Home » for » Page 9

Thomson Reuters Reaffirms Commitment To Core Journalistic principles

London, United Kingdom – Thomson Reuters has reiterated its dedication to The Trust Principles, the bedrock of its journalistic standards, safeguarding the independence and integrity of its news reporting globally. These principles,foundational to the organization’s operations,emphasize unbiased reporting and the delivery of factual details.

The Pillars Of The Trust Principles

Established in 1941, The Trust Principles enshrine a commitment to remain free from political, commercial, and other influences. This dedication is especially crucial in an era of increasing misinformation and biased reporting.Thomson Reuters prioritizes providing reliable and trustworthy news to its audience.

The core tenets of The Trust Principles include independence, integrity, impartiality, and a commitment to covering all sides of a story. These principles are instilled throughout the organization, influencing editorial decisions and newsgathering practices.

Principle Description
Independence Freedom from political, commercial, and other undue influences.
integrity Adherence to the highest ethical standards in journalism.
Impartiality Presenting news without bias and covering all relevant perspectives.
Accuracy Ensuring all reported information is verified and factually correct.

Recent studies highlight the growing public concern over news credibility. A Pew Research Center report from December 2023 indicates that only 39% of U.S. adults have a great deal of confidence in the information they get from national news organizations. This underlines the importance of upholding journalistic principles like those championed by Thomson Reuters.

Did you Know? The Trust Principles were originally drafted by geoffrey Dawson, then editor of The Times, as a guide for Reuters correspondents during World War II.

Pro Tip: When evaluating news sources, always consider the organization’s stated principles and track record for accuracy and impartiality.

The Ongoing Relevance In A Digital Age

In the current digital landscape, characterized by rapid information dissemination and the proliferation of online sources, the need for trustworthy journalism is more critical than ever. misinformation and disinformation pose significant challenges to public understanding and democratic processes.

Thomson Reuters continues to invest in resources and training to ensure its journalists adhere to the highest standards of reporting. The organization is committed to transparency and accountability,and actively addresses concerns raised by the public and media critics.

Maintaining Journalistic Standards: A Look Ahead

The media landscape is constantly evolving. Future challenges will likely include navigating artificial intelligence and deepfakes. Maintaining trust will require continued vigilance and adaptation to new technologies, always prioritizing factual accuracy and ethical reporting. The ability to distinguish between genuine news and fabricated content will be paramount.

Frequently asked Questions About the Trust Principles

What are The Trust Principles? the Trust Principles are a set of ethical guidelines established by Thomson Reuters to ensure independent, impartial, and accurate news reporting.

Why are The Trust Principles vital? They safeguard the integrity of journalism and promote public trust in news organizations, especially in an era of misinformation.

How does Thomson Reuters enforce The Trust Principles? Through rigorous editorial standards,journalist training,and a commitment to transparency and accountability.

Are The Trust Principles still relevant today? Absolutely. They’re even more critical in the digital age, where false information can spread rapidly.

What is Thomson reuters doing to address misinformation? Investing actually-checking, promoting media literacy, and upholding its commitment to unbiased reporting.

What role do you believe journalistic principles play in today’s media environment? How can news organizations better build trust with their audiences?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and help us continue the conversation about responsible journalism!


What are the potential consequences of the increasing player exodus from Australia and South Africa to European clubs for the long-term competitiveness of their national teams?

Rugby Championship Climax Introduces Uncertain Future in Southern Hemisphere Tour

The 2025 Rugby Championship: A Season of Shifting Sands

the 2025 Rugby Championship concluded recently, delivering a thrilling climax but simultaneously casting a long shadow of uncertainty over the future of Southern Hemisphere rugby tours. This year’s tournament, featuring Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, was marked by unpredictable results, increased player movement, and growing financial pressures – all contributing to a potentially seismic shift in the landscape of international rugby. The implications extend beyond the pitch, impacting broadcasting rights, sponsorship deals, and the overall viability of the customary touring model.

Key Takeaways from the 2025 Tournament

Several factors defined the 2025 Rugby Championship, setting the stage for potential restructuring:

* New Zealand’s Dominance Continues: Despite fierce competition, the All Blacks secured the championship title, showcasing their consistent strength and tactical prowess. This reinforces New Zealand’s position as a rugby powerhouse.

