Home » Damascus » Page 2
Tag:

Damascus

world

Turkey’s Concern Over Potential Regional Targeting Following Hamas Strike in Qatar

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Turkey Warns of Potential Israeli ‘Reckless Attacks’ After Qatar Incident

Table of Contents

Ankara – A recent Israeli action in Qatar has ignited anxieties in Turkey, prompting warnings that the contry could become the next target. The escalating situation stems from a strike on a gathering of Hamas officials, and raises fears of a wider regional conflict.

Escalating Tensions and Turkish Concerns

Rear Admiral Zeki Akturk, a spokesperson for the Turkish defense ministry, publicly stated on Thursday that Israel risks broadening it’s military operations, mirroring the action taken in Qatar. He cautioned that such escalation could “drag the entire region, including its own country, into disaster.” This statement underscores turkey’s deep apprehension regarding the unfolding events.

A History of Deteriorating Relations

The relationship between Israel and Turkey, once characterized by robust collaboration, has significantly deteriorated since the late 2000s. The current war in Gaza, triggered by the Hamas-led assault on Southern Israel on October 7, 2023, has pushed ties to an all-time low. Competing geopolitical interests in syria, notably following the weakening of the Assad government, have further exacerbated the strain.

Erdogan’s Stance and Criticism of Israel

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has long been a staunch advocate for the Palestinian cause and a supporter of Hamas. Since the commencement of the Gaza war, Erdogan has leveled sharp criticism against Israel and prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing Israel of conduct amounting to genocide and drawing parallels between Netanyahu and Adolf Hitler. These strong condemnations have contributed to the growing rift between the two countries.

Hamas Presence in Turkey and Israeli Accusations

Hamas officials frequently visit Turkey, with some establishing residency within its borders. Israel has previously accused turkey of providing a safe haven for Hamas to orchestrate attacks, facilitate recruitment efforts, and raise funds. These allegations have further elaborate the already tense dynamic between Ankara and Jerusalem.

Diplomatic Movements and Regional Summit

President Erdogan maintains close ties with the leadership of Qatar and Turkey shares strong economic and military relations with the emirate. He is scheduled to attend an Arab and Muslim leaders’ summit in Qatar this weekend, were the ongoing crisis and regional security are expected to be key discussion points.

Key Player Position
Recep Tayyip Erdogan President of Turkey, Supporter of Palestinian Cause
Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel, Subject of Criticism from Erdogan
Zeki Akturk Turkish Defence ministry Spokesperson

Did You know? Turkey was one of the first countries to recognize Israel in 1949, showcasing a historically complex relationship.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about the evolving situation in the Middle east by consulting reputable international news sources.

The current situation demands careful diplomacy to prevent further escalation. Will Turkey’s efforts to mediate contribute to a de-escalation of tensions? How will the outcome of the Arab and Muslim leaders’ summit impact the regional outlook?

Israel-Turkey Relations: A past Overview

The relationship between Israel and Turkey has been marked by periods of close cooperation and meaningful strain. In the 1990s, the two countries forged a strategic alliance, collaborating on military exercises, intelligence sharing, and economic ventures. However, tensions began to rise in the early 2000s, stemming from disagreements over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Turkey’s growing support for Islamist movements in the region. The 2010 Mavi Marmara incident,in which Israeli commandos raided a Turkish-owned ship attempting to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza,led to a severe diplomatic crisis. While efforts were made to mend ties in subsequent years, fundamental differences persisted, and the current Gaza conflict has further deepened the divide.

Frequently Asked Questions About turkey and Israel

  • What is the primary source of tension between Turkey and Israel? The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Turkey’s support for Hamas are major sources of tension.
  • what was the significance of the October 7th Hamas attack? The attack triggered the current war in Gaza, significantly worsening relations between Israel and Turkey.
  • How does Turkey’s relationship with Qatar factor into this situation? Turkey has close ties with Qatar, where Hamas officials have met, raising concerns in Israel.
  • Has Turkey historically been a strong ally of Israel? Yes, Israel and Turkey were once close strategic partners, particularly in the 1990s.
  • What is Turkey’s position on the accusations from Israel about Hamas? Turkey has not confirmed the accusations of allowing Hamas to plan attacks from its territory.

Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below and help us continue to provide accurate and timely reporting.


What are the potential economic repercussions for Turkey if the Qatar-Israel conflict escalates and disrupts trade routes?

Turkey’s Concern Over Potential Regional Targeting Following Hamas Strike in Qatar

the Qatar Attack & Ankara’s Strategic Calculations

The recent, albeit claimed, Hamas strike originating from Qatar has triggered significant concern within Turkish foreign policy circles. While no group has officially taken obligation, the implications of such an event – even a perceived one – are considerable, particularly regarding potential regional escalation and the possibility of Turkey being indirectly targeted. This isn’t simply about solidarity with Qatar, a key ally; it’s about a complex web of geopolitical risks impacting Turkish interests in the Middle east. The incident raises questions about regional security, qatar’s stability, and the potential for a wider israeli-Palestinian conflict spillover.

Why Turkey is particularly Vulnerable

Turkey’s position makes it uniquely sensitive to instability in the Gulf. Several factors contribute to this vulnerability:

* Economic Ties: Turkey maintains robust economic relationships with both qatar and, to a lesser extent, Israel. Disruption to trade routes or investment flows would negatively impact the Turkish economy, already facing challenges. Turkish-Qatari relations are particularly strong, with significant investment from Qatar in Turkey.

* Geopolitical Alignment: Turkey and Qatar share similar perspectives on several regional issues, including the Palestinian cause and the role of Islamist movements.A destabilized Qatar weakens Turkey’s regional influence.

* Counter-Terrorism Concerns: Turkey is deeply concerned about the potential for extremist groups to exploit regional chaos. A security vacuum in Qatar coudl provide opportunities for groups like ISIS or al-Qaeda to regroup and launch attacks, perhaps impacting Turkey. Terrorism threats are a constant concern for Ankara.

* Military Presence: Turkey operates a military base in Qatar, a key component of its regional security strategy. The base’s continued operation relies on Qatar’s stability. Turkish military base in Qatar serves as a strategic asset.

Potential Scenarios for Regional Targeting

Ankara is reportedly analyzing several potential scenarios following the Qatar incident:

  1. Retaliatory strikes: The most immediate concern is the possibility of retaliatory strikes against qatar, potentially by Israel or other actors. While direct military action is considered unlikely, cyberattacks or covert operations are plausible.
  2. Proxy Conflicts: The incident could exacerbate existing proxy conflicts in the region, with various actors supporting different sides. This could lead to increased violence and instability in countries like lebanon, Syria, and Yemen. Regional proxy wars are a major source of instability.
  3. Increased Iranian Involvement: A heightened conflict could draw iran further into the fray, potentially leading to a direct confrontation with Israel or its allies. Turkey shares a border with both Iran and Iraq, making it vulnerable to spillover effects. Iran’s regional role is a key factor in Turkey’s calculations.
  4. Targeting of Turkish Assets: While less likely, Turkey cannot rule out the possibility of its assets in the region – including its military base in Qatar and economic interests – being targeted. Protection of Turkish assets abroad is a priority for Ankara.

Turkey’s Diplomatic Efforts & Mitigation Strategies

Turkey is actively engaged in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and prevent further escalation. These efforts include:

* High-Level Contacts: President Erdoğan has reportedly been in contact with both Qatari and Israeli leaders,urging restraint and dialog. Turkish diplomacy is focused on preventing a wider conflict.

* Intelligence Sharing: Turkey is sharing intelligence with qatar and other regional partners to help identify the perpetrators of the attack and prevent future incidents.

* Emphasis on De-escalation: Turkey is publicly calling for a return to negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, emphasizing the need for a two-state solution. The Israeli-Palestinian peace process remains a central focus for Turkey.

* Strengthening Security Cooperation: Turkey is likely to increase security cooperation with Qatar to enhance its defenses and protect its interests.

The Role of External Actors: US & Russia

The involvement of external actors, particularly the United States and Russia, is crucial.

* United States: The US’s role as a key mediator and its strong relationship with both Israel and Qatar are vital. Turkey is highly likely urging the US to use its influence to restrain all parties. US foreign policy in the Middle East considerably impacts Turkey’s strategic calculations.

