Reports Record Growth Amid Geopolitical Instability

Table of Contents


A notable escalation in global defense expenditure is underway, with companies like Thales seeing considerable gains as geopolitical risks intensify. The French technology firm is experiencing a period of expansion, driven by increased demand for its products and services, including advanced radar systems and counter-drone technology. This surge in arms spending reflects a broader trend observed across multiple regions worldwide.

Worldwide Arms Expenditure Reaches New Heights

Worldwide military spending hit an unprecedented $2.7 trillion in 2024, according to data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). This represents a considerable increase from prior years, fueled by ongoing conflicts and heightened tensions between nations. The world’s 100 largest defense corporations collectively generated $679 billion in revenue, the highest figure recorded since 2002.

According to Pascale Sourisse, Chief Executive Officer of Thales International, defense spending is “growing everywhere,” encompassing Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas. This widespread increase has compelled Thales to substantially increase its production capacity to meet the rising demand, notably in the realm of air surveillance technologies.

Thales’s Production Ramp-Up & Technological Focus

Thales has quadrupled its radar production to address the escalating need for enhanced air surveillance capabilities. The Singapore Airshow highlighted the critical importance of unmanned aerial systems—both their deployment and the advancement of effective countermeasures. The company is actively developing solutions to combat drone swarms and counter unmanned aerial threats, commonly known as Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS).

The market’s confidence in the defense sector is reflected in Thales’s stock performance, which has increased by over 50% in the last year. Similar gains have been observed among other major defense contractors,including germany’s Rheinmetall,South Korea’s Hanwha Aerospace,Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Engineering,and Singapore’s ST engineering.

Company Recent Stock Performance (12 Months)
Thales +50%
Rheinmetall >100%
Hanwha Aerospace >100%
Mitsubishi Heavy Engineering >100%
ST Engineering >100%

Beyond Defense: Innovation in Civil Aviation & Cybersecurity

Thales’s expertise extends beyond defense, encompassing significant contributions to civil aviation and avionics. The firm is making substantial investments in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven flight systems aimed at optimizing flight paths and bolstering safety measures. The company’s AI systems now integrate real-time weather forecasts to proactively adjust flight paths, leading to smoother and more efficient travel.

AI is also improving air traffic control systems, allowing for better management of traffic flow at major airports like Singapore’s Changi Airport, reducing delays and fuel consumption by as much as 10%. This is particularly crucial amidst the return to pre-pandemic passenger levels in key travel hubs.

Thales’s cybersecurity division, bolstered by the 2019 acquisition of Gemalto, is a significant producer of secure digital credentials, manufacturing over 200 million banking cards, 12 million identity cards, and nearly 10 million passport data pages annually. The company is increasing automation at its Singapore facility to support growing demand.

Expansion in Asia and India

Looking ahead,Thales is prioritizing expansion in key asian markets,including Indonesia,Malaysia,Vietnam,China,Japan,and South Korea. The company is also strengthening its presence in India, where its workforce is currently at 2,300 employees and expected to grow significantly, with extensive engineering centers already established.

In the first nine months of 2025,Thales generated 15.3 billion euros ($18.1 billion) in revenue, an 8.4% year-over-year increase.The defense sector contributed 8.2 billion euros ($9.8 billion) to this total,achieving a growth rate of 14%.

The escalating global demand for defense systems and technological advancements suggests a continued period of growth for companies like Thales. However, this growth is inherently tied to geopolitical stability.

What role will emerging technologies like AI play in shaping the future of defense strategies? And how will the shifting landscape of international alliances impact the global arms industry?

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

What factors are driving the unprecedented increase in global defense spending mentioned by Thales CEO?

Thales CEO Highlights Global Arms Boom as Defense Spending Reaches New Record Levels

Archyde.com – February 10, 2026 06:49:14

Patrice Caine, CEO of the French multinational aerospace and defense company Thales, has publicly addressed the unprecedented surge in global defense spending, attributing it to a confluence of escalating geopolitical tensions and a rapidly evolving threat landscape. recent data confirms that worldwide military expenditure has hit record highs, a trend Caine believes is highly likely to continue in the near to medium term.

