Home » israel » Page 87

netanyahu Declares No Palestinian state, Raising Fears of Escalated Conflict

Jakarta – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has unequivocally stated that ther will be no establishment of a palestinian state, a declaration that has ignited strong reactions and heightened anxieties about further instability in the Middle East. A prominent religious leader, Anwar Abbas, Chairman of PP Muhammadiyah, has characterized Netanyahu’s statement as a declaration of “total war.”

Abbas expressed concern that the prospect of peaceful coexistence in the region has been severely diminished by Netanyahu’s rejection of a Palestinian state. He asserted that Israel views Palestinian territories as integral parts of its own nation, justifying current construction of Israeli settlements within occupied areas. He believes that Israel intends to exert complete control over both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

“The trajectory is clear: Israel is working to solidify its hold on these territories through construction projects intended for its citizens,” Abbas explained. “The situations in Gaza and the West Bank are simply awaiting the opportune moment for full Israeli control.”

Call for Arab Unity

Despite the bleak outlook, Abbas urged Arab nations not to remain passive in the face of this evolving situation. He encouraged a unified front among Arab countries to counter what he describes as Israel’s aggressive stance. He believes that a collective response is the only viable path forward for both Palestine and the Arab world.

“Victory necessitates a united Arab world,” Abbas stated. “Currently, the only recourse for palestine and its Arab allies is to resist, as Israel has effectively declared total war with its rejection of a Palestinian state.”

Abbas further suggested that the ambitions of Zionist ideologies and Netanyahu extend beyond current borders, encompassing territories in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, all envisioned as part of a “Greater Israel.”

He firmly blamed Israel for the ongoing chaos in the Middle East, calling on Arab countries to unite and engage in action to restore peace to the region. He emphasized that inaction will allow Israel to expand its territorial ambitions unchecked.

Settlement Expansion and international Response

Netanyahu reiterated his position against a Palestinian state during a recent event at Maale Adumim, an Israeli settlement east of Jerusalem, stating, “We will fulfill our promise that there will be no Palestinian contry; this place is ours.” He added, “We will maintain our inheritance, our land, and our security… we will double the population of this city.”

Meanwhile, several Western nations, including the United Kingdom and France, have signaled their intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations later this month. Britain has specifically linked this recognition to Israel’s response to calls for a ceasefire in the Gaza conflict.

Did You Know? The Oslo Accords, signed in the 1990s, aimed to establish a two-state solution, envisioning an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. Tho,the peace process has stalled,and settlement expansion has continued to be a major obstacle.

Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of the Israeli-palestinian conflict is crucial for interpreting current events. The conflict dates back over a century, with roots in competing claims to the same territory.

Key Developments: Israel and Palestine

Date Event
september 12, 2025 Netanyahu declares there will be no palestinian state.
September 14, 2025 Anwar Abbas calls for Arab unity against Israel.
Ongoing Western nations consider recognizing a Palestinian state.

The Long-Term Implications of a One-State Solution

The rejection of a two-state solution raises concerns about the future of both Israelis and Palestinians. A one-state solution, where Palestinians and Israelis live together in a single state, presents numerous challenges, including questions of citizenship, political portrayal, and the potential for ongoing conflict. Experts warn that without a viable pathway towards self-determination for Palestinians,the region could face continued instability and violence.

Furthermore, the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank is considered illegal under international law.This continues to fuel tensions and undermines the possibility of a future Palestinian state. The international community has repeatedly called for a halt to settlement construction, but these calls have largely been ignored.

Frequently Asked Questions about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Q: What is the core issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

A: The core issue is a dispute over land and self-determination, with both Israelis and palestinians claiming historical and religious ties to the same territory.

Q: What is the two-state solution?

A: The two-state solution proposes the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, allowing both peoples to have their own sovereign nations.

Q: why are Israeli settlements in the West Bank controversial?

A: Israeli settlements are considered illegal under international law and are seen as an obstacle to peace as they encroach upon territory palestinians claim for a future state.

Q: What is the role of the United Nations in the conflict?

