Home » Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva » Page 2

Brazil‘s President Lula Criticizes US Visa Revocations for Palestinian Officials at UN

New york, NY – Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has publicly reprimanded the United States for revoking the visas of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and other delegates prior to the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York. the President voiced his disapproval during his address to the 80th session of the UN General assembly on Wednesday, September 24th, 2025, sparking international discussion.

Lula’s Condemnation of US Action

President Lula described the visa revocations as regrettable and suggested they where an attempt to exert undue influence on the proceedings. He stated the action effectively prevented Palestine from fully participating in a critical international forum. “It was regrettable that President Mahmoud Abbas was prevented by the host contry by ‘occupying’ (colonizing) the Palestinian bench at this historical moment,” he articulated during his speech.

The United States cited concerns that the Palestinian officials’ presence would jeopardize peace prospects as justification for the decision. According to reports from Reuters and Al Arabiya on august 30th, the administration of former President Donald Trump initiated the visa revocations, impacting approximately 80 Palestinian representatives.

Addressing the conflict in Gaza

Beyond the visa dispute, President Lula addressed the dire situation in Gaza, asserting that the ongoing violence constitutes a genocide. While acknowledging that the attacks launched by Hamas were unjustified, he emphasized the disproportionate and unlawful nature of the Israeli response. He specifically highlighted the immense civilian casualties, stating, “There, under tons of ruins, buried tens of thousands of women and innocent children.”

Hunger as a Weapon of War

Lula further accused parties involved in the conflict of weaponizing hunger and forced displacement within Gaza. He appealed for an immediate cessation of hostilities and urged international intervention to alleviate the humanitarian crisis.

UN Response and Continued dialog

Despite the visa issues, the United Nations General Assembly allowed President Abbas to deliver a prerecorded statement to the assembly. This accommodation enabled Palestine to convey its message, albeit through a modified format.The UN’s decision underscores the importance of Palestinian portrayal in global discussions.

Did You Know? The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) estimates that over 2.3 million palestinians are in need of humanitarian assistance in Gaza as of September 2025.

Issue US Position Brazil’s Position
Visa Revocations To safeguard peace prospects. An unacceptable interference in UN proceedings.
Gaza conflict Supports Israel’s right to defend itself. Condemns disproportionate response and characterizes it as genocide.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about international affairs by consulting multiple news sources and verifying details before sharing.

The broader Context of US-Palestine Relations

the recent actions reflect a long-standing complex and often strained relationship between the United states and Palestine. The US has historically been a strong ally of israel, providing significant military and economic aid. This close relationship has often led to criticism from Palestinian authorities and their supporters, who accuse the US of bias. The Trump administration took several steps that further alienated Palestinians, including recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and cutting aid to UNRWA. Current US policy remains largely supportive of Israel, although there have been calls for increased humanitarian assistance to Gaza.

Frequently Asked Questions about the UN and Palestine


What are your thoughts on the international response to the Gaza conflict? Do you think the US visa policy is a constructive step toward peace, or a hindrance?

Share your opinions in the comments below!

how might Lula’s criticisms of Israel impact Brazil’s economic relationship with the U.S.?

Brazilian president Discusses Middle East at UN Session: Advocacy for palestinian Rights highlights Diplomatic Tensions with U.S.

Lula’s UNGA Address: A Bold stance on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva delivered a meaningful address to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on September 23, 2025, focusing heavily on the escalating crisis in the Middle East. His remarks, especially his strong advocacy for Palestinian rights, have ignited diplomatic friction with the United States, a key strategic partner for Brazil. The speech underscored Brazil’s commitment to a two-state solution and criticized what Lula termed as “collective punishment” of the Palestinian people. This assertive foreign policy position marks a departure from previous administrations and signals a more self-reliant role for Brazil on the global stage.

Key Points from President Lula’s Speech

Lula’s address didn’t shy away from direct criticism of the current situation. Several core arguments were presented:

* Condemnation of Hamas Attacks: While unequivocally condemning the October 7th, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, Lula stressed the need to contextualize the violence within decades of Israeli occupation and the ongoing blockade of Gaza.

