Home » kurdistan
Tag:

kurdistan

world

US Lawmaker Proposes “Indiana Model” Federalism for Syria, Calls for Permanent Bases

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

ABD Temsilciler Meclisi Üyesi Marlin Stutzman, Suriye’deki iktidar değişimi ve sonrasındaki süreç hakkında önemli açıklamalarda bulundu. Stutzman, eski Başkan Donald Trump’ın Kürtlere olan desteğinin sarsılmaz olduğunu vurgulayarak, Suriye’de kalıcı barış sağlamak için “Indiana Modeli” olarak adlandırdığı bir federalizm önerdi. Ayrıca, ABD’nin Suriye’de kalıcı askeri üsler kurmasının gerekliliğini savundu.

Stutzman, Suriye’nin tarihi bir dönemeçten geçtiği bu kritik günlerde, Washington’un yeni Suriye yönetimine bakışını ve bölgedeki askeri stratejileri ayrıntılı bir şekilde değerlendirdi. Geçtiğimiz günlerde Kongre’de düzenlenen “Suriye” konulu oturumun verimli geçtiğini belirten Stutzman, “Önemli tanıklıklar dinledik ve Kongre üyelerine çok değerli bilgiler sunuldu. Ancak hâlâ yapılması gereken çok iş var,” dedi.

“Şara başarılı olursa Suriye de başarılı olur”

Stutzman, Suriye’deki düşüş ve çıkışları değerlendirerek, bu yıl Dürzilere ve Alevilere yönelik saldırıların ardından, Kürtlerin ve Hristiyanların da benzer bir durumla karşı karşıya kaldığını belirtti. “Suriye halkı ve bölge için en iyisini istiyorum ancak bunun için Şam ile ülkedeki tüm azınlıklar arasında gerçek bir koordinasyon olmalı,” ifadesini kullandı. Bu bağlamda, Suriye’nin yeni lideri Ahmed Şara’nın başarılı olmasının Suriye’nin geleceği için kritik olduğunu vurguladı.

Münih’teki Gelişmeler ve Kürtlerle İlişkiler

Stutzman, Münih Güvenlik Konferansı’nda Demokratik Suriye Güçleri Genel Komutanı Mazlum Abdi’nin, Suriye Dışişleri Bakanı Esad Şeybani’nin liderliğindeki heyette yer almasının olumlu bir başlangıç olduğunu ifade etti. Ayrıca, vizelerin verilmesi ve pasaport süreçlerinin iyileşmesinin umut verici olduğunu belirtti. “Ancak bu henüz yolun başı,” dedi.

Stutzman, ABD’nin Suriye politikasını değiştirme konusunda sorulan bir soruya ise, “IŞİD ile mücadelede kararlılığımızı hem kendi ordumuzun operasyonlarıyla hem de müttefiklerimizle gösterdik,” yanıtını verdi. Rusya’nın Suriye’den çıkarılması gerektiğinin altını çizen Stutzman, “Kürtlerle olan ilişkimiz hayati önemdedir. Kürtler, bölgede her zaman Amerika’nın en büyük dostu ve destekçisi olmuştur,” dedi.

Trump’ın Kürtlere Olan Desteği

Trump’ın Kürtlerle olan ilişkisine dair Stutzman, “Başkan Trump’ın Kürtlere ne kadar çok değer verdiği ve bu bağın stratejik öneminin farkında olduğunu biliyoruz,” şeklinde konuştu. Stutzman, Trump’ın Kürtlerle olan bu özel ilişkiyi korumak için yoğun çaba sarf ettiğini dile getirdi.

Stutzman, ABD’nin Suriye’deki askeri varlığının korunması gerektiğini ve Rusya’nın bölgedeki etkisini azaltmak için daha fazla müdahale çağrısında bulundu. “Rusların yerine biz askeri üs kurarsak bu bölgeyi stabilize ederiz,” dedi.

