News continues in the case of accusing Brazilian star Dani Alves, the former Barcelona player, of sexually assaulting a girl in a nightclub in Barcelona at the end of last December.
Marca confirmed that Esther García, the plaintiff’s lawyer, had appealed once morest the judge’s decision to approve the psychological examination of the girl, which had been proposed by Alves’ defense lawyer, arguing that her client should not be subjected to questions from a psychiatrist.
The appeal once morest the judge’s decision, which agreed to refer the plaintiff to an independent Sharia judge from the Institute of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Sciences and a psychiatrist appointed by the player’s defense, was not only from the plaintiff’s lawyer, but also from the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
The Brazilian star is in pre-trial detention without bail in Barcelona due to accusations of alleged sexual assault in a famous nightclub in Barcelona on the night of December 30-31.
Tag:
between
Watch.. A heated discussion on air between the sheikh and Fallatah because of this comment • Al Marsad Sports
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
Sports Observatory: Sports critic Abdullah Fallatah entered into a heated debate on the air with sports journalist Mohammed Al-Sheikh, due to a disagreement between the two regarding the performance of the competitions committee of the League.
During tonight’s episode of “Action with Walid,” Fallata said that the sheikh, with his speech, gives the audience a feeling that there are no mistakes in the competitions committee’s work.
The sheikh became agitated in response to Fallatah’s comment, asking the latter not to interfere in his intention, so that the media, Walid Al-Faraj, intervened to calm the atmosphere between the two.
The first comment from Biden on the announcement of the signing of a historic deal between Saudi Arabia and the American company Boeing to purchase 121 aircraft
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
Al-Marsad newspaper: US President Joe Biden praised the two “historic” deals that Boeing concluded with Saudi Arabia to manufacture up to 121 aircraft, and said that it would support jobs in the United States, while Riyadh considered them evidence of the strength of relations with Washington.
The White House said in a statement that Biden pledged during his run for president to make the United States a global leader in manufacturing once more.
He added: “Last month, Boeing concluded its second largest commercial deal in history, to support the expansion of Air India’s commercial fleet, by more than 200 aircraft, and today, Boeing completed two deals with Saudi Arabia to manufacture up to 121 Boeing 787 aircraft.” Dreamliner, equipped with the latest General Electric engines.
Biden considered the two new deals, valued at regarding $ 37 billion, “historic” with Saudi Arabia.
He indicated that they would support the US market with more than a million jobs.
According to the White House, the latest deals with Saudi Arabia alone support more than 140,000 American jobs, many of which do not require a college degree.
Watch… the story of a dispute over a “wedding dress” between a fashion designer and a bride that ends in the corridors of the courts
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
Al-Marsad Newspaper: A content creator on “Tik Tok” recounted an exciting story regarding the “dress case” that was considered in court by a judge, between a bride and a fashion designer.
The content creator explained the details of the controversial “dress” story, noting that she saw a bride carrying a dress on her back in a courtroom.
Regarding the details of the story, she said that a girl asked a fashion designer to design her wedding dress, and she agreed for an amount of 22,000 riyals.
And she indicated that the bride expressed her admiration for the dress in conversations between them on “WhatsApp”, and she actually bought it and attended her wedding event with it, but following the wedding was completed, she wrote to the fashion designer that she wanted to return it, under the pretext that she did not like it, but the latter refused.
And the content creator stated that the bride filed a case once morest her, and by presenting the dispute between them before the judge, the designer indicated that the dress had already been used by the bride and that it had a “foundation” of her joy.
And she concluded that the judge sent the case to the experts, and they ruled to return half of the amount to the bride.