.
Reid Family to Comply with Building Rules after Lengthy Dispute
Table of Contents
- 1. Reid Family to Comply with Building Rules after Lengthy Dispute
- 2. What steps could the Reid family have taken *before* construction to avoid the $138,000 fine and enforcement orders?
- 3. Reid Family katikati: $138,000 Fine for Unconsented Building – A Warning for Developers
- 4. Understanding the Katikati Case: Key Details
- 5. Why Building consents Matter: Legal Framework & Implications
- 6. Katikati Building Regulations: A Local Viewpoint
After a two-week trial and years of resistance, the Reid family of Katikati is now cooperating with authorities to bring their sprawling rural property into compliance with building regulations.The family had been found guilty of erecting multiple dwellings without consent, sparking a lengthy legal battle with the Western Bay of Plenty District Council.
The property, home to the Reids and previously at least two other families, operates as an “intentional living” community with a focus on homeschooling and Vedic faith. It had become increasingly cluttered with structures including sheds, houses, kids’ play equipment and a partially built barn.
During their trial, the Reids maintained they should be able to use their land as they saw fit and believed their actions were causing no harm.However, Judge Kelvin Reid noted a “significant change of heart” and renewed cooperation from the family.
The resulting enforcement orders will require the removal or demolition of existing buildings. Instead, the family plans to construct “tiny houses” on wheels, which do not require the same level of consent. Materials for these structures have already been purchased.
Bianca Reid, speaking on behalf of the family, described the situation as a positive development. She also indicated that buildings would be sold to fund the new project.
The compromised enforcement orders,secured through cooperation,are less restrictive than originally proposed by the Crown. dhruva Reid will oversee the dismantling of existing structures and construction of the tiny homes.
The property will eventually conform to the District Plan,with a deadline of mid-next year for complete compliance.This marks the end of a contentious chapter for the Reid family and the local council.
What steps could the Reid family have taken *before* construction to avoid the $138,000 fine and enforcement orders?
Reid Family katikati: $138,000 Fine for Unconsented Building – A Warning for Developers
The recent case involving the Reid family in Katikati serves as a stark reminder of the financial and legal risks associated with building without proper consent. A $138,000 fine and enforcement orders have been issued following the construction of buildings on their property without the necessary planning permissions. This incident underscores the importance of navigating New Zealand’s building consent process and the potential consequences of non-compliance. This article breaks down the details, implications, and preventative measures for developers and landowners in the Bay of Plenty region and beyond.
Understanding the Katikati Case: Key Details
The Western Bay of Plenty District Council took enforcement action against the Reid family due to unconsented construction. While specific details of the structures built are currently limited in public reporting, the substantial fine indicates a notable breach of the Resource management Act 1991.
* The Fine: $138,000 – a considerable penalty reflecting the severity of the breach.
* Enforcement Orders: Mandate compliance with previous consent conditions (if any existed) or require the removal/rectification of the unconsented structures.
* Location: Katikati, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand – a region experiencing growth and development, making adherence to planning regulations crucial.
* Core Issue: Construction commenced without obtaining the required building consents and resource consents.
Why Building consents Matter: Legal Framework & Implications
New Zealand’s building consent system is designed to ensure structures are safe, compliant with building codes, and contribute positively to the surrounding environment. Bypassing this process carries significant risks.
* Resource Management Act 1991: The primary legislation governing resource consent requirements.
* Building Act 2004: Outlines the requirements for building consents, ensuring structural integrity and safety.
* Potential Consequences of Non-Compliance:
- Financial Penalties: As demonstrated by the Reid family case, fines can be substantial.
- Enforcement Orders: Requiring demolition,rectification,or cessation of work.
- Legal Action: Potential for further court proceedings.
- Property Value Impact: Unconsented structures can negatively affect property value and saleability.
- Insurance Issues: Difficulty obtaining or maintaining building insurance.
Katikati Building Regulations: A Local Viewpoint
The Western Bay of Plenty District Council has a clear process for building consents. Developers and landowners in Katikati must adhere to these regulations.
* District Plan: The Western Bay of Plenty District Plan outlines zoning rules, permitted activities, and consent requirements.
* building Consent Application Process: Typically involves submitting detailed plans, specifications, and a property