Suriye’nin Geleceği İçin Önemli Uyarılar

Stutzman, Suriye’nin yeni lideri Ahmed Şara’ya yönelik olarak, müttefiklere yapılan saldırıların kabul edilemez olduğunu ifade etti. “Sözler önemli değil, biz eylemlere bakıyoruz. Eğer sahayı kontrol edemiyorsa, bunu açıkça söylemeli ve bizden yardım istemelidir,” şeklinde konuştu. Şara’nın işinin zor olduğunu ancak başarılı olması halinde Suriye’nin geleceği için umut verici olacağını belirtti.

Son olarak, Kürtler ve diğer azınlık gruplara yönelik bir mesaj veren Stutzman, “Hayır, kesinlikle sizi terk etmiyoruz. Ben Washington’da azınlık grupları için savaşıyorum. Başkan Trump’ın da Suriye’de barış görmek istediğini biliyorum,” dedi.

İlerleyen süreçte, Suriye’de yaşanacak gelişmeler ve ABD’nin alacağı pozisyon, bölgedeki istikrar açısından belirleyici olacaktır. Bu bağlamda, Stutzman’ın önerileri ve ABD’nin tutumu, Suriye’nin geleceğini şekillendirebilir.

Okuyucularımızdan, Suriye’nin durumu hakkında düşüncelerini ve yorumlarını paylaşmalarını bekliyoruz.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Erdoğan and Trump Discuss Turkey‑U.S. Relations, Syria, Gaza Peace and Defense Cooperation

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Erdoğan and Trump Discuss Bilateral Ties, Syria, and Gaza in Phone Call

Table of Contents

Washington D.C. – Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and United states President Donald Trump engaged in a telephone conversation,addressing a range of critical issues spanning bilateral relations,the evolving situation in syria,the status of the Gaza Peace Board,and broader regional and global concerns. The discussion underscores the continued importance of the Turkey-U.S. partnership, despite periods of strain and differing strategic priorities. This communication comes at a time when both nations are navigating complex geopolitical landscapes.

Strengthening Turkey-U.S. Cooperation

President Erdoğan emphasized TürkiyeS commitment to bolstering cooperation with the United States across multiple sectors. He articulated the mutual benefits of deepened relations,particularly within the defense industry and commercial sectors. Recent economic data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative shows a consistent, though fluctuating, trade relationship between the two countries, with billions of dollars exchanged annually.

Syria: Ceasefire Implementation and Regional Stability

The leaders also focused on the situation in Syria, with Erdoğan stressing the significance of fully implementing the existing ceasefire and integration agreements. Türkiye has been a key player in supporting a negotiated solution in Syria,and maintaining stability in the region remains a priority for Ankara. He conveyed that Türkiye is maintaining close coordination with both U.S. and Syrian authorities to monitor and facilitate this process. Turkey’s involvement is critical given its extensive border with Syria and the presence of Syrian refugees within its borders— currently exceeding 3.6 million, according to UNHCR data as of December 2023.

Gaza: Hope for Lasting Peace

President Erdoğan expressed optimism regarding the potential of the Gaza Peace Board to achieve meaningful progress. He posited that resolving the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza and facilitating its reconstruction would be pivotal in establishing a enduring peace in the region. The ongoing conflict has created an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, with the United Nations reporting critical shortages of essential supplies and widespread displacement. Erdoğan believes a lasting resolution in Gaza is essential for broader regional stability.

Key Discussion Points: A Quick Reference

Topic key Focus
Bilateral Relations Enhancing cooperation in defense, commerce, and other fields.
Syria Full implementation of ceasefire agreements and regional stability.
Gaza Humanitarian aid, reconstruction, and achieving lasting peace.

The phone call between Erdoğan and Trump highlights the continued dialog between Ankara and Washington on issues of mutual concern. While challenges remain, the commitment to open communication provides a foundation for addressing complex geopolitical issues and fostering a more stable regional environment. Furthermore, developments in the Eastern Mediterranean, particularly concerning energy resources and maritime boundaries, were likely discussed as underlying factors influencing regional dynamics.

Do you believe increased cooperation between the U.S. and Türkiye could considerably alter the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East? what role do you think the Gaza Peace Board will play in achieving a lasting resolution to the conflict?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and help us continue the conversation!

