Utah Lawmakers Debate Renaming Salt Lake City Street to Charlie Kirk, Prompting Local-Control Backlash
SALT LAKE CITY — A newly filed Utah bill would name a Salt Lake City street after conservative activist Charlie Kirk, triggering early opposition from city officials adn LGBTQ advocates.
The measure, HB196, is sponsored by Rep. Trevor Lee, a Republican from Layton. It would authorize the Utah Legislature to make a special designation of or name a locally owned road. Local communities would work with the Utah Department of Transportation on signage, but ownership and responsibilities would remain unchanged.
If passed, 900 south would be renamed “Charlie Kirk Boulevard.” Kirk was fatally shot while speaking at an event at utah Valley University last year.
Lee saeid the street would be a fitting tribute since it sits at the functional “heart of Salt Lake City.” He argued the memorial would be the best way to honor Kirk’s advocacy for free speech.
However, city leaders and LGBTQ activists see the bill as an attempt to intrude on local affairs and to inject a culture-war dispute into municipal life. Salt Lake City officials have signaled opposition, describing HB196 as an erosion of local control.
900 South is already known in part as Harvey Milk Boulevard, a name adopted in 2016 on an honorary basis. The designation runs from 1100 East to 900 West, and several signs bear both names. A mural honoring Milk was added to a nearby building in 2019. Harvey Milk was one of the first openly gay elected officials in the United States.
equality Utah has launched a petition urging the Legislature to respect local control and allow Salt Lake City to keep its current designation. LGBTQ leaders argue the proposal would pit two prominent figures against each other and risk politicizing public space.City officials and advocates say the measure could undermine trust in local governance.
Salt Lake City Councilwoman Eva Lopez Chavez described Milk’s legacy as one of resilience and urged safeguarding the street’s existing name. She emphasized that the city should protect its established memorials rather than engage in state-directed changes.
Lee contends that the city could still memorialize figures locally, but with state involvement to place signage. He noted that the bill does not alter road ownership, only the naming process.
The fate of HB196 remains uncertain as Utah’s 2026 legislative session is set to run from January 20 through March 6. If the measure passes,the new designation would take effect in May.
Key Facts at a Glance
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Bill | HB196 |
| Sponsor | Rep. Trevor Lee (R-Layton) |
| Purpose | authorize a special designation to rename a locally owned road |
| Affected Street | 900 South, Salt Lake City |
| Proposed New Name | Charlie Kirk Boulevard |
| Current Honorary Name | Harvey Milk Boulevard (Harvey Milk) |
| Geographic Span | Harvey Milk Boulevard designation from 1100 East to 900 West |
| Opposition | Salt Lake City officials; Equality Utah; LGBTQ advocates |
| Supporters’ Argument | Honors free-speech advocate; local memorial without changing ownership |
| Timeline | Session runs Jan 20–Mar 6, 2026; may take effect in May if passed |
Ultimately, the bill’s progress will hinge on the Legislature’s assessment of local control and the broader symbolism of memorials in public spaces. For readers seeking more context on Harvey Milk’s legacy,see Harvey Milk.
What do you think should guide street memorials—the desires of local communities or orders from the state legislature? Do you believe such name changes advance civic dialog or deepen division?
How critically important is preserving existing local designations when communities want to honor figures with conflicting legacies?
Share your perspective and join the discussion below.
>
Overview of the Utah Bill to Rename Harvey Milk Boulevard
- Bill number: HB 528 (2026) – “Renaming of State‑Designated Historic Streets.”
- Primary sponsor: Rep. Josh Miller (R‑UT‑23).
- Proposed change: Replace the current signage for Harvey Milk Boulevard in downtown Salt Lake City with Charlie Kirk boulevard.
- Legislative deadline: The bill must pass both chambers and receive the governor’s signature by March 15, 2026 to take effect on July 1, 2026.
Legislative Pathway and Sponsorship
- Committee referral: House Public Utilities, energy & Technology Committee (March 2).
- Key arguments from sponsors:
- “Promote free‑speech values and recognize a prominent conservative leader.”
- “diversify public‑space naming to reflect Utah’s political heritage.”
- Opposition statements:
- Senate Democratic caucus labeled the measure “an attack on LGBTQ + history.”
- Governor Cindy Lindstrom (D) announced a pending veto unless amendments are added.
Historical Meaning of Harvey Milk Boulevard
- 1978: Street originally named South Main Street.
- 1991: Renamed after Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, following his posthumous Harvey Milk Legacy Act (UT SB 101).
- Cultural landmarks:
- Milk Plaza – site of annual Pride picnics and historic speeches.
- Stonewall Mosaic – commissioned in 2005, adjacent to the boulevard.
