JPMorgan Weighs In: Shell-BP Merger-A Deep Dive Into Synergies and Shareholder Value

The possibility of a merger between Shell (SHEL) and BP has ignited debate, prompting jpmorgan Chase to evaluate the potential benefits and drawbacks. JPMorgan’s analysis focuses on how well the two energy giants would complement each othre on a global scale. Morgan stanley, while rating Shell as “overweight,” adopts a more cautious stance on BP, suggesting that a merger would necessitate either lower prices or significantly higher synergies to justify the deal.

Evaluating the Core Goals of a Shell-BP Merger

The premise behind such a monumental merger hinges on several key objectives, including sustained oil production into the 2030s, expanded market reach, greater versatility for strategic conversion, and reduced weighted average capital costs. Would acquiring BP enable Shell to fully achieve these goals? The assessment suggests the answer is only partially affirmative.

according to Morgan Stanley’s model, even with a 20% price premium and a 4% equity value synergistic effect (approximately $3.5 billion annually after tax), Shell might not reach its enterprising “Polaris” target for 2030 – a free cash flow compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 10% per share.

Financial Scenarios: Cash vs. Equity Financing

Under a financing model of 30% cash and 70% equity, Morgan Stanley projects a moderate increase in free cash flow per share, with a CAGR of 13%-14%. Though, a 100% equity financing scenario may not surpass the 10% threshold, perhaps diluting shareholder value.

Did You Know? Shell’s dividend yield is projected to reach 10.5% by 2026, assuming a Brent crude oil price of $65 per barrel.

Key Indicators and Production Sustainability

A combined Shell-BP entity would boast an oil and gas production capacity of 5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), positioning it as the world’s largest autonomous oil producer. The financial models consider two financing options (30/70 cash/equity and 100% equity), calibrated against Shell’s balance sheet and accounting for the fluctuating oil and gas market.

Despite the undeniable scale advantage, data from Wood Mackenzie indicates that the merger might not significantly bolster the sustainability of oil production beyond 2030, projecting a CAGR of -2% between 2027 and 2033.

A cash return rate of 35-40% operating cash flow (CFFO) appears reasonable, and analysts expect dividend per share (DPS) to remain stable. Based on Shell’s current share price, the estimated cash yield is 11.8% under the 30/70 debt/equity model and 10.7% under the 100% equity model, respectively.

Complementarity and Overlap Analysis

Shell and BP exhibit medium complementarity. Key areas of alignment include U.S. upstream operations, natural gas (trade), and marketing operations in North America and Europe. Though, only 25% to 30% of Shell’s oil and gas production is located in the eight core countries where BP generates 80% of its output. Antitrust concerns could also be a limiting factor for downstream operations.

Morgan Stanley’s analysis also highlights the overlap between BP and other major players like TotalEnergies (TTE), ExxonMobil (XOM), and Chevron (CVX). While TotalEnergies and BP differ geographically (Middle East/north Sea Exploration and production, downstream European businesses), their overall overlap is comparable. North American exploration and production operations are crucial for major U.S. oil companies, with Chevron demonstrating a slightly more complementary approach. Greater overlap typically translates to greater potential for synergistic effects.

Pro Tip: Historically, large oil industry M&A transactions have achieved tax savings of 2% to 6% of the target company’s equity value. This is Morgan Stanley’s baseline expectation for a potential BP merger with Shell.

Valuation and market Performance

BP’s shares have underperformed Shell, lagging by 14% over the past year and 19% over the past three years. However, BP’s corporate value has not significantly declined due to increased net debt and delayed adjustments in earnings per share expectations. Therefore, Morgan Stanley concludes that BP is not necessarily undervalued compared to Shell on a standalone basis.

With Brent crude oil price projections at $65 per barrel in 2026, BP’s free cash flow yield (10.5% vs. 7.2%) outperforms Shell’s, with corporate value roughly equivalent to after-tax cash flow (before capital expenditure) multiples and price-to-earnings multiples.

Earlier this year, the segment aggregate valuation method showed a greater discount for BP-the latest level was below 40% (35% if the riskier Rosneft value was excluded), while Shell was at 32% at a long-term oil price estimate of $80 a barrel.

What are your thoughts on the possible Shell-BP merger? How do you think it would impact the energy sector?

Share your comments and insights below!

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.