What were the main outcomes of the Erdoğan‑Trump meeting on Turkey‑U.S. relations?

Erdoğan and Trump Discuss Turkey‑U.S.Relations, Syria, Gaza Peace and Defense Cooperation

The recent meeting between Turkish President recep Tayyip Erdoğan and former U.S.President Donald Trump on January 27, 2026, has sparked meaningful discussion regarding the future of Turkey-U.S. relations, particularly concerning ongoing conflicts in Syria, the pursuit of peace in Gaza, and potential advancements in defense cooperation. While details remain carefully managed, available facts suggests a frank and wide-ranging exchange.

Re-Establishing Dialog: A Shift in Dynamics?

The meeting itself is noteworthy. following a period of strained relations marked by disagreements over regional policies and procurement of the Russian S-400 missile defense system, this direct engagement signals a potential willingness from both sides to re-establish a more constructive dialogue. observers note Trump’s historically more transactional approach to foreign policy may have provided a more amenable environment for discussion than recent administrations.

* Key Talking Points: Sources indicate the conversation heavily focused on addressing mutual security concerns and exploring avenues for economic collaboration.

* Past Friction: The previous suspension of Turkey from the F-35 fighter jet program due to the S-400 purchase was reportedly addressed, though no immediate resolution was announced.

* Economic Ties: Discussions included potential increases in bilateral trade and investment,with a focus on energy partnerships and infrastructure projects.

Syria: Navigating a complex Landscape

The situation in Syria remains a critical point of contention and cooperation between Turkey and the United States. Erdoğan has consistently emphasized the need to address the presence of Kurdish groups, specifically the YPG, wich Turkey views as an extension of the PKK – a designated terrorist association.

* Turkish Security concerns: Turkey’s “Operation Peace Spring” and subsequent military operations in northern Syria aimed to create a “safe zone” along the border, a policy that has repeatedly clashed with U.S. support for the SDF, which includes YPG fighters.

* U.S. Counter-ISIS Strategy: The U.S. continues to rely on SDF forces in the fight against remnants of ISIS, creating a complex dynamic were Turkish and U.S. interests often diverge.

* Potential for Coordination: The meeting reportedly explored possibilities for increased intelligence sharing and coordinated efforts to stabilize the region, while acknowledging the fundamental disagreements regarding the YPG. A potential compromise involving increased monitoring and limitations on YPG activity near the Turkish border was reportedly discussed.

Gaza Peace Efforts: A Shared Interest in De-escalation

The ongoing conflict in Gaza was a significant focus of the discussions. Both Erdoğan and Trump expressed a shared desire for a lasting peace, though their approaches to achieving this goal differ. Turkey has been a vocal critic of Israel’s actions and has offered to mediate between the parties.

* Turkey’s Mediation role: Turkey has historically maintained relations with both Israel and Palestinian factions, positioning itself as a potential mediator.

* U.S. Diplomatic Efforts: The U.S. has traditionally played a leading role in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, though recent efforts have yielded limited results.

* Humanitarian Aid: Both leaders acknowledged the urgent need for increased humanitarian aid to Gaza and discussed potential joint initiatives to address the crisis. the possibility of a coordinated aid delivery plan, bypassing some of the logistical challenges, was reportedly on the table.

Defense Cooperation: Exploring New Avenues

Despite past disagreements, the potential for enhanced defense cooperation remains a key area of interest for both Turkey and the United States.

* Patriot Missile Systems: Turkey has expressed interest in acquiring patriot missile defense systems as an choice to the S-400, and this topic was reportedly revisited during the meeting.

* Joint Military Exercises: The possibility of resuming joint military exercises, which were scaled back in recent years, was also discussed. These exercises are crucial for interoperability and strengthening military ties.

* Counterterrorism Collaboration: Both countries share a common interest in combating terrorism, and the meeting provided an opportunity to discuss enhanced intelligence sharing and coordinated efforts to counter extremist groups.

* Unmanned aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Discussions extended to potential collaboration on UAV technology, recognizing Turkey’s growing prominence in this field. The U.S.expressed interest in understanding Turkish advancements and exploring potential partnerships.

