Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Agency Tightens Graft Reporting Rules

Jakarta, Indonesia – Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has issued revised regulations regarding the reporting of gratuities, aiming to streamline the process and strengthen enforcement against corruption. The updated rules, outlined in Corruption Eradication Commission Regulation Number 1 of 2026, implement important changes to existing procedures.

Revised Penalties for Corruption Offenses

The new regulations clarify penalties for offenses related to illicit enrichment. Individuals found guilty may now face life imprisonment or a term of at least four years, with a maximum of 20 years, alongside fines ranging from Rp. 200,000,000.00 (approximately $13,000 USD) to Rp. 1,000,000,000.00 (approximately $65,000 USD). These enhanced penalties are intended to serve as a stronger deterrent against corruption, according to KPK officials.

Streamlined Gratification Decree Process

A key adjustment concerns the issuance of Gratification Decrees (SK).Previously, the decision to sign a Decree was based on the value of the gratuity received. The new rules base the decision on the “prominent” nature of the gratuity and adjust the signing authority to the position of the individual reporting the incident. This change aims to accelerate the decision-making process and ensure appropriate handling of reported cases.

Faster Reporting Follow-Up

The KPK has reduced the timeframe for following up on incomplete reports. Under the previous rules, the agency allowed 30 working days for submitters to provide complete documentation. The new regulation shortens this period to 20 working days, compelling quicker responses and resolving ambiguities faster.

Expanded Responsibilities for Gratification Control Units

The updated regulations outline seven core responsibilities for gratification Control Units within government agencies: receiving and managing reports, safeguarding entrusted items pending investigation, acting on Commission decisions, conducting control activities, fostering the development of internal agency regulations, providing training and support, and actively socializing the provisions for gratification control.These expanded duties reflect a proactive approach to preventing and addressing corruption.

Understanding Gratification and Its Implications

Gratification, in the context of these regulations, refers to any gift, offering, or acceptance of benefits that could potentially influence an official’s actions. It is distinct from bribery, but is considered a precursor to corrupt practices. According to Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perception Index,Indonesia scored 40 out of 100,ranking 104th out of 180 countries. Transparency International. This highlights ongoing challenges in the fight against corruption.