* Russia: Russia’s growing influence in the region, particularly in Syria, adds another layer of complexity. Turkey is seeking to maintain a dialogue with Russia to ensure that its interests are not undermined. Russia’s influence in Syria is a key concern for Turkey.

Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy Long-term

This incident underscores the inherent risks of Turkey’s increasingly assertive foreign policy in the Middle East.While Turkey seeks to position itself as a regional power broker, it must carefully balance its interests and avoid actions that could escalate tensions. The situation highlights the need for:

* Diversification of Alliances: Turkey needs to diversify its alliances and avoid over-reliance on any single partner.

* Pragmatic Diplomacy: A more pragmatic and less ideological approach to diplomacy is essential.

* Enhanced Intelligence Capabilities: Investing in enhanced intelligence capabilities is crucial for anticipating and mitigating future threats.

* Focus on Economic resilience: strengthening the Turkish economy is vital for weathering potential regional shocks. Economic stability in Turkey is paramount.

Case Study: Turkey’s Response to the 2019 saudi Aramco Attacks

Turkey’

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Israel Strikes Damascus: Ex-Air Defense Base Targeted

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Israel’s Syria Strikes Signal a Shift in Regional Strategy

The frequency of direct Israeli military action within Syria is accelerating, and the recent airborne landing near Damascus isn’t simply a tactical operation – it’s a strategic signal. While officially unconfirmed, the IDF’s foray into a former Iranian-controlled air defense base, coupled with preceding airstrikes, suggests a hardening of resolve to counter Iranian influence and a willingness to operate with increased boldness. This isn’t just about preventing immediate threats; it’s about shaping the future security landscape of the region.

The Kiswa Operation: Beyond a Search for Equipment

On August 20, 2025, IDF soldiers parachuted from four helicopters into a military post near Kiswa, south of Damascus, conducting a two-hour operation. Reports indicate the search focused on equipment potentially left behind by Iranian-backed groups. However, framing this solely as a recovery mission overlooks the symbolic weight of the operation. The base itself held significance during Bashar al-Assad’s rule, serving as a key outpost for pro-Iranian elements. The choice of target – a location steeped in history of external influence – sends a clear message to both Damascus and Tehran.

Syrian sources, as reported by Al Jazeera and Shams TV, suggest casualties, though figures remain unconfirmed. The lack of clashes with the Syrian army is noteworthy, potentially indicating tacit acceptance – or at least, a calculated avoidance of escalation – from Damascus, especially given ongoing security talks between the two nations. This delicate balance highlights the complex geopolitical dance currently unfolding.

Escalating Incursions and the Iran Factor

Israel has demonstrably increased its incursions into southern Syria in recent months. This isn’t happening in a vacuum. The strikes in the Kiswa region and on Jabal Manea hilltop, both historically significant military outposts utilized by pro-Iranian groups, underscore the primary objective: disrupting the network of Iranian influence within Syria. This influence isn’t merely political; it’s manifested in the presence of militias, the transfer of weaponry, and the development of infrastructure that threatens Israeli security.

The timing of these strikes, coinciding with security talks, is also crucial. It suggests Israel is signaling its red lines even as diplomatic channels remain open. The message is clear: negotiations won’t curtail its commitment to self-defense. This approach, while potentially destabilizing in the short term, may be viewed by Israeli policymakers as necessary to prevent a more significant long-term threat.

The Role of Former Iranian Infrastructure

The focus on former Iranian-controlled bases is particularly telling. These locations weren’t simply occupied; they were strategically developed to project Iranian power. The IDF’s actions suggest a systematic effort to dismantle this infrastructure, preventing its reactivation or repurposing by other actors. This proactive approach is a departure from previous strategies that primarily focused on responding to immediate threats.

The Syrian army’s belief that equipment was left behind by Iranian-backed groups further supports this assessment. Even a limited presence of advanced weaponry or technology in the hands of hostile actors poses a significant risk, justifying the IDF’s aggressive posture.

Future Trends: A New Normal for Regional Conflict?