A: The United Nations has played a role in mediating the conflict and providing humanitarian assistance to Palestinians, and it has passed numerous resolutions related to the issue.

Q: What are the potential consequences of Netanyahu’s statement?

A: Netanyahu’s statement could escalate tensions, led to increased violence, and further undermine the peace process.

Q: What is the stance of Arab nations on the conflict?

A: Arab nations have historically supported the Palestinian cause and have called for a just and lasting solution based on international law.

Q: What is the current status of the Gaza Strip?

A: The Gaza Strip is under a blockade imposed by israel and Egypt, and it is indeed controlled by Hamas, a Palestinian militant group.

What do you think is the most viable path forward for achieving peace in the region? Share your thoughts in the comments below. Do you believe international pressure can influence a change in policy?

How might the formation of a united Arab state impact the existing geopolitical landscape in the Middle East?

Muhammadiyah Urges Formation of United Arab State to Confront Israel

The Call for Arab Unity amidst Escalating Conflict

Indonesia’s second-largest Islamic organization, Muhammadiyah, has issued a strong call for the formation of a unified Arab state, explicitly citing the need to effectively counter what it perceives as Israeli aggression and the ongoing Palestinian crisis. This proposition,gaining traction within certain political and religious circles,represents a meaningful shift in discourse surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and regional stability. The urgency stems from recent escalations in violence, especially in Gaza and the west Bank, and a perceived lack of effective international intervention. This demand for Arab solidarity is rooted in a long history of pan-Arab sentiment.

Muhammadiyah’s Rationale: A Deep Dive

Muhammadiyah’s leadership argues that a united Arab front, possessing consolidated political and economic power, would be better positioned to:

* Negotiate with Israel from a position of strength: Currently, fragmented Arab nations lack the leverage to significantly influence Israeli policy. A unified state could present a cohesive and powerful negotiating bloc.

* provide comprehensive support to Palestine: Beyond financial aid, a united Arab state could offer robust military and logistical support to Palestinians, bolstering their self-determination efforts. This includes advocating for Palestinian statehood and protecting Palestinian territories.

* Address the Root Causes of the Conflict: Muhammadiyah believes a unified Arab state could tackle the underlying issues driving the conflict,such as land disputes,refugee crises,and the status of jerusalem.

* counter External Interference: A strong, unified Arab entity could resist external pressures and interference from global powers, allowing for a more independent and regionally-focused approach to conflict resolution. Regional geopolitics play a crucial role in this assessment.

Historical Precedents and Pan-Arabism

The idea of Arab unity isn’t new. Throughout the 20th century, various movements advocating for pan-Arabism emerged, fueled by a shared language, culture, and a desire to overcome colonial legacies.

* The Arab League (1945): Established to promote cooperation among Arab states, the League has often been hampered by internal divisions and conflicting national interests.

* United Arab Republic (1958-1961): A short-lived political union between Egypt and Syria, demonstrating both the appeal and the challenges of Arab unification.

* Gamal Abdel Nasser’s Pan-Arabism: Egyptian President Nasser championed a vision of Arab unity, inspiring widespread support but ultimately facing obstacles due to regional rivalries.

Muhammadiyah’s current call builds upon this historical context, arguing that the urgency of the situation necessitates a more radical and comprehensive approach than previous attempts at regional cooperation. The concept of Arab nationalism is central to understanding this historical backdrop.

Potential Challenges to Arab State Formation

Despite the perceived benefits, the formation of a united Arab state faces significant hurdles:

* Deep-Seated National Interests: Arab nations have distinct political systems, economic priorities, and foreign policy agendas. Overcoming these differences would require unprecedented levels of compromise and cooperation.

* Rivalries and Geopolitical Competition: Long-standing rivalries between countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran (though not arab), and Egypt pose significant obstacles to unification. middle East conflicts are often fueled by these rivalries.

* Internal Political Instability: Many Arab nations are grappling with internal political instability, economic challenges, and social unrest, making it challenging to focus on regional integration.

* External Opposition: The formation of a powerful,unified Arab state could be viewed with suspicion by external powers,potentially leading to opposition and interference.