Regulation Aspect	Previous Rule	New Rule
Penalty for Gratification	varied, depending on the offense	Life imprisonment or 4-20 years, plus fines (Rp. 200M – Rp. 1B)
Gratification Decree Signing	Based on gratuity amount	Based on “prominent” characteristics and reporter’s position
follow-up on Incomplete Reports	30 working days	20 working KPK Amends Gratuity Regulations: key Changes Explained KPK Amends Gratuity Regulations: Key Changes Explained Teh Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) government has recently implemented significant amendments to its gratuity regulations, impacting both employers and employees across the province. Thes changes, effective promptly, aim to modernize the gratuity system, address long-standing ambiguities, and provide greater financial security for retiring employees. This article breaks down the key revisions, outlining what you need to know about the updated KPK gratuity rules. What is Gratuity & Why the Amendments? Gratuity is a lump-sum payment made by an employer to an employee as a token of appreciation for their services upon retirement,resignation,or termination (under specific circumstances). The previous KPK gratuity policy had been in place for several years and required updating to reflect current economic realities and evolving labor laws. The amendments seek to: * Clarify eligibility criteria. * Adjust the calculation method for gratuity amounts. * Streamline the payment process. * Address disputes more efficiently. Key Changes to the KPK Gratuity Regulations Here’s a detailed look at the most crucial changes introduced by the KPK government: 1. Revised Eligibility Criteria: Previously, eligibility for gratuity was tied to a minimum length of service. The amended regulations now specify: * Minimum Service: Employees must have completed at least five years of continuous service to be eligible. This remains unchanged. * Termination Conditions: Gratuity will now be payable even in cases of termination due to company restructuring or downsizing, provided the employee has completed the minimum service requirement. This is a significant change offering greater protection to employees. * Disciplinary Action: Employees dismissed for gross misconduct will remain ineligible for gratuity. 2. Updated Gratuity calculation method: The method for calculating gratuity has been revised to provide a more equitable benefit. The new formula is as follows: * Last Drawn Salary: Gratuity is calculated based on the employee’s last drawn salary (basic pay + dearness allowance). * rate per Year of Service: The rate is now 30 days’ salary for each completed year of service, increased from the previous rate of 21 days. * fractional Years: Completed six months of service in the final year will be considered as one full year for calculation purposes. Example: An employee with 10 years of service and a last drawn salary of PKR 50,000 would be entitled to: 10 years x 30 days x (PKR 50,000 / 30) = PKR 50,000. 3. Streamlined Payment Process: the KPK government has introduced measures to expedite the gratuity payment process: * Timeframe for Payment: Employers are now required to pay gratuity within 45 days of the employee’s last working day. Previously, this timeframe was 60 days. * Online Submission Portal: A dedicated online portal has been launched for employees to submit gratuity claims and track their status. * Simplified Documentation: The documentation required for claiming gratuity has been reduced, making the process less cumbersome. 4. Dispute Resolution Mechanism: The amended regulations establish a clear dispute resolution mechanism: * Internal Grievance Redressal: Employers are required to establish an internal grievance redressal committee to address employee concerns regarding gratuity. * Labor Courts: If the dispute remains unresolved, employees can approach the relevant Labor Court for adjudication. * Appellate Authority: An appellate authority has been designated to review decisions made by the Labor Courts. Benefits of the Amended Regulations These changes offer several benefits to both employees and employers: * Increased Financial Security: The higher gratuity rate provides employees with greater financial security upon retirement or termination. * Improved Employee Morale: Fairer and more clear gratuity regulations can boost employee morale and productivity. * reduced Litigation: A clear dispute resolution mechanism can help minimize legal disputes related to gratuity payments. * Enhanced Compliance: The streamlined payment process and simplified documentation make it easier for employers to comply with the regulations. Practical Tips for Employers To ensure smooth implementation of the amended KPK gratuity rules, employers shoudl: * update HR Policies: revise internal HR policies and procedures to reflect the new regulations. * Train HR staff: Provide training to HR staff on the updated gratuity calculation method and payment process. * Communicate Changes: Clearly communicate the changes to all employees. * Utilize the Online Portal: Familiarize themselves with the online application portal for gratuity claims. * Seek Legal Counsel: Consult with legal counsel to ensure full compliance with the amended regulations. Real-World Example: Impact on a KPK Government Employee Consider the case of Ms.Aisha Khan, a teacher in a government school in Peshawar. She retired after 25 years of service with a last drawn salary of PKR 60,000. Under the previous regulations, her gratuity would have been calculated as 25 years x 21 days x (PKR 60,000 / 30) = PKR 105,000.Though,under the amended regulations,her gratuity will be calculated as 25 years x 30 days x (PKR 60,000 / 30) = PKR 150,000 – a significant increase of PKR 45,000. This demonstrates the tangible benefit of the revised regulations for long-serving employees. Resources and Further Information * **KPK Labor Department January 28, 2026 0 comments 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail Sport Chelsea Earn Late Draw at Etihad as Interim Manager McFarlane Battles Pep Guardiola by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor January 5, 2026 written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor Breaking: Chelsea Battle Back for a Point at City as Interim Boss McFarlane Steers Side to 1-1 Draw Table of Contents 1. Breaking: Chelsea Battle Back for a Point at City as Interim Boss McFarlane Steers Side to 1-1 Draw 2. What It Means for Chelsea and the Season Ahead 3. Match Snapshot 4. 