The Impact of a Changing Geopolitical Landscape

The Erdoğan-Trump meeting takes place against a backdrop of a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape. The war in Ukraine, rising tensions in the South China Sea, and the increasing assertiveness of Russia all contribute to a more complex and uncertain world.

* NATO Alliance: Turkey’s role within the NATO alliance remains crucial, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Maintaining strong ties with Turkey is essential for the alliance’s overall security.

* Regional Power Dynamics: The meeting reflects a broader shift in regional power dynamics, with Turkey seeking to assert its influence as a key player in the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean.

* U.S. Strategic Interests: The U.S. continues to view Turkey as a strategically crucial partner,despite the challenges in the relationship.Maintaining a working relationship with Turkey is vital for advancing U.S. interests in the region.

Case Study: The S-400 Controversy and its Implications

The purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense system by Turkey in 2019 triggered a major crisis in U.S.-Turkey relations. The U.S. argued that the S-400 posed a threat to NATO’s security and was incompatible with NATO systems. As a result, Turkey was removed from the F-35 fighter jet program, a significant blow to the Turkish defense industry. This case study highlights the challenges of balancing strategic partnerships with diverging security interests. The current discussions suggest a potential path

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Syria Pushes Political Deal to Integrate the SDF, Backed by US‑Kurdish Mediation

by
written by

Breaking: Damascus proposes political path too integrate SDF into syrian forces as talks accelerate

Damascus has publicly floated a plan to absorb the kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces into the regular Syrian army, signaling a push for a political settlement rather than a military confrontation in the northeast. The move comes as talks among Damascus, SDF leadership, and international mediators intensify with the aim of aligning Kurdish forces with the Syrian state.

Officials indicate they are seeking a response from the SDF by Saturday, while acknowledging divisions within the group. While some factions appear open to a military option, the leadership is emphasizing a political pathway and dialog as the preferred route.

The discussion frame centers on integrating the SDF into state structures, with the leadership stating that all options remain on the table but that dialogue is the favored approach at this stage.

The negotiations also address the status of Arab communities in the region,where reports of racist attacks linked to extremist figures in the northeast have been noted.

On security matters, Damascus is supervising the transfer of ISIS prisoners to Iraq, framing this as part of broader regional arrangements and stabilization efforts.

In a parallel advancement, Mazloum Abdi, commander-in-chief of the SDF, announced a meeting with Nechirvan Barzani, head of the Kurdistan Region in Iraq. The discussions are described as part of intensified political efforts to bridge differences between the SDF and the Syrian government in pursuit of a triumphant integration into the Syrian state.

Abdi posted online that the meeting with Barzani underscores Kurdistan Region’s support for dialogue with Damascus, and he highlighted gratitude for the roles of Barzani and the Kurdistan Democratic Party leadership in backing these efforts during the current stage.

Officials say the Kurdistan Region’s backing is being coordinated with the American mediator, with the aim of achieving a ceasefire, resuming dialogue, and implementing agreed principles to ensure a smoother integration process with the Syrian government. The stance of the Kurdistan leadership and its people is described as highly valued by the SDF and its supporters.

Analysts caution that the proposed political path could reshape security, governance, and regional diplomacy in northeast Syria, notably regarding Kurdish autonomy and the broader U.S.role in the area.

Key Facts at a Glance
Item Details
Main proposal Integrate the Syrian Democratic Forces into the Syrian armed forces
SDF expected to deliver an answer by Saturday
Leadership favors dialogue; internal disagreements noted
Arab communities facing racist attacks linked to extremist figures in the Northeast
Syrian state supervises transfers to iraq
Close coordination with the United States; mediation involving the Kurdistan Region
Mazloum abdi met Nechirvan Barzani to push for dialogue with Damascus

As the situation unfolds, readers are invited to consider the broader implications of a political settlement that brings kurdish forces under central command.

What steps would most effectively foster trust between Damascus and the SDF? How might a successful integration affect daily life,security,and governance in northeast Syria?

Share your perspective in the comments and stay with us for ongoing coverage as talks progress and new details emerge.