* Australia’s Struggles Persist: The Wallabies faced continued challenges, finishing near the bottom of the table. This has reignited debate about the state of Australian rugby and the need for significant investment in grassroots progress and coaching.

* South Africa’s Mixed Form: The Springboks, fresh off their World Cup victory, displayed moments of brilliance but lacked consistency throughout the tournament. Concerns are growing about player burnout and the impact of Northern Hemisphere commitments.

* Argentina’s Growing Competitiveness: Los pumas demonstrated significant improvement, securing notable victories and proving they are a force to be reckoned with. Their performance highlights the potential for growth in emerging rugby nations.

* Increased Player Exodus: A significant number of players from Australia and south Africa have signed contracts with European clubs,drawn by higher salaries and perceived better career opportunities. This “brain drain” is a major concern for Southern Hemisphere rugby.

The Financial Realities Facing SANZAAR

SANZAAR, the governing body for the Rugby Championship, is facing mounting financial pressures. Declining attendance figures in some regions, coupled with the increasing cost of touring, are squeezing profit margins.

* Broadcasting Revenue: negotiations for future broadcasting rights are proving arduous, with broadcasters demanding greater value for money. The rise of streaming services adds another layer of complexity.

* Sponsorship Challenges: Securing lucrative sponsorship deals is becoming increasingly competitive, as brands seek a return on investment. The uncertainty surrounding the future of the tournament is deterring potential sponsors.

* Touring Costs: The logistical challenges and expenses associated with touring – including travel, accommodation, and security – are considerable. These costs are becoming unsustainable for some unions.

* Player Welfare Concerns: The demanding schedule of the Rugby Championship, combined with commitments to club rugby, is raising concerns about player welfare and the risk of injury.

Potential Restructuring Models: What’s on the Table?

Several restructuring models are being considered to address the challenges facing the Rugby Championship. These include:

  1. Reduced Touring: Limiting the number of tour matches and focusing on centralized venues to reduce costs. This could involve playing multiple matches in a single city or country.
  2. Expansion of the Championship: Including Pacific Island nations (Fiji, Samoa, Tonga) to broaden the tournament’s appeal and generate new revenue streams. This would require significant investment in infrastructure and player development.
  3. Formation of a southern Hemisphere League: Creating a domestic league featuring teams from Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.This would provide a more stable financial base and reduce reliance on touring.
  4. Increased Collaboration with the Six Nations: Exploring opportunities for greater collaboration with the Six Nations Championship, potentially through cross-hemisphere play-offs or a combined international calendar.
  5. Private Equity Investment: Seeking investment from private equity firms to inject capital into the tournament and support its long-term growth.

The Impact of Northern Hemisphere Influence

The growing influence of the Northern Hemisphere is a significant factor shaping the future of Southern Hemisphere rugby.

* Player Recruitment: European clubs are aggressively recruiting Southern Hemisphere players, offering lucrative contracts and attractive lifestyles.

* Coaching Expertise: northern Hemisphere coaches are increasingly sought after for their tactical innovation and player development skills.

* Financial Power: The financial strength of the Northern Hemisphere rugby unions allows them to invest heavily in infrastructure and player development.

* Competition for Viewership: The Six Nations Championship is a major competitor to the Rugby Championship, vying for television audiences and sponsorship dollars.

Case study: The Impact of Player Exodus on the Wallabies

The recent exodus of Australian players to European clubs serves as a stark warning about the challenges facing Southern Hemisphere rugby. Players like Will Skelton and Bernard Foley have opted for higher salaries and greater stability in Europe, leaving a void in the Wallabies squad. This has contributed to Australia’s struggles on the international stage and raised questions about the long-term viability of Australian rugby. The situation highlights the need for SANZAAR to address the financial disparities between the hemispheres and create a more attractive surroundings for players.

Practical Tips for SANZAAR: Securing

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Cuban Fighters in Ukraine: US Accusations and Diplomatic Efforts Over Cuban Embargo

Washington has Allegedly identified up to 5,000 cuban citizens currently engaged in combat operations supporting Russia in Ukraine. These allegations, surfacing in internal American diplomatic documents, coincide with a concerted campaign to weaken international opposition to the decades-long United States embargo against Cuba.

