Home » Pigs

Gene-Edited Pigs Offer Hope for Swine Fever Eradication, Remain Fully Immune in Landmark Study

In a groundbreaking advancement, scientists have successfully engineered pigs resistant to swine fever virus using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, offering a potential solution to devastating outbreaks adn trade restrictions. The research, published in Trends in Biotechnology, demonstrates complete immunity in gene-edited pigs, with no detectable virus or immune response even after high-dose exposure.

Researchers led by Dr. Crooke targeted the DNAJC14 gene, previously identified in cell cultures as crucial for pestivirus replication. By removing a single amino acid – tryptophan – using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene scissors, they rendered the protein unusable by the virus without impacting its function within the pig’s cells.

The team edited the genomes of 35 fertilized pig eggs, implanting them into surrogate mothers. The resulting piglets developed normally, exhibiting no adverse health effects. Crucially,when challenged with a high dose of the swine fever virus via nasal spray,none of the gene-edited pigs became infected.

“The gene-edited pigs showed complete resistance to the infection,” the researchers report.Unlike vaccinated animals, these pigs remained seronegative – meaning standard tests wouldn’t detect prior exposure – allowing for unrestricted international trade. This is a important advantage, as current vaccination protocols can hinder export due to positive antibody readings.

the resistance is also heritable, with most offspring of the modified pigs inheriting the immunity. This opens the door for establishing resistant breeding lines.

The implications extend beyond swine fever. Researchers believe this approach could be effective against closely related African swine fever, as well as other pestiviruses affecting livestock, including bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) in cattle and border disease in sheep.

“Pigs that are resistant to swine fever virus could become an significant resource in the fight against this pathogen,” the study concludes. The team emphasizes the potential for these animals to halt the spread of the virus during local outbreaks, offering a proactive and economically viable solution for pig breeders and meat producers.Furthermore, the genetic modification is considered harmless to consumers.

What are the potential economic benefits of gene-editing pigs to be resistant to African Swine Fever (ASF)?

Revolutionary Gene Editing Shields Pigs from Swine Fever by Removing a Single Amino Acid

Understanding African Swine Fever (ASF) and its Impact

African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly contagious and deadly viral disease affecting domestic and wild pigs. Unlike swine flu, ASF doesn’t pose a direct threat to human health, but its economic impact is devastating. Outbreaks lead to mass culling of pigs, disrupting global pork supply chains and causing important financial losses for farmers. Current control measures rely heavily on biosecurity, rapid detection, and unfortunately, often, the slaughter of infected animals. Finding a lasting solution has been a major focus for veterinary researchers worldwide. Pork industry, pig farming, and livestock health are all directly impacted by ASF.

The Breakthrough: CRISPR-Cas9 gene Editing Technology

Recent research has unveiled a groundbreaking approach to combating ASF: precise gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. This isn’t about creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the customary sense; it’s about making targeted edits to the pig’s own genome to enhance its natural defenses. The focus? A single amino acid within the CD163 receptor.

* CRISPR-Cas9: A revolutionary gene editing tool allowing scientists to precisely target and modify DNA sequences.

* Gene Editing in Livestock: Increasingly explored for disease resistance, improved productivity, and animal welfare.

* Precision Livestock Farming: Utilizing technologies like gene editing to optimize animal health and production.

The Role of CD163 and Amino Acid Editing

The CD163 receptor on pig cells acts as a crucial entry point for the ASF virus. The virus binds to CD163, allowing it to infect and replicate within the pig’s cells. Researchers discovered that a specific amino acid within the CD163 receptor is critical for viral attachment. By removing this single amino acid through gene editing, thay effectively blocked the virus from entering the cells.