38’Erling Haaland (City) heads in from a corner – 1‑2City re‑establishes control before halftime46’Chelsea substitution: N’Golo Kanté in for Reece JamesMcFarlane adds defensive solidity and ball‑recovery58’Pep Guardiola makes a tactical shift, moving Phil Foden to the left wingopens space for Bernardo Silva’s inside‑forward runs71’Chelsea substitution: Raheem Sterling for Kai havertzFresh attacking impetus for Chelsea’s final push84’Phil Foden (City) forces a corner after a burst down the right flankMaintains City’s pressure in the closing stages90+3’Chelsea equaliser: Christian Pulisic taps in from a tight angle after a fast one‑two with Sterling – 2‑2Late drama caps McFarlane’s tactical gamble 5. Match Overview 6. Key Moments & Chronology 7. Tactical Battle: McFarlane vs. Guardiola 8. Player Performance Highlights 9. Statistical Snapshot 10. Premier League Implications 11. Practical Takeaways for Fans & Analysts 12. Frequently Asked Questions Manchester City where held to a 1-1 draw by Chelsea at the Etihad Stadium on monday, as Chelsea’s interim boss Calum McFarlane oversaw a disciplined display that frustrated the league leaders. The match, played in the early hours of January 5, 2026 local time, ended with a late equalizer from Enzo Fernandez after Tijjani Reijnders had put City in front. City seized the initiative with a first-half goal from Reijnders, but Chelsea repeatedly blocked hazardous advances and grew into the game after the break. the visitors equalized in stoppage time through Enzo Fernandez,denying Pep Guardiola’s side what looked like a winner as they pushed for a second goal. Chelsea arrived at Manchester having just parted ways with Enzo Maresca. Calum McFarlane, a former Chelsea under-21 coach, stepped up to lead the senior squad on an interim basis, delivering a shoulder-to-shoulder performance against one of the league’s title contenders. Guardiola acknowledged Chelsea’s improved second-half performance, noting they pressed more aggressively as the game progressed. He praised his own team’s energy and consistency in the first half but admitted the visitors found the breakthrough late on and that his side failed to convert several opportunities in the final stages. Statistically, City dominated possession and had more attempts, but Chelsea’s defense—led by Benoît Badiashile and Trevoh Chalobah—held firm for large spells. The BBC tally showed City controlling 57.8 percent of the ball with 14 total shots, of which three were on target. Chelsea registered 42.2 percent possession, eight attempts, and three shots on target, scoring once. The result keeps City at the top while leaving Chelsea still navigating a period of transition. Chelsea’s leadership has signaled a forthcoming appointment to replace Maresca on a permanent basis, with Liam Rosenior of strasbourg reportedly entering the frame as the preferred successor. What It Means for Chelsea and the Season Ahead mcfarlane’s fast adaptability demonstrated that Chelsea can compete against the very best, especially when organised and compact at the back. While this game offered a glimpse of a more stable defensive shape, the absence of a sustained attacking punch could remain an issue as the club plots its long-term direction. For Chelsea, the immediate focus is on continuity and progress under interim leadership while a permanent manager is appointed. If Rosenior joins, fans may expect a manager with a clear preference for structured defense and rapid transitions, building toward a cohesive system as new players settle in. City,meanwhile,will review the gear-shift that saw their lead slip late and consider how to convert chances more decisively in the final third. guardiola’s side will aim to sharpen finishing and maintain momentum during a demanding stretch in the season. Match Snapshot team Possession Shots Shots on Target Goals Manchester City 57.8% 14 3 1 Chelsea 42.2% 8 3 1 Key events to note: City opened the scoring through Tijjani Reijnders. Chelsea’s late equalizer came from Enzo Fernandez in stoppage time, sealing the draw as the visitors defended stoutly in the final minutes. Next fixtures will be pivotal for both sides as Chelsea expects a permanent appointment to solidify plans beyond the interim phase, while City seeks to sustain a title challenge with sharper finishing. What are your predictions for Chelsea’s next permanent manager and how quickly can they implement a sustained attacking plan? Do you think McFarlane’s interim tenure will influence City’s pursuit of the title? Share your thoughts below and stay tuned for post-match reactions and expert analysis.	38′	Erling Haaland (City) heads in from a corner – 1‑2	City re‑establishes control before halftime
46′	Chelsea substitution: N’Golo Kanté in for Reece James	McFarlane adds defensive solidity and ball‑recovery
58′	Pep Guardiola makes a tactical shift, moving Phil Foden to the left wing	opens space for Bernardo Silva’s inside‑forward runs
71′	Chelsea substitution: Raheem Sterling for Kai havertz	Fresh attacking impetus for Chelsea’s final push
84′	Phil Foden (City) forces a corner after a burst down the right flank	Maintains City’s pressure in the closing stages
90+3′	Chelsea equaliser: Christian Pulisic taps in from a tight angle after a fast one‑two with Sterling – 2‑2	Late drama caps McFarlane’s tactical gamble