* Criticism of Israeli Response: The President voiced strong concerns over the scale of the Israeli military response in Gaza, labeling it disproportionate and resulting in unacceptable civilian casualties. He specifically used the phrase “collective punishment,” drawing parallels to past atrocities.

* Advocacy for Palestinian Statehood: Lula reiterated Brazil’s long-standing support for the creation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian state, based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. He urged the international community to recognize Palestine as a full member of the United Nations.

* Call for Ceasefire: A central demand of the speech was an immediate ceasefire in Gaza to allow for humanitarian aid to reach the affected population and to facilitate negotiations towards a lasting peace.

* Emphasis on International Law: Lula repeatedly emphasized the importance of upholding international law and human rights in the context of the conflict, accusing both sides of violations.

U.S. response and diplomatic Fallout

The U.S. State Department swiftly responded to Lula’s remarks, expressing “disappointment” and calling his comments “inflammatory and unproductive.” A spokesperson stated that the U.S.views Israel as a key ally and supports its right to defend itself. This strong rebuke highlights the growing divergence in perspectives between Washington and Brasília regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The diplomatic tensions are further complex by Brazil’s historical ties with both Israel and Arab nations. Brazil maintains economic and political relationships with countries across the middle East,making a balanced approach challenging.

* Historical Context: Brazil has traditionally maintained a neutral stance in the middle East, seeking to foster dialogue and mediate conflicts. Though, Lula’s current position represents a more explicit alignment with Palestinian concerns.

* Economic Implications: Potential repercussions for Brazil include strained trade relations with the U.S. and possible pressure on investment flows. However, Brazil also stands to strengthen its relationships with Arab countries, possibly opening new economic opportunities.

* BRICS alignment: This stance aligns Brazil with other BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) who often share a critical view of Western foreign policy in the Middle East.

Brazil’s Foreign Policy Shift: A Reflection of Domestic Politics?

Some analysts suggest that lula’s assertive stance on the Middle East is partly driven by domestic political considerations. His base of support, particularly within the Workers’ Party (PT), traditionally holds strong pro-Palestinian views.

Moreover, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, as noted in recent scholarship, includes provisions designed to prevent undue military influence in government. This historical context may embolden civilian leadership to pursue a more independent foreign policy, free from the constraints of past military regimes. https://brainly.com/question/9698155

Regional Reactions and International Implications

Beyond the U.S., Lula’s speech has elicited varied reactions from other nations:

* Arab League: The Arab League welcomed Lula’s remarks, praising his courage in speaking out for Palestinian rights.

* European Union: The EU response has been more muted, with some member states expressing concern over the escalating tensions but also acknowledging the need for a political solution.

* United Nations: UN Secretary-General António Guterres has repeatedly called for a ceasefire in Gaza and welcomed any efforts to de-escalate the conflict, but stopped short of directly endorsing Lula’s specific criticisms.

* Global South: Many nations in the Global South view Lula’s speech as a powerful expression of solidarity with the Palestinian people and a challenge to Western dominance in international affairs.

The Future of Brazil-U.S. Relations and Middle East Diplomacy

The diplomatic fallout from Lula’s UNGA address raises questions about the future of Brazil-U.S. relations.While both countries share important economic and strategic interests, the diverging views on the Middle East could create friction in other areas of cooperation.

The situation also underscores the complexities of Middle East diplomacy. A lasting peace will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including a willingness to address the root causes of the conflict and to prioritize the needs of the Palestinian people. Brazil’s role,

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Bolsonaro Sentence: A Harbinger of Democratic Backsliding or a Bulwark Against It?

The conviction of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years and three months in jail for undermining the democratic order isn’t just a national legal event; it’s a potential inflection point for global democracy. While coups and attempts to subvert elections are, sadly, not new, the brazenness of Bolsonaro’s actions – and the speed with which the Brazilian Supreme Court responded – raises a critical question: are we entering an era where democratic institutions are increasingly vulnerable to internal threats, and what can be done to fortify them?