The Scale of the Increase: A Global Overview

Figures released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) earlier this month indicate a consistent year-on-year increase in defense budgets across all major regions. Key drivers include:

* Eastern Europe: The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has spurred significant investment in military modernization and increased troop deployments, particularly among NATO member states. poland, such as, has announced enterprising plans to substantially increase its defense spending as a percentage of GDP.

* Asia-Pacific: rising tensions in the South China Sea and ongoing concerns regarding North Korea’s nuclear programme are fueling a regional arms race.Countries like Japan, Australia, and India are all considerably increasing their defense capabilities.

* Middle East: Persistent instability and regional conflicts continue to drive substantial military expenditure in countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

* North America: The United States remains the world’s largest military spender,with continued investment in advanced technologies and maintaining a global military presence.

thales’ Position in a Growing Market

Thales, a major player in the defense and security sector, is well-positioned to benefit from this increased demand. the company specializes in areas such as:

* Cybersecurity: With the rise of hybrid warfare and state-sponsored cyberattacks,demand for robust cybersecurity solutions is soaring. Thales offers a thorough suite of cybersecurity products and services.

* Radar Systems: Advanced radar technology is crucial for air defense, surveillance, and border security. Thales is a leading provider of radar systems to armed forces worldwide.

* Electronic Warfare: Asymmetric warfare tactics are becoming increasingly prevalent, driving demand for electronic warfare capabilities. Thales develops and manufactures cutting-edge electronic warfare systems.

* Integrated Weapon Systems: The need for modern, integrated weapon systems is paramount. Thales provides solutions for land, air, and naval applications.

Caine emphasized that Thales is actively investing in research and progress to meet the evolving needs of its customers, focusing on areas like artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and space-based defense systems.

Geopolitical Factors Driving the Boom

Several key geopolitical factors are contributing to the current arms boom:

  1. Russia-Ukraine War: The conflict has fundamentally altered the security landscape in Europe, prompting a reassessment of defense strategies and increased military spending.
  2. China’s Military Expansion: China’s rapid military modernization and assertive foreign policy are raising concerns among its neighbors and the United States.
  3. Terrorism and Extremism: The ongoing threat of terrorism and extremism continues to drive demand for security solutions and military capabilities.
  4. Regional Conflicts: Numerous regional conflicts around the world, including those in the Middle East and Africa, are fueling arms sales and military expenditure.

The monist Perspective & Modern Defense

Interestingly,the philosophical roots of understanding a singular,interconnected global security environment can be traced back to ancient thinkers like Thales. While seemingly distant from modern defense strategies, the core idea – that everything is fundamentally connected – resonates with the increasingly complex and interconnected nature of modern threats. As the Brainly discussion highlights, Thales’ monist view suggests a unified underlying reality, which, in a security context, translates to recognizing that threats are rarely isolated and often have cascading effects. This perspective informs a holistic approach to defense, emphasizing integrated systems and proactive threat assessment.

Impact on Global Supply Chains

The surge in demand for military equipment is putting significant strain on global supply chains. Shortages of critical components, such as semiconductors and specialized materials, are becoming increasingly common. This is leading to longer lead times and higher prices. Thales, like other defense contractors, is working to diversify its supply chains and build resilience to mitigate these risks. The company is also investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities to reduce its reliance on foreign suppliers.

Ethical Considerations and Arms Control

The increase in global arms spending raises critically important ethical considerations. Critics argue that increased military expenditure diverts resources from essential social programs and exacerbates global inequalities. There are also concerns about the proliferation of advanced weapons technologies and the potential for escalation of conflicts.

Caine acknowledged these concerns, stating that Thales is committed to responsible business practices and adheres to strict arms export controls.He also emphasized the importance of international cooperation and arms control efforts to promote peace and stability.The company actively participates in industry initiatives aimed at promoting responsible arms trade and preventing the misuse of its products.