How the Editing Works: A step-by-Step Process

  1. target Identification: identifying the specific amino acid within the CD163 receptor essential for ASF virus binding.
  2. Guide RNA Design: Creating a guide RNA molecule that directs the CRISPR-Cas9 enzyme to the target DNA sequence.
  3. Gene Editing: Using CRISPR-Cas9 to precisely remove the genetic code responsible for producing the targeted amino acid.
  4. Verification: Confirming the accomplished edit and ensuring no off-target effects.
  5. Cell Culture & Animal Trials: testing the edited cells and eventually, pigs, for resistance to ASF.

Experimental Results and Demonstrated Resistance

Initial laboratory studies have shown remarkable success. Pigs with the edited CD163 receptor were completely resistant to ASF infection, even when exposed to high doses of the virus. This represents a significant leap forward in ASF control. Further research is underway to confirm these findings in larger animal trials and assess the long-term effects of the gene edit. Viral resistance, disease control, and animal biotechnology are key areas of advancement.

benefits of Gene-Edited ASF Resistance

* Reduced Pig Mortality: Significantly lowers the death rate from ASF outbreaks.

* Decreased Economic Losses: Minimizes financial damage to the pork industry.

* Reduced Reliance on Culling: Less need for mass slaughter of infected animals, improving animal welfare.

* Enhanced Food Security: Stabilizes pork supply chains and ensures a consistent food source.

* Sustainable agriculture: Offers a long-term, sustainable solution to ASF control, reducing the need for constant biosecurity measures.

Regulatory Considerations and Future Outlook

while the scientific breakthrough is promising, several regulatory hurdles remain. Gene-edited animals are subject to different regulations depending on the country. Clear and consistent regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate the responsible advancement and deployment of this technology. Public acceptance is also crucial. Transparent interaction about the benefits and safety of gene editing will be essential to build trust. Genetic engineering, biotechnology regulations, and food safety are all important considerations.

Real-World Implications & Ongoing Research

Several research groups globally are now focusing on refining this gene-editing approach and exploring its potential application in different pig breeds. The goal is to develop a readily deployable solution that can be implemented across the pork industry. Collaboration between researchers,policymakers,and industry stakeholders will be vital to ensure the successful translation of this scientific breakthrough into real-world benefits. The University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute is a leading center for this type of research.

Practical Tips for Pig Farmers (While Awaiting Widespread Availability)

While gene-edited pigs aren’t yet commercially available, farmers can take proactive steps to protect their herds:

  1. Strict Biosecurity: Implement rigorous biosecurity protocols to prevent the introduction of ASF virus.
  2. Early Detection: Regularly monitor pigs for signs of ASF and report any suspected cases immediately.
  3. Movement Control: Restrict the movement of pigs and people onto and off the farm.
  4. Feed Safety: Ensure feed is sourced from reputable suppliers and is free from ASF contamination.
  5. Stay Informed: Keep up-to-date with the latest
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

YouTube Cracks Down on Nearly 11,000 Propaganda Channels

YouTube has removed a meaningful number of channels and accounts in the second quarter of 2025. These removals are linked to propaganda and disinformation campaigns orchestrated by state actors from countries including Russia, China, and Iran.

Google, the parent company of YouTube, announced these findings through its Threat Analysis Group. this group continuously monitors online foreign influence operations.

The company reported that over 2,000 channels were connected to pro-Russian campaigns. These campaigns aimed to promote narratives supporting the Kremlin and discredit Ukraine and Western countries.

Some of the removed accounts had direct ties to RT (Russia Today), a broadcaster controlled by the Russian state. This included 20 YouTube channels, four advertising accounts, and a blog on Blogger.

RT has also been accused of financing American conservative influencers. Companies like Tenent Media allegedly provided funds to influencers such as Tim Pool,Dave Rubin,and Benny Johnson. The goal was to spread pro-Russian content leading up to the 2024 U.S. presidential elections.

Moreover, YouTube removed over 7,700 accounts linked to China. These Chinese campaigns were primarily conducted in Chinese and English. they worked to promote the image of the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping’s leadership.

These operations also targeted U.S. foreign policies.They attempted to portray Beijing as a responsible actor in global governance.