The Anatomy of a Conspiracy

The Brazilian Supreme Court found Bolsonaro guilty of crimes including attempted abolition of the Democratic State of Law, coup d’etat, and criminal organization. The charges stem from a concerted effort to discredit the electoral system and, ultimately, prevent the peaceful transfer of power to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva after the 2022 election. This wasn’t a spontaneous outburst; the court determined the conspiracy began in June 2021, well before the election, with a deliberate campaign to sow doubt about the integrity of Brazil’s voting process.

This campaign evolved from rhetoric to action. Following Lula’s victory, protests erupted, and camps of Bolsonaro supporters demanded the military intervene. The culmination of this unrest was the January 8th, 2023 assault on Brazil’s presidential palace, parliament, and Supreme Court – a chilling echo of the January 6th insurrection in the United States. The prosecution successfully argued that this attack was the direct result of Bolsonaro’s orchestrated efforts to delegitimize the election and incite his base.

The Role of Disinformation and Polarization

A key element of the conspiracy, and a worrying trend globally, was the weaponization of disinformation. Bolsonaro and his allies relentlessly attacked the credibility of Brazil’s electoral system, spreading false claims of fraud and manipulating public opinion. This created a climate of distrust and polarization, making it easier to mobilize supporters and justify extreme actions. According to a report by the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, coordinated disinformation campaigns on social media played a significant role in amplifying these false narratives.

Bolsonaro’s case highlights the dangerous intersection of political polarization, disinformation, and the erosion of trust in democratic institutions. It’s a pattern we’ve seen repeated in various forms across the world, from the United States to Myanmar.

Global Implications: A Rising Tide of Democratic Erosion?

The Bolsonaro case isn’t isolated. Across Latin America, and increasingly in established democracies, we’re witnessing a rise in populist leaders who challenge democratic norms and institutions. This trend is fueled by a complex mix of factors, including economic inequality, social grievances, and the spread of misinformation. The conviction of Bolsonaro, while a victory for Brazilian democracy, doesn’t necessarily signal a reversal of this trend.

In fact, it could potentially *accelerate* certain aspects of it. Bolsonaro’s supporters view the conviction as a politically motivated attack, further solidifying their distrust in the system. This could lead to increased radicalization and a greater willingness to engage in extra-institutional forms of political action. The risk is that this creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, where attempts to defend democracy are perceived as attacks on freedom, further fueling polarization and instability.

Fortifying Democracy in the Age of Disinformation

So, what can be done to counter this rising tide of democratic erosion? The Bolsonaro case offers several key lessons.

Strengthening Electoral Integrity

Protecting the integrity of elections is paramount. This requires not only robust voting systems but also effective measures to combat disinformation and foreign interference. Brazil’s experience underscores the importance of independent electoral commissions, transparent vote counting processes, and media literacy initiatives to help citizens discern fact from fiction.

Holding Leaders Accountable

The swiftness of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s response sends a powerful message: those who attempt to subvert democracy will be held accountable. This is crucial for deterring future attacks on democratic institutions. However, accountability must be applied fairly and consistently, avoiding the perception of political bias.

Investing in Civic Education

A well-informed and engaged citizenry is the best defense against democratic backsliding. Investing in civic education programs that teach critical thinking skills, media literacy, and the importance of democratic values is essential. This includes promoting constructive dialogue and fostering a shared understanding of the principles that underpin a healthy democracy.

The Role of Tech Companies

Social media platforms and tech companies have a critical role to play in combating disinformation and protecting democratic processes. They need to invest in content moderation, fact-checking initiatives, and algorithms that prioritize accurate information. However, this must be done in a way that respects freedom of speech and avoids censorship.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Democratic Resilience

The Bolsonaro conviction is a significant moment, but it’s just one battle in a larger war for the future of democracy. The challenges are immense, but not insurmountable. By strengthening electoral integrity, holding leaders accountable, investing in civic education, and addressing the spread of disinformation, we can build more resilient democracies that are better equipped to withstand internal and external threats. The alternative – a world where democratic norms are routinely violated and the rule of law is undermined – is a future we must actively strive to avoid.

