Another petition related to voter pressure was filed in the Supreme Court on the issue of 26th Constitutional Amendment.
A petition against the 26th constitutional amendment has been filed in the Supreme Court by Afrasiab Khattak, a senior leader of the National Democratic Movement, in which all political parties including Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz and People’s Party have been made parties.
The petition requested the Supreme Court to constitute a full court to hear the petition against the 26th constitutional amendment and to inquire whether the members of the assembly voted voluntarily or under pressure in the 26th constitutional amendment.
The petition has requested that the Supreme Court conduct an inquiry into the matter itself or conduct an inquiry into the matter of pressure on the members through a judicial commission and declare that the 26th constitutional amendment was not properly passed.
26 constitutional amendments challenged in Supreme Court and Sindh High Court, ‘Amendment is a direct attack on the independence of judiciary’
It has also been requested in the petition that the election disputes of the members of the assembly are pending in the election tribunal, the 26th constitutional amendment should be dismissed as against the independence of the judiciary.
The petition has adopted the position that the independence of the judiciary is the basic structure of the constitution, the annual performance review of judges, the change in the method of appointment of the Chief Justice and the establishment of constitutional benches are against the independence of the judiciary, the petition against the 26th constitutional amendment. But constitutional benches cannot hear.
Maia Sandu, who has been in office since 2020, and ten other candidates are running for re-election in Sunday’s elections. Sandu is the election favorite, and pre-election polls give her result of 35%.
In parallel with the elections, a referendum initiated by Sandu is taking place, in which Moldovans answer the question whether European integration should be included in the constitution as a strategic goal of the state.
Sandu’s opponents include politicians who support a return to close cooperation with Russia. Since Sandu won the elections in 2020 (and her party the following year), Moldova has chosen a pro-Western course, and the authorities’ main goal is to join the EU. Moldova has started accession negotiations with the EU. Sandu announces the continuation of his policy – striving for the EU and reforms, economic development and strengthening democracy.
Former Attorney General Alexander Stoianoglo enjoys the support of socialists led by pro-Russian former president Igor Dodon. Stoianoglo says he is in favor of European integration, but “not in its current form.” This is rhetoric also used by other candidates – while formally announcing their pro-European stance, they criticize Sandu for the way he conducts politics and accuses her of using the referendum as a “political technology” to manipulate moods.
Stoianoglo, as he writes Newsmaker.mdis a supporter of Moldova’s neutral status and good relations with Russia.
Our Party’s candidate Renato Usatii is an outspoken critic of Sandu. In the case of the second round, he announced, he would not support it. He also speaks out against the referendum. In the past, he was considered a pro-Russian politician, but he condemned Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.
The list of candidates also includes Vasile Tarlev from the Future of Moldova party, Ion Chicu (Development and Consolidation Party), Andrei Nastase, Octavian Ticu, Victoria Furtuna, journalist Natalia Morari and Tudor Ulianovschi.
The “great absentee” of this campaign is the pro-Russian opposition politician Ilan Sor, who is prosecuted in Moldova (he was sentenced to 15 years in prison for gigantic financial frauds). Neither he nor parties from his Pobeda bloc, founded in Russia, can run in the elections, but some candidates, such as Irina Vlah or Vasile Tarlev, are suspected of having links with Sor. Irina Vlah, a former Bashkan (leader) of the autonomous Gagauzia, is perceived as a candidate favoring Russia. He supports Moldova’s neutrality, and in the campaign he uses narratives consistent with those of the Kremlin.
It is known for certain that from Russia Sor coordinates the campaign against Sandu and European integration, among others. illegally bringing millions of dollars into the country through intermediaries and “activists” for electoral bribery. The police are conducting a number of proceedings in connection with these activities.
According to the authorities in Chisinau, before the elections, Russian hybrid activities aimed at torpedoing the policy of the pro-Western government have become even more intense than before. These include information campaigns and illegal transfers of money to the country for pro-Russian activists, politicians and for “buying votes” of voters.
The 2024 ballot introduces an alternative postal vote for the first time. It is available to Moldovan citizens taking part in elections in the United States of America, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Iceland and Finland, provided that they have previously registered to vote by correspondence, Radio Moldova reports.
The Moldovan Election: Sandu’s Tightrope Walk Between East and West
Ah, Moldova! A country where the political scene resembles a game of Jenga—one wrong move and it all tumbles down. We’ve got Maia Sandu, the current president, strutting her stuff in an election campaign against ten other candidates. Now, isn’t that a crowd? It’s like a Tinder date gone wrong, and everyone just wants to swipe left.