The recent events point towards several potential future trends. First, we can expect a continuation – and potentially an escalation – of Israeli incursions into Syria. The pursuit of Iranian assets will likely remain a top priority, even in the face of diplomatic efforts. Second, the dynamic between Israel and Syria may evolve into a precarious balance of limited conflict and ongoing negotiation. Damascus, constrained by its own internal challenges and external pressures, may be forced to tolerate a degree of Israeli activity in exchange for avoiding a wider confrontation.

Third, the potential for miscalculation remains high. A single incident could quickly spiral into a larger conflict, drawing in other regional actors. The presence of multiple armed groups and the complex web of alliances in Syria create a volatile environment where unintended consequences are a constant threat. The Council on Foreign Relations provides in-depth analysis of the Syrian conflict and regional dynamics.

Finally, the increasing use of airborne operations, as demonstrated by the Kiswa landing, suggests a shift towards more rapid and decisive action. This could indicate a desire to minimize the risk of prolonged engagements and to project power more effectively.

The situation in Syria is a microcosm of the broader geopolitical competition unfolding in the Middle East. Israel’s actions are not isolated events; they are part of a larger strategy to contain Iranian influence and safeguard its own security interests. Understanding this context is crucial for anticipating future developments and assessing the potential risks and opportunities in the region. What impact will these continued incursions have on the already fragile peace talks? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Israel Drone Strike: 6 Syrian Soldiers Killed

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

The Evolving Calculus of Conflict: How Drone Warfare and Limited Talks are Reshaping the Israel-Syria Dynamic

Six soldiers dead. A condemnation from Damascus. Routine operations, according to Israel. This recent escalation, involving Israeli drone strikes within Syria, isn’t an anomaly – it’s a symptom of a decades-long, deeply complex relationship increasingly defined by shadow wars and carefully calibrated communication. But beyond the immediate headlines, a critical shift is underway. The interplay of drone technology, limited diplomatic engagement, and the involvement of regional actors suggests a future where the Israel-Syria conflict isn’t about outright conquest, but about maintaining a precarious, and potentially escalating, balance of power.

The Rise of Drone Warfare as a New Normal

The August 2025 incident is just the latest example of Israel’s increasingly frequent use of drones in Syria. While Israel has long maintained a policy of ambiguity regarding its operations in Syria, the pattern is clear: targeting what it perceives as Iranian military infrastructure and allied militias, and disrupting arms shipments. This isn’t a full-scale war, but a sustained campaign of targeted strikes. The advantage of drones is obvious – they minimize risk to Israeli personnel while allowing for precise attacks. However, this also lowers the threshold for conflict, making escalation more likely. As drone technology becomes more accessible globally, we can expect to see this model replicated in other volatile regions, creating a world where limited, deniable conflicts are commonplace.

Key Takeaway: The proliferation of drone technology is fundamentally altering the nature of modern warfare, shifting the focus from large-scale conventional battles to smaller, more frequent, and strategically targeted engagements.

The Golan Heights: A Lingering Flashpoint

At the heart of the Israel-Syria conflict lies the Golan Heights, seized by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War. Despite a 1974 ceasefire agreement, the area remains a source of tension. Israel’s continued occupation and the presence of UN peacekeepers create a fragile status quo. Recent events demonstrate that even seemingly contained incidents can quickly escalate. The potential for miscalculation, particularly in a region rife with proxy actors, is significant. Furthermore, the ongoing Syrian civil war has created a power vacuum in the region, allowing for increased Iranian influence – a key concern for Israel.

Expert Insight: “The Golan Heights isn’t just about territory; it’s about strategic depth and preventing the establishment of a hostile front against Israel,” explains Dr. Sarah Klein, a Middle East security analyst at the Institute for Strategic Studies. “Israel views maintaining control of the Golan as essential to its national security, and is unlikely to relinquish it without significant concessions.”

Diplomacy in the Shadows: A Return to the 1974 Ceasefire?

Despite the military tensions, back-channel communications between Israel and Syria continue. The recent meeting between Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Schaibani and an Israeli delegation in Paris, aimed at revisiting the 1974 ceasefire agreement, is a significant development. This suggests a mutual, albeit cautious, interest in de-escalation. However, the path to a lasting agreement is fraught with obstacles. Syria’s internal instability, the presence of Iranian forces, and the complex geopolitical landscape all complicate negotiations. The United States’ role as a mediator is also crucial, but its influence is limited by its broader regional strategy.

