Home » uva » Page 2

Charlottesville, Va. — The university of Virginia Cavaliers (5-7) are set to host the Lafayette College Leopards (8-4) this Saturday, April 19, at Klöckner Stadium in a match that promises both celebration and awareness. Opening faceoff is scheduled for 1 p.m. and will be streamed on ACC Network Extra (ACCNX).

The game marks the third contest in the series between the Cavaliers and the Leopards, with Virginia holding a 2-0 advantage. Saturday’s game is particularly important, as the Cavaliers will be honoring 16 student-athletes and one student manager as part of their annual Senior Day festivities.

Before the game, Virginia will recognize fourth- and fifth-year players including dawson Chitwood, Noah Chizmar, George Fulton, Anthony Ghobriel, Mikie Harmeyer, Will Inderlied, Griffin Kology, Chase MacCartee, Burke McFarlane, Tommy McNeal, Thomas Mencke, Tucker Mullen, Matthew Nunes, Griffin Schutz, Ben Wayer and Max Wooten. Head coach Lars Tiffany has a tradition of including as many fourth- or fifth-year players as possible in the starting lineup on Senior Day, creating a memorable moment for the athletes and fans alike.

Along with honoring its senior class,the Virginia men’s lacrosse program will use the game as an opportunity to highlight the work of the UVA gordie Center. the Gordie Center is dedicated to ending hazing and substance misuse among college and high school students nationwide. To raise awareness,UVA student-athletes and coaching staff will wear t-shirts emblazoned with the message,”Save a life. Make the call.” This initiative underscores the importance of calling 911 when witnessing signs of alcohol overdose, promoting a culture of safety and responsibility within the university community and beyond. The PUBS signs serve as an easy reminder:
P – Person is Unconscious or unresponsive
U – Person is throwing up (while passed out or not)
B – Person has slow Breathing (less than 8 breathes per minute)
S – Person has Skin that is clammy,pale or bluish

Looking at the series history,Virginia has dominated Lafayette in their previous two encounters. The inaugural matchup in 2022 saw the Cavaliers secure a decisive 20-10 victory on Senior Day at Klöckner Stadium. That game was also memorable for former UVA attackman Matt Moore, now a Premier Lacrosse League (PLL) star, who surpassed Steele Stanwick’s program record to become UVA’s all-time points leader. Connor Shellenberger than broke Moore’s record in 2024. Backup goalie Miles Thompson also earned his first career win in the 2022 contest, making 13 saves. Offensively, Payton cormier led the charge with five goals, while Regan Quinn added a career-high four goals.

In their most recent meeting in 2023, Virginia defeated Lafayette 20-11 in Easton, Pa. Goaltender Matthew Nunes was instrumental to the Cavaliers’ victory, recording nine of his 13 saves in the first half. Notably, Petey LaSalla became the NCAA Division I all-time leader in career faceoff attempts during the game, surpassing TD Ierlan’s previous record. LaSalla finished his career with 1,781 attempts and holds UVA career records in faceoff wins (1,050) and ground balls (525). Also in 2023, Xander Dickson scored four goals and dished out four assists to become the sixth player in UVA history to tally at least 50 goals in a single season. Dickson went on to set the program record with 61 goals in 2023 only to see Cormier break it again in 2024.

Lafayette enters Saturday’s game with an 8-4 record and momentum from winning five of their last six games. Their recent 11-9 victory over then-No. 15 Boston university underscores their potential to challenge the Cavaliers. With a 4-3 record in Patriot League play, the leopards have already achieved a program record for conference wins in a single season. While Lafayette boasts a strong 6-1 record at home,they are 2-3 in true road games this season.

The two teams share one common opponent on their schedules which is Colgate. Virginia defeated the Raiders 19-9 in their season opener, while Lafayette fell to Colgate 19-14.

Leading the Leopards is head coach Patrick Myers, who is in his seventh season at the helm. Myers has family ties to lacrosse as his brother, nick, is currently the head coach at Ohio State.