Rising Concerns Over Foreign Fighters

According to Reports, the United States government believes Cuba is actively aiding Russia’s war efforts, a claim previously denied by Havana. The revelation comes amidst growing international scrutiny of foreign fighters participating in the Ukrainian conflict. As the full-scale invasion in February 2022, fighters from various nations have joined both sides of the conflict, raising complex legal and geopolitical questions. the involvement of Cubans adds another layer to this intricate situation.

US Diplomatic Push Against UN Resolution

American diplomats are reportedly working to influence voting patterns at the United Nations General Assembly. The annual resolution condemning the US embargo against Cuba consistently receives overwhelming support, with 187 countries voting in favor last year, and only the United States and Israel opposing. The current strategy focuses on persuading nations to abstain from voting or refrain from participating altogether, possibly diminishing the symbolic weight of the resolution.

The Economic Context and Recruitment

Cubans are increasingly seeking employment opportunities abroad due to the persistent economic hardships on the island. The Communist government attributes these challenges, in part, to the US embargo. Though, Washington maintains that issues such as corruption and inefficient state management are the primary drivers of Cuba’s economic struggles. These economic pressures have created a vulnerability exploited by recruiters offering opportunities – sometimes under false pretenses – to fight in Ukraine.

Reports indicate that some Cubans have been lured into joining the Russian military under the guise of legitimate employment opportunities. While Cuban authorities claimed to have dismantled a mercenary recruitment network in 2023, media reports suggest such activities continue, operating in a climate of limited transparency and strict state control.

North Korea’s Involvement

Reports also suggest that North Korea is providing support to Russia in Ukraine, with similar concerns arising about its citizens participating in the conflict. This follows a recent agreement between North Korea and Russia, establishing a strategic partnership that includes mutual assistance in the event of aggression against either nation. This agreement seems to have paved the way for north Korean involvement in the conflict.

Country Estimated Fighters in Ukraine (Supporting Russia) Government Position
Cuba 1,000 – 5,000 Initially Denied Involvement, later claimed to have dismantled recruitment networks.
North Korea Unknown (Reports of Support) confirmed strategic partnership with Russia including mutual assistance.

Understanding the US-Cuba Embargo

The United States first imposed an embargo against Cuba in 1960, following the Cuban Revolution and the nationalization of US-owned properties. Over the decades, the embargo has been tightened and loosened at various times, but remains largely in place today. The stated objectives of the embargo have evolved, ranging from promoting democracy and human rights to combating terrorism. The embargo’s impact on the Cuban economy has been meaningful, contributing to shortages of essential goods and hindering economic development.

Did You Know?: The US embargo against Cuba is the longest-running trade embargo in modern history.

Pro Tip: for further research on the US-Cuba relationship, consult resources from the Council on Foreign relations and the US State Department.

Frequently Asked Questions


what do you believe are the long-term implications of foreign fighters involvement in the Ukraine conflict? Should the international community exert more pressure on Cuba regarding its alleged support for Russia’s war effort?

What evidence supports the US claim of a Cuban program recruiting fighters for Russia, and how has Cuba responded to these allegations?

Cuban Fighters Allegedly Support Russia in Ukraine Conflict, Claims United States

US Allegations and Cuban Government Response

the United states government has recently asserted that Cuban citizens are fighting alongside Russian forces in the ongoing Ukraine conflict. These claims, surfacing in October 2025, allege a program where Cuba is providing military personnel to bolster RussiaS war effort. The US State Department has indicated that this support violates international law and undermines global security.

The Cuban government vehemently denies these accusations. Officials in Havana have labeled the US claims as “disinformation” and a smear campaign intended to damage Cuba’s international reputation. They maintain that no cuban citizens have been sent to fight in Ukraine, and any individuals involved are acting independently, without state sponsorship. This denial echoes similar responses from Cuba regarding previous allegations of military involvement in foreign conflicts.

Details of the Alleged Program

According to US intelligence reports, the program began recruiting Cuban citizens in early 2024, offering financial incentives – reportedly up to $2,000 USD per month – and promises of Russian citizenship.Recruitment focused on individuals with prior military experience, particularly those discharged from the Cuban armed forces.

* Recruitment Tactics: Reports suggest recruitment occurred through a network of intermediaries, bypassing official Cuban channels. This suggests a degree of covert operation.