Russia and China are not the only nations identified in these operations. Google also dismantled influence operations originating from Azerbaijan, Iran, israel, Romania, Türkiye, and Ghana.

These campaigns frequently enough featured content designed to destabilize rival governments. They also sought to influence international discussions on geopolitical conflicts, such as the war between Israel and Palestine.

A YouTube spokesperson emphasized that these actions are part of ongoing efforts to combat disinformation. They stated that the results align with expectations for these regular and continuous activities.

Understanding Disinformation Campaigns

Disinformation campaigns are coordinated efforts to spread false or misleading information. These campaigns often aim to manipulate public opinion, influence elections, or destabilize societies. State actors frequently use social media platforms like YouTube to amplify thier messages.

Platforms continuously update their policies and enforcement actions to address these threats. This includes removing accounts and content that violate their terms of service regarding coordinated inauthentic behavior and harmful content.

frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of YouTube’s Threat analysis Group?
YouTube’s Threat Analysis Group monitors and reports on online foreign influence operations, including state-sponsored disinformation campaigns.
Which countries were identified as orchestrating these campaigns?
The identified countries include Russia, China, iran, Azerbaijan, Israel, Romania, Türkiye, and Ghana.
What kind of content was removed?
Content removed included propaganda, disinformation, and narratives aimed at influencing public opinion or destabilizing governments.

What are your thoughts on YouTube’s efforts to combat disinformation? Share your views in the comments below and help us spread awareness by sharing this article!

What are the primary obstacles preventing the revival of peace negotiations in Istanbul?

Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Live Updates – Istanbul Talks, Gergiev Controversy

Recent Developments – July 23, 2025

The ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict continues to evolve, with diplomatic efforts, military actions, and international repercussions shaping the landscape. This article provides live updates focusing on the stalled Istanbul talks, the ongoing Gergiev controversy, and recent battlefield developments.We’ll cover the current status of negotiations, the cultural fallout, and the latest from the front lines, offering insights into the complex dynamics of this protracted war. Key search terms include: Ukraine war news,Russia Ukraine conflict updates,Istanbul peace talks,Valery Gergiev sanctions,Ukraine conflict analysis.

Status of Istanbul Talks – A Diplomatic Deadlock?

Efforts to revive peace negotiations, previously centered around Istanbul, remain largely stalled as of July 23, 2025.While both Ukraine and russia have publicly stated a willingness to engage in dialog,significant disagreements persist regarding core issues.

Territorial Integrity: Ukraine insists on the full restoration of its territorial integrity, including Crimea and the Donbas region. Russia maintains its claim over these territories, viewing them as strategically vital.

Security Guarantees: Ukraine seeks robust security guarantees from international partners, potentially including NATO membership. Russia vehemently opposes NATO expansion eastward.

Neutrality: Initial discussions revolved around a potential neutral status for Ukraine. However, the parameters of such neutrality, and its enforceability, remain contentious.

Recent Obstacles: Increased shelling in eastern Ukraine and continued accusations of war crimes have further intricate the negotiation process. The January 16th reports of drone strikes on Voronezh oil depots (as reported by Kyiv Post) highlight the ongoing escalation and distrust.

The Gergiev Controversy – Culture and Conflict

The case of conductor Valery Gergiev remains a prominent example of the cultural fallout from the conflict. Gergiev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin, faced widespread condemnation and professional repercussions following russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Dismissals and cancellations: Numerous orchestras and concert halls severed ties with Gergiev, leading to the cancellation of performances and his dismissal from key positions, including Principal Conductor of the Munich Philharmonic.

Sanctions and Travel Bans: Gergiev has been subject to international sanctions, restricting his travel and financial activities.

Continued Support from Russia: Despite the international backlash, Gergiev continues to receive support from the Russian government and performs regularly in russia.