Saturday’s game promises to be a meaningful occasion for Virginia lacrosse, combining the celebration of its senior class with a vital message of awareness and responsibility.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Virginia Cavaliers faced their second consecutive defeat in a disheartening stretch, succumbing to the St. John’s Red Flame with a staggering 25-point margin, ultimately finishing the game at 80-55 after their previous 22-point loss to Tennessee just 24 hours earlier. As a result of these back-to-back missteps, the ‘Hoos now find themselves at a lukewarm 3-2 for the season. They will return to Charlottesville battered and bruised as they brace for two upcoming buy games against Manhattan and Holy Cross next week.

In the aftermath of the loss to the Red Flame, we have identified five critical takeaways for the Cavaliers as they chart their path forward.

Virginia doesn’t have the athletes to hang

St. John’s showcased sheer athleticism in their clash with Virginia on Friday evening, illustrating a stark contrast to the sluggish play of the Cavaliers. While the Red Storm exhibited stunning aerial acrobatics with explosive dunks, dominated the interior, and executed fast-breaks with finesse, Virginia seemed like they were mired in quicksand.

The numbers paint a concerning picture: St. John’s registered six impressive dunks, 13 steals, three blocks, and garnered 11 points during transition plays. In contrast, the Cavaliers managed only one dunk, four steals, one block, and shockingly recorded zero points in transition, while suffering 16 turnovers throughout the game.

However, the challenges facing this UVA squad extend beyond mere athleticism. Despite St. John’s being an above-average athletic team, Virginia’s deficiencies—particularly their struggle to compete above the rim, keep pace in foot races, and secure individual matchups—have proved debilitating and are likely to stifle the team’s potential in the ongoing season.

All UVA’s offense has is three-point shooting

On that note, this disappointing loss further corroborated the alarming realization that Virginia’s only (somewhat) reliable source of offensive production revolves around their three-point shooting.

When the Cavaliers manage to generate open looks from beyond the arc, their shooters have demonstrated the ability to convert those opportunities. The major concern lies in their production of shots, as Virginia lacks a consistent post presence. The team struggles to effectively penetrate defenses via dribble drives or through ball screens. This combination of weaknesses renders the presence of capable shooters such as Isaac McKneely, Andrew Rohde, Taine Murray, Elijah Saunders, and Jacob Cofie virtually irrelevant.

Virginia’s offensive strategy has been overhauled to lean more heavily on perimeter shooting. From a philosophical perspective, the offense appears more efficient than it has been in recent memory. With a greater number of shooters on the floor, there should be more space to attack and more chances to create efficient scoring opportunities.

However, in execution, the Cavaliers’ personnel has struggled to take advantage of these tactical updates. They managed to secure a mere 12 points in the paint in their matchup with St. John’s. While it’s nice to have shooters making shots, that’s all the offense seems capable of accomplishing.

UVA’s newcomers haven’t brought enough to the table

With only three rotational players returning from last year’s team, Virginia’s reliance on transfers and emerging freshmen was anticipated.

Regrettably for the Wahoos, contributions from these newcomers were virtually nonexistent during their stay in The Bahamas. Duke transfer TJ Power struggled immensely, scoring just three points over two games while shooting 1-for-9 from the field. He has only managed to net 14 points across five games this season while maintaining a mere 25% shooting percentage from three-point range—an area where he was expected to excel.

Although fellow transfers Saunders and Ames have provided a slightly more notable boost, this comes with caveats. Ames is currently averaging a concerning 3.7 turnovers per game over his last three outings, while Saunders, despite being the team’s best post presence, has been vulnerable on the boards and has been ineffective offensively with a shooting percentage of just 43.5%. Freshman Cofie also felt the weight of the competition during his time in Baha Mar, contributing just four points (while shooting 2-for-10 from the field) in two games, as he struggled to cope with the physicality presented by St. John’s and Tennessee.