Did you know? The 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria was brokered by US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and established a UN-monitored buffer zone in the Golan Heights.

The Drusen Factor: Israel’s Protective Role

Israel’s intervention in the clashes between groups in the Syrian region of Suwaida, particularly to protect the Druze minority, adds another layer of complexity. Israel has publicly stated its commitment to safeguarding the Druze community, and has provided humanitarian aid and, at times, military assistance. This intervention, while framed as humanitarian, also serves Israel’s strategic interests by creating a buffer zone and potentially gaining influence in the region. However, it also risks further escalating tensions with the Syrian government, which views Israel’s actions as a violation of its sovereignty.

Future Trends and Implications

Looking ahead, several key trends are likely to shape the Israel-Syria dynamic:

  • Increased Reliance on Asymmetric Warfare: Expect continued use of drones, cyberattacks, and other forms of asymmetric warfare as both sides seek to avoid direct confrontation.
  • Greater Regional Involvement: Iran’s presence in Syria will continue to be a major source of tension, potentially drawing in other regional actors.
  • The Importance of De-escalation Mechanisms: Maintaining open channels of communication, even through back channels, will be crucial to preventing miscalculation and escalation.
  • The Evolving Role of the United States: The US’s ability to mediate and influence events will depend on its broader regional strategy and its relationship with both Israel and Syria.

Pro Tip: Monitor open-source intelligence (OSINT) sources and think tanks specializing in Middle East security for real-time updates and analysis of the situation.

The Potential for a New Normal

The Israel-Syria conflict is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon. Instead, we are likely to see a continuation of the current pattern: limited military engagements, sporadic diplomatic efforts, and a constant undercurrent of tension. The key will be managing the risks of escalation and preventing the conflict from spiraling out of control. This requires a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics at play, a commitment to de-escalation, and a willingness to engage in dialogue, even in the face of deep-seated mistrust.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the significance of the Golan Heights?
A: The Golan Heights is a strategically important territory seized by Israel in 1967. It provides Israel with a buffer zone and access to water resources, and is considered essential to its national security.

Q: Why does Israel conduct strikes in Syria?
A: Israel claims its strikes in Syria are aimed at preventing Iran from establishing a military presence and transferring weapons to Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Q: Is a peace agreement between Israel and Syria possible?
A: While not impossible, a comprehensive peace agreement is unlikely in the near future due to the ongoing Syrian civil war, the presence of Iranian forces, and the unresolved issue of the Golan Heights.

Q: What role does the United States play in the conflict?
A: The US has historically played a mediating role, but its influence is limited by its broader regional strategy and its relationship with both Israel and Syria.

What are your predictions for the future of the Israel-Syria conflict? Share your thoughts in the comments below!


0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Syria: Druze-Bedouin Clashes Rise After Withdrawal

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Syria’s Sectarian Violence: A Harbinger of Future Instability?

Nearly 80,000 people displaced in just one week. A UN aid mission held hostage. Renewed clashes erupting despite a brokered ceasefire. The recent fighting in Syria’s Sweida province, pitting Druze militias against Bedouin tribes, isn’t just another tragic episode in a decade of war – it’s a chilling preview of how localized conflicts, fueled by historical grievances and exploited by external actors, could become the dominant form of instability in a fractured Syria and beyond.

The Roots of Conflict in Sweida Province

The immediate trigger for the violence – a dispute at a checkpoint – belies a complex web of historical tensions between the Druze and Bedouin communities in Sweida. As Syrian researcher Ahmed Aba Zeid notes, these tensions often lack a clear, rational explanation, existing as “social problems that have no reason.” However, the Syrian government’s opportunistic intervention, siding with the Bedouins against the Druze, dramatically escalated the situation. This wasn’t about restoring order; it was about leveraging existing divisions to consolidate control.

This pattern – state actors exploiting sectarian fault lines – is increasingly common in fragile states. It’s a tactic that allows governments to weaken potential opposition, maintain power, and justify continued security spending. But it comes at a devastating human cost, as seen in the allegations of civilian executions and widespread looting during the Sweida clashes.