* Training Locations: Initial training for recruited Cuban fighters allegedly took place in Russia,focusing on infantry tactics and urban warfare.

* Deployment Areas: US officials claim these fighters have been deployed to key battle zones in eastern Ukraine,participating in offensive operations alongside Russian troops. Specific areas mentioned include around Avdiivka and Bakhmut.

* Estimated Numbers: Estimates of the number of Cuban fighters involved vary, ranging from several dozen to potentially over a hundred individuals. Verification of these numbers remains a challenge.

Past Context: Cuba-Russia Military Ties

The alleged involvement of Cuban fighters in Ukraine isn’t occurring in a vacuum. Cuba and Russia have a long history of close military and political ties dating back to the Cold War.

* Soviet Support: During the Cold War, the Soviet Union provided significant economic and military aid to Cuba, solidifying a strategic alliance.

* Post-Soviet Cooperation: Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia continued to maintain strong ties with Cuba, offering economic assistance and military cooperation.

* Military Agreements: Cuba and Russia have signed numerous agreements related to military training, arms sales, and intelligence sharing.

* Recent Developments: In recent years, military cooperation has increased, including joint military exercises and the modernization of Cuban military equipment. This deepening relationship provides a backdrop for understanding the current allegations.

International Law and Implications

If the US allegations are substantiated, cuba’s actions could constitute a violation of international law, specifically the principles of neutrality and non-interference in the internal affairs of othre states.

* Neutrality Obligations: Under international law, neutral states are obligated to refrain from taking sides in armed conflicts between other states.

* Mercenary Activities: The recruitment and deployment of foreign fighters can be considered mercenary activity, which is prohibited under international conventions.

* Potential Sanctions: The US and other Western nations could impose sanctions on Cuba in response to its alleged support for Russia.

* impact on US-Cuba Relations: The allegations have further strained already tense relations between the US and Cuba, potentially reversing recent efforts towards normalization.

Verification Challenges and Ongoing Investigation

Independent verification of the US claims remains tough. Access to conflict zones in Ukraine is restricted, and obtaining reliable information from both sides is challenging.

* Information Warfare: Both Russia and Ukraine are engaged in information warfare, making it difficult to discern truth from propaganda.

* Lack of Independent Confirmation: While US intelligence agencies have presented evidence supporting their claims, independent organizations have yet to corroborate these findings.

* Ongoing Investigations: Several international organizations and investigative journalists are currently investigating the allegations, seeking to gather more evidence and determine the extent of Cuban involvement.

* Role of Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT): Analysts are utilizing OSINT techniques – analyzing publicly available information, including social media and satellite imagery – to attempt to verify the claims.

Potential Motivations for Cuban Involvement

Several potential motivations could explain Cuba’s alleged support for Russia,if the claims prove true:

* Economic Dependence: Cuba is heavily reliant on economic assistance from Russia,and supporting Russia could be seen as a way to maintain this vital lifeline.

* Ideological Alignment: Cuba’s communist government shares a similar ideological outlook with Russia, fostering a sense of solidarity.

* Anti-US Sentiment: Cuba has a long history of antagonism towards the US, and supporting Russia could be viewed as a way to counter US influence in the region.

* Security Concerns: Cuba may perceive Russia as a strategic ally in countering potential threats from the US and other Western powers.

Related Search terms

* Ukraine conflict

* Russia-Ukraine war

* Cuban mercenaries

* US-Cuba relations

* International law violations

* Russian foreign fighters

* Ukraine war updates

* Cuban military involvement

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Giuliani Allies throw Support Behind Cuomo in NYC Mayoral Race

New York City’s Mayoral contest has taken a surprising turn as prominent figures once aligned with former Republican Mayor Rudy Giuliani are now backing Andrew Cuomo against the Republican nominee, Curtis Sliwa. This dramatic shift underscores the complex dynamics at play in the upcoming election, diverging sharply from traditional political allegiances.

High-Profile Endorsements Signal Political Realignment

Joe Lhota, a previous Republican candidate for mayor in 2013 and a former deputy mayor during the Giuliani management, has publicly declared his support for Cuomo. Lhota, who later served as the Chairman and CEO of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority under Governor cuomo, emphasized the importance of experienced leadership. He explained that his choice was between “a proven manager, a socialist, and a fruit loop,” ultimately siding with Cuomo.