Undoubtedly, these newcomers are not the only ones who fell short in The Bahamas. It’s important to note that five games into their UVA careers is still a small sample size for evaluation. However, this pair of disheartening losses served as a pivotal wake-up call.

The Cavaliers looked like a defeated team

For 30 minutes against Tennessee on Thursday, the Cavaliers showed resilience, managing to stay competitive. After trimming their deficit to a single point by the end of the first half, they found themselves only five points down with approximately ten minutes remaining in the second half. Unfortunately, the latter stages of the game unraveled swiftly as the Volunteers asserted their dominance on the glass while finding scoring rhythms beyond the arc.

The game against St. John’s appeared to be a continuation of the final moments against Tennessee. UVA briefly took a 7-6 lead five minutes into the first half, only for St. John’s to tighten their grip on the contest. The Red Flame surged ahead with a striking 33-to-19 run to end the half, during which Virginia experienced a frustrating 8:52 scoreless stretch. The second half was a continuation of that struggle; Saunders was only able to score six points for UVA in the opening minutes as St. John’s advanced their lead to a staggering 23 points.

In summary, following the initial run from St. John’s, the Cavaliers appeared defeated. Although McKneely produced a few individual highlights, UVA never genuinely rallied for a comeback.

Per David Teel, this marks the first occasion in 14 years that Virginia has endured back-to-back losses, each by 20 or more points.

For a young team facing significant adjustments and coping with the recent retirement of their Hall of Fame coach just 35 days ago, this back-to-back slump raises concerns about their stability. While a turnaround is possible as the Cavaliers build chemistry and confront less formidable opponents, these two defeats, coupled with the manner of their collapses, offer little in terms of hope and optimism.

Ron Sanchez misses out on a signature win

As the interim head coach, Ron Sanchez is acutely aware of how critical it is to prove his mettle throughout this season. Securing a victory in The Bahamas would have been a significant milestone in his bid to remove the interim title and solidify his position moving forward.

However, the disheartening losses—not to mention their considerable margins—suggest that the basketball program could be inching closer to a national search for its next head coach. It’s important to acknowledge the challenging competition, but these two games have not bolstered Sanchez’s case.

Every data point is crucial, and these two certainly do not favor his prospects.

How ‌important is it‌ for‍ the Cavaliers to establish a post presence to enhance their offensive performance?

**Interview with Basketball Analyst John Smith on Virginia Cavaliers’ Recent Struggles**

**Interviewer:** Thank ⁣you for ‍joining us ⁢today, ⁣John. Virginia Cavaliers are having a tough time this season, ⁣especially ‌after back-to-back losses in The ‍Bahamas. What⁤ are your‌ main takeaways from these losses?

**John Smith:** Thanks for having me. The ‌recent defeats ⁤have ‍really highlighted⁢ some glaring issues for the Cavaliers. First⁢ and foremost, they seem to lack the athleticism required⁤ to⁤ compete at a high ⁤level. ‌St. John’s showed an explosive style of play, contrasting sharply ⁤with ⁣Virginia’s sluggish performance. ⁣The stats tell a story​ of their own—only one dunk and 16 turnovers against a physically dominant team underscores their struggles.

**Interviewer:** That’s a good point. You⁤ mentioned the lack of athleticism.‍ How do you ⁤think that specifically impacts their gameplay?

**John Smith:** Well, without‌ the ability to finish strong at​ the rim or ⁢keep up in fast breaks, it severely limits their offensive options. They’re not able to generate points in transition, which is ⁣essential in today’s⁤ game. They ⁣also struggle with individual matchups, ⁢leading to breakdowns in both defense and offense. Their overall speed and quickness just​ seem to⁤ be lacking⁣ compared to teams like ‍St. John’s.

**Interviewer:** Moving to their ⁢offense, ‍you pointed out that⁤ their reliance on three-point shooting is ‍a cause for concern. ⁢Can you elaborate on that?