* Governance and Power Sharing: Establishing a fair and effective system of governance and power-sharing within a unified state would be a complex and contentious process.

Reactions and International Perspectives

muhammadiyah’s proposal has elicited a range of reactions. Some Arab political analysts have cautiously welcomed the idea,suggesting it could be a catalyst for greater regional cooperation. Others have dismissed it as unrealistic, citing the aforementioned challenges.

International responses have been more muted. Western governments, while generally supportive of a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, are wary of any initiative that could destabilize the region or undermine existing alliances. The international community’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a subject of debate.

The Role of Islamic Organizations and Civil Society

Muhammadiyah’s initiative highlights the growing role of islamic organizations and civil society groups in shaping the discourse surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These organizations often serve as advocates for Palestinian rights and mobilize public opinion in support of a just and lasting peace. Islamic activism is increasingly visible on the global stage.

* Humanitarian Aid: Islamic organizations provide crucial humanitarian aid to palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

* Advocacy and Awareness Campaigns: These groups raise awareness about the plight of Palestinians and lobby governments to take action.

* Diplomatic Efforts: Some Islamic organizations engage in diplomatic efforts to mediate between Israel and Palestine.

The Future of the Proposal: Prospects and Considerations

whether Muhammadiyah’s call for a united Arab state will gain traction remains to be seen. However,it underscores the growing frustration with the status quo and the urgent need for a new approach to

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

requirements.

Northern Israel’s Reconstruction: A Long Road to Recovery and Rebuilding Community

Almost two years of displacement have left deep scars on the social and physical landscape of northern Israel. The drive through the Upper Galilee presents a deceptive tranquility-vineyards stretch across the hills, and villages appear nestled against the Lebanon border. However, beneath this surface lies a reality marked by rocket attacks, evacuations, shuttered businesses, and mounting debts. The question now isn’t just about rebuilding infrastructure, but whether displaced families will return and rebuild their lives.

“This is an chance we must come out stronger from after the war,” asserts Asaf Levinger, head of the Upper Galilee Regional Council.”it is a national imperative to build something different here.”

Despite the challenges, glimmers of hope are emerging. Approximately 85% of evacuated families have returned, and new residents are beginning to arrive. Kibbutz Yiftach, less than a kilometer from the border, has welcomed thirteen new families, with many more considering a return. In Manara, temporary mobile homes are being prepared, and many houses are no longer vacant.

A Focus on Rebuilding and Community

The reconstruction effort requires a comprehensive approach, addressing both the physical damage and the social fabric of the region. Levinger emphasizes the importance of attracting new families and businesses to bolster the area’s resilience.This involves investing in infrastructure, providing economic incentives, and fostering a sense of community.

Challenges Remain

Despite the positive signs, important hurdles remain. The ongoing security concerns, financial burdens on residents, and the need for ample investment present ongoing obstacles. Rebuilding trust and restoring a sense of normalcy will take time and consistent effort.

Looking Ahead

The situation in northern Israel requires sustained commitment from the government and broader community. The future of this region hinges on a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes not only reconstruction but also the well-being and future of its residents. Will northern Israel be able to overcome these challenges and emerge stronger? What steps can be taken to encourage long-term investment and rebuild community trust?

Keywords: northern Israel, reconstruction, evacuation, Galilee, Israel-Lebanon border, displacement, rebuilding, community, infrastructure, Asaf Levinger, economic recovery.

note: This response is made to be thorough and engaging, optimized for SEO and readability, and written in a style appropriate for a news publication. I have not included the requested JSON-LD schema, as it requires more context and specific data to be accurately implemented.

What are the primary factors contributing to the escalating crisis in the Upper Galilee region of Israel?

Neglect and Bureaucratic Challenges Threaten Future of Israel’s North Frontier in Upper Galilee

The Escalating Crisis in Northern Israel

The Upper Galilee region of Israel, a strategically vital frontier area, is facing a multifaceted crisis stemming from years of governmental neglect and crippling bureaucratic hurdles. This isn’t simply a matter of infrastructure; it’s a threat to national security, economic viability, and the very future of communities living along the northern border. The situation has been exacerbated by repeated conflicts and the constant threat of Hezbollah activity. Concerns over border security, regional progress, and civilian safety are paramount.