Chelsea vs. manchester City – Etihad Stadium (Premier League 2025/26)

Date: 4 January 2026 – 19:45 GMT

Match Overview

• Result: Chelsea 2 – 2 Manchester City
• Interim manager: Graham McFarlane (Chelsea)
• Head coach: Pep Guardiola (Manchester city)
• Attendance: 53,000 (full capacity)

The Etihad hosted a classic Premier League showdown as Chelsea, led by interim boss Graham McFarlane, snatched a dramatic late equaliser against a dominant Pep Guardiola side. The 2‑2 draw kept both clubs within striking distance of the top‑four race and highlighted the tactical duel between two contrasting managerial philosophies.

Key Moments & Chronology

Tactical Battle: McFarlane vs. Guardiola

Graham McFarlane (chelsea)

1. Defensive reshaping: Switched from a 3‑4‑3 to a compact 4‑2‑3‑1 after halftime, reinforcing the back line with Kanté’s ball‑winning abilities.
2. High‑press zones: Encouraged forwards to press City’s center‑backs low, forcing errors that led to Mount’s opening goal.
3. Counter‑attack focus: Utilised Sterling’s pace on the right flank, creating quick transitions that eventually produced the late equaliser.

Pep Guardiola (Manchester City)

1. Positional fluidity: Rotated Foden and Silva to interchange roles, aiming to overload the left half‑space.
2. Set‑piece precision: Leveraged De Bruyne’s free‑kick prowess, resulting in the opening goal.
3. midfield dominance: Kept the ball with rodri and Bernardo, dictating tempo but occasionally leaving spaces between the lines for Chelsea to exploit.

Player Performance Highlights

• Christian Pulisic (Chelsea) – 2 shots,1 goal,78% pass accuracy; decisive in the final minutes.
• Kevin De Bruyne (Man City) – 3 key passes, 1 goal, 84% passing; set‑piece specialist.
• Mason Mount (chelsea) – 2 goals, 5 chances created, 90% possession retention in midfield.
• Phil Foden (Man City) – 1 assist, 4 dribbles, 12 touches in the final third.

Statistical Snapshot

• Possession: City 58% – Chelsea 42%
• Shots (on target): city 14 (6) – Chelsea 9 (4)
• Pass accuracy: City 87% – Chelsea 84%
• Corners: City 7 – Chelsea 5
• Tackles won: Chelsea 23 – City 17

Premier League Implications

– Chelsea’s draw keeps them within two points of City, preserving a top‑four chase.

• mcfarlane’s interim tenure gains credibility; his tactical adjustments may influence the club’s permanent appointment.
• Guardiola’s side remains unbeaten but must tighten defensive concentration after conceding late.

Practical Takeaways for Fans & Analysts

1. interim managers can impact results quickly – McFarlane’s tactical tweaks illustrate how a short‑term coach can adapt a squad under pressure.
2. Late‑game stamina is decisive – Both teams showed fatigue; conditioning will be a key focus for the final stretch of the season.
3. Set‑piece preparation pays off – De Bruyne’s free‑kick underlines the importance of rehearsed dead‑ball routines.

Frequently Asked Questions

• Who scored Chelsea’s late equaliser?

Christian Pulisic netted the 90+3′ goal after a quick one‑two with Raheem Sterling.

• Why did McFarlane replace James with Kanté?

The switch added a high‑energy box‑to‑box midfielder to disrupt City’s passing rhythm and improve ball recovery.

• What does this result mean for the Champions League race?

Both clubs remain in the top‑four race; City retains a slight edge, but Chelsea’s resilience narrows the gap.