Ms. Sandu, who’s been in office since the dawn of 2020 (when everyone was blissfully unaware of what chaos lay ahead), is currently leading in the polls with a rather uninspiring 35%. It’s a bit like being the tallest member of a short club—great, but still short, right?
So, what’s the situation? In classic election style, alongside the voting booths, we have a referendum that Sandu has kicked off. Voters are asked whether they want to add European integration as a strategic goal in the constitution. Because, let’s face it, nothing says “let’s enjoy our democracy” quite like a good ol’ referendum!
Facing the Competition
But wait, there’s more! Sandu’s opponents are like the cast of a soap opera called “Return of the Pro-Russians.” Among them is the Former Attorney General, Alexander Stoianoglo, who hitches a ride on the socialist train led by none other than pro-Russian ex-president Igor Dodon. Stoianoglo claims he’s pro-European too—just not the version that Sandu offers. Classic political double-talk! It’s like saying you’re a vegetarian, but a bacon cheeseburger is totally on the menu.
Stoianoglo has a flair for theatrics, alleging that Sandu is using the referendum as some sort of fancy political trick. You know, like pulling a rabbit out of a hat, except it’s a rabbit that plans to join the EU! Oh, the irony!
We’ve also got Renato Usatii, a vocal rival who’s shaking his fist at the idea of European integration—he’s like the disgruntled neighbor who’s always out to complain about the homeowners’ association. Once a pro-Russian fellow, he’s now condemning Russia’s antics in Ukraine, possibly sensing that political tides might shift quicker than a contestant on a reality TV show.
The Great Absentee
And let’s not forget Ilan Sor, the notorious absentee of the election, relegated to the sidelines thanks to a conviction for spectacularly bad financial practices. Think of him as the ghost haunting a haunted house tour—only instead of chains, he brings a suitcase filled with dubious financial deals.
Interestingly enough, it seems Sor is still pulling strings from afar—allegedly coordinating attempts to undermine Sandu and her European aspirations like a villain in a bad 80s action flick. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a secret lair somewhere, possibly with a cat on his lap and a map of Moldova spread out before him.
Outside Influences at Play
As the election draws near, reports indicate that Russian hybrid activities have ramped up—because why wouldn’t they? It’s like a Formula 1 race, but instead of cars, we have misinformation and financial warfare zip-zapping around Moldova. Local authorities claim these tactics aim to destabilize Sandu’s pro-Western course and sway the voters as if they’re marionettes on strings. Rotary phone, anyone?
Mail-in Voting: A Game Changer
To add a sprinkle of innovation, the upcoming elections will introduce postal voting for Moldovan citizens in places like the United States and Scandinavia. So, if you’ve ever considered being an armchair politician from abroad, now’s your chance! Just imagine marking your ballot while enjoying a cozy winter night in Norway—talk about living your best life while impacting Moldovan democracy with a warm cup of coffee.
In conclusion, as the ballots prepare to be cast and the juicy drama unfolds, keep your eyes peeled on this Moldovan election! With strategic friendships, power plays, and a little sprinkle of international intrigue, this isn’t just politics—it’s the high-stakes poker game of democracy.
Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Elena Mihai: Navigating Moldova’s Election Landscape
Editor: Today we have Dr. Elena Mihai, a political analyst specializing in Eastern European politics, to discuss the upcoming elections in Moldova involving President Maia Sandu and her numerous opponents. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Mihai.
Dr. Mihai: Thank you for having me. It’s an exciting time for Moldova, albeit a complicated one.
Editor: President Maia Sandu is seeking re-election amidst a tense political atmosphere. Recent polls show her leading with 35%. How significant is this figure in the context of Moldova’s political landscape?
Dr. Mihai: That 35% signifies more than just a lead; it reflects a deeply polarized electorate. While Sandu’s popularity demonstrates some support for her pro-European stance, it also highlights the challenges she faces from opponents, particularly those leaning towards closer ties with Russia. It’s a precarious situation; she needs to galvanize support beyond that base to secure a solid victory.
Editor: Alongside the elections, a referendum initiated by Sandu proposing to include European integration in the constitution is also on the ballot. How might this affect voter turnout and overall opinion?
Dr. Mihai: The referendum could drive voter engagement, as it presents a clear and immediate question about the country’s direction. However, opponents are framing it as a manipulative tactic by Sandu. If this narrative resonates, it could backfire and diminish her support. Voter mobilization will hinge on how effectively she can communicate the importance of this constitutional change.