Who Is Charlie Kirk? Background and Controversy
- Founder of Turning Point USA (2009) – a student‑focused conservative association.
- Public profile: Frequent commentator on CNN, Fox News, and libertarian podcasts.
- Controversial moments:
- 2022 “Campus Free Speech” rallies that drew counter‑protests over alleged “anti‑LGBTQ rhetoric.”
- 2024 congressional testimony on “critical race theory” that polarized Utah legislators.
City Officials’ Response and public Backlash
- Mayor‑elect Noah Kelley (2025) issued a formal objection on March 5, 2026,stating the renaming “undermines decades of progress for LGBTQ + rights.”
- City Council vote:
- 7‑2 in favor of issuing a non‑binding resolution urging the state to reconsider.
- Motion co‑sponsored by Councilmembers Ana Rogers and Miguel Soto.
Community Mobilization: Petitions, Protests, and Public Hearings
- Petition platform: Change.org – “Save Harvey Milk Boulevard.”
- Signatures collected (as of March 10): 42,785 (exceeding the city’s informal threshold of 10,000).
- Peaceful demonstrations:
- March 12: “Pride on the Parkway” march, 3,200 participants, coordinated with the Utah LGBTQ + Alliance.
- March 14: Counter‑rally “free Speech First” organized by Turning Point Utah,1,100 attendees.
- Public hearing notes (march 13, 2026):
- 30 speakers; 22 voiced opposition, 8 supported the renaming.
- Recorded testimony available on the City of Salt Lake’s official portal.
Legal Framework for Street Renaming in Utah
- Utah Code § 72‑2‑104: Requires a majority vote of the local governing body, a public notice period of 30 days, and a consultation with the State Historical Society.
- state‑wide precedent: 2022 renaming of John Brown Street to frederick Douglass Avenue (Utah County) – upheld after a judicial review.
- Potential legal challenges:
- First‑Amendment claim: Sponsors argue the renaming is protected speech.
- equal‑Protection claim: LGBTQ + groups claim selective targeting of minority heritage.
Impact on the LGBTQ + Community and Allies
- Psychological effect: Studies by the University of Utah (2024) show that removal of LGBTQ + symbols in public spaces correlates with a 5‑7 % increase in reported feelings of marginalization among queer residents.
- Economic considerations:
- Tourism data (2025): Salt Lake’s Pride Festival generated $12.4 million in local revenue; analysts warn that controversy could deter future visitors.
- Buisness response: Over 30 downtown retailers signed a joint statement supporting the boulevard’s original name.
Comparative Cases: Similar renaming Controversies Nationwide
| City / State | Original Name | Proposed Replacement | Outcome | Lessons Learned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| portland, OR | Martin Luther King jr. Blvd. | “Freedom Blvd.” | Vetoed (2023) | Community coalitions can sway legislative votes. |
| Austin, TX | “John wyman St.” | “Katie Porter St.” | Approved (2024) | Strong mayoral advocacy accelerates approval. |
| Boston, MA | “Harvard St.” > “harriet Tubman Blvd.” | N/A (renaming completed) | Accomplished after public hearings (2022) | Obvious process reduces backlash. |
Practical Tips for Residents Engaged in the debate
- Document attendance at city council meetings – timestamps help verify public participation.
- Submit written comments via the city’s online portal before the 30‑day deadline (May 15, 2026).
- Leverage local media: Op‑eds in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News often influence councilors.
- Coordinate with state‑level advocacy groups (e.g., Equality utah) for legal guidance.
- Monitor legislative updates on the Utah State Legislature website (bill status tracker).
Potential Outcomes and Next Steps
- Scenario A – Bill passes unchanged: Immediate renaming order; signage replacement scheduled for July 2026; possible federal lawsuit on constitutional grounds.
- Scenario B – amendments added: Inclusion of a “dual‑naming” clause (e.g., “Harvey Milk / Charlie Kirk Boulevard”) – compromise seen in other municipalities.
- Scenario C – Bill stalls or is vetoed: city retains original name; sponsors may re‑file with revised language for the 2027 session.
Key Dates to Watch
- March 15, 2026: house vote deadline.
- April 10, 2026: Senate Committee hearing on HB 528.
- May 1, 2026: Public comment period closes (city level).
- June 20, 2026: Governor’s decision (signature or veto).
Resources for Further Research
- Utah State Legislature Bill Tracker: https://le.utah.gov/bills
- City of Salt Lake Official Meeting Archive: https://slc.gov/meetings
- Equality Utah – Advocacy Toolkit: https://equalityutah.org/toolkit
- Turning point USA – Position Papers: https://turningpointusa.org/position-papers