What steps do you think are most crucial for safeguarding democracy in the face of rising polarization and disinformation? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What are the potential consequences of Bolsonaro’s conviction?

A: Beyond the immediate legal ramifications, the conviction could disqualify Bolsonaro from running for office in the future. It also sets a precedent for holding leaders accountable for attempts to undermine democratic institutions.

Q: How does the Bolsonaro case compare to the January 6th insurrection in the United States?

A: Both events involved attempts to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power and were fueled by disinformation and political polarization. However, the Bolsonaro case involved a more explicit conspiracy to overthrow the government.

Q: What role did social media play in the events leading up to the Bolsonaro conviction?

A: Social media platforms were used to spread disinformation, incite violence, and coordinate protests against the election results. This highlights the need for greater regulation and content moderation on these platforms.

Q: Is Brazil’s democracy now secure?

A: While the conviction is a positive step, Brazil’s democracy remains fragile. The country continues to grapple with deep political divisions and economic challenges. Continued vigilance and reform are essential.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail


Bolsonaro’s Fate Linked to <a href="https://www.archyde.com/us-sanctions-cut-30-of-huaweis-revenue-in-2021/" title="US sanctions cut 30% of Huawei's revenue in 2021">Trump</a> as <a href="https://www.archyde.com/last-goalkeeper-to-score-in-the-classic-alianza-u-was-signed-in-the-argentine-super-league/" title="Last goalkeeper to score in the classic Alianza-'U 'was signed in the Argentine Super League">Brazil</a> Confronts Political Reckoning

Brasília – The political trajectories of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and ex-U.S. President Donald Trump remain strikingly connected as Bolsonaro awaits a critical verdict that could reshape Brazilian democracy. The case highlights a global pattern of populist leaders facing accountability, and the potent influence of religious ideologies in modern politics.

A History of Alliance and controversy

Over the years, the Bolsonaro family and the Trumps have fostered a close relationship, marked by multiple meetings. A notable incident during Trump’s frist term saw Bolsonaro host a large delegation at Mar-a-Lago, where nearly two dozen attendees contracted Covid-19. Bolsonaro himself later contracted the virus upon returning to Brazil,experiencing a unique quarantine punctuated by an encounter with local wildlife.

Echoes of Authoritarianism

Even out of office, parallels persist. As trump continues to promote increasingly militarized policies within the United States, Bolsonaro frequently expresses nostalgia for the military dictatorship that governed Brazil from 1964 to 1985. Despite the regime’s documented human rights abuses – including the deaths of hundreds and the torture of tens of thousands – Bolsonaro, a former military officer, has controversially stated that the only failing of the dictatorship was its insufficient brutality.

the Rise of Pentecostalism and Political Influence

bolsonaro’s support base shares similarities with Trump’s, notably strong backing from evangelical Christians. While Bolsonaro’s personal religious practice appears sporadic, his alignment with the growing Pentecostal movement in Brazil – now encompassing over thirty percent of the population, up from thirteen percent a decade ago – has proven politically advantageous. This trend is explored in the newly released documentary “Apocalypse in the Tropics” by filmmaker Petra Costa, who previously directed the acclaimed “The Edge of democracy.”

Silas Malafaia: The Spiritual Kingmaker

Costa’s film delves into the relationship between Bolsonaro and Silas Malafaia, a sixty-six-year-old pastor widely considered Bolsonaro’s spiritual advisor. The documentary reveals a strategic alliance where spiritual influence is interwoven with populist politics. Malafaia has repeatedly denounced “cultural Marxism” and “political correctness,” advocating for the removal of Lula‘s Workers’ Party from power. Bolsonaro, on the campaign trail, promised widespread gun ownership and the denial of land rights to Indigenous populations, a violation of Brazil’s constitutional obligations.

A Controversial Speech and Whispered Counsel

Critics suggest Costa overstates Malafaia’s influence; however, she points to a 2021 speech by Bolsonaro in which he defied rulings by Justice de Moraes, declaring his pursuit of power would end in “victory, prison, or death.” Costa observed Malafaia whispering along during the address,leading her to speculate he may have authored the fiery rhetoric.