Editor: Speaking of opponents, former Attorney General Alexander Stoianoglo appears to be one of the main challengers. He claims to support European integration but criticizes Sandu’s approach. How does that position him in the eyes of the electorate?
Dr. Mihai: Stoianoglo’s rhetoric positions him as a pragmatic alternative, but it can also confuse voters. He is attempting to appeal to pro-European sentiments while positioning himself as a reformer who offers a different vision. However, his association with pro-Russian figures like Igor Dodon could alienate voters who genuinely seek a European path. It’s a balancing act that could either attract undecided voters or make them wary.
Editor: There are also accusations of illicit activities by their opponents, particularly with links to Ilan Sor, currently absent from the elections due to legal issues. What impact does this have on the election’s integrity?
Dr. Mihai: The allegations of hybrid warfare and financial interference from Russia complicate matters significantly. Voters need to feel that the election is fair and transparent for it to have legitimacy. If the claims against Sor are substantiated and appear credible, it could seriously undermine trust in the opposition, benefiting Sandu if she can slip through the rhetoric and position herself as a defender of democracy.
Editor: With such a divided electorate, what strategies should Sandu prioritize leading up to the elections?
Dr. Mihai: First and foremost, Sandu should focus on clear and consistent communication about her government’s achievements, especially concerning EU accession talks. She must mobilize her base while reaching out to undecided voters. Engaging in public forums, emphasizing reform narratives, and bridging gaps between pro-European and neutrality supporters will be crucial in navigating this complex political landscape.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mihai, for your insights on the unfolding political drama in Moldova. It’s a defining moment for the country.
Dr. Mihai: Thank you for having me. The next few days will be critical for Moldova, and I’m eager to see how it all plays out.
Or repel support depending on how voters perceive his intentions and affiliations.
Editor: Renato Usatii has also been quite vocal against Sandu’s approach to European integration. How crucial is his stance in the broader election dynamic?
Dr. Mihai: Usatii’s opposition brings another layer of complexity to the election. His past as a pro-Russian politician but current condemnation of Russia’s actions in Ukraine presents a strategic pivot that aligns with shifting public sentiment. His criticism of the referendum and Sandu may resonate with those who feel uneasy about rapid European integration, potentially galvanizing significant opposition to Sandu’s policies. His presence complicates the landscape for Sandu as he seeks to appeal to disillusioned voters.
Editor: You mentioned external influences—specifically Russian interference—what impact could that have on the election results?
Dr. Mihai: Russian hybrid activities significantly complicate the electoral landscape. Such tactics can manipulate public perception and may even swing undecided voters through misinformation and financial incentives. If not effectively countered, these activities might bolster pro-Russian candidates while undermining Sandu’s pro-European initiatives. The effectiveness of her campaign in addressing these threats will be a crucial determining factor in the election outcome.
Editor: Lastly, the introduction of postal voting for Moldovans abroad seems like a game changer. What implications will this have?
Dr. Mihai: The postal voting mechanism opens up new avenues for participation, particularly among diaspora populations who may have strong views about Moldova’s direction. It can enhance voter engagement and potentially sway the results if large numbers of expatriates prioritize pro-European candidates. This innovation could act as a double-edged sword—a boon for Sandu or a platform for her opponents depending on how well they mobilize abroad.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mihai, for your insights into this complex and dynamic electoral situation in Moldova. We will keep a close watch on how these factors play out in the coming days.
Dr. Mihai: Thank you for having me. It will certainly be an interesting election season!
The draft constitution adopted Thursday by the Council of Ministers was sent to the Constitutional Court for opinion and verification of compliance with all legal provisions before its publication, announced Sunday evening the Secretary General of the Government, Abdul Razzaq Guy Kambogo, guest of the 8 p.m. news on Gabon 1erastate television.
« For procedural questions, we may have 24 hours to wait for the Constitutional Court to rule (…) to certify that the procedure has been respected », recommended Mr. Kambogo.

The Secretary General of the Government explained that after the adoption of the draft constitution in the Council of Ministers and its official submission to the Prime Minister “ immediately follows the transmission of the decree accompanying the draft constitution to the Constitutional Court which will examine it to ensure that the constitutional provisions have been respected. This is what the procedure requires »
« The President of the Republic wants this project, which will be submitted to the Gabonese people, to strictly respect all constitutional procedures. “, he added.
« Everything is done so that as soon as the opinion of the Constitutional Court is given, publication (of the text, editor’s note) will take place in all possible forms accessible to us. “, he continued.
« I know that everyone is impatient to see this real constitution (…) it shows the enthusiasm around the constitution. I reassure the Gabonese people that the constitution is ready. It will be published. Simply for procedural questions, we perhaps have 24 hours to wait for the Constitutional Court to rule (…) attest that the procedure has been respected “, he insisted.