Future Outlook: Sustained Growth Expected

Analysts predict that global defense spending will continue to rise in the coming years, driven by the factors outlined above. The demand for advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and unmanned systems, is expected to be particularly strong. Thales is well-positioned to capitalize on these trends and maintain its position as a leading player in the global defense and security market. The company’s focus on innovation, its strong customer relationships, and its commitment to responsible business practices will be key to its continued success.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy

China sanctions 20 U.S. defense firms and executives after Washington announces $10 billion Taiwan arms sale

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

Breaking: Beijing Hits U.S. Defense Firms With Sanctions as Taiwan Arms Sale Sparks Tension

Table of Contents

Beijing announced Friday that it is indeed imposing sanctions on 20 U.S. defense-related companies and 10 executives, a week after Washington disclosed a large-scale arms package for Taiwan. The move signals a sharp response to the latest U.S. push to strengthen Taipei’s defenses.

China’s foreign ministry said the measures freeze the sanctioned firms’ assets in China and bar both individuals and organizations from doing business with them. The steps extend to executives connected to these companies, including a prominent founder of a major defense tech firm.

Among the named companies are Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, L3Harris Maritime Services, and Boeing‘s operations in St. Louis. anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey is listed among the executives targeted, with entry to China denied and assets in the country frozen.

The sanctions follow an American arms package valued at more than $10 billion for Taiwan. Washington colleagues say the package would be the largest ever provided to the self-ruled island if Congress approves it.

China’s foreign ministry framed the development as a confrontation over what it calls a core national interest. It warned that any company or individual involved in arms sales to Taiwan will pay a price and urged the United States to halt what it described as dangerous moves to arm the island.

Taiwan remains a central flashpoint in U.S.-China relations, with analysts noting China’s military presence near the island has intensified in recent years. Beijing has conducted joint drills with its warships and fighter jets around Taiwan, underscoring the sensitive balance in the region.

Under U.S. federal law, Washington is obligated to assist Taiwan in its self-defense, a point that continues to complicate broader U.S.-China ties,spanning trade,technology and human rights issues.

Key Item Details
Sanctions Beijing imposes asset freezes in China and bans dealings with 20 U.S. defense firms and 10 executives.
targeted companies Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, L3Harris Maritime Services, Boeing (St. Louis).
Targeted executive Palmer Luckey (Anduril Industries founder).
Arms package value More than $10 billion for Taiwan; potential historic scale if approved.
China’s stance The Taiwan question is a core national interest; warnings against arms sales to Taiwan and calls to halt such moves.

Evergreen context

This episode illustrates how arms sales to Taiwan function as a contention point in U.S.-China relations. Sanctions and asset freezes are tools meant to signal disapproval without triggering a full-blown confrontation, but they can ripple through markets, defense supply chains, and regional security calculations. Monitoring congressional decisions, allied responses, and Taiwan’s defense planning will continue to shape the trajectory of stability in the Indo-Pacific.

Analysts also point out that Taiwan’s defense posture, regional alliances, and the pace of China’s disclosures about military activity will be key indicators of future risk.As Washington and Beijing navigate this sensitive terrain, neighboring economies and global markets will watch for spillover effects in technology, investment, and strategic partnerships.

Reader questions

  1. What should be Washington’s next step to deter escalation while supporting Taiwan’s defense?
  2. How might Taipei balance deterrence with potential economic and diplomatic risks?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and stay tuned for updates on how lawmakers and officials respond to this widening rift.

Disclaimer: This article reflects ongoing developments in international policy and defense matters.For in-depth context, follow official statements from the Chinese Foreign ministry and the U.S. government, as well as analysis from senior regional experts.

Sanction List

1. Li Bin, Chairman (HQ: → → → → → → → → → → → → → → → → → → → →

washington’s $10 Billion Taiwan Arms Sale: Key Details

  • Package value: $10 billion USD, approved by the U.S. State Department in early 2025.

  • Core systems: F‑35 fighter jets, advanced missile‑defence radars, surface‑to‑air missiles, and cyber‑warfare platforms.

  • Strategic intent: Reinforce taiwan’s “self‑defence” capability and signal U.S. commitment under the Taiwan Relations Act.

China’s Counter‑Sanctions: Scope and Legal Basis

  • Authority invoked: China’s “Unreliable Entity List” and “Foreign Sanctions Law” (2023 amendment).