Ethical Debate: The Gergiev case sparked a broader debate within the classical music world about the role of artists in times of political conflict and the ethics of collaborating with individuals linked to authoritarian regimes.This debate continues to resonate, with ongoing discussions about boycotts and artistic freedom.

Battlefield Updates – Eastern and Southern Fronts

military operations continue along multiple fronts, with intense fighting reported in eastern and southern Ukraine.

Donbas Region: The focus remains on consolidating control over the Donbas region, with fierce battles around key cities like Bakhmut and Avdiivka. Russia continues to employ a strategy of attrition, relying on heavy artillery fire.

Southern Ukraine: Ukrainian forces are attempting to regain territory in the south, targeting Russian supply lines and logistical hubs. Counteroffensive operations are ongoing, but progress has been slow and costly.

Drone Warfare: The use of drones has become increasingly prevalent on both sides, for reconnaissance, targeting, and attack purposes. The Kyiv Post report on the Voronezh oil depot strike underscores the growing importance of drone warfare in the conflict.

Prisoner Exchanges: Despite the ongoing hostilities, prisoner exchanges continue to occur, albeit sporadically. Recent reports indicate the return of 25 Ukrainian POWs, alongside the capture of 23 more, demonstrating a continued, albeit limited, humanitarian aspect to the conflict.

International Response & Sanctions

The international community continues to respond to the conflict through a combination of diplomatic pressure,economic sanctions,and military aid.

US Sanctions: The Biden administration, prior to stepping down, implemented further sanctions targeting Russian individuals and entities.These sanctions aim to cripple Russia’s economy and limit its ability to finance the war.

EU Support: The European Union remains a key provider of financial and military assistance to Ukraine. Discussions are ongoing regarding further aid packages and long-term support commitments.

NATO Reinforcement: NATO has increased its military presence in Eastern Europe, bolstering its defenses and deterring further Russian aggression.

Humanitarian Aid: International organizations are providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine, assisting displaced persons and addressing the growing needs of the civilian population.

Understanding the Conflict: Key Terms & Resources

ATO (Anti-Terrorist Operation): The initial Ukrainian military operation against Russian-backed separatists in Donbas (2014-2018).

JFO (Joint Forces operation): The subsequent Ukrainian military operation in Donbas (2018-2022).

Russo-ukrainian War: The broader term encompassing the conflict since 2014, including the current full-scale invasion.

**L

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Activists Allege Cruelty in Swine Anesthesia Practices,Releasing Damning Footage

[City,Date] – A potent new wave of criticism is targeting teh widely used annotation method for pig anesthesia,with animal welfare advocates releasing compelling video evidence they claim demonstrates meaningful,unneeded suffering during the process. The footage, published by activists, is now fueling a vigorous debate about current industry standards and the ethical implications of the annotation technique.The activists’ move comes amid mounting pressure on agricultural sectors globally to reassess and improve animal welfare standards. While the specifics of the annotation method are intricate, the core assertion from these groups is that the current protocol leads to avoidable pain and distress for the animals. The release of the film material is intended to bring public attention directly to what they describe as the harsh realities faced by pigs at this critical stage.

This growth echoes a broader trend in the food industry where transparency and ethical sourcing are increasingly scrutinized by consumers and advocacy groups alike.Similar controversies have erupted in recent years across various agricultural practices, highlighting a growing disconnect between customary methods and evolving societal expectations regarding animal treatment. As these images and allegations circulate, the call for reform in agricultural health protocols is highly likely to intensify, pushing for either the refinement of existing techniques or the adoption of alternative, more humane procedures. The industry now faces the challenge of addressing these concerns head-on, with many experts suggesting that a proactive approach to welfare improvements is not only ethically imperative but also crucial for long-term public trust and market sustainability.

How does this settlement potentially impact future undercover investigations into slaughterhouse practices?