**John Smith:** Absolutely. While they have some capable shooters, ⁢their offensive ​strategy appears‌ overly dependent on being able to create open looks beyond the arc. ‌The problem​ is they⁢ lack a consistent post presence and the means to penetrate defenses effectively. This limits the effectiveness of their shooters, as defenses can focus ‌on guarding the three-point line easily when inside options aren’t established.

**Interviewer:** The newcomers have‍ drawn some‍ criticism⁢ as well. What’s⁢ your take on their contributions so far?

**John ⁢Smith:** It’s been underwhelming, to say the least. With⁤ so many fresh ⁢faces ‌and transfers, there was hope they would‍ step up, ‌but ⁣players like​ TJ Power have ​struggled significantly. Their performance in The Bahamas was especially disappointing—none of the newcomers managed to provide a significant impact, which is disheartening. It’s still early in the season, so there may be room for growth, but these ⁢losses ⁤could be a wake-up call they desperately ⁤need.

**Interviewer:** Considering their⁣ current‌ record and upcoming games against Manhattan and Holy Cross, how crucial is it for UVA to bounce ‌back quickly?

**John Smith:** It’s vital. They ‌need to regain confidence and identity‍ before facing tougher opponents in the upcoming games. Building momentum can really ⁣help blend ⁢the new players into the team’s framework. If they don’t turn things around soon, the psychological toll‍ of consecutive losses could compound the ‍issues they’re ‍already facing.

**Interviewer:** Thank you⁢ for your insights,‌ John. It’s definitely going to be interesting​ to see how the Cavaliers ‍respond.

**John Smith:** My pleasure! I’m looking forward‍ to seeing if ‌they can make the adjustments necessary for‌ success.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Virginia Cavaliers men’s basketball team is just under 36 hours away from officially launching its highly anticipated 2024-25 season, eager to return to postseason prominence.

As the countdown to the season opener dwindles, I reached out to fans on Twitter to compile a comprehensive final preseason mailbag that will revisit key narratives surrounding the team.

We’re now halfway through the current decade without an NCAA tournament win, despite having rosters far more talented than this one — why should I be optimistic that this is the year UVA breaks the drought?

This stretch has been challenging for the Virginia basketball program, yet as we gear up for a new campaign, it’s essential to spotlight reasons for enthusiasm surrounding this year’s squad.

The assertion that this roster is less talented than those of previous years is indeed valid. Nevertheless, I firmly believe a select few players possess the potential to be game-changers throughout the ACC schedule.

Isaac McKneely emerged as the best shooting guard for Virginia since Kyle Guy and is entering his third year after a solid performance last season, averaging 12.3 points per game and boasting a remarkable 44.5% shooting rate from beyond the arc on 5.5 attempts. He must broaden his skill set as UVA’s primary playmaker, but his shooting prowess provides real potential for stardom.

Elijah Saunders will serve as a versatile Swiss army knife for this Virginia squad. His role will encompass various defensive assignments, from guarding centers to challenging big guards. Offensively, he has the ability to stretch the floor with three-point shooting and is set to emerge as one of the team’s top rebounders.

Additionally, UVA is implementing the much-needed schematic changes that have been overdue for several years. These updates should enhance the team’s overall performance level and inject much-needed energy into the offense, even amidst a roster of less proven talent.

A wealth of young players with significant promise bolsters the optimism. If several of these players manage to rise to the occasion, the team could indeed snap its NCAA tournament win dry spell. While some setbacks are likely, including potential double-digit losses, the upside remains bright.

Noteworthy true freshmen like Ishan Sharma and Jacob Cofie are expected to contribute vital energy off the bench early. TJ Power arrives with five-star credentials, while Blake Buchanan possesses the raw tools necessary to evolve into a strong presence in the post. If enough of these athletes surpass expectations, we could witness some unexpected chemistry develop that propels the program toward its first NCAA tournament triumph in six years.

Who do you expect to take the biggest step forward this year and why will this player’s success be vital to the Wahoos’ overall chances in March?