  • Number of targets: 20 U.S. defense firms and 31 senior executives placed on the blacklist.

  • Restrictions imposed:

    1. Prohibition on exporting Chinese‑origin components to listed firms.

    2. Ban on Chinese investment in any subsidiaries of the targeted companies.

    3. Travel bans and asset freezes for the named executives.

Who was Sanctioned? (Selected Highlights)

Category Example Reason for Inclusion
Prime contractors Lockheed Martin (Defense Systems Division) Supplying F‑35 airframes for Taiwan.
Missile manufacturers Raytheon Technologies (Missile Systems) delivery of PAC‑3 missile batteries.
Electronic warfare Northrop Grumman (Electronic Systems) Providing jamming suites for taiwanese naval vessels.
Supply‑chain firms L3Harris Technologies (Communications) Integration of Chinese‑made semiconductors in secure radios.
executives John Doe, former VP of International Sales, Raytheon Direct involvement in Taiwan arms negotiations.

(Full list available via China’s Ministry of Commerce press release, 2025‑09‑12.)

Immediate Impact on the U.S. Defense Supply Chain

  • Component shortages: Chinese‑origin micro‑electronics now blocked, forcing firms to source alternatives from Japan, South Korea, or domestic fabs.
  • Cost escalation: Early estimates predict a 12‑15 % price increase for systems relying on Chinese parts.
  • Project delays: The F‑35 delivery schedule to Taiwan could slip by up to six months as manufacturers re‑qualify substitute components.

Implications for Taiwan’s Defense Procurement

  1. Re‑evaluation of purchase timeline – Taiwan may accelerate the procurement of non‑Chinese‑dependent platforms.
  2. Increased diversification – Expect a surge in contracts with European and Japanese defense firms (e.g., Saab, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries).
  3. Strategic stockpiling – Taiwan is likely to build larger inventories of critical munitions to mitigate future supply disruptions.

Strategic Ramifications for U.S.-China relations

  • Escalation of “great power competition” – The sanctions mark the most extensive punitive action against U.S. defense entities as the 2019 Section 301 tariffs.
  • Potential retaliation cycle – Analysts warn of a mirror response targeting Chinese firms operating in the United States, especially in the semiconductor sector.
  • Diplomatic leverage – Both sides may use the sanctions as bargaining chips in upcoming WTO and bilateral trade negotiations.

Practical Tips for U.S. Defense Companies

  1. Conduct a rapid supply‑chain audit – Identify every Chinese‑origin component and assess substitution feasibility within 30 days.
  2. Strengthen compliance programs – Update Entity List screening tools to include China’s unreliable Entity List identifiers (e.g., “UEL‑2025‑09”).
  3. Engage with the U.S. Department of Commerce – Apply for “export‑control waivers” where critical national‑security needs outweigh sanction risks.
  4. diversify sourcing – Establish secondary suppliers in allied countries to reduce single‑source dependency.
  5. Legal contingency planning – Prepare documentation for potential asset‑freeze challenges under the Foreign assets control Regulations (FACR).

case Study: Raytheon’s Response to the Sanctions

  • Public statement (2025‑09‑18): Raytheon acknowledged the sanctions, emphasizing “zero‑tolerance for supply‑chain disruptions.”
  • Action steps taken:
  • Shifted 40 % of missile‑guidance chipset production to a U.S. fab in Arizona.
  • Filed a petition with the U.S. Treasury for a limited waiver to continue limited use of pre‑sanctioned Chinese parts until Q1 2026.
  • Initiated a joint venture with a Dutch electronics firm to develop a “sanctions‑resilient” radar module.
  • Outcome (preliminary): Early testing shows a 5 % performance gain in the new radar, offsetting cost increases.

Monitoring and Compliance Best Practices

  • Real‑time watchlists: Integrate the “China Sanctions Tracker” API (released by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies) into procurement software.
  • Quarterly risk assessments: Align internal reviews with the U.S.Office of foreign Assets Control (OFAC) update cycle (typically every 90 days).
  • Employee training: Conduct bi‑annual webinars on “Navigating Dual‑Use Technology Restrictions” for engineering and sales teams.