Israel’s Intervention and the Regionalization of the Conflict

The intervention of Israel, launching airstrikes in defense of the Druze community, adds another layer of complexity. While understandable given the significant Druze population within Israel and their historical loyalty, this intervention risks further regionalizing the conflict. As Sheikh Sami Abi al-Muna, the spiritual leader of the Druze community in Lebanon, warned, external intervention “gives an excuse for Israeli intervention and for blowing up the situation in the region.”

This highlights a dangerous trend: the increasing willingness of external powers to intervene in localized conflicts, often based on sectarian or ethnic affiliations. This can quickly escalate tensions, undermine diplomatic efforts, and create a breeding ground for proxy wars. The Council on Foreign Relations provides a comprehensive overview of the complex geopolitical landscape in Syria.

The Rise of Non-State Actors and the Erosion of State Authority

The Sweida conflict also underscores the growing power of non-state actors in Syria. Both Druze militias and Bedouin tribes operate with a degree of autonomy, challenging the authority of the central government. This fragmentation of power is a hallmark of failing states, creating a security vacuum that can be exploited by extremist groups and criminal networks.

Did you know? Syria’s ongoing civil war has created a complex network of armed groups, including government forces, rebel factions, Kurdish militias, and extremist organizations like ISIS, all vying for control of territory and resources.

Future Trends: From Civil War to “Fractured Peace”

The situation in Sweida isn’t an isolated incident. We’re likely to see a shift from large-scale civil war to a pattern of localized, sectarian conflicts across Syria and other fragile states. This “fractured peace” will be characterized by:

  • Increased Competition for Resources: As state authority weakens, competition for land, water, and other resources will intensify, exacerbating existing tensions between communities.
  • Exploitation of Identity Politics: Political actors will increasingly exploit sectarian and ethnic identities to mobilize support and consolidate power.
  • External Interference: Regional and international powers will continue to intervene in localized conflicts, often pursuing their own strategic interests.
  • Humanitarian Crises: Localized conflicts will lead to mass displacement, food insecurity, and a breakdown of essential services, creating ongoing humanitarian crises.

Implications for Regional Stability and Beyond

The implications of this “fractured peace” extend far beyond Syria’s borders. Increased instability in the region could lead to a surge in refugee flows, exacerbate existing security threats, and create opportunities for terrorist groups to regroup and expand their operations. The potential for spillover effects into neighboring countries is significant.

Furthermore, this pattern of localized conflict could become a model for other fragile states facing similar challenges. The lessons learned from Syria – both positive and negative – will be closely watched by actors in other conflict zones around the world. See our analysis of the key factors contributing to state fragility.

The Role of Humanitarian Aid in a Fractured Landscape

Delivering humanitarian aid in this environment will become increasingly difficult and dangerous. As the UN’s Adam Abdelmoula noted, access to Sweida remains restricted due to ongoing insecurity and road closures. Humanitarian organizations will need to adapt their strategies, working more closely with local communities and exploring innovative approaches to reach those in need.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Druze religious sect?

The Druze are a religious minority with roots in Islam, primarily concentrated in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel. Their beliefs are often described as an esoteric offshoot of Shiite Islam, and they maintain a distinct cultural identity.

Why did Israel intervene in the Sweida conflict?

Israel intervened due to the presence of a significant Druze population within Israel, who view the Syrian Druze as part of their community. The intervention was framed as a defensive measure to protect the Druze from attacks.

What is the long-term outlook for Syria?

The long-term outlook for Syria remains bleak. The country is deeply divided, its economy is shattered, and its political future is uncertain. A return to a unified, stable Syria appears unlikely in the foreseeable future.

How can the international community help?

The international community can help by providing humanitarian aid, supporting diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict, and addressing the root causes of instability, such as poverty, inequality, and political exclusion.

The events in Sweida serve as a stark reminder that the Syrian conflict is far from over. The shift towards localized, sectarian violence presents a new set of challenges, requiring a more nuanced and adaptive approach from both regional and international actors. Ignoring this trend risks a prolonged period of instability and suffering, not just in Syria, but across the wider Middle East. What steps can be taken to prevent similar conflicts from erupting in other vulnerable regions? Explore our coverage of conflict prevention strategies.


0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.