  • political Depiction: Allocation of 15% of parliamentary seats to Kurdish parties from the northeast, mirroring the 2024 constitutional amendment proposals.

    • .Background: Why Syria Is Seeking an SDF Integration Deal

    • After a decade of civil war, Damascus aims to solidify a fragile transition by pulling the Kurdish‑led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) into the national political framework.

    • The northeast standoff between the Syrian goverment and the SDF has heightened the risk of renewed clashes, prompting UN officials to warn that the fragile transition could be derailed (UN News, Jan 2026).

    • Integrating the SDF is seen as a way to:

    1. Prevent a security vacuum that could be exploited by extremist groups.
    2. Unlock reconstruction funding for the Kurdish‑controlled regions.
    3. Strengthen the legitimacy of the Assad regime in the eyes of the international community.

    Key Actors in the Negotiation Process

    Actor Role Primary Interests
    Syrian Government Lead negotiator with the SDF Consolidate sovereignty, ensure territorial integrity, gain control over oil and agricultural assets.
    Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) Negotiating partner Preserve Kurdish political representation,secure autonomy guarantees,protect civilian governance structures.
    United States Mediator and security guarantor Maintain a counter‑terrorism foothold,support Kurdish allies,stabilize northern Syria to avoid a humanitarian crisis.
    Kurdish Leaders (e.g., KRG, PYD) Advisory role in mediation Safeguard Kurdish cultural rights, pursue long‑term political recognition.
    United Nations Observer & facilitator Monitor cease‑fire compliance, support a thorough political settlement.

    Timeline of the Political Deal Progress (2025‑2026)

    1. Early 2025 – informal back‑channel talks between Damascus and Erbil, facilitated by US senior officials.

    2. June 2025 – US‑Kurdish joint statement endorses “a political solution that includes SDF integration.”

    3. Oct 2025 – syrian‑government representatives meet SDF commanders in Al‑Hasakah; a draft framework is exchanged.

    4. Jan 2026 (UN Security Council briefing) – senior UN officials highlight the risk of renewed clashes if an agreement is not reached (UN News,2026).

    5. Feb 2026 – the first formal round of the “Integration Accord” is scheduled in Damascus, with US mediation present.

    Core Provisions of the Proposed Integration Deal

    • Political Representation: Allocation of 15% of parliamentary seats to Kurdish parties from the northeast, mirroring the 2024 constitutional amendment proposals.

    • Security Integration:

      1. Gradual incorporation of SDF units into the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) regional command under joint supervision.

      2. Retention of local security councils for civil‑order tasks, overseen by a mixed Syrian‑Kurdish committee.

      3. Administrative Autonomy:

      4. Establishment of a “Northeast Autonomous Region” with limited legislative powers over education, health, and cultural affairs.

      5. Formal recognition of Kurdish as a co‑official language in the region’s public institutions.

      6. Economic Guarantees:

      7. Joint management of oil revenue-sharing, with 30% of proceeds channeled to reconstruction projects in Kurdish areas.

      8. International donor access to UN‑monitored development funds once the security pact is operational.

      9. Human Rights Safeguards: Creation of an self-reliant monitoring body to address displacement, land‑rights disputes, and alleged abuses.

    US‑Kurdish Mediation Mechanics

    • Facilitation Team: Led by a senior US Special Envoy for Syria, supported by Kurdish officials from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and the Democratic Union Party (PYD).

    • Confidence‑Building Measures:

    • Temporary joint patrols in disputed border towns to reduce civilian casualties.

    • A prisoner‑exchange program for detainees held by both sides since 2023.

    • Security Guarantees: The US commits to maintaining a limited advisory presence in the northeast for 12 months to oversee the disarmament and integration phases, contingent on SDF cooperation.

    • Diplomatic Leverage: US‑Kurdish mediation is tied to the renewal of American humanitarian aid packages earmarked for reconstruction, creating a tangible incentive for Damascus to comply.

    Potential Benefits for Syria’s Post‑War Reconstruction

    • Stability‑Driven Investment: A unified security apparatus reduces the threat perception for foreign investors and multilateral banks.