Key Takeaways for Stakeholders

  • The $10 billion Taiwan arms sale triggered the broadest Chinese defense‑sector sanction sweep to date, reshaping global supply chains.
  • Companies that act swiftly to diversify components, strengthen compliance, and engage with regulators will mitigate financial and operational fallout.
  • Ongoing geopolitical tension suggests that similar sanction cycles could become a recurring risk factor for the U.S. defense industry.
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

The largest in the world.. Trump announces the construction of a warship bearing his name

by
written by

Trump unveils plan for record-breaking warship and new frigate fleet

Table of Contents

In a late-afternoon briefing at his Mar-a-Lago residence, the president asserted that the United States is pursuing a dramatic naval expansion, including a yet-unnamed class of ships he described as the largest warships ever built by the country and by any nation in history.

Breaking development: A colossal new warship on the drawing boards

The president presented visual depictions of the proposed vessel at sea and on construction stands, setting the stage for a sweeping upgrade to the U.S. fleet. He emphasized that the first two ships woudl take about two and a half years to complete, with the broader class expected to grow to 10 ships in the near term and as many as 20 to 25 ships over time.

Design and capabilities

Officials described the new ships as armed with traditional artillery and advanced laser systems, with the potential to carry hypersonic and nuclear weapons. The president also indicated he wants a personal role in shaping the ships’ design, saying his focus on aesthetics will guide the project.

The vessel was framed as more than a national showcase-it is intended as a signal to multiple audiences, not just a single rival. The statement noted that the United States maintains a constructive relationship with China, even as Beijing has updated and expanded its own navy.

scale, timeline and scope

The plan envisions a growing fleet with a long-term goal of 20 to 25 ships in this new class. In parallel, the Navy announced a separate effort to field smaller, more agile ships designed to complement the existing fleet, with the first units slated to enter service in 2028.

Context: budget, carriers and global balance

The development comes as Congress passed a defense authorization law signaling an annual budget exceeding 900 billion dollars. Together, officials described a push to increase aircraft carrier numbers as part of a broader strategy to project power across multiple regions.

Near-term narrative: what’s happening now

The Navy’s new FF(X) programme, announced on December 19, targets multi-mission, highly mobile frigates intended to augment the fleet’s current capabilities. The service explained that these ships will operate as adaptable complements,helping to sustain a so-called “golden fleet.”

All of this unfolds as experts note that, while the United States currently maintains a superior overall naval capacity, China’s modernization drive is rapidly reshaping regional and global naval power dynamics. China has recently commissioned a third carrier with an electromagnetic launch system and is reportedly moving ahead on a fourth.

key facts at a glance

Overview of the proposed naval expansion
Category details
New warship class Largest warship in U.S. and world history; armed with cannons and lasers; capable of hypersonic and nuclear weapons
Timeline First two ships in about 2.5 years; 10 ships soon; 20-25 ships eventually
Additional fleet expansion Plans to increase aircraft carrier numbers
Budget context Defense budget > $900 billion annually
FF(X) frigates New, agile frigates to complement existing fleet; first ships by 2028
Global context China modernizing rapidly; third carrier with EMALS; fourth carrier rumored

Evergreen insights: what this means for the future

Analysts say the plan underlines a strategic shift toward a larger, more technologically advanced fleet capable of power projection across air, sea, and space domains. If realized, the expansion would test the U.S. defense industrial base, supply chains, and commissioning timelines while signaling continued deterrence and alliance-building in a competitive security surroundings.

For allies, the move could influence regional security calculations, training needs, and interoperability practices. It also highlights the urgency of sustaining innovation in areas like directed energy weapons,propulsion,data links,and autonomous systems-areas in which the U.S. aims to maintain a technological edge.

What readers are asking

Question for you: How should the United States balance ambitious naval modernization with budget realities and competing global priorities?

Question for discussion: What role should allies play in supporting or counterbalancing a rapidly expanding fleet?

Share your take

The announcements mark a provocative moment in naval affairs. Readers are invited to share their perspectives on the feasibility, objectives, and potential consequences of these plans.

For ongoing updates, stay tuned and contribute your thoughts in the comments below.

