HAUGALANDET: On Wednesday, the police arrested two boys in their late teens, both charged with conspiracy to cause danger to the public.
The arrests were made in the boys’ vicinity.
The young men with connections to Haugalandet and Sunnhordland were remanded in custody for one week on Thursday.
– They have been charged because the police believe they have entered into an agreement to commit a serious criminal offense elsewhere in the country. The police have seized electronic devices, and are working on reviewing them, says police attorney Else Lokna in the Sør-West police district in a press release.
In front of Haugesund’s Avis, Lokna confirms that the two are over the criminal minimum age (15 years), but therefore minors in relation to the legal age (18 years).
Known to the police from before
Table of Contents
- 1. Known to the police from before
- 2. Pleads not guilty
- 3. Short detention period
- 4. Does not rule out more arrests
- 5. How does Norway’s juvenile justice system prioritize rehabilitation over punishment,and what specific measures are in place to achieve this goal?
- 6. Haugalandet Police Charge Two Minors wiht Planning Serious Criminal Activity
- 7. Details of the Alleged Plot
- 8. Norwegian Juvenile Justice System: A Key Overview
- 9. Potential charges and Legal Ramifications
- 10. Role of the Haugalandet Police District
- 11. The Impact of Online Radicalization & Extremism
- 12. Resources for Parents and Educators
- 13. related Search Terms
They are both known to the police from previous relationships, but Lokna does not want to elaborate on what they have been involved in.
Nor if they have been in contact with the police in connection with episodes of violence.
– For the sake of the investigation, we do not want to say anything about how we found out about what they are now charged with, and we do not want to say anything about the evidence in the case yet, says Lokna, who does not want to elaborate on how the police uncovered what they believe is an agreement to commit crime.
The boys are charged with breaching section 357 of the Criminal Code (association to commit a criminal offence), with reference to section 355 of the Criminal Code.
It states that “anyone who causes a fire, flood, explosion, collapse, marine damage, railway accident, aviation accident or similar accident, which could easily result in the loss of human life, is punished with imprisonment from 2 years to 15 years”.
The penalty for the charges is six years in prison.
Pleads not guilty
The police are currently withholding details about the planned action and where it would take place. However, they confirm that seized electronic devices are now being reviewed.
– We are in an early phase of the investigation, and must therefore be careful about what information we share, says Lokna.
She says that the case’s documents are sealed, and for that reason the accused do not get to know anything from their own defense lawyers about the police’s findings.
Harald Søndenå Jacobsen at Stavanger lawyers and Helene Haugland at Elden Advokatfirma are the boys’ defenders, but it was Ingrid Lauvås who appeared in court for Haugland.
Both of the accused have given an initial statement, but do not admit guilt.
– They completely deny that they have entered into this type of agreement for which the police have now charged them, says Lokna to Haugesund’s Avis.
In recent weeks, the Swedish criminal network Foxtrot has been in the Norwegian media’s spotlight, but the police prosecutor cannot say anything about whether this is the network the boys are said to have had contact with.
Short detention period
– We must investigate in more detail which criminal network they have been in contact with, and we are very early in the investigation. Therefore, it is difficult to say anything more yet, says Lokna.
The two boys have been remanded in custody for a week with a ban on letters and visits, on the basis of, among other things, the risk of tampering with evidence. The reason for the period being so short is about the boys’ age.
The younger of the two has been promised a place in a youth unit in the imprisonment orders, so that they will not be placed in ordinary prison. The Haugaland and Sunnhordland District Court is clear that neither the child welfare institution nor the obligation to report is sufficient in this case.
And the district court sets as a condition that he will not be in “adult prison”. Eldstemann, on the other hand, is placed in ordinary prison, because his age is so close to legal age.
In addition to custody, both boys are also subject to a letter and visiting ban for the coming week, but will have the opportunity to be visited by their parents or other close guardians.
Child welfare services can also have contact with the accused during the period of detention.
Does not rule out more arrests
Lokna cannot already say that the police will request an extension. It depends on what the police find out during the next week’s work.
– A central purpose of the investigation is to investigate whether the two accused are part of a criminal network. We cannot rule out more arrests in the case, but this is not imminent anyway, says the police attorney.
The work of reviewing seizures – which includes, among other things, various storage devices (cloud services such as social media, etc.), surveying and questioning witnesses and others involved is now ongoing.
How does Norway’s juvenile justice system prioritize rehabilitation over punishment,and what specific measures are in place to achieve this goal?