Decades of disinvestment: A Pattern of Neglect

For decades, the Upper Galilee has suffered from systemic underinvestment compared to central and southern Israel. This disparity manifests in several key areas:

* Infrastructure Deficiencies: Roads are poorly maintained, public transportation is limited, and access to essential services like healthcare and education is substantially restricted. This impacts rural infrastructure and regional connectivity.

* Economic Stagnation: Limited employment opportunities force residents, particularly young people, to migrate to more prosperous areas, leading to a demographic decline. Economic development is stifled by a lack of investment and support for local businesses.

* Inadequate Emergency Preparedness: Shelters are insufficient, warning systems are outdated, and emergency response capabilities are stretched thin, leaving communities vulnerable during periods of heightened tension. this directly impacts civil defense and disaster preparedness.

* Agricultural Challenges: The agricultural sector, a cornerstone of the Upper Galilee’s economy, faces challenges including water scarcity, limited access to markets, and a lack of modern farming technologies.Agricultural sustainability is at risk.

Bureaucratic Obstacles: A Web of Red Tape

Compounding the issue of underinvestment is a deeply entrenched bureaucratic system that actively hinders development and discourages investment.

* Land Ownership Disputes: Complex and frequently enough unresolved land ownership issues create critically important obstacles for construction projects, agricultural development, and infrastructure improvements. Land registration and property rights are major sticking points.

* Planning and Permitting Delays: Obtaining building permits and approvals can take years, discouraging both private investment and public sector initiatives. This impacts construction permits and urban planning.

* Inter-Agency Coordination Failures: Lack of effective coordination between different government ministries and agencies leads to duplication of effort, conflicting regulations, and project delays. Government efficiency is severely compromised.

* Limited Local Authority capacity: Many local councils in the Upper Galilee lack the resources and expertise to navigate the complex bureaucratic landscape and effectively advocate for their communities. Local governance is weakened.

The Security Dimension: A Vulnerable Frontier

The neglect and bureaucratic challenges have directly impacted Israel’s security posture in the north.

* Increased Hezbollah threat: Hezbollah has exploited the vulnerabilities in the region, establishing a network of cross-border tunnels and stockpiling weapons. The lack of adequate infrastructure and security measures makes it tough to detect and counter these threats. Hezbollah activity and cross-border tunnels are critical concerns.

* Reduced IDF Presence: While the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) maintains a presence in the region, limited resources and infrastructure hinder their ability to effectively patrol the border and respond to potential attacks. IDF deployment and border patrol effectiveness are compromised.

* Civilian Vulnerability: The lack of adequate shelters and emergency preparedness leaves civilians highly vulnerable to rocket attacks and other forms of aggression. Civilian protection is a paramount concern.

* Erosion of Deterrence: The perception of neglect and vulnerability may embolden Hezbollah to escalate its activities, perhaps leading to a wider conflict. Regional stability is threatened.

Case Study: Kiryat Shmona – A City in Crisis

Kiryat Shmona, a city heavily impacted by the ongoing situation, exemplifies the challenges facing the Upper Galilee. Years of economic decline, coupled with repeated rocket attacks, have led to a mass exodus of residents. Businesses have closed,property values have plummeted,and the city’s infrastructure is crumbling. The city’s struggle highlights the urgent need for thorough intervention and long-term investment. Urban decay and population displacement are visible consequences.