Anthony Carbonetti, who served as Giuliani’s chief of staff and a key advisor during his 2008 presidential campaign, mirrored Lhota’s assessment. Carbonetti highlighted the critical need for Cuomo to attract voters from Sliwa’s base and undecided citizens to challenge Zohran mamdani, the current Democratic frontrunner.

Concerns Mount Over Leading democratic Candidate

Carbonetti and others have expressed reservations regarding Mamdani’s progressive platform.These concerns center on policies such as fare-free public transportation, with warnings that such measures could have unintended negative consequences, potentially transforming buses into inadequate shelters.

Legal Eagle Backs cuomo to Avert Potential Risks

Adding another layer to the intricate political landscape, Mike Mukasey, a former U.S. Attorney General under President George W. Bush and a longtime Republican voter, has also endorsed Cuomo. Mukasey asserted that preventing Mamdani’s potential win – which he characterized as a threat to the city’s economic stability – is paramount.He suggested that Cuomo represents the most viable alternative, notably following Eric Adams’ withdrawal from the race.

Internal Republican Divisions Surface

Recent statements from President Trump regarding Curtis Sliwa have revealed internal discord within the Republican Party. While acknowledging Sliwa’s Republican affiliation, Trump subtly questioned his viability against Mamdani, hinting that Cuomo might pose a more formidable challenge. This is a departure from traditional support a President would offer his party’s nominee.

Sliwa Campaign Dismisses Endorsements

Despite the endorsements, the Sliwa campaign remains resolute. Campaign advisor Rob Cole downplayed the meaning of lhota’s and other Giuliani associates’ backing of Cuomo, referencing Lhota’s earlier switch in political affiliation. The campaign believes that these endorsements do not reflect the broader sentiment of Republican voters.

Endorser Former Role Current Position/Affiliation Rationale for Supporting Cuomo
Joe Lhota Former Deputy Mayor (Giuliani Admin), 2013 Mayoral Candidate Former MTA Chairman & CEO Experienced Leadership
Anthony Carbonetti Giuliani Chief of Staff (2008 Campaign) Political Advisor Strategic need to Challenge Mamdani
Mike Mukasey Former U.S. Attorney General Private Practice Attorney Prevent Potential Economic Risks

With Election Day approaching,polls currently indicate Zohran Mamdani as the frontrunner,although he is currently short of securing a majority. The withdrawal of eric Adams has further complex the race. As alliances shift and public opinion continues to evolve, the outcome of New York City’s mayoral election remains highly uncertain.

The Shifting Sands of New York City Politics

New York City’s political landscape is known for its volatility and independent streak. The willingness of prominent Republicans to cross party lines demonstrates the growing dissatisfaction with traditional political options. This trend reflects a broader national phenomenon where voters are prioritizing practical solutions and competence over strict ideological adherence.

Did You Know? New York City has had a Democratic mayor for the past three terms, illustrating the city’s generally progressive leaning despite periodic Republican challenges.

Pro Tip: In municipal elections, understanding the specific needs and priorities of different neighborhoods is crucial for predicting outcomes. Local issues often outweigh national political trends.

Frequently Asked Questions about the NYC Mayoral Race

  • What impact will these endorsements have on the election? These endorsements could sway independent voters and republicans hesitant about their nominee.
  • Who is the current frontrunner in the NYC mayoral race? Zohran Mamdani is currently leading in the polls.
  • Why are Giuliani allies supporting Andrew Cuomo? they believe Cuomo is a more pragmatic and viable candidate than Curtis Sliwa.
  • What are the key concerns regarding Zohran Mamdani’s platform? Concerns center around his progressive policies, particularly those related to public transportation costs.
  • How did Eric Adams’ withdrawal affect the race? Adams’ departure opened up new opportunities for other candidates to gain momentum.
  • What is the significance of Trump’s comments on Sliwa? They reflect potential internal divisions within the Republican Party regarding Sliwa’s electability.
  • What does this say about the state of the Republican party in New York City? This demonstrates a possible willingness to prioritize pragmatic governance over strict party loyalty.