Investigation and International Connections

Recently, Malafaia came under investigation after messages on Bolsonaro’s phone revealed he was advising the former President on his legal defense. These messages included a suggestion that Bolsonaro solicit talking points from Trump to counter criticism of his government. Bolsonaro acknowledged the request but cited hiccups as a distraction.

Defiance in the Face of Scrutiny

Following the release of these messages, Malafaia defended his actions on social media, drawing parallels to Billy Graham’s counsel to American Presidents and Martin Luther King Jr.’s fight against racism. He framed criticism of his involvement as an attack on faith itself.

A Pivotal Moment for Brazil

As the Supreme Court prepares to deliver its verdict in Bolsonaro’s case, the outcome remains uncertain. Costa believes a conviction would represent a watershed moment for Brazil, marking the first time a leader has been held accountable for attempting a coup. She notes a reversal of roles between the US and Brazil, with Brazil potentially leading the way in resisting a wave of new fascism while the US struggles with its own challenges to democratic norms.

leader Country Key Political Alignment Current Status
Jair Bolsonaro Brazil Far-Right, Nationalist Facing legal proceedings
Donald Trump United States Populist, Conservative Actively campaigning
Silas Malafaia Brazil Evangelical Pastor, political Influencer Under investigation

The Global Rise of Populism and Religious Influence

The events unfolding in Brazil reflect a broader global trend of populist movements leveraging religious fervor for political gain.This phenomenon is seen in various nations around the world, including the United States, India, and Poland. Researchers at the Pew Research Center have documented the increasing alignment between religious belief and political ideology, especially among evangelical christians.

Did You Know? Brazil has the largest Catholic population in the world,but the number of Protestants,particularly Pentecostals,is growing rapidly.

Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of military dictatorships in Latin America is crucial to interpreting the current political landscape.

Frequently asked Questions

  • What is the significance of Bolsonaro’s trial? This trial represents a potential turning point for Brazil, as it could be the first time a leader is held accountable for attempting to undermine the democratic process.
  • Who is Silas Malafaia and what role has he played? Malafaia is a prominent pastor who served as a key spiritual advisor to Bolsonaro,helping to mobilize religious support and shape political messaging.
  • How does the situation in Brazil relate to events in the United States? The intertwined fates of Bolsonaro and Trump highlight a global trend of populist leaders facing accountability, and the influence of religious ideologies.
  • What are the potential consequences if Bolsonaro is convicted? A conviction could lead to imprisonment for Bolsonaro and potentially destabilize the political landscape, with the risk of unrest from his supporters.
  • What is the role of Pentecostalism in Brazilian politics? Pentecostalism is a rapidly growing religious movement in Brazil that has become a significant political force, often aligning with conservative candidates like Bolsonaro.
  • Is the influence of religious leaders in politics a new phenomenon? While religious leaders have always played a role in politics, their influence has been growing in recent years, particularly in countries with rising religious populations.
  • What are the long-term implications of this case for Brazilian democracy? The outcome of Bolsonaro’s trial will either reinforce the rule of law and democratic institutions or potentially embolden anti-democratic forces.

What do you believe will be the long-term consequences of Bolsonaro’s case for Brazil’s political landscape? How will the role of religion in politics continue to evolve in Brazil and beyond?

Share your thoughts in the comments below.



What are the potential consequences of the Supreme Federal Court’s rulings on Lula’s convictions for Brazil’s democratic institutions?

brazil Awaits Judgment on Lula and Its Democratic Future: The Outcomes of ex-President Lula’s Trial Hold Notable Implications for Chico Mendes’ Legacy and Brazil’s Political Landscape

The Shifting Sands of Brazilian Politics: A Recent History

Brazil stands at a critical juncture. The political climate, still reverberating from the contested 2022 elections and the subsequent challenges to democratic norms, hinges on the ongoing legal battles surrounding Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, often referred to simply as Lula. As of September 10, 2025, the nation anticipates further rulings that will profoundly shape its future. Recent reports,like those from tagesschau.de,indicate a slow but discernible move towards a power transition,even after initial resistance from former President Bolsonaro. This transition, though, remains fragile and deeply intertwined with Brazil’s historical struggles for social justice and environmental protection. Understanding this context is crucial when considering the implications for figures like Chico Mendes and the Amazon rainforest.