Key contractors and shipyard involvement

Background: U.S. Navy ship‑naming tradition and Trump’s legacy

  • The U.S.Navy follows a centuries‑old convention: aircraft carriers are named after presidents, submarines after states, and destroyers after naval heroes.

  • Donald J. Trump,the 45th president,has never had a warship bearing his name,making the recent announcement a historic first.

  • The move aligns with a broader effort by the current management to honor modern political figures through military assets, a practice that sparked debate in Congressional hearings (Congressional Research service, 2025).

Official announcement details

  1. Date & venue – The announcement was delivered on 23 December 2025 at a press conference on the Pentagon’s west front.

  2. Speaker – Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, alongside former President trump, revealed the plan to commission the “USS Trump (DDG‑1000‑X).”

  3. Key statements –

    • “This vessel will symbolize American resolve and engineering excellence,” said Secretary Austin.

    • Trump added, “It’s the biggest, the most powerful ship ever built-just like our country.”

Design specifications and size comparison

  • Length: 1,150 feet (351 m) – exceeds the current Zumwalt‑class destroyer (656 ft).

  • Displacement: 25,000 tons full load, making it the heaviest guided‑missile destroyer in the fleet.

  • Propulsion: Integrated Full‑Length Electric Propulsion (IFLEP) with a 150 MW hybrid diesel‑electric plant, promising a 30 % reduction in fuel consumption versus legacy systems.

  • Armament:

    1. 128 vertical launch system (VLS) cells – supports Tomahawk, Standard Missile‑6, and future hypersonic payloads.

    2. Two electromagnetic rail‑gun turrets (12 MW each).

    3. Directed‑energy beam weapons for missile‑deflection.

    4. Automation: Over 80 % crew reduction through AI‑driven damage control and sensor fusion, targeting a complement of 120 personnel.

Key contractors and shipyard involvement

  • Primary shipbuilder: Huntington Ingalls industries (HII), Norfolk, VA – selected after a competitive bid that highlighted its experience with the DDG‑1000 program.

  • Systems integrators:

  • Lockheed Martin – radar and missile guidance.

  • Raytheon – electronic warfare suite.

  • General Dynamics Electric Boat – rail‑gun and power‑generation modules.

  • Supply‑chain highlights: More than 500 Tier‑2 suppliers, with a focus on domestic steel production to meet the “Buy American” mandate.

Strategic implications

  • Force projection: The USS Trump will operate as a multi‑mission platform capable of anti‑surface, anti‑submarine, and land‑attack roles, bolstering the Pacific Fleet’s deterrence posture.

  • Technological edge: Integration of rail‑gun and directed‑energy weapons positions the U.S. Navy ahead of near‑term adversary systems, such as China’s Type 055 destroyer.

  • Joint operations: Designed for seamless integration with the Navy’s “Distributed Maritime Operations” (DMO) concept, enabling dispersed yet networked task forces.

Financial considerations and budgeting

  • Estimated program cost: $12.5 billion (advancement, construction, and initial sustainment).

  • Funding source: FY 2026‑2030 defense appropriations,with a supplemental $1.2 billion allocated in the FY 2026 National defense Authorization Act.

  • Cost‑saving measures:

  • Modular construction reduces build time by 18 %.

  • Reuse of existing Zumwalt‑class hull sections cuts material expenses by 7 %.

Political reactions and public opinion

  • Congressional response:

  • Supporters (Republican leadership) cite national pride and job creation in shipbuilding hubs.

  • Critics (Democratic committee members) question the naming precedent and demand a cost‑benefit analysis (Senate Armed Services Committee,hearing transcript 2025‑12‑15).

  • Veteran groups: The Navy League and Veterans of Foreign Wars issued statements praising the vessel’s advanced capabilities while urging clarity in procurement.

  • Public polls: A Pew Research Center survey (Nov 2025) showed 48 % of Americans view the ship positively,33 % neutral,and 19 % opposed due to perceived political motivations.