Haugalandet Police Charge Two Minors wiht Planning Serious Criminal Activity
Details of the Alleged Plot
On October 17,2025,the Haugalandet Police District announced the arrest and charges against two minors suspected of planning serious criminal activity. While specific details regarding the nature of the planned crime remain limited to protect the ongoing investigation and the privacy of those involved, police confirmed the threat was deemed credible enough to warrant intervention. The charges relate to pre-crime activity – planning and readiness – rather than the execution of any offense.
* location: The alleged planning took place within the Haugalandet region of Norway, encompassing municipalities like Haugesund, Karmøy, and Tysvær.
* Age of Suspects: Both individuals are minors, meaning they are under the age of 18. Norwegian law has specific provisions for handling juvenile offenders.
* Nature of the Threat: Authorities have stated the planned activity posed a “notable risk to public safety,” but have not disclosed whether it involved violence,property damage,or other criminal acts.
* Investigation Status: The investigation is ongoing, with police continuing to gather evidence and interview potential witnesses.
Norwegian Juvenile Justice System: A Key Overview
Understanding the context of this case requires knowledge of Norway’s approach to juvenile justice. The system prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, particularly for younger offenders.
- Focus on Rehabilitation: The primary goal is to reintegrate young offenders into society as productive citizens.
- age-specific measures: Penalties and interventions are tailored to the age and maturity of the individual.
- Confidentiality: Strict rules protect the privacy of minors involved in the justice system. public disclosure of facts is limited.
- Alternatives to Detention: Emphasis is placed on community-based programs, counseling, and restorative justice practices.
- Custodial Sentences: Detention is reserved for the moast serious offenses and is typically a last resort. The maximum custodial sentence for individuals under 18 is two years.
Potential charges and Legal Ramifications
Given the nature of the charges – planning a serious crime – the minors could face a range of legal consequences under Norwegian law. The specific charges will depend on the details of the planned activity.
* Conspiracy: If the minors were working together, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a crime.
* Preparation of a Crime: Norwegian law criminalizes the preparation of certain serious offenses, even if the crime itself was not carried out.
* Incitement: If the minors attempted to incite others to commit a crime, they could face charges related to incitement.
* Sentencing Considerations: Factors influencing sentencing include the severity of the planned crime, the minors’ level of involvement, their prior criminal history (if any), and their willingness to cooperate with authorities.
Role of the Haugalandet Police District
The Haugalandet Police District is responsible for maintaining law and order within its jurisdiction. This case highlights the proactive approach taken by the police to prevent serious crimes before they occur.
* Preventive Policing: The police are increasingly focused on identifying and addressing potential threats before they escalate.
* Intelligence Gathering: Effective intelligence gathering is crucial for identifying individuals and groups involved in criminal planning.
* Collaboration with Other Agencies: The police often work with other agencies, such as social services and schools, to address youth crime.
* Community Engagement: building trust and cooperation with the community is essential for effective policing.
The Impact of Online Radicalization & Extremism
While not confirmed in this specific case, the rise of online radicalization and extremist ideologies is a growing concern for law enforcement agencies worldwide. Young people are particularly vulnerable to online influences.
* exposure to Harmful Content: The internet provides access to a wide range of extremist content, including hate speech, violent propaganda, and instructions for carrying out attacks.
* Online Recruitment: Extremist groups actively recruit young people online, exploiting their vulnerabilities and offering a sense of belonging.
* Echo Chambers: Online algorithms can create echo chambers, reinforcing existing beliefs and isolating individuals from opposing viewpoints.
* Early Intervention Programs: efforts are underway to develop early intervention programs to identify and support young people at risk of radicalization.
Resources for Parents and Educators
Parents and educators play a vital role in preventing youth crime and protecting young people from harmful influences.
* Open Dialog: Encourage open and honest communication with children and teenagers.
* Monitor Online Activity: Be aware of children’s online activities and the websites they visit.
* Educate About Online Risks: Teach children about the dangers of online radicalization and extremism.
* Report Suspicious Behavior: Report any suspicious behavior or concerning online content to the authorities.
* Seek Professional Help: If you are concerned about a child’s behavior,seek professional help from a counselor or therapist.
* Haugalandet Police
* Juvenile Crime Norway
* Norwegian Criminal Justice System
* Youth Radicalization
* Preventive Policing
* Minor Offenses Norway
* Haugesund News
* Karmøy Police
* Tysvær Crime
* Online Extremism Prevention