Potential Solutions and Pathways Forward

Addressing the crisis in the Upper Galilee requires a multi-pronged approach:

  1. Massive investment in Infrastructure: Prioritize investments in roads, public transportation, healthcare, education, and emergency preparedness.
  2. Streamlining Bureaucracy: Simplify the planning and permitting process, resolve land ownership disputes, and improve inter-agency coordination.
  3. Economic Incentives: Offer tax breaks, subsidies, and other incentives to attract businesses and create employment opportunities.
  4. Strengthening Security: Increase IDF presence, improve border security measures, and enhance civilian defense capabilities.
  5. Empowering Local Authorities: Provide local councils with the resources and expertise they need to effectively advocate for their communities.
  6. **Promoting Agricultural Innovation
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


UN Assembly Condemns Hamas, Backs Path to Palestinian Statehood

The United Nations general Assembly has overwhelmingly approved a declaration known as the “New York Declaration,” signaling a renewed push for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The resolution, passed on Friday, explicitly condemns Hamas and calls for its disarmament and transfer of authority in Gaza to the Palestinian Authority.

International isolation of Hamas

The vote, with 142 nations in favor, 10 opposed – including Israel and the United States – and 12 abstentions, represents a notable diplomatic shift. It directly addresses the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas on Israeli civilians, demanding the immediate release of all hostages held in Gaza. The declaration stipulates that Hamas must relinquish control of the Gaza Strip and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international support.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot hailed the vote as a moment of “final international isolation of hamas.” According to sources within the French presidency, the declaration will serve as a foundation for a summit co-hosted by Paris and Riyadh on September 22 at the UN in New York. During this summit, French President Emmanuel Macron is expected to announce the recognition of a Palestinian state.

A ‘Shield’ against Criticism

Analysts suggest the resolution provides cover for nations considering recognizing Palestinian statehood.Richard Gowan, of the International Crisis Group, stated the text enables supporters of Palestine to refute accusations of implicitly endorsing Hamas. He added that it also “offers a shield against criticism of Israel” for those contemplating state recognition.

Several countries have indicated they will follow France’s lead and announce recognition of a Palestinian state during the upcoming UN General Assembly week.This move is seen as a means of increasing pressure on Israel to end the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

Reactions from Israel and Palestine

Israel vehemently rejected the resolution, labeling it “shameful” and alleging it encourages Hamas to persist in its military activities. Conversely, Palestinian vice-President Hussein al-Sheikh welcomed the declaration as “an critically important step towards the end of the occupation,” expressing his gratitude on social media platform X.

Vote Outcome Details
For 142 Nations
Against 10 Nations (including Israel & US)
Abstentions 12 nations

Did You Know? The two-state solution, advocating for an independent Palestine alongside israel, has been a central tenet of international diplomacy for decades, but its implementation remains elusive.

Pro Tip: Staying informed about international resolutions like the “New York Declaration” is crucial for understanding the evolving dynamics of global conflicts.

The Enduring Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the world’s most protracted and complex disputes, rooted in competing claims over land and self-determination. Its origins trace back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries with the rise of Zionism and Palestinian nationalism. While numerous peace initiatives have been attempted, key obstacles remain, including disagreements over borders, the status of Jerusalem, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees.Recent data from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) shows a continued increase in settlement construction and ongoing violence in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the “New York Declaration” regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? The “New York Declaration” is a UN General Assembly resolution condemning Hamas and supporting a two-state solution.
  • Why is Hamas being singled out in this resolution? The resolution directly condemns Hamas’s attacks on civilians and calls for its disarmament.
  • What does the resolution say about the future of Gaza? It calls for hamas to cede control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority.
  • What is France’s role in this diplomatic effort? France is co-hosting a summit to discuss the implementation of the resolution and is prepared to recognize a Palestinian state.
  • What is the meaning of recognizing a Palestinian state? recognition is viewed as a means of pressuring Israel and advancing the peace process.

What are your thoughts on the UN’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Do you believe the “New York Declaration” represents a viable path toward a lasting peace?

Share your perspectives in the comments below and join the discussion!


How might the UN General Assembly’s resolution impact the existing power dynamics between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority in Gaza and the West bank?

UN General Assembly Endorses Vision of a Future Palestinian State excluding Hamas

The Resolution and its Core Tenets

On Friday, September 13, 2025, the UN General Assembly took a significant step towards reshaping the Israeli-Palestinian peace process by voting in favor of a resolution outlining a future Palestinian state without the involvement of Hamas. This landmark decision signals a renewed push for the two-state solution, but with a critical condition: the exclusion of the militant group currently governing Gaza. The vote reflects growing international concern over Hamas’s role in obstructing peace efforts and its impact on regional stability.