What do you think about these surprising endorsements? Will they considerably shift the dynamics of the NYC mayoral race? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

How does the framing of Sliwa’s policies as “socialist” exemplify political polarization and the use of loaded language in campaigns?

Giuliani’s Allies Back Cuomo Against Sliwa for NYC Mayoral Race, Labeling Sliwa as Socialist and Unstable

The Unexpected Alliance: Giuliani Network Supports Cuomo

A surprising turn in the New York City mayoral race has seen prominent figures associated with former Mayor Rudy Giuliani throwing their weight behind incumbent Andrew Cuomo, actively campaigning against Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa. This advancement, reported widely across New York political news outlets, centers around a concerted effort to portray Sliwa as ideologically extreme and unfit for office. The core argument being pushed by Giuliani’s allies revolves around labeling Sliwa’s political stances as “socialist” and questioning his mental stability – accusations Sliwa’s campaign vehemently denies.This unexpected support for Cuomo, given giuliani’s own often-contentious relationship with the Governor, highlights the perceived threat Sliwa poses to established political interests.

Key Players and Their Motivations

Several individuals with strong ties to Giuliani’s past campaigns and political network are leading the charge. These include:

* Maria Bartiromo: The Fox Business Network host, a long-time giuliani supporter, has used her platform to amplify criticisms of Sliwa, focusing on his past associations and policy proposals.

* Bernard Kerik: Former NYPD Commissioner under Giuliani, Kerik has been actively involved in online campaigns discrediting Sliwa, sharing articles and commentary questioning his judgment.

* john Catsimatidis: A prominent New York businessman and radio host, Catsimatidis, a frequent Giuliani ally, has publicly endorsed Cuomo and criticized Sliwa’s economic policies.

Their motivations appear to stem from a belief that Sliwa represents a significant departure from the conservative principles traditionally associated with New York City’s Republican party. Concerns have been raised about Sliwa’s stances on issues like rent control and affordable housing, which are viewed as leaning towards socialist policies by this group. The “Sliwa as Socialist” narrative is a key component of their strategy.

The “Socialist” label: A Deep Dive

The accusation of “socialism” leveled against Sliwa is a purposeful attempt to tap into anxieties about the direction of American politics. Giuliani’s allies are framing Sliwa’s proposals as radical and detrimental to the city’s economic health.Specifically,they point to:

* Rent Control Advocacy: Sliwa has expressed support for strengthening rent control laws,a position seen as unfavorable by real estate developers and landlords – a key constituency for Giuliani and his network.

* Increased Social Spending: Proposals for increased funding for social programs, including affordable housing and healthcare, are being characterized as “socialist giveaways.”

* progressive Tax Policies: Sliwa’s willingness to consider progressive tax policies to address income inequality is being portrayed as an attack on the wealthy and a disincentive for investment.

This framing aims to resonate with conservative voters and independents who may be wary of policies perceived as economically damaging. The use of the term “socialist” is a potent political weapon in the current climate,designed to trigger negative associations and undermine Sliwa’s credibility.

Concerns Over “Instability”: A Controversial Tactic

Beyond the economic arguments, Giuliani’s allies are also attempting to raise doubts about Sliwa’s mental stability. This tactic is especially controversial and has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum. The claims center around:

* Past Personal Struggles: References to Sliwa’s past struggles with addiction and personal issues are being used to suggest he is not fit to handle the pressures of the mayoralty.

* Unconventional Campaign Tactics: Sliwa’s often-unconventional campaign tactics,including his use of colorful costumes and attention-grabbing stunts,are being portrayed as evidence of erratic behavior.

* Questionable Judgement: Opponents are highlighting past controversies and statements made by Sliwa, attempting to paint him as impulsive and lacking sound judgment.

These attacks are seen by many as a smear campaign designed to distract from substantive policy debates. The ethical implications of questioning a candidate’s mental health are significant, and the tactic could backfire if perceived as overly aggressive or unfair.

Impact on the Mayoral Race: Shifting Dynamics

This unexpected intervention by Giuliani’s allies has undeniably shifted the dynamics of the mayoral race. While Sliwa was initially seen as a long-shot candidate, he had gained momentum in recent weeks, appealing to voters disillusioned with the status quo.The attacks from giuliani’s network are aimed at halting that momentum

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.