Lula’s Legal Battles and Their Impact on Democratic Institutions

Lula’s journey through the Brazilian legal system has been tumultuous. Accusations of corruption, initially leading to imprisonment, were later overturned due to procedural errors, raising serious questions about the impartiality of the judiciary and the politicization of the legal process.

Operation Lava Jato: The sprawling “lava Jato” (Car Wash) investigation, while uncovering significant corruption, became a focal point of controversy regarding its methods and potential overreach.

Supreme Federal Court Rulings: Key decisions by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) have been pivotal, particularly those invalidating convictions based on flawed investigations.

Political Polarization: These legal battles have exacerbated existing political polarization, fueling distrust in institutions and creating a climate of uncertainty.

The outcomes of these trials aren’t simply about Lula’s personal fate; they represent a test of Brazil’s democratic institutions and the rule of law.A perceived lack of fairness or clarity could further erode public trust and embolden anti-democratic forces.This is particularly relevant given the recent challenges to the election results and the slow acceptance of defeat by Bolsonaro’s camp.The stability of Brazilian democracy, and its ability to address pressing issues like inequality and environmental degradation, depends on a robust and impartial legal system.

Chico Mendes’ Legacy: Environmentalism and Social Justice Under Threat?

the legacy of Chico Mendes, the renowned rubber tapper and environmental activist murdered in 1988, is inextricably linked to the fate of the Amazon rainforest and the rights of its inhabitants.Mendes championed the concept of extrativismo, a lasting economic model based on the responsible use of forest resources. his work highlighted the interconnectedness of environmental protection and social justice.

The Rubber Tappers Movement: Mendes organized the rubber tappers, fighting for their land rights and challenging the unchecked deforestation driven by cattle ranchers and logging companies.

Sustainable Development: His advocacy for sustainable development offered an alternative to the destructive practices that threatened the Amazon.

International Recognition: Mendes gained international recognition for his work, bringing global attention to the plight of the Amazon and its people.

A weakening of democratic institutions in Brazil directly threatens Mendes’ legacy. Increased deforestation, land grabbing, and violence against environmental defenders are all likely consequences of a less accountable government. The current political climate, marked by skepticism towards environmental regulations and a prioritization of economic growth over conservation, poses a significant risk to the Amazon and the communities that depend on it. The potential rollback of environmental protections, coupled with a lack of enforcement, could undo decades of progress.

Bolsonaro’s Transition and the Future of Environmental Policy

While reports suggest Bolsonaro signaled a willingness to cooperate with the transition to Lula’s government, the legacy of his presidency casts a long shadow. During his term, deforestation rates soared, environmental agencies were weakened, and indigenous land rights were repeatedly challenged.

Increased Deforestation: Data consistently showed a dramatic increase in deforestation in the Amazon under Bolsonaro’s leadership.

Weakening of Environmental Agencies: Funding cuts and political interference hampered the ability of agencies like IBAMA (Brazilian Institute of Surroundings and Renewable Natural Resources) to enforce environmental laws.

Indigenous Rights Under Attack: Policies and rhetoric frequently enough undermined the rights of indigenous communities, leading to increased conflict and violence.

The extent to which Lula can reverse these trends will depend on his ability to rebuild environmental institutions, strengthen law enforcement, and foster a political climate that prioritizes sustainability. The transition period is crucial, and any delays or resistance could have devastating consequences for the Amazon. The international community is watching closely, with manny countries and organizations offering support for conservation efforts.

The Role of International pressure and Collaboration

International pressure and collaboration are vital in safeguarding Brazil’s democratic future and protecting the Amazon rainforest.

Trade Agreements: linking trade agreements to environmental standards can incentivize sustainable practices.The EU-Mercosur trade deal, such as, has faced scrutiny due to concerns about deforestation.

* Financial Aid: Providing financial aid for conservation projects and sustainable development initiatives can support local

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.