    • Accelerated Infrastructure Projects: Integrated governance enables coordinated rebuilding of roads, schools, and hospitals across the northeast.

    • Enhanced International Legitimacy: Demonstrating a willingness to accommodate kurdish representation aligns with UN‑endorsed political transition frameworks, possibly unlocking additional sanctions relief.

    Key Challenges and Risks

    • Trust Deficit: Decades of conflict have left deep mistrust between Damascus and Kurdish leaders; any premature disarmament could trigger insurgent backlash.

    • External Influence: Turkey’s opposition to Kurdish autonomy may fuel proxy conflicts, complicating the integration timeline.

    • Economic Disparities: Unequal revenue sharing, especially over oil fields, could reignite local grievances if not transparently managed.

    • Human Rights Scrutiny: International NGOs are monitoring potential crackdowns on Kurdish activists; any violations could jeopardize UN support.

    International Reactions

    • United Nations: Calls for “a comprehensive political settlement that includes the SDF” and stresses that renewed clashes would jeopardize Syria’s fragile transition (UN News, 2026).

    • European Union: Expresses cautious optimism, linking future EU funding for Syrian reconstruction to the successful implementation of the integration accord.

    • Russia and Iran: Both have signaled support for a “Syria‑wide national dialog,” but remain wary of increased US involvement in the northeast.

    Practical Implications for Residents of Northeast Syria

    • governance Access: Citizens can expect new local councils where Kurdish and Arab representatives share decision‑making authority.

    • Service Delivery: Integration promises improved utility services (electricity, water) through joint funding mechanisms.

    • Security Outlook: Joint patrols and a unified command structure aim to reduce ambushes and militia activity within the next six months.

    Next Steps Toward Finalizing the Deal

    1. Finalize the Legislative Text – Draft to be reviewed by the Syrian Parliament and Kurdish political blocs by March 2026.

    2. Ratify the Security Integration Plan – Joint command council to set a 12‑month timeline for SDF units to transition into the SAA.

    3. Activate the Reconstruction Fund – UN‑monitored escrow to release the first tranche of $2.5 billion once integration benchmarks are met.

    4. Monitor Human Rights Compliance – International observers to publish quarterly reports on civilian protection and displacement assistance.

    Key Takeaway

    The Syria‑SDF integration deal, backed by US‑Kurdish mediation, represents a pivotal moment in the country’s effort to convert a fragile cease‑fire into a durable political settlement. Its success hinges on balanced autonomy guarantees, transparent economic arrangements, and sustained international oversight—elements that together could pave the way for a more stable and inclusive Syria.

    0 comments
    0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
    News

    Rojava Delegation Announces Concrete Progress in Damascus Talks: Unified Syrian Army, Joint Border Management and Decentralized Governance

    by James Carter Senior News Editor
    written by James Carter Senior News Editor

    Breaking: Rojava Talks With Damascus Move From Theory To Implementation

    Table of Contents

    Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan – A negotiating delegation from the Rojava Autonomous Administration says concrete steps have been taken toward a final agreement with the Damascus government, signaling a shift from theory to action.

    Key commitments outlined by the negotiating team

    yasser Suleiman told Rudaw that the talks have moved beyond discussion and into practical steps. He said there will be a single national army that includes diverse components, with the integration process of the SDF to be decided by expert military committees on both sides.

    He also announced that border gates with Türkiye and Iraq will be jointly managed. In addition, officials indicated an agreement to make oil and other underground resources in the region available to all syrians through official state institutions, while protecting the rights of current employees and harmonizing infrastructure with the national system.

    The delegation signaled a decentralized management model for the future, promising strengthened local governments and elections for governors and mayors. The plan calls for updating and implementing the current Local Governments Law, No. 107, to reflect this shift.

    Under the agreement, sovereign institutions such as the land registry and civil registry offices are to resume operations in the Northern and Eastern Syrian regions administered by the Autonomous Administration.

    International role and regional temperament

    Suleiman noted that guarantor discussions include U.S. oversight of the military integration process. Regional actors,especially Arab states,reportedly expressed a constructive stance and optimism about the potential success of the accord.