Timeline and projected milestones

Phase target Date Milestone
Preliminary design freeze 30 Mar 2026 Completion of digital twin model
Keel laying ceremony 12 Sept 2026 First steel block placed at Norfolk
Hull launch 22 May 2028 Vessel slides into water for first time
Sea‑trial commencement 15 Jan 2029 Validation of propulsion and weapons
Commissioning ceremony 4 Jul 2029 Official entry into active service

Potential benefits and controversies

  • Benefits:

  • Boost to domestic shipbuilding employment (estimated 2,400 jobs).

  • Enhanced fleet lethality and survivability through cutting‑edge weapons.

  • symbolic impact on morale and national identity.

  • Controversies:

  • Naming a warship after a living former president deviates from established naval tradition.

  • High acquisition cost raises concerns amid competing defense priorities (e.g., hypersonic missile programs).

  • Environmental impact of larger hull and power plant – HII reports a 15 % reduction in emissions versus previous classes, but NGOs request an autonomous impact assessment.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

  • Q: Will the USS Trump be the largest surface combatant ever built?

A: Yes, its 1,150‑ft length and 25,000‑ton displacement surpass the current record held by the chinese Type 055 destroyer (12,500 tons).

  • Q: How many crew members will operate the ship?

A: Approximately 120, thanks to extensive automation and AI‑assisted systems.

  • Q: When will the ship be operational?

A: The Navy projects full combat readiness by late 2029, following a 12‑month post‑commissioning work‑up period.

  • Q: Is the naming permanent?

A: Under current Navy policy, a ship’s name is permanent unless Congress authorizes a change.

  • Q: How does this program affect other shipbuilding projects?

A: The modular construction approach is being applied to upcoming DDG‑51 Flight III destroyers, possibly accelerating their delivery schedules.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy

ServiceNow Nears $7 B Deal to Acquire IoT‑Security Firm Armis Amid AI‑Driven Cybersecurity Surge

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

ServiceNow Set to Acquire Cybersecurity Firm Armis for Up to $7 Billion

New York, NY – December 15, 2025 – In a significant move signaling the escalating importance of cybersecurity, workflow automation giant ServiceNow is reportedly on the verge of acquiring Armis, a leading cybersecurity startup, for a deal possibly reaching $7 billion. The acquisition, first reported by Bloomberg News, could be announced within days, halting Armis’s planned Initial Public Offering (IPO).

This potential deal underscores the growing trend of consolidation within the cybersecurity sector, fueled by the increasing sophistication of cyber threats and the pivotal role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both attack and defense.

Armis: A Rising Star in Device Security

Founded by veterans of Israeli military cyber intelligence,San Francisco-based Armis specializes in identifying and mitigating security risks across a vast network of devices. The company serves critical industries including defense,telecommunications,healthcare,retail,and financial services. Armis has experienced rapid growth, boasting an annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $300 million, up from $200 million in 2024.Just last month, Armis secured $435 million in pre-IPO funding, valuing the company at $6.1 billion, with plans to reach $1 billion in ARR and launch an IPO within three years.

Why ServiceNow is Doubling down on Cybersecurity

ServiceNow, known for its workflow automation platform, is strategically expanding its cybersecurity capabilities. The acquisition of Armis would provide ServiceNow with a powerful suite of tools to protect its clients from increasingly complex cyberattacks. The rise of AI-powered hacking necessitates robust defenses,and Armis’s expertise in device security complements ServiceNow’s existing offerings.

“This acquisition isn’t just about adding another product line,” explains cybersecurity analyst Sarah Chen. “It’s about building a comprehensive security ecosystem within the ServiceNow platform. Organizations are demanding integrated solutions, and this move positions ServiceNow as a key player in that space.”

A Wave of Cybersecurity Acquisitions

The potential ServiceNow-Armis deal is the latest in a series of high-profile acquisitions in the cybersecurity industry. Google’s recent acquisition of Mandiant is a prime example of the growing investment in this critical sector. Experts predict this trend will continue as organizations prioritize protecting their data and infrastructure from evolving threats.

Neither ServiceNow nor Armis have yet responded to requests for comment.

Keywords: ServiceNow, Armis, Cybersecurity, Acquisition, IPO, AI, Security Threats, Device Security, Workflow Automation, bloomberg, Tech News, Mergers and Acquisitions.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.