Thursday after the adoption of the draft constitution, the council of ministers chaired by the president of the Transition, Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema set the date of the constitutional referendum for November 16.
The Gabonese will go to the polls to vote “ oui » or « non » to this draft constitution. The government is widely criticized for not having immediately published this project after its adoption.
Camille Boussoughou

2024-10-20 21:26:00
#draft #constitution #published #hours #Constitutional #Court
Kim Jong Un Goes Full Drama: South Korea is the Ultimate Enemy!
Well, folks, it seems Kim Jong Un has officially declared South Korea his main nemesis! Yes, forget about the usual suspects—like low WiFi signals or your in-laws—this is serious business. North Korea has revised its constitution to entrench South Korea as the enemy. Talk about taking family feuds to the next level!
From “Hello” to “Goodbye”: Cutting Connections
According to North Korea’s state media, they’ve gone all out to cut ties—like your mate deleting his ex from social media. All roads and railways linking North and South Korea have been demolished following some “explosive events.” Yes, you heard that correctly—explode first, ask questions later! KCNA insists this is an “inevitable and legitimate measure.” Sounds quite legitimate, doesn’t it? If by ‘legitimate’, they mean a toddler’s temper tantrum.
The 60-meter-long sections of infrastructure serving as border crossings are now blocked, marking a dramatic step back for reunification efforts. Can we get an applause for that level of commitment to separation?
That Awkward Two-State System
In a shocking plot twist, Kim Jong Un has decided it’s time to pivot away from the age-old dream of reunification. Instead, they’re pursuing a two-state system. It’s like that awkward high school dance where Kim’s on one side of the gym and South Korea is on the other, both pretending the other doesn’t exist. Kim’s statement on South Korea being both ‘independent’ and an enemy is a real plot twist—maybe Kim’s reading too many soap operas?
We’re Not Exactly Friends Here!
Let’s address the elephant in the room—or should I say, the tank on the battlefield? North Korea is formally in a state of war with South Korea. A love-hate relationship if there ever was one—minus the love. The two countries are still technically at war since the Korean War ended in a never-ending armistice. So, other than avoiding each other like sneaky schoolmates, what’s new?
State media reported on the latest constitutional changes, saying that South Korea is an “enemy state.” Ah, nothing like a little name-calling to spice up diplomatic relations! If you thought your last break-up was awkward, imagine this level of permanent enmity!
Final Thoughts: A Rocky Road Ahead
So what’s next for this ongoing saga? Will Kim Jong Un continue to build this metaphorical wall? Or will there be hope for peace like a solid rom-com ending? One cannot predict the future, especially with North Korea being, well, North Korea. Just know, every time they threaten to cut things off, they are not just talking about transportation—it’s about cutting off any hope for a peaceful reunion. So grab your popcorn; this drama is just heating up!
Stay tuned for the next episode of “Kim’s Next Move” because let’s be real, you never know what kind of absurd plot twist will come next!
Leader Kim Jong Un declared South Korea the main enemy in December. Now state media confirm that the new definition has also been anchored in the constitution. All transport connections should be cut off.
North Korea “clearly describes South Korea as an enemy state” in its revised constitution. This was reported by the state news agency KCNA. The North Korean parliament had already met last week to change the country’s constitution. However, North Korea’s state media had so far published few details about the meeting.
Road and rail connections cut
Road and rail connections to South Korea have now been completely cut off following explosions on Tuesday. “This is an inevitable and legitimate measure in accordance with the Constitution of the DPRK, which clearly defines the Republic of Korea as an enemy state,” KCNA stated.
60-meter-long sections of road and railway on the North Korean side that served as border crossings are now completely blocked. This is part of a gradual complete demarcation of its territory from the south.
North Korea wants a two-state system
The constitutional change was expected in line with Kim Jong Un’s recent statements in which he described South Korea as an independent country and North Korea’s main enemy. This means that North Korea is moving further away from its long-standing goal of reunification and is instead aiming for a two-state system.
South Korea, on the other hand, reiterated that it would continue to adhere to a policy of national unity but would oppose any aggression from the North.
Formally in a state of war
At the end of 2023, North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un demanded for the first time at a meeting of the ruling Workers’ Party that South Korea should be designated as the main enemy in the country’s socialist constitution. He also described inter-Korean relations as those between two warring states.
The two countries are still formally at war, as the 1950-53 Korean War ended with an armistice rather than a peace treaty.