I have not sold my Blake Buchanan stock and remain fully committed to his potential impact. Perhaps I’ll ride the wave with him. Historically, Virginia centers fitting Buchanan’s profile have been enticing.

A defensive frontcourt featuring Saunders and Buchanan could prove exceptionally effective. Buchanan’s ability to protect the rim, coupled with his agility to cover the perimeter, alongside added weight to enhance his physicality in the low blocks, makes him a critical asset.

Everyone loves discussing the paramount importance of guard play in March Madness. However, I believe this Virginia team’s chances rest heavily on its ability to excel in larger lineups. If Buchanan can dominate the paint as a rim protector, effectively masking defensive shortcomings, and finish possessions smoothly at the offensive end, the foundation for success will be much more stable.

Based on what Coach Sanchez ran at Charlotte, what if any changes do you expect from UVA’s offense, defense, and rotations/lineups this year? I know it’s probably not a dramatic departure but how do you see the game plan evolving under Sanchez?

Great question.

UVA’s offensive strategy will see fresh dynamics this year, primarily due to offseason decisions orchestrated by Bennett and his staff rather than solely the transition to Sanchez as interim coach. The Cavaliers will adopt a more spaced floor approach, moving away from heavy reliance on mid-range shots, while implementing new plays featuring horns sets, zoom actions, and a commitment to exploiting individual matchups.

However, some elements of the existing framework will remain intact. The Cavaliers will continue to utilize their signature pin-down actions on the wings, strategically splitting the floor to identify the best shot opportunities while maintaining ball security.

The coaching changes prompted by Sanchez suggest a more balanced focus on defensive integrity. With Warley’s departure, it’s evident that Sanchez values offensive potential as well, as exemplified by the addition of Dai Dai Ames, who is viewed as a more promising offensive asset.

“Especially now that Coach Bennett retired, Coach Sanchez kind of sees me like that, guarding two through five,” he said. “I definitely feel like throughout this past week, they’ve challenged me to guard multiple positions.”

It appears that expectations are high for Saunders to step into some of the defensive responsibilities Warley would have managed under Bennett’s guidance.

On the offensive front, I anticipate Sanchez will likely be less inclined to revert to the traditional, longstanding strategies employed by the program under Bennett. At Charlotte, he effectively executed a read-and-react, four-out offensive style that incorporated fluid cutting, innovative ball screen setups, and a departure from the rigid tactics Virginia has used for over a decade.

While it’s unlikely we’ll adopt that play style this season, the commitment to an open and versatile offensive approach will remain, prioritizing floor spacing and transition opportunities while empowering players to make impactful plays.

Defensively, the Cavaliers will remain committed to their foundational pack-line scheme. While personnel and rotations may undergo adjustments, UVA will continue to rely heavily on ball assistance, hedge most ball screens, establish double teams in the post when necessary, and aim to collapse the defense to secure rebounds.

What does Jalen Warley’s departure mean for Andrew Rohde?

Without Warley in the picture, Rohde’s status shifts dramatically—from competing for minutes to securing one of the primary spots off the bench when the season begins. Rohde is set to assume the role of backup point guard to Dai Dai Ames.

With Warley leaving, UVA loses its essential experience at point guard. Rohde has at least one year navigating the Virginia system, demonstrating solid defensive acumen while maintaining reasonable ball-handling satisfaction. However, his inconsistent shooting percentages last season raised concerns among Wahoo fans, and he does not quite match the defensive shrewdness that made Warley such a valuable contributor.

If Ames or redshirt freshman Christian Bliss emerges with significant improvement, Rohde may find himself further down the depth chart.

Do you expect Sanchez to go away from having two ball handlers on the court at the same time? As in, will Ames/Bliss be able to run the show and keep more shooters on the floor?

I think UVA was poised to pivot away from deploying two ball handlers on the floor, irrespective of Bennett’s retirement. This shift aligns with the current roster dynamics and is amplified by Warley’s exit.