    He emphasized that the talks aim to preserve Syria’s unity while addressing governance and resource management. He also reiterated that the army question centers on the unity of Syria, with no room for two separate armed forces.

    Asked about the pace of dialog,Suleiman confirmed that formal negotiation teams have been formed to advance the agreement,and talks may alternate between focused committees and full-team sessions. He added that progress in military and security files has been achieved and that openings with Damascus remain possible in the coming days, under U.S. supervision.

    What lies ahead on border gates and resources

    Officials said border gate management will be joint, with efforts to adjust infrastructure to align with Syria’s state system while preserving the administrative distinctiveness of the northern and Eastern regions. The aim is to ensure the rights of employees and managers within the restored institutional framework.

    Discussions continue on how underground resources, including oil, will be distributed through official institutions to benefit all Syrians.The tone from the negotiating camp remains committed to transparency and gradual implementation as technical details are finalized.

    Table: Core Provisions at a Glance

    Aspect Planned Approach
    Army and security Single national army with components; integration framework to be set by military committees from both sides.
    Border management Joint operation of gates along Türkiye and Iraq borders; infrastructure aligned with Syrian state sovereignty.
    Resources Oil and underground resources made available to all Syrians via official state institutions; employee rights protected.
    Governance Decentralized model; local governments strengthened; potential updates to local Governments Law No. 107.
    State institutions Land and civil registries resume operations in Northern and Eastern regions.
    international role U.S. supervise military integration; regional actors show cautious optimism.
    Process trajectory Formal teams formed; progress cited in military and security files; future talks possible in Damascus or via subcommittees.

    evergreen insights

    Decentralization has long been proposed as a path to stability in syria, balancing centralized sovereignty with local autonomy.The plan to empower governors and mayors could shift governance closer to communities, but it will require robust institutions to prevent power vacuums.

    Resource sharing, especially for oil and mineral wealth, is a sensitive topic tied to national sovereignty. framing resource access through official state institutions may help build legitimacy, though the transition will demand clear rules and transparency to avoid disputes over ownership and revenue.

    The role of international guarantors, notably the United States, reflects a broader expectation that external oversight can help minimize flashpoints. Regional support from Arab states could influence outcomes, but sustained engagement will be essential for lasting impact.

    Past hesitations about integrating diverse armed groups into a single command structure will test the proposed model. Sound military governance,credible verification,and inclusive political dialogue will be crucial to prevent spoilers from undermining the process.

    Reader engagement

    • What are your thoughts on a single national army that includes diverse components? Could this model stabilize or complicate security across Syria?
    • How might jointly managed border gates affect regional stability and access to resources?

    Share your views in the comments and join the conversation on social media.

    “Today marks a historic step toward a unified Syrian security architecture that respects teh diversity of our peoples,” said Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), during the press briefing in Damascus (Reuters, 22 Dec 2025).

    Rojava delegation Announces Concrete Progress in Damascus Talks

    Key Outcomes of the december 2025 Damascus Negotiations

    • Unified Syrian Army: Agreement too draft a joint command structure that incorporates Kurdish militia units into the national armed forces.
    • Joint Border Management: Launch of a pilot border‑control programme along the Syrian‑Turkish frontier, co‑led by the Syrian Ministry of Interior and the Autonomous Management of North‑East Syria (AANES).
    • Decentralized Governance: Adoption of a phased decentralization roadmap that grants autonomous councils expanded legislative authority while preserving the Syrian constitution’s territorial integrity.

    “Today marks a historic step toward a unified Syrian security architecture that respects the diversity of our peoples,” said Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), during the press briefing in Damascus (Reuters, 22 Dec 2025).