The resolution, as reported by Yahoo News [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/un-general-assembly-votes-hamas-150741906.html], formally seeks to revitalize the long-stalled two-state solution. key aspects of the resolution include:

* Reaffirming the two-state solution: The core principle remains the establishment of an independent palestinian state alongside a secure Israel.

* Hamas exclusion: Explicitly states that a future Palestinian state should be built without the participation of Hamas, citing its designation as a terrorist organization by several nations.

* gaza’s Future: addresses the complex issue of Gaza’s governance, advocating for a transition to a Palestinian Authority-led administration.

* International Guarantees: Calls for international guarantees to ensure the security and viability of both states.

Implications for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

This UN vote carries substantial weight, potentially altering the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Here’s a breakdown of the potential implications:

* Palestinian Authority (PA) Strengthening: The resolution implicitly supports strengthening the PA’s role in governing both the West Bank and,eventually,Gaza. This could involve bolstering its security forces and administrative capabilities.

* Hamas’s Response: Hamas has already condemned the resolution, viewing it as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause.Their reaction will be crucial in determining the path forward. Potential responses range from increased resistance to attempts to undermine the PA.

* Regional Reactions: Arab nations are likely to have varied responses. Some may support the resolution as a pragmatic step towards peace, while others may express reservations about excluding a major Palestinian faction.

* Impact on Peace Negotiations: The resolution could create a new framework for peace negotiations, focusing on a Palestinian state governed by a more moderate leadership. However, it also introduces a significant obstacle: achieving Hamas’s disengagement or marginalization.

The Role of International Actors

The success of this resolution hinges on the active involvement of key international actors.

* United States: the US, a strong supporter of Israel and the two-state solution, is expected to play a leading role in mediating negotiations and providing financial assistance to the PA.

* European Union: The EU can leverage its diplomatic and economic influence to encourage both sides to engage in constructive dialog.

* United Nations: The UN will likely be tasked with monitoring the implementation of the resolution and providing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people.

* Egypt and Jordan: These neighboring countries, with strong ties to both Israel and the Palestinians, can serve as crucial intermediaries.

Challenges and Obstacles to Implementation

Despite the UN’s endorsement,numerous challenges remain in implementing this vision:

  1. Hamas’s Entrenched Position in Gaza: Removing Hamas from power in Gaza is a formidable task,requiring a complex combination of political,security,and economic strategies.
  2. Internal palestinian Divisions: Deep divisions between Fatah (the dominant party in the PA) and Hamas could hinder efforts to form a unified Palestinian government.
  3. Israeli Security Concerns: Israel will likely demand robust security guarantees before agreeing to a Palestinian state,particularly regarding the prevention of terrorist attacks.
  4. Settlement Expansion: Continued Israeli settlement expansion in the west Bank remains a major obstacle to peace, undermining the viability of a future Palestinian state.
  5. Lack of Trust: Decades of conflict have eroded trust between Israelis and Palestinians, making it arduous to reach a lasting agreement.

Potential Benefits of a Hamas-Free Palestinian State

A Palestinian state free from Hamas control could offer several benefits:

* Improved Security: A more stable and predictable Palestinian government could enhance security cooperation with Israel, reducing the risk of violence.

* Economic Advancement: A peaceful and stable environment would attract foreign investment and promote economic growth in the Palestinian territories.

* Enhanced International Relations: A responsible Palestinian government would be better positioned to engage with the international community and secure aid and support.

* Greater Regional Stability: A resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could contribute to greater stability in the Middle East.

Key Search Terms & Related Queries

* Two-state solution

* Israeli-Palestinian conflict

* Hamas

* Palestinian Authority

* UN General Assembly

* Gaza

* West Bank

* peace negotiations

* Middle east peace process

* Palestinian statehood

* international diplomacy

* Terrorism

* Regional security

* UN Resolution on Palestine

* Hamas exclusion from Palestine

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.