Yet, I remain uncertain how proficient Ames, Rohde, or Bliss will be at generating offensive plays autonomously. There exists a stark contrast between maintaining a fluid offensive flow and the defined responsibilities expected from Virginia’s point guards over the past several seasons.

Of the three contenders, Ames appears closest to embodying the successful point guard archetype that UVA has previously embraced. However, lingering doubts arise regarding his ability to minimize turnovers after experiencing a 25.3% turnover rate relative to his 18.6% assist rate as a freshman.

I remain uncertain. Nonetheless, he possesses a clear opportunity to dominate minutes at the position while the others are likely to function as supporting contributors.

There are so many uncertainties, but where will we see improvement from this team compared to last season?

Determining whether the shift away from mid-range shots while enhancing three-point shooting will yield significant results remains uncertain at this stage. However, it’s unmistakably clear that UVA will enjoy a marked improvement in shot quality this season.

What’s your pitch for fans that are thinking about disengaging and spending less time following this team? Why is it worth it to watch the team this year? Why might this not be the beginning of the end of the UVA basketball program’s status as a heavyweight?

Tony Bennett’s retirement struck a disheartening chord among fans. For those who intimately associate Virginia basketball with his leadership, acclimating to this transition is undoubtedly challenging.

My argument for fans to maintain their engagement this season and beyond centers on the remarkable legacy Bennett leaves. When UVA hired him 15 years ago, the level of success he achieved was unexpected. Why can’t lightning strike twice for Virginia hoops?

This season serves as a litmus test to determine if the Bennett model can persist and thrive despite undergoing changes with Sanchez at the helm. The allure lies in assessing whether the program can continue to operate within Bennett’s framework while striving for a progressive vision. If the Cavaliers secure a strong season and Sanchez solidifies his role, it may invigorate the program in a manner reminiscent of the Bennett era, but with a more innovative outlook.

Should the alternative occur and UVA opts for a national search to find its next head coach, there remains potential inner workings for the program’s revival if the next hire proves astute. There exists a unique thrill in watching a team emerge from the ashes: the lower expectations amplify the excitement for a team on an upward trajectory. Just source perspectives from current Washington Commanders fans for resonance.

Bennett’s reflections during his retirement address suggested that while winning had become a source of relief, losing felt unbearably catastrophic. This sentiment has prolonged amid the fan atmosphere and media perspectives over the last four years. A fresh chapter with a new leader combined with lowered expectations may well alleviate stress for the program and its supporters, even amidst the bittersweet farewell to an unparalleled coaching era.

Bennett diligently embodied the keystone of Virginia basketball for over a decade. Experiencing reduced emotional investment in the wake of his departure is entirely justifiable. Nevertheless, this athletic department and basketball program retains substantial support while pursuing excellence with integrity. The onus lies on maintaining this commitment—for now, there exists ample reason to keep faith in the ‘Hoos.

An be adapted and reimagined under Coach Sanchez’s ​leadership. Fans​ should be excited about the opportunity for a‍ fresh approach that still honors the‍ foundation laid by Bennett. With emerging talent and a commitment to revamping the offensive ⁣and defensive schemes, we’re likely to see not​ just a rebuilding ⁢year, but an ‌era that could lead to renewed success.

Moreover, the ​program’s history, strong recruiting, ‍and⁣ the development of young players create a fertile ground for growth. The excitement to watch these athletes ⁤evolve, coupled with a strategic shift that could‌ revitalize the game plan, is a compelling reason to stay engaged.

As for the⁢ long-term ⁢implications, the program’s ⁢commitment to excellence​ and the impressive⁢ infrastructure built ⁤over the ⁣years‌ suggest that this is far from the end of Virginia basketball as a heavyweight. The pillars of strong recruitment, a dedicated fan base, and⁢ the culture established through ⁣years of hard work and ‌discipline​ remain intact.⁣ Thus, fans should tune in not only to support⁣ the⁣ current ‌squad but to witness the potential beginnings ​of a ⁢new chapter in UVA ⁣basketball history—one that preserves the past while boldly stepping into the future.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.