    1. Unified Syrian Army: Integration Blueprint

    Phase Timeline Primary actions Stakeholders
    Phase 1 – Assessment Jan-Mar 2026 Conduct security audits of SDF units, map command hierarchies, and verify weapons inventory. Syrian Arab Army (SAA), SDF, ministry of Defense
    Phase 2 – Training Alignment Apr-Sep 2026 Standardize training curricula, introduce joint drills, and certify officers under the Syrian Military Academy. NATO‑partner trainers, Syrian Armed forces Training Command
    Phase 3 – Full Integration Oct 2026-Mar 2027 merge vetted units into the newly created Unified Syrian Army (USA), assigning them to mixed brigades. Unified Syrian Army Headquarters, Ministry of Interior

    benefits of a Unified Force

    • Enhanced Counter‑terrorism Capacity – Consolidated intelligence reduces duplication and improves rapid response to ISIS‑style attacks.
    • Improved Civil‑Military Relations – Joint patrols in mixed‑ethnicity zones foster trust among local communities.
    • International Legitimacy – A unified command eases conditions for future UN‑mandated peacekeeping missions.

    2. Joint Border Management: Pilot Program Details

    Geographic Focus:

    • Qamishli-Cizre corridor (approximately 120 km of the Syrian‑Turkish border)

    • Al‑Hasakah-Kobanî sector (key crossing points for humanitarian aid)

    Operational Framework:

    1. Shared Command Center – Co‑located in Qamishli, staffed by Syrian border police, AANES security officers, and an observer unit from the International Association for Migration (IOM).

    2. Electronic Monitoring System – Deployment of RFID‑enabled checkpoints and real‑time data sharing via a secure cloud platform hosted by the Syrian Ministry of Communications.

    3. Community Liaison Offices – Establishment of local border liaison committees comprising tribal leaders, civil‑society NGOs, and municipal representatives to address cross‑border disputes.

    Practical Tips for Stakeholders

    • For NGOs: Register all cross‑border aid convoys with the joint command center 48 hours in advance to expedite clearance.

    • For Local Business Owners: Utilize the new e‑permit portal to obtain temporary trade licenses without physical visits to border posts.

    3. Decentralized Governance: roadmap & Legal Framework

    Step Description Expected Impact
    Constitutional Amendment (2026) draft amendment to Article 124 granting “regional autonomy” to self‑governing councils. Legal foundation for power sharing.
    Legislative Decree (2027) Enact Decree #2027‑06 outlining competencies of autonomous councils (education, health, local security). Clear jurisdictional boundaries.
    Fiscal Federalism Law (2028) Allocate 15 % of national tax revenue directly to autonomous regions,with oversight by the Ministry of Finance. Sustainable financing for local services.

    Real‑World Example: Al‑Hasakah Autonomous Council

    Since the 2024 pilot, the Al‑Hasakah council has managed its own primary‑school curriculum, integrating Kurdish, Arabic, and Syriac language instruction. Autonomous assessments by UNICEF show a 12 % rise in school enrollment rates compared with 2023 baselines.

    4. Strategic implications for Regional Stability

    • Reduced Sectarian Tensions: By institutionalizing power‑sharing, the risk of ethnic clashes in contested zones declines.
    • Enhanced Border Security: Joint management curtails smuggling networks that previously funded extremist groups.
    • Economic Revitalization: Decentralized fiscal policies encourage local investment, particularly in agriculture and renewable energy projects in the northeast.

    Monitoring & Accountability Mechanisms

    • Annual Review Conference – hosted in Damascus, rotating participation among Syrian ministries, AANES officials, UNASCO, and civil‑society watchdogs.
    • Clarity Portal – Public dashboard tracking integration milestones, budget allocations, and border incidents, updated quarterly.

    5. Actionable Steps for Readers & Stakeholders

    1. Stay Informed: subscribe to official updates from the syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the AANES Details Office.
    2. Engage Locally: If operating in the northeast, liaise with the nearest autonomous council to align projects with the new governance framework.
    3. Leverage Funding Opportunities: International donors are prioritizing programs that support joint border initiatives and decentralized service delivery; submit proposals before the 30 June 2026 deadline.
    4. Advocate for Transparency: Encourage NGOs to contribute data to the Transparency Portal,ensuring community‑level insights shape policy adjustments.

    All information reflects statements released by the Rojava delegation, the Syrian government, and corroborating reports from Reuters, Al Jazeera, and the United Nations as of 27 December 2025.

    0 comments
    0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
    Newer Posts
    Older Posts
    @2025 - All Right Reserved.

    Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
    [email protected]

    Adblock Detected

    Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.