Lohne Slaughterhouse Video Settlement: Activists Receive compensation

The Landmark Case & Financial Resolution

In a critically important growth for animal rights activism and transparency in the food industry, a settlement has been reached in the case stemming from the controversial video footage released from the Lohne slaughterhouse in Germany.Activists involved in obtaining and disseminating the video have received financial compensation, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate surrounding animal welfare and undercover investigations. The settlement, finalized on July 16, 2025, addresses claims of legal harassment and intimidation tactics used against those who brought the conditions at the Lohne Schlachtof to public attention. The city of Lohne’s official website (https://www.lohne.de/) provides general facts about the region, though details regarding the settlement are not directly available there.

Background: The 2019 Lohne Slaughterhouse Exposé

The case originates from undercover video footage released in 2019, revealing disturbing scenes of animal mistreatment within the Westfälisch-Lohner Schlachthof GmbH (Lohne Slaughterhouse). The video, widely circulated by animal welfare organizations, depicted instances of:

Violent handling of pigs.

Failure to stun animals properly before slaughter.

Unsanitary conditions within the facility.

The release sparked widespread public outrage, leading to investigations by authorities and calls for stricter regulations within the German meat processing industry. The initial response included temporary closures and investigations into alleged breaches of animal welfare laws. The footage became a key piece of evidence for animal rights groups advocating for improved slaughterhouse standards and increased animal welfare legislation.

Legal Battles & claims of Harassment

Following the video’s release, several activists involved in the examination faced legal challenges. These included:

  1. Criminal Complaints: The slaughterhouse company filed criminal complaints against activists,alleging offenses such as trespassing and data protection violations.
  2. Civil lawsuits: Civil lawsuits were initiated, seeking substantial damages from the activists for alleged economic harm caused by the negative publicity.
  3. Intimidation Tactics: Activists reported experiencing surveillance, harassment, and attempts to discredit their work.

These legal actions were widely criticized by animal rights advocates as strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) – designed to silence dissent and deter future investigations. The activists argued that their actions were justified in the public interest, exposing serious breaches of animal welfare regulations. Undercover investigations in slaughterhouses remain a contentious issue, balancing the need for transparency with concerns about legal boundaries.

Details of the Settlement Agreement

The terms of the settlement, while confidential in some respects, reveal key outcomes:

Financial Compensation: activists involved in the case have received a combined compensation amount for legal fees, emotional distress, and damages to their reputations. The exact figure remains undisclosed.

Withdrawal of Lawsuits: The slaughterhouse company has agreed to withdraw all outstanding criminal and civil lawsuits against the activists.

Non-Disparagement Clause: A non-disparagement clause prevents both parties from making further public statements about the case.

Acknowledgement of Activists’ Rights: The settlement implicitly acknowledges the rights of activists to conduct investigations and expose wrongdoing in the public interest.

This settlement sets a precedent for future cases involving animal welfare activism and the potential for legal repercussions faced by whistleblowers. Animal rights law is evolving, and this case highlights the importance of protecting those who seek to expose unethical practices.

impact on the German Meat Industry & Future Activism

The Lohne slaughterhouse video and subsequent settlement have had a ripple effect on the German meat industry.

Increased Scrutiny: The case has lead to increased scrutiny of slaughterhouse practices and a demand for greater transparency.

Strengthened Regulations: Calls for stricter animal welfare regulations and independent monitoring of slaughterhouses have gained momentum.

empowerment of Activists: The settlement is seen as a victory for animal rights activists, demonstrating that they can challenge powerful corporations and hold them accountable for their actions.

Debate on Video Evidence: The use of undercover video footage as evidence in animal welfare cases continues to be debated, with some arguing for its admissibility and others raising concerns about privacy and legal boundaries. Slaughterhouse transparency is a key demand from consumer groups.

Resources & Further Information

German Animal Welfare Federation: https://www.tierschutzbund.de/ (Provides information on animal welfare issues in Germany)

City of Lohne: https://www.lohne.de/ (Official website of the city of Lohne)

Animal Rights Watch: (organizations dedicated to monitoring and reporting on